Death and Denial
On June 9, 2008, at least 60 dolphins stranded along the coast of Cornwall, England, in what was by far the largest common dolphin mortality ever seen in UK waters. For hours, rescuers tried to lead them back to sea - often unsuccessfully, as some of the animals were panicked and others just milled about in tight circles, resistant to saving.
For several days before the strandings, the Royal Navy ran a large, multinational event, which included the U.S. Navy and involved active sonar and other disruptive activities, off the Cornish coast. That event, the investigators concluded, was closely correlated in space and time with the dolphins entering Falmouth Bay and eventually coming ashore. All other possible causes - disease, algal blooms, malnourishment - were eliminated.
The implication of naval exercises in a mass stranding will come as no surprise to those who have followed this issue in the States. Nor will the Royal Navy's perfunctory denial, which, as reported in the Daily Mail, seems awfully similar to what we have heard over the years from the U.S. Navy.
In the case of mass strandings, what navy officials always seem to demand after the fact is some definitive, minute-by-minute record of the victims' movements before beaching, as though it were possible to stick a tag on every whale and dolphin in the sea. Until biologists can provide that infeasible level of proof, the navy refuses responsibility. But really the Cornwall case is simple: a gun was fired, there were bodies, and no one else was in the room.
It's long past time for both navies to stop denying the obvious and do something meaningful to reduce harm, like putting especially vulnerable habitat off limits to dangerous training. In this country - where our Navy has requested permission to harm marine mammals 30 million times over the next five years without improving its mitigation plan - perhaps even more than in Cornwall, that may be something we have to fight for.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
For several days before the strandings, the Royal Navy ran a large, multinational event, which included the U.S. Navy and involved active sonar and other disruptive activities, off the Cornish coast. That event, the investigators concluded, was closely correlated in space and time with the dolphins entering Falmouth Bay and eventually coming ashore. All other possible causes - disease, algal blooms, malnourishment - were eliminated.
The implication of naval exercises in a mass stranding will come as no surprise to those who have followed this issue in the States. Nor will the Royal Navy's perfunctory denial, which, as reported in the Daily Mail, seems awfully similar to what we have heard over the years from the U.S. Navy.
In the case of mass strandings, what navy officials always seem to demand after the fact is some definitive, minute-by-minute record of the victims' movements before beaching, as though it were possible to stick a tag on every whale and dolphin in the sea. Until biologists can provide that infeasible level of proof, the navy refuses responsibility. But really the Cornwall case is simple: a gun was fired, there were bodies, and no one else was in the room.
It's long past time for both navies to stop denying the obvious and do something meaningful to reduce harm, like putting especially vulnerable habitat off limits to dangerous training. In this country - where our Navy has requested permission to harm marine mammals 30 million times over the next five years without improving its mitigation plan - perhaps even more than in Cornwall, that may be something we have to fight for.
For several days before the strandings, the Royal Navy ran a large, multinational event, which included the U.S. Navy and involved active sonar and other disruptive activities, off the Cornish coast. That event, the investigators concluded, was closely correlated in space and time with the dolphins entering Falmouth Bay and eventually coming ashore. All other possible causes - disease, algal blooms, malnourishment - were eliminated.
The implication of naval exercises in a mass stranding will come as no surprise to those who have followed this issue in the States. Nor will the Royal Navy's perfunctory denial, which, as reported in the Daily Mail, seems awfully similar to what we have heard over the years from the U.S. Navy.
In the case of mass strandings, what navy officials always seem to demand after the fact is some definitive, minute-by-minute record of the victims' movements before beaching, as though it were possible to stick a tag on every whale and dolphin in the sea. Until biologists can provide that infeasible level of proof, the navy refuses responsibility. But really the Cornwall case is simple: a gun was fired, there were bodies, and no one else was in the room.
It's long past time for both navies to stop denying the obvious and do something meaningful to reduce harm, like putting especially vulnerable habitat off limits to dangerous training. In this country - where our Navy has requested permission to harm marine mammals 30 million times over the next five years without improving its mitigation plan - perhaps even more than in Cornwall, that may be something we have to fight for.