DOE Awards Nuclear Grant to Three-Mile Island Firm
Administration pushing modular nukes: 'best thing since sliced bread'
The Energy Department awarded a grant on Tuesday to Babcock & Wilcox--best known for its design of Three Mile Island--for a class of small nuclear reactors.
The North Carolina-based company will receive an unspecified portion of a $452 million Department of Energy grant that aims to speed commercialization of modular nuclear reactors.
"The Obama administration continues to believe that low-carbon nuclear energy has an important role to play in America's energy future," said Energy Secretary Steven Chu in a statement Tuesday.
Modular reactors, about one-third the size of a conventional nuclear power plant, are designed to be less expensive--and supposedly safer--than existing plants.
"The newest reactor is always the greatest thing since sliced bread," said Arjun Makhijani, president of the nonprofit Institute for Energy and Environmental Research in Maryland. "We've always been told that nuclear reactors are economical." He adds:
I simply do not believe that reactors properly designed with adequate safety systems would be cheaper than large reactors. You have to worry about if there are leaks. You have to worry about containment.
What will be the cost of guarding these reactors? All these things are being said about the safety and attractiveness of these reactors without a single one having gone through licensing with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Anti-nuclear activist Harvey Wasserman writes that the "small modular nukes must still be fought," adding that "the numbers on this imperfect technology do not work without massive taxpayer subsidies or public liability insurance."
The Obama administration is promoting their development as part of an "all-of-the-above" approach to American energy production.
After a "cooperative agreement" is reached with B&W, the DOE will use remaining program funds to finance other reactor designs.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Energy Department awarded a grant on Tuesday to Babcock & Wilcox--best known for its design of Three Mile Island--for a class of small nuclear reactors.
The North Carolina-based company will receive an unspecified portion of a $452 million Department of Energy grant that aims to speed commercialization of modular nuclear reactors.
"The Obama administration continues to believe that low-carbon nuclear energy has an important role to play in America's energy future," said Energy Secretary Steven Chu in a statement Tuesday.
Modular reactors, about one-third the size of a conventional nuclear power plant, are designed to be less expensive--and supposedly safer--than existing plants.
"The newest reactor is always the greatest thing since sliced bread," said Arjun Makhijani, president of the nonprofit Institute for Energy and Environmental Research in Maryland. "We've always been told that nuclear reactors are economical." He adds:
I simply do not believe that reactors properly designed with adequate safety systems would be cheaper than large reactors. You have to worry about if there are leaks. You have to worry about containment.
What will be the cost of guarding these reactors? All these things are being said about the safety and attractiveness of these reactors without a single one having gone through licensing with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Anti-nuclear activist Harvey Wasserman writes that the "small modular nukes must still be fought," adding that "the numbers on this imperfect technology do not work without massive taxpayer subsidies or public liability insurance."
The Obama administration is promoting their development as part of an "all-of-the-above" approach to American energy production.
After a "cooperative agreement" is reached with B&W, the DOE will use remaining program funds to finance other reactor designs.
The Energy Department awarded a grant on Tuesday to Babcock & Wilcox--best known for its design of Three Mile Island--for a class of small nuclear reactors.
The North Carolina-based company will receive an unspecified portion of a $452 million Department of Energy grant that aims to speed commercialization of modular nuclear reactors.
"The Obama administration continues to believe that low-carbon nuclear energy has an important role to play in America's energy future," said Energy Secretary Steven Chu in a statement Tuesday.
Modular reactors, about one-third the size of a conventional nuclear power plant, are designed to be less expensive--and supposedly safer--than existing plants.
"The newest reactor is always the greatest thing since sliced bread," said Arjun Makhijani, president of the nonprofit Institute for Energy and Environmental Research in Maryland. "We've always been told that nuclear reactors are economical." He adds:
I simply do not believe that reactors properly designed with adequate safety systems would be cheaper than large reactors. You have to worry about if there are leaks. You have to worry about containment.
What will be the cost of guarding these reactors? All these things are being said about the safety and attractiveness of these reactors without a single one having gone through licensing with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Anti-nuclear activist Harvey Wasserman writes that the "small modular nukes must still be fought," adding that "the numbers on this imperfect technology do not work without massive taxpayer subsidies or public liability insurance."
The Obama administration is promoting their development as part of an "all-of-the-above" approach to American energy production.
After a "cooperative agreement" is reached with B&W, the DOE will use remaining program funds to finance other reactor designs.