SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
U.S. Vice President Joe Biden (L) sits with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu before a dinner at the Prime Minister's residence March 9, 2010 in Jerusalem, Israel. (Photo: Baz Ratner-Pool/Getty Images)
If Biden Is Serious About Ending Forever Wars, the US Needs to End Support for Israel
Cutting military aid to a state that oppresses its Palestinian population would show that the U.S. is serious about human rights.
May 13, 2021
President Joe Biden's announcement that the U.S. will withdraw its troops from Afghanistan is a much-needed start to the dissolution of U.S. militarism in the Middle East. More than 2,400 U.S. troops and more than 100,000 Afghans, including 47,000 civilians, are estimated to have died as a result of the conflict. Ending this forever war was the right decision for all parties involved.
But U.S. influence in the region enables, advances and causes violence far beyond Afghanistan. Ending this war must be viewed as the beginning, not the end, of a major shift in U.S. foreign policy.
If the U.S. truly wants to commit to being a broker of peace on a global scale, it must also end support for Israel as long as the country continues to enact a regime of apartheid over the Palestinians.
We must put an end to our support for Israel as long as they continue to oppress Palestinians as an apartheid state.
Democrats who claim to be progressives have a responsibility to stand against state violence of all forms and the U.S. funding that supports it. Therefore, if the United States truly wants to be committed to brokering peace in the region, we must also put an end to our support for Israel as long as they continue to oppress Palestinians as an apartheid state.
Recently, Israeli police raided al-Aqsa Mosque using tear gas and rubber bullets to injure over 300 people, many of whom were taken to the hospital in critical conditions. As a Black American, the history of my people in the United States is riddled with instances of violence inflicted on places of worship. These attacks are now widely condemned, especially by elected officials. We should maintain these same standards of safety for places of worship in Israel/Palestine and across the globe.
Last year alone, the Israeli government demolished 848 Palestinian residential and livelihood structures, displacing around 1,000 people; killed at least 133 Palestinians, including 28 children, and continued its 13-year illegal blockade of the Gaza Strip. Yet, despite such deplorable and overt violence, the U.S. continues to support Israel.
The U.S. gives Israel $3.8bn annually, mostly for security and military purposes, without conditioning that aid on a commitment that the Israeli government end its vast, long-lasting and well-documented human rights abuses against Palestinians. Not only is this aid an endorsement of state-sanctioned violations of human rights; it's also troubling coming from a country that cannot even figure out how to fund healthcare for its own citizens.
Committing to regional peace
In addition to discontinuing aid until Israel ends its practice of state violence against Palestinians--as proposed in a recent bill put forward by Representative Betty McCollum--a full commitment to regional peace would also require the us to reverse many of the choices it previously made towards legitimising Israel's oppressive actions.
The U.S. cannot keep its embassy in Jerusalem, a disastrous decision by the Trump administration that legitimised Israeli claims to the disputed territory.
The U.S. could learn a great deal from reviewing its past dealings with another apartheid state. In 1986, the U.S. Congress enacted the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act, which imposed sanctions on South Africa and created five preconditions for lifting the sanctions that would have led to the end of apartheid in the country. South Africa's apartheid system formally ended in 1994.
By taking similar actions against the state of Israel, the U.S. could cement its position as a major influencer in the region. It would show that Washington has made the leap from a preoccupation with military achievements, to a real devotion to championing human rights around the globe.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Middle East Eye
Imani R Oakley
Imani R Oakley is an attorney and leading voice for people of colour, women, and the working class in New Jersey. A progressive political organiser and New Jersey native, she has worked to influence policy throughout the state and has been a public servant on the federal, state, and grassroots levels.
President Joe Biden's announcement that the U.S. will withdraw its troops from Afghanistan is a much-needed start to the dissolution of U.S. militarism in the Middle East. More than 2,400 U.S. troops and more than 100,000 Afghans, including 47,000 civilians, are estimated to have died as a result of the conflict. Ending this forever war was the right decision for all parties involved.
But U.S. influence in the region enables, advances and causes violence far beyond Afghanistan. Ending this war must be viewed as the beginning, not the end, of a major shift in U.S. foreign policy.
If the U.S. truly wants to commit to being a broker of peace on a global scale, it must also end support for Israel as long as the country continues to enact a regime of apartheid over the Palestinians.
We must put an end to our support for Israel as long as they continue to oppress Palestinians as an apartheid state.
Democrats who claim to be progressives have a responsibility to stand against state violence of all forms and the U.S. funding that supports it. Therefore, if the United States truly wants to be committed to brokering peace in the region, we must also put an end to our support for Israel as long as they continue to oppress Palestinians as an apartheid state.
Recently, Israeli police raided al-Aqsa Mosque using tear gas and rubber bullets to injure over 300 people, many of whom were taken to the hospital in critical conditions. As a Black American, the history of my people in the United States is riddled with instances of violence inflicted on places of worship. These attacks are now widely condemned, especially by elected officials. We should maintain these same standards of safety for places of worship in Israel/Palestine and across the globe.
