SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Extortion Politics: Why Won't American Business Stop the GOP From Threatening to Blow Up the Economy?
As the government approaches its borrowing limit of $14.3 trillion, Republicans are seeking political advantage over what conditions should be attached to raising that limit.
This is a scandal -- or should be. Raising the debt limit shouldn't be subject to party politics. Economic extortion should be out of bounds.
It's bad enough government shutdowns have become an accepted part of political negotiation. But failure to increase the amount the Treasury can borrow would have far graver results.
Apr 19, 2011
As the government approaches its borrowing limit of $14.3 trillion, Republicans are seeking political advantage over what conditions should be attached to raising that limit.
This is a scandal -- or should be. Raising the debt limit shouldn't be subject to party politics. Economic extortion should be out of bounds.
It's bad enough government shutdowns have become an accepted part of political negotiation. But failure to increase the amount the Treasury can borrow would have far graver results.
Not only would the government be unable to issue Social Security or Medicare checks but the United States couldn't pay interest on its current debt.
We'd go into default. The full faith and credit of the United States would be in jeopardy. Treasury bonds would go into free fall. Interest rates would skyrocket. We, and most of the rest of the world, would fall into financial chaos.
The recovery is still fragile. All this would force us and most of the rest of the world into a deeper recession or worse.
No one in their right mind would threaten this. Yet it's talked about as if it's just another aspect of Washington politics -- a threat that might be carried out in early July when the Treasury runs out of ways to keep paying our debts.
In fact, it's a giant game of highway chicken, and if one driver doesn't yield the crash will be catastrophic.
Games of chicken are won by drivers able to convince their opponents they won't swerve. That gives a strategic advantage to Republicans backed by the Tea Party, who are so convinced government is evil they've signaled they'd be willing to risk it.
But this shouldn't be a matter of political strategy. Disagreement about the nation's budget should be worked out through the constitutional process of majority votes in Congress, followed by the President's signature or veto, and Congress's right to override the veto.
No group of legislators is entitled to threaten to crash the United States economy if its demands aren't met.
The biggest surprise is the silence of American business and Wall Street. They have as much if not more to lose as anyone if this game ends in tragedy. Yet the GOP -- which big business and Wall Street fund -- insists on playing it.
Why isn't the Business Roundtable decrying the use of this tactic? Where are the leaders of Wall Street? Where are the corporate statesmen? They should insist this game of chicken be called off or they'll stop the funding.
Maybe they think the crash won't happen, that Obama and the Dems will cave in to Paul Ryan's and the Republicans' before that.
If so, they're wrong. The Republicans' demands are so far beyond the pale -- turning Medicare into vouchers that funnel money to private insurance companies, turning Medicaid and food stamps into block grants that would deliver less to the poor, giving a giant tax windfall to the very rich -- they cannot be met without causing the Democratic base (and most Independents) to revolt.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Robert Reich
Robert Reich, is the Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley, and a senior fellow at the Blum Center for Developing Economies. He served as secretary of labor in the Clinton administration, for which Time magazine named him one of the 10 most effective cabinet secretaries of the twentieth century. His book include: "Aftershock" (2011), "The Work of Nations" (1992), "Beyond Outrage" (2012) and, "Saving Capitalism" (2016). He is also a founding editor of The American Prospect magazine, former chairman of Common Cause, a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and co-creator of the award-winning documentary, "Inequality For All." Reich's newest book is "The Common Good" (2019). He's co-creator of the Netflix original documentary "Saving Capitalism," which is streaming now.
As the government approaches its borrowing limit of $14.3 trillion, Republicans are seeking political advantage over what conditions should be attached to raising that limit.
This is a scandal -- or should be. Raising the debt limit shouldn't be subject to party politics. Economic extortion should be out of bounds.
It's bad enough government shutdowns have become an accepted part of political negotiation. But failure to increase the amount the Treasury can borrow would have far graver results.
Not only would the government be unable to issue Social Security or Medicare checks but the United States couldn't pay interest on its current debt.
We'd go into default. The full faith and credit of the United States would be in jeopardy. Treasury bonds would go into free fall. Interest rates would skyrocket. We, and most of the rest of the world, would fall into financial chaos.
The recovery is still fragile. All this would force us and most of the rest of the world into a deeper recession or worse.
No one in their right mind would threaten this. Yet it's talked about as if it's just another aspect of Washington politics -- a threat that might be carried out in early July when the Treasury runs out of ways to keep paying our debts.
