NY Times Continues to Blame Schools and Teachers for Poverty and Penury
The Business Roundtable's Rube Goldberg plan for evaluating teachers in Tennessee (and other venues with RTTT money) has met with almost universal disdain, a response that has brought CEOs running out of their penthouses to dictate responses for the corporate media editorial pages.
The New York Times, which never saw a corporate education idea it didn't like, published its own tribute to the current effort by the Oligarchs of Ed on Saturday, with an editorial in support of Tennessee's ridiculous plan based on "value-added" test scores and an observation instrument that assures that thousands of good teachers will lose their tenure, if not their jobs. And thousands more will lose their love of teaching.
From the Times education experts on Saturday, which, with a date or two changed, could have been written any time during the past 30 years of school and teacher bashing:
Tennessee's need to do better was underscored when the latest National Assessment of Educational Progress, also known as the nation's report card, ranked the state near the bottom in fourth-grade math performance, just ahead of Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi. These dismal results -- slightly worse than those reported in 2009 -- were made public earlier this month during legislative hearings on the evaluation system.
Yes, Tennessee test scores are abysmal, but, first off, let's at least get their ranking correct. As you can see the scores from 1992-2011 below, NAEP numbers have been flat for a long time, with the flattest coming during the most recent and most intense test-and-punish period of the NCLB conflagration.
Tennessee NAEP Math
1992--211
1996--219
2000--220
2003--228
2005--232
2007--233
2009--232
2011--233
Tennessee NAEP Reading
1992--212
1994--213
1998--212
2002--214
2003--212
2005--214
2007--216
2009--217
2011--215
Most interesting, too, is the fact that the Sanders Miracle of value-added testing (TVAAS) started in 1992. This is the same value-added miracle-turned-mirage that corporate water carriers like Brent Staples of the Times Editorial Board want to impose on the rest of the nation.
So with Tennessee test scores pancaked, some other states without the benefit of the Sanders Miracle have moved ahead, thus lowering Tennessee even further:
Progress from other states [from 2009 to 2011] lowered Tennessee's rankings:
* From 45th to 46th in the nation in fourth-grade math
* From 39th to 41st in fourth-grade reading
* From 43rd to 45th in eighth-grade math
* From 34th to 41st in eighth-grade reading.
Most interesting for those who pretend to believe that more failed corporate education reforms will improve learning in Tennessee, or anywhere else, are facts related to education spending in Tennessee, which exactly matches Tennessee's testing rank among states. A Compendium of State Education Rankings ranks Tennessee 44th in per pupil spending at $6,855 (based on NEA data from 2005).
Another coincidence, no doubt: a report earlier this year by U. S. News ranked Tennessee's kids, that's right, 44th in "smartness" based on NAEP data.
And the biggest coincidence yet that relates to Tennessee's ranking on tests? Only 5 other states (Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Arkansas) have higher percentages of children living in poverty than Tennessee, which is tied with Texas, South Carolina and Kentucky with 26% of its children living in poverty.
So Mr. Staples, you and the other privileged and invested education opinionators of the New York Times Editorial Board need to do more than you have done historically to educate the public on education issues. Rather than doubling down on another generation of failed reforms that have deformed our public schools, why not examine the facts, rather than dismissing them in favor of foundation press releases? Why not offer something to the 99% of your readers who are looking for illumination on the issues, rather than diversionary misinformation that you print to serve the hedge fund 1%ers of Wall Street? Why not, in fact, read the most recent brief by the Education Writers Association, which points to the lack of research to back up the corporate education policies you are pushing? Why not read, in fact, your own best reporter who has talked to people to Tennessee to expose the house of cards that you continue to prop up?
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Business Roundtable's Rube Goldberg plan for evaluating teachers in Tennessee (and other venues with RTTT money) has met with almost universal disdain, a response that has brought CEOs running out of their penthouses to dictate responses for the corporate media editorial pages.
The New York Times, which never saw a corporate education idea it didn't like, published its own tribute to the current effort by the Oligarchs of Ed on Saturday, with an editorial in support of Tennessee's ridiculous plan based on "value-added" test scores and an observation instrument that assures that thousands of good teachers will lose their tenure, if not their jobs. And thousands more will lose their love of teaching.
From the Times education experts on Saturday, which, with a date or two changed, could have been written any time during the past 30 years of school and teacher bashing:
Tennessee's need to do better was underscored when the latest National Assessment of Educational Progress, also known as the nation's report card, ranked the state near the bottom in fourth-grade math performance, just ahead of Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi. These dismal results -- slightly worse than those reported in 2009 -- were made public earlier this month during legislative hearings on the evaluation system.
Yes, Tennessee test scores are abysmal, but, first off, let's at least get their ranking correct. As you can see the scores from 1992-2011 below, NAEP numbers have been flat for a long time, with the flattest coming during the most recent and most intense test-and-punish period of the NCLB conflagration.
Tennessee NAEP Math
1992--211
1996--219
2000--220
2003--228
2005--232
2007--233
2009--232
2011--233
Tennessee NAEP Reading
1992--212
1994--213
1998--212
2002--214
2003--212
2005--214
2007--216
2009--217
2011--215
Most interesting, too, is the fact that the Sanders Miracle of value-added testing (TVAAS) started in 1992. This is the same value-added miracle-turned-mirage that corporate water carriers like Brent Staples of the Times Editorial Board want to impose on the rest of the nation.
