Taming Inflation Can Be Worse Than Inflation
One of the biggest threats to the moneyed class is inflation because it hurts those who have a lot of money, but can help those who owe a lot of money
The ghost of John Crow haunts us still.
In his seven years as Governor of the Bank of Canada starting in 1987, Crow presided like a gunslinging vigilante over the Canadian economy, relentlessly raising interest rates in his battle against inflation -- even though Canadian inflation wasn't really much of a problem (peaking at 5.6 percent a year in 1991).
Crow's conquest of inflation came at a high price for millions of Canadians -- many of whom are still struggling to regain economic ground they lost when his punishingly high-interest rates pushed Canada into deep recession in 1990-92, throwing hundreds of thousands out of work.
Since the Crow era ended in 1994, the Bank has stayed on the track he established -- keeping inflation rigidly in check, never allowing it to stray much above 2 percent a year.
Now, with a recovering economy in the wake of the pandemic, the bank has allowed our inflation rate to creep up to 4.7 percent -- a far cry from "runaway" or "galloping" inflation. Even so, it's prompting howls of outrage from Bay Street.
Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland moved to reassure Bay Street earlier this week, announcing that inflation-fighting will remain unequivocally the top priority of the Bank of Canada for the next five years. In renewing the bank's mandate like this, she has kept Canada on the very-low inflation path Crow established years ago.
There had been speculation she might buck the financial establishment and create a "dual mandate," requiring the bank to prioritize not just fighting inflation but also battling the real scourge faced by workers -- high unemployment.
In the end, she appeased Bay Street, settling for vague instructions that the Bank also keep an eye on labor markets.
Although few Canadians were lying awake at night wondering what Freeland would decide, in fact, her decision will be one of the most consequential in shaping post-pandemic Canada.
Many Canadians may soon actually suffer from insomnia, terrified of losing their homes due to crippling interest rates -- as so many did in the early '90s.
Bay Street isn't shy about advocating higher interest rates. Earlier this week, prominent inflation hawk William Robson published an op-ed calling for higher rates -- possibly much higher.
As CEO of the corporate-funded C.D. Howe Institute, Robson is always on guard against anything threatening the interests of the wealthy. And one of the biggest threats to the moneyed class is inflation.
That's because inflation erodes the real value of money. This hurts people who have a lot of money, but can help those who owe a lot of money.
Imagine you owe the bank $50,000. If the dollar's value is eroded by 5 per cent inflation, then the real cost of repaying that debt shrinks by 5 percent -- benefiting you and hurting the bank.
Of course, inflation also means higher prices for consumer goods, which hurts workers -- unless their wages are growing as fast or faster.
While Canadian inflation is running at 4.7 percent, Canadian wages are also rising. For some of the most disadvantaged workers (new hires), average wages are growing at the impressive rate of 10 percent a year -- putting them well ahead of inflation.
And this booming labor market may get better yet, as contracts expire and new ones are negotiated at a time when workers are wielding more power than they have in decades.
It is this resurgent bargaining power of workers that the corporate elite truly fears.
Of course, the standard media narrative is that everyone should be very worried about inflation. Here's a simple question to determine whether you should be: Am I rich?
If the answer is no, chances are you'd be better off with a little inflation than with high-interest rates aimed at crushing it.
While celebrated at the C.D. Howe Institute, John Crow's brutal legacy properly belongs in the history books.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The ghost of John Crow haunts us still.
In his seven years as Governor of the Bank of Canada starting in 1987, Crow presided like a gunslinging vigilante over the Canadian economy, relentlessly raising interest rates in his battle against inflation -- even though Canadian inflation wasn't really much of a problem (peaking at 5.6 percent a year in 1991).
Crow's conquest of inflation came at a high price for millions of Canadians -- many of whom are still struggling to regain economic ground they lost when his punishingly high-interest rates pushed Canada into deep recession in 1990-92, throwing hundreds of thousands out of work.
Since the Crow era ended in 1994, the Bank has stayed on the track he established -- keeping inflation rigidly in check, never allowing it to stray much above 2 percent a year.
Now, with a recovering economy in the wake of the pandemic, the bank has allowed our inflation rate to creep up to 4.7 percent -- a far cry from "runaway" or "galloping" inflation. Even so, it's prompting howls of outrage from Bay Street.
Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland moved to reassure Bay Street earlier this week, announcing that inflation-fighting will remain unequivocally the top priority of the Bank of Canada for the next five years. In renewing the bank's mandate like this, she has kept Canada on the very-low inflation path Crow established years ago.
There had been speculation she might buck the financial establishment and create a "dual mandate," requiring the bank to prioritize not just fighting inflation but also battling the real scourge faced by workers -- high unemployment.
In the end, she appeased Bay Street, settling for vague instructions that the Bank also keep an eye on labor markets.