In fact, it's a giant game of highway chicken, and if one driver doesn't yield the crash will be catastrophic.
Games of chicken are won by drivers able to convince their opponents they won't swerve. That gives a strategic advantage to Republicans backed by the Tea Party, who are so convinced government is evil they've signaled they'd be willing to risk it.
But this shouldn't be a matter of political strategy. Disagreement about the nation's budget should be worked out through the constitutional process of majority votes in Congress, followed by the President's signature or veto, and Congress's right to override the veto.
No group of legislators is entitled to threaten to crash the United States economy if its demands aren't met.
The biggest surprise is the silence of American business and Wall Street. They have as much if not more to lose as anyone if this game ends in tragedy. Yet the GOP -- which big business and Wall Street fund -- insists on playing it.
Why isn't the Business Roundtable decrying the use of this tactic? Where are the leaders of Wall Street? Where are the corporate statesmen? They should insist this game of chicken be called off or they'll stop the funding.
Maybe they think the crash won't happen, that Obama and the Dems will cave in to Paul Ryan's and the Republicans' before that.
If so, they're wrong. The Republicans' demands are so far beyond the pale -- turning Medicare into vouchers that funnel money to private insurance companies, turning Medicaid and food stamps into block grants that would deliver less to the poor, giving a giant tax windfall to the very rich -- they cannot be met without causing the Democratic base (and most Independents) to revolt.
Robert Reich
Robert Reich, is the Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley, and a senior fellow at the Blum Center for Developing Economies. He served as secretary of labor in the Clinton administration, for which Time magazine named him one of the 10 most effective cabinet secretaries of the twentieth century. His book include: "Aftershock" (2011), "The Work of Nations" (1992), "Beyond Outrage" (2012) and, "Saving Capitalism" (2016). He is also a founding editor of The American Prospect magazine, former chairman of Common Cause, a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and co-creator of the award-winning documentary, "Inequality For All." Reich's newest book is "The Common Good" (2019). He's co-creator of the Netflix original documentary "Saving Capitalism," which is streaming now.
As the government approaches its borrowing limit of $14.3 trillion, Republicans are seeking political advantage over what conditions should be attached to raising that limit.
This is a scandal -- or should be. Raising the debt limit shouldn't be subject to party politics. Economic extortion should be out of bounds.
It's bad enough government shutdowns have become an accepted part of political negotiation. But failure to increase the amount the Treasury can borrow would have far graver results.
Not only would the government be unable to issue Social Security or Medicare checks but the United States couldn't pay interest on its current debt.
We'd go into default. The full faith and credit of the United States would be in jeopardy. Treasury bonds would go into free fall. Interest rates would skyrocket. We, and most of the rest of the world, would fall into financial chaos.
The recovery is still fragile. All this would force us and most of the rest of the world into a deeper recession or worse.
No one in their right mind would threaten this. Yet it's talked about as if it's just another aspect of Washington politics -- a threat that might be carried out in early July when the Treasury runs out of ways to keep paying our debts.
In fact, it's a giant game of highway chicken, and if one driver doesn't yield the crash will be catastrophic.
Games of chicken are won by drivers able to convince their opponents they won't swerve. That gives a strategic advantage to Republicans backed by the Tea Party, who are so convinced government is evil they've signaled they'd be willing to risk it.
But this shouldn't be a matter of political strategy. Disagreement about the nation's budget should be worked out through the constitutional process of majority votes in Congress, followed by the President's signature or veto, and Congress's right to override the veto.
No group of legislators is entitled to threaten to crash the United States economy if its demands aren't met.
The biggest surprise is the silence of American business and Wall Street. They have as much if not more to lose as anyone if this game ends in tragedy. Yet the GOP -- which big business and Wall Street fund -- insists on playing it.
Why isn't the Business Roundtable decrying the use of this tactic? Where are the leaders of Wall Street? Where are the corporate statesmen? They should insist this game of chicken be called off or they'll stop the funding.
Maybe they think the crash won't happen, that Obama and the Dems will cave in to Paul Ryan's and the Republicans' before that.
If so, they're wrong. The Republicans' demands are so far beyond the pale -- turning Medicare into vouchers that funnel money to private insurance companies, turning Medicaid and food stamps into block grants that would deliver less to the poor, giving a giant tax windfall to the very rich -- they cannot be met without causing the Democratic base (and most Independents) to revolt.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.