So with Tennessee test scores pancaked, some other states without the benefit of the Sanders Miracle have moved ahead, thus lowering Tennessee even further:
Progress from other states [from 2009 to 2011] lowered Tennessee's rankings:
* From 45th to 46th in the nation in fourth-grade math
* From 39th to 41st in fourth-grade reading
* From 43rd to 45th in eighth-grade math
* From 34th to 41st in eighth-grade reading.
Most interesting for those who pretend to believe that more failed corporate education reforms will improve learning in Tennessee, or anywhere else, are facts related to education spending in Tennessee, which exactly matches Tennessee's testing rank among states. A Compendium of State Education Rankings ranks Tennessee 44th in per pupil spending at $6,855 (based on NEA data from 2005).
Another coincidence, no doubt: a report earlier this year by U. S. News ranked Tennessee's kids, that's right, 44th in "smartness" based on NAEP data.
And the biggest coincidence yet that relates to Tennessee's ranking on tests? Only 5 other states (Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Arkansas) have higher percentages of children living in poverty than Tennessee, which is tied with Texas, South Carolina and Kentucky with 26% of its children living in poverty.
So Mr. Staples, you and the other privileged and invested education opinionators of the New York Times Editorial Board need to do more than you have done historically to educate the public on education issues. Rather than doubling down on another generation of failed reforms that have deformed our public schools, why not examine the facts, rather than dismissing them in favor of foundation press releases? Why not offer something to the 99% of your readers who are looking for illumination on the issues, rather than diversionary misinformation that you print to serve the hedge fund 1%ers of Wall Street? Why not, in fact, read the most recent brief by the Education Writers Association, which points to the lack of research to back up the corporate education policies you are pushing? Why not read, in fact, your own best reporter who has talked to people to Tennessee to expose the house of cards that you continue to prop up?
The Business Roundtable's Rube Goldberg plan for evaluating teachers in Tennessee (and other venues with RTTT money) has met with almost universal disdain, a response that has brought CEOs running out of their penthouses to dictate responses for the corporate media editorial pages.
The New York Times, which never saw a corporate education idea it didn't like, published its own tribute to the current effort by the Oligarchs of Ed on Saturday, with an editorial in support of Tennessee's ridiculous plan based on "value-added" test scores and an observation instrument that assures that thousands of good teachers will lose their tenure, if not their jobs. And thousands more will lose their love of teaching.
From the Times education experts on Saturday, which, with a date or two changed, could have been written any time during the past 30 years of school and teacher bashing:
Tennessee's need to do better was underscored when the latest National Assessment of Educational Progress, also known as the nation's report card, ranked the state near the bottom in fourth-grade math performance, just ahead of Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi. These dismal results -- slightly worse than those reported in 2009 -- were made public earlier this month during legislative hearings on the evaluation system.
Yes, Tennessee test scores are abysmal, but, first off, let's at least get their ranking correct. As you can see the scores from 1992-2011 below, NAEP numbers have been flat for a long time, with the flattest coming during the most recent and most intense test-and-punish period of the NCLB conflagration.
Tennessee NAEP Math
1992--211
1996--219
2000--220
2003--228
2005--232
2007--233
2009--232
2011--233
Tennessee NAEP Reading
1992--212
1994--213
1998--212
2002--214
2003--212
2005--214
2007--216
2009--217
2011--215
Most interesting, too, is the fact that the Sanders Miracle of value-added testing (TVAAS) started in 1992. This is the same value-added miracle-turned-mirage that corporate water carriers like Brent Staples of the Times Editorial Board want to impose on the rest of the nation.
So with Tennessee test scores pancaked, some other states without the benefit of the Sanders Miracle have moved ahead, thus lowering Tennessee even further:
Progress from other states [from 2009 to 2011] lowered Tennessee's rankings:
* From 45th to 46th in the nation in fourth-grade math
* From 39th to 41st in fourth-grade reading
* From 43rd to 45th in eighth-grade math
* From 34th to 41st in eighth-grade reading.
Most interesting for those who pretend to believe that more failed corporate education reforms will improve learning in Tennessee, or anywhere else, are facts related to education spending in Tennessee, which exactly matches Tennessee's testing rank among states. A Compendium of State Education Rankings ranks Tennessee 44th in per pupil spending at $6,855 (based on NEA data from 2005).
Another coincidence, no doubt: a report earlier this year by U. S. News ranked Tennessee's kids, that's right, 44th in "smartness" based on NAEP data.
And the biggest coincidence yet that relates to Tennessee's ranking on tests? Only 5 other states (Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Arkansas) have higher percentages of children living in poverty than Tennessee, which is tied with Texas, South Carolina and Kentucky with 26% of its children living in poverty.
So Mr. Staples, you and the other privileged and invested education opinionators of the New York Times Editorial Board need to do more than you have done historically to educate the public on education issues. Rather than doubling down on another generation of failed reforms that have deformed our public schools, why not examine the facts, rather than dismissing them in favor of foundation press releases? Why not offer something to the 99% of your readers who are looking for illumination on the issues, rather than diversionary misinformation that you print to serve the hedge fund 1%ers of Wall Street? Why not, in fact, read the most recent brief by the Education Writers Association, which points to the lack of research to back up the corporate education policies you are pushing? Why not read, in fact, your own best reporter who has talked to people to Tennessee to expose the house of cards that you continue to prop up?