Last year alone, the Israeli government demolished 848 Palestinian residential and livelihood structures, displacing around 1,000 people; killed at least 133 Palestinians, including 28 children, and continued its 13-year illegal blockade of the Gaza Strip. Yet, despite such deplorable and overt violence, the U.S. continues to support Israel.
The U.S. gives Israel $3.8bn annually, mostly for security and military purposes, without conditioning that aid on a commitment that the Israeli government end its vast, long-lasting and well-documented human rights abuses against Palestinians. Not only is this aid an endorsement of state-sanctioned violations of human rights; it's also troubling coming from a country that cannot even figure out how to fund healthcare for its own citizens.
Committing to regional peace
In addition to discontinuing aid until Israel ends its practice of state violence against Palestinians--as proposed in a recent bill put forward by Representative Betty McCollum--a full commitment to regional peace would also require the us to reverse many of the choices it previously made towards legitimising Israel's oppressive actions.
The U.S. cannot keep its embassy in Jerusalem, a disastrous decision by the Trump administration that legitimised Israeli claims to the disputed territory.
The U.S. could learn a great deal from reviewing its past dealings with another apartheid state. In 1986, the U.S. Congress enacted the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act, which imposed sanctions on South Africa and created five preconditions for lifting the sanctions that would have led to the end of apartheid in the country. South Africa's apartheid system formally ended in 1994.
By taking similar actions against the state of Israel, the U.S. could cement its position as a major influencer in the region. It would show that Washington has made the leap from a preoccupation with military achievements, to a real devotion to championing human rights around the globe.
Imani R Oakley
Imani R Oakley is an attorney and leading voice for people of colour, women, and the working class in New Jersey. A progressive political organiser and New Jersey native, she has worked to influence policy throughout the state and has been a public servant on the federal, state, and grassroots levels.
President Joe Biden's announcement that the U.S. will withdraw its troops from Afghanistan is a much-needed start to the dissolution of U.S. militarism in the Middle East. More than 2,400 U.S. troops and more than 100,000 Afghans, including 47,000 civilians, are estimated to have died as a result of the conflict. Ending this forever war was the right decision for all parties involved.
But U.S. influence in the region enables, advances and causes violence far beyond Afghanistan. Ending this war must be viewed as the beginning, not the end, of a major shift in U.S. foreign policy.
If the U.S. truly wants to commit to being a broker of peace on a global scale, it must also end support for Israel as long as the country continues to enact a regime of apartheid over the Palestinians.
We must put an end to our support for Israel as long as they continue to oppress Palestinians as an apartheid state.
Democrats who claim to be progressives have a responsibility to stand against state violence of all forms and the U.S. funding that supports it. Therefore, if the United States truly wants to be committed to brokering peace in the region, we must also put an end to our support for Israel as long as they continue to oppress Palestinians as an apartheid state.
Recently, Israeli police raided al-Aqsa Mosque using tear gas and rubber bullets to injure over 300 people, many of whom were taken to the hospital in critical conditions. As a Black American, the history of my people in the United States is riddled with instances of violence inflicted on places of worship. These attacks are now widely condemned, especially by elected officials. We should maintain these same standards of safety for places of worship in Israel/Palestine and across the globe.
Last year alone, the Israeli government demolished 848 Palestinian residential and livelihood structures, displacing around 1,000 people; killed at least 133 Palestinians, including 28 children, and continued its 13-year illegal blockade of the Gaza Strip. Yet, despite such deplorable and overt violence, the U.S. continues to support Israel.
The U.S. gives Israel $3.8bn annually, mostly for security and military purposes, without conditioning that aid on a commitment that the Israeli government end its vast, long-lasting and well-documented human rights abuses against Palestinians. Not only is this aid an endorsement of state-sanctioned violations of human rights; it's also troubling coming from a country that cannot even figure out how to fund healthcare for its own citizens.
Committing to regional peace
In addition to discontinuing aid until Israel ends its practice of state violence against Palestinians--as proposed in a recent bill put forward by Representative Betty McCollum--a full commitment to regional peace would also require the us to reverse many of the choices it previously made towards legitimising Israel's oppressive actions.
The U.S. cannot keep its embassy in Jerusalem, a disastrous decision by the Trump administration that legitimised Israeli claims to the disputed territory.
The U.S. could learn a great deal from reviewing its past dealings with another apartheid state. In 1986, the U.S. Congress enacted the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act, which imposed sanctions on South Africa and created five preconditions for lifting the sanctions that would have led to the end of apartheid in the country. South Africa's apartheid system formally ended in 1994.
By taking similar actions against the state of Israel, the U.S. could cement its position as a major influencer in the region. It would show that Washington has made the leap from a preoccupation with military achievements, to a real devotion to championing human rights around the globe.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.