SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Years After the Enron Debacle, Traders Still Fleecing Consumers
Jul 05, 2011
When Enron collapsed, electricity markets were prone to gaming and corruption. And, it turns out, they still are. Shrewd energy traders are still at it, discovering and exploiting flaws and loopholes, often at the general public's expense.
In deregulated electricity markets, limits on transmission lines make prices fluctuate wildly. Utilities try their best to limit price disparities by asking strategically located power plants to turn themselves on and off throughout the day.
The resulting patchwork is like a "whack-a-mole" game in which prices for electricity quickly soar and collapse. Prices can change within minutes by a factor of 300 without warning, or even become negative. In those cases, consumers actually get paid to consume energy.
Because the market is so complicated and risky, rate structures are anything but straightforward and the entire industry is prone to corruption. It's very hard for utilities to set appropriate rates for consumers when they have trouble predicting their own revenues. Cost volatility also complicates planning for the multi-year investments needed to expand generating capacity.
Consumers would of course be baffled if their power providers rapidly changed their billing rate. To get around this problem, utilities purchase derivatives in the futures market to lock in long-term rates. In this system, banks assume the risks inherent in the price of electricity. It's just like what happens when you insure your car. You know that you'll probably lose money over time, but that risk is more than compensated in knowing you'll be covered if you get into a bad accident.
These markets are governed by rules too confusing for outsiders to understand. Plus, they change all the time. For example, there are over 50 pending revisions to the more than 1,100 mind-numbing pages of market rules in Texas. These rules are intended to protect the electricity system from manipulation, but often the details provide the very vulnerabilities that energy traders exploit for personal gain.
Traders in the Texas electricity market found a new game they couldn't lose when they acquired extraordinary quantities of free options between two power plants located at the same site. These options were like lottery tickets that would only pay off if the price of power ever differed between the two plants. Only in this lottery, the energy traders would always win, and win big, because they exploited an obscure rule that artificially changed the settlement price for certain shut-down plants.
Even though the traders didn't pay a dime for these options and there was no reason for them to be worth anything, the flawed rule made these options extremely valuable.
Traders fleeced the market for $3 million with this scam beginning in December 2010. Luminant and other energy companies had to the pay the bill, ultimately passing these costs to their customers. Two months later the Texas electricity operators identified the scam and fixed the glitch, just as many other traders tried to get in on the action and pocket $20 million.
As of July 2011, Texas still hasn't forced the culprits to return these funds. Energy traders argue that changing the rules after the fact would open up a Pandora's Box by making market conditions less predictable and raising risk premiums. Ultimately, they claim, consumers would have to shell out even more money.
The industry's deregulation created an overly complex and risky market. We all pay the price when energy traders abuse market loopholes, and then we pay again when the authorities try to fix their mistakes. We need simpler markets to ensure that power companies will focus on efficiently delivering electricity to consumers without giving traders opportunities to pilfer funds. Corruption, fraud, and manipulation will persist as long as the market for electric power remains too bewildering to police.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This column was distributed by OtherWords.
Taylor Moulton
Taylor Moulton, a former energy trader, is a Sustainable Energy and Economy Network researcher at the Institute for Policy Studies.
When Enron collapsed, electricity markets were prone to gaming and corruption. And, it turns out, they still are. Shrewd energy traders are still at it, discovering and exploiting flaws and loopholes, often at the general public's expense.
In deregulated electricity markets, limits on transmission lines make prices fluctuate wildly. Utilities try their best to limit price disparities by asking strategically located power plants to turn themselves on and off throughout the day.
The resulting patchwork is like a "whack-a-mole" game in which prices for electricity quickly soar and collapse. Prices can change within minutes by a factor of 300 without warning, or even become negative. In those cases, consumers actually get paid to consume energy.
Because the market is so complicated and risky, rate structures are anything but straightforward and the entire industry is prone to corruption. It's very hard for utilities to set appropriate rates for consumers when they have trouble predicting their own revenues. Cost volatility also complicates planning for the multi-year investments needed to expand generating capacity.
Consumers would of course be baffled if their power providers rapidly changed their billing rate. To get around this problem, utilities purchase derivatives in the futures market to lock in long-term rates. In this system, banks assume the risks inherent in the price of electricity. It's just like what happens when you insure your car. You know that you'll probably lose money over time, but that risk is more than compensated in knowing you'll be covered if you get into a bad accident.
These markets are governed by rules too confusing for outsiders to understand. Plus, they change all the time. For example, there are over 50 pending revisions to the more than 1,100 mind-numbing pages of market rules in Texas. These rules are intended to protect the electricity system from manipulation, but often the details provide the very vulnerabilities that energy traders exploit for personal gain.
