Capital or Community in Wisconsin?
It should be the sound of the other shoe dropping, but you'll have to listen hard to Governor Scott Walker's budget address because most media will miss most of it.
It's a funny thing about covering budgets. Cutting spending garners a whole lot more attention than cutting taxes. How many Americans know, for example, that Governor Walker gave $140 million in tax breaks to corporations -- right before he announced this fiscal year's deficit of $137 million?
It should be the sound of the other shoe dropping, but you'll have to listen hard to Governor Scott Walker's budget address because most media will miss most of it.
It's a funny thing about covering budgets. Cutting spending garners a whole lot more attention than cutting taxes. How many Americans know, for example, that Governor Walker gave $140 million in tax breaks to corporations -- right before he announced this fiscal year's deficit of $137 million?
The good people I met last week at the Wisconsin Budget Project call that a structural deficit. I'd go further. It's not only structural; it's structured - to bring about exactly this phony budget crisis.
As Scott Walker refuses to budge on his so-called budget repair bill, Wisconsin is bracing now for his actual budget. It's anticipated to cut almost a billion from education, literally scuttling public schools in heavily African-American cities like Milwaukee. And we already know Walker's plans include shrinking Medicaid while privatizing public utilities, cutting off yet more routes for public revenue.
Tea Partiers convening in Phoenix this week reportedly sprang to their feet at the mention of Walker, but they're only one side of this argument. According to the latest New York Times& poll, Americans oppose weakening the bargaining rights of public employee unions - as Walker would -- by a margin of nearly two to one. Given a list of options to reduce the deficit, 40 percent said they would increase taxes; only 3 percent opt for cutting education.
What's really playing out here isn't a battle over numbers. It's a debate over what government is for. Is it, as Walker and his backers' believe, for stripping profit of all responsibility to people, or as the American people seem to believe, for protecting the public welfare? Walker's staked out his position clearly. The good news out of his state is that the conflict, as "Fighting Bob" LaFollette said, has been joined by the people. It is wealth vs. the common weal. Capital or community. We have a choice.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
It should be the sound of the other shoe dropping, but you'll have to listen hard to Governor Scott Walker's budget address because most media will miss most of it.
It's a funny thing about covering budgets. Cutting spending garners a whole lot more attention than cutting taxes. How many Americans know, for example, that Governor Walker gave $140 million in tax breaks to corporations -- right before he announced this fiscal year's deficit of $137 million?
The good people I met last week at the Wisconsin Budget Project call that a structural deficit. I'd go further. It's not only structural; it's structured - to bring about exactly this phony budget crisis.
As Scott Walker refuses to budge on his so-called budget repair bill, Wisconsin is bracing now for his actual budget. It's anticipated to cut almost a billion from education, literally scuttling public schools in heavily African-American cities like Milwaukee. And we already know Walker's plans include shrinking Medicaid while privatizing public utilities, cutting off yet more routes for public revenue.
Tea Partiers convening in Phoenix this week reportedly sprang to their feet at the mention of Walker, but they're only one side of this argument. According to the latest New York Times& poll, Americans oppose weakening the bargaining rights of public employee unions - as Walker would -- by a margin of nearly two to one. Given a list of options to reduce the deficit, 40 percent said they would increase taxes; only 3 percent opt for cutting education.
What's really playing out here isn't a battle over numbers. It's a debate over what government is for. Is it, as Walker and his backers' believe, for stripping profit of all responsibility to people, or as the American people seem to believe, for protecting the public welfare? Walker's staked out his position clearly. The good news out of his state is that the conflict, as "Fighting Bob" LaFollette said, has been joined by the people. It is wealth vs. the common weal. Capital or community. We have a choice.
It should be the sound of the other shoe dropping, but you'll have to listen hard to Governor Scott Walker's budget address because most media will miss most of it.
It's a funny thing about covering budgets. Cutting spending garners a whole lot more attention than cutting taxes. How many Americans know, for example, that Governor Walker gave $140 million in tax breaks to corporations -- right before he announced this fiscal year's deficit of $137 million?
The good people I met last week at the Wisconsin Budget Project call that a structural deficit. I'd go further. It's not only structural; it's structured - to bring about exactly this phony budget crisis.
As Scott Walker refuses to budge on his so-called budget repair bill, Wisconsin is bracing now for his actual budget. It's anticipated to cut almost a billion from education, literally scuttling