Although few Canadians were lying awake at night wondering what Freeland would decide, in fact, her decision will be one of the most consequential in shaping post-pandemic Canada.
Many Canadians may soon actually suffer from insomnia, terrified of losing their homes due to crippling interest rates -- as so many did in the early '90s.
Bay Street isn't shy about advocating higher interest rates. Earlier this week, prominent inflation hawk William Robson published an op-ed calling for higher rates -- possibly much higher.
As CEO of the corporate-funded C.D. Howe Institute, Robson is always on guard against anything threatening the interests of the wealthy. And one of the biggest threats to the moneyed class is inflation.
That's because inflation erodes the real value of money. This hurts people who have a lot of money, but can help those who owe a lot of money.
Imagine you owe the bank $50,000. If the dollar's value is eroded by 5 per cent inflation, then the real cost of repaying that debt shrinks by 5 percent -- benefiting you and hurting the bank.
Of course, inflation also means higher prices for consumer goods, which hurts workers -- unless their wages are growing as fast or faster.
While Canadian inflation is running at 4.7 percent, Canadian wages are also rising. For some of the most disadvantaged workers (new hires), average wages are growing at the impressive rate of 10 percent a year -- putting them well ahead of inflation.
And this booming labor market may get better yet, as contracts expire and new ones are negotiated at a time when workers are wielding more power than they have in decades.
It is this resurgent bargaining power of workers that the corporate elite truly fears.
Of course, the standard media narrative is that everyone should be very worried about inflation. Here's a simple question to determine whether you should be: Am I rich?
If the answer is no, chances are you'd be better off with a little inflation than with high-interest rates aimed at crushing it.
While celebrated at the C.D. Howe Institute, John Crow's brutal legacy properly belongs in the history books.
The ghost of John Crow haunts us still.
In his seven years as Governor of the Bank of Canada starting in 1987, Crow presided like a gunslinging vigilante over the Canadian economy, relentlessly raising interest rates in his battle against inflation -- even though Canadian inflation wasn't really much of a problem (peaking at 5.6 percent a year in 1991).
Crow's conquest of inflation came at a high price for millions of Canadians -- many of whom are still struggling to regain economic ground they lost when his punishingly high-interest rates pushed Canada into deep recession in 1990-92, throwing hundreds of thousands out of work.
Since the Crow era ended in 1994, the Bank has stayed on the track he established -- keeping inflation rigidly in check, never allowing it to stray much above 2 percent a year.
Now, with a recovering economy in the wake of the pandemic, the bank has allowed our inflation rate to creep up to 4.7 percent -- a far cry from "runaway" or "galloping" inflation. Even so, it's prompting howls of outrage from Bay Street.
Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland moved to reassure Bay Street earlier this week, announcing that inflation-fighting will remain unequivocally the top priority of the Bank of Canada for the next five years. In renewing the bank's mandate like this, she has kept Canada on the very-low inflation path Crow established years ago.
There had been speculation she might buck the financial establishment and create a "dual mandate," requiring the bank to prioritize not just fighting inflation but also battling the real scourge faced by workers -- high unemployment.
In the end, she appeased Bay Street, settling for vague instructions that the Bank also keep an eye on labor markets.
Although few Canadians were lying awake at night wondering what Freeland would decide, in fact, her decision will be one of the most consequential in shaping post-pandemic Canada.
Many Canadians may soon actually suffer from insomnia, terrified of losing their homes due to crippling interest rates -- as so many did in the early '90s.
Bay Street isn't shy about advocating higher interest rates. Earlier this week, prominent inflation hawk William Robson published an op-ed calling for higher rates -- possibly much higher.
As CEO of the corporate-funded C.D. Howe Institute, Robson is always on guard against anything threatening the interests of the wealthy. And one of the biggest threats to the moneyed class is inflation.
That's because inflation erodes the real value of money. This hurts people who have a lot of money, but can help those who owe a lot of money.
Imagine you owe the bank $50,000. If the dollar's value is eroded by 5 per cent inflation, then the real cost of repaying that debt shrinks by 5 percent -- benefiting you and hurting the bank.
Of course, inflation also means higher prices for consumer goods, which hurts workers -- unless their wages are growing as fast or faster.
While Canadian inflation is running at 4.7 percent, Canadian wages are also rising. For some of the most disadvantaged workers (new hires), average wages are growing at the impressive rate of 10 percent a year -- putting them well ahead of inflation.
And this booming labor market may get better yet, as contracts expire and new ones are negotiated at a time when workers are wielding more power than they have in decades.
It is this resurgent bargaining power of workers that the corporate elite truly fears.
Of course, the standard media narrative is that everyone should be very worried about inflation. Here's a simple question to determine whether you should be: Am I rich?
If the answer is no, chances are you'd be better off with a little inflation than with high-interest rates aimed at crushing it.
While celebrated at the C.D. Howe Institute, John Crow's brutal legacy properly belongs in the history books.