Traders in the Texas electricity market found a new game they couldn't lose when they acquired extraordinary quantities of free options between two power plants located at the same site. These options were like lottery tickets that would only pay off if the price of power ever differed between the two plants. Only in this lottery, the energy traders would always win, and win big, because they exploited an obscure rule that artificially changed the settlement price for certain shut-down plants.
Even though the traders didn't pay a dime for these options and there was no reason for them to be worth anything, the flawed rule made these options extremely valuable.
Traders fleeced the market for $3 million with this scam beginning in December 2010. Luminant and other energy companies had to the pay the bill, ultimately passing these costs to their customers. Two months later the Texas electricity operators identified the scam and fixed the glitch, just as many other traders tried to get in on the action and pocket $20 million.
As of July 2011, Texas still hasn't forced the culprits to return these funds. Energy traders argue that changing the rules after the fact would open up a Pandora's Box by making market conditions less predictable and raising risk premiums. Ultimately, they claim, consumers would have to shell out even more money.
The industry's deregulation created an overly complex and risky market. We all pay the price when energy traders abuse market loopholes, and then we pay again when the authorities try to fix their mistakes. We need simpler markets to ensure that power companies will focus on efficiently delivering electricity to consumers without giving traders opportunities to pilfer funds. Corruption, fraud, and manipulation will persist as long as the market for electric power remains too bewildering to police.
Taylor Moulton
Taylor Moulton, a former energy trader, is a Sustainable Energy and Economy Network researcher at the Institute for Policy Studies.
When Enron collapsed, electricity markets were prone to gaming and corruption. And, it turns out, they still are. Shrewd energy traders are still at it, discovering and exploiting flaws and loopholes, often at the general public's expense.
In deregulated electricity markets, limits on transmission lines make prices fluctuate wildly. Utilities try their best to limit price disparities by asking strategically located power plants to turn themselves on and off throughout the day.
The resulting patchwork is like a "whack-a-mole" game in which prices for electricity quickly soar and collapse. Prices can change within minutes by a factor of 300 without warning, or even become negative. In those cases, consumers actually get paid to consume energy.
Because the market is so complicated and risky, rate structures are anything but straightforward and the entire industry is prone to corruption. It's very hard for utilities to set appropriate rates for consumers when they have trouble predicting their own revenues. Cost volatility also complicates planning for the multi-year investments needed to expand generating capacity.
Consumers would of course be baffled if their power providers rapidly changed their billing rate. To get around this problem, utilities purchase derivatives in the futures market to lock in long-term rates. In this system, banks assume the risks inherent in the price of electricity. It's just like what happens when you insure your car. You know that you'll probably lose money over time, but that risk is more than compensated in knowing you'll be covered if you get into a bad accident.
These markets are governed by rules too confusing for outsiders to understand. Plus, they change all the time. For example, there are over 50 pending revisions to the more than 1,100 mind-numbing pages of market rules in Texas. These rules are intended to protect the electricity system from manipulation, but often the details provide the very vulnerabilities that energy traders exploit for personal gain.
Traders in the Texas electricity market found a new game they couldn't lose when they acquired extraordinary quantities of free options between two power plants located at the same site. These options were like lottery tickets that would only pay off if the price of power ever differed between the two plants. Only in this lottery, the energy traders would always win, and win big, because they exploited an obscure rule that artificially changed the settlement price for certain shut-down plants.
Even though the traders didn't pay a dime for these options and there was no reason for them to be worth anything, the flawed rule made these options extremely valuable.
Traders fleeced the market for $3 million with this scam beginning in December 2010. Luminant and other energy companies had to the pay the bill, ultimately passing these costs to their customers. Two months later the Texas electricity operators identified the scam and fixed the glitch, just as many other traders tried to get in on the action and pocket $20 million.
As of July 2011, Texas still hasn't forced the culprits to return these funds. Energy traders argue that changing the rules after the fact would open up a Pandora's Box by making market conditions less predictable and raising risk premiums. Ultimately, they claim, consumers would have to shell out even more money.
The industry's deregulation created an overly complex and risky market. We all pay the price when energy traders abuse market loopholes, and then we pay again when the authorities try to fix their mistakes. We need simpler markets to ensure that power companies will focus on efficiently delivering electricity to consumers without giving traders opportunities to pilfer funds. Corruption, fraud, and manipulation will persist as long as the market for electric power remains too bewildering to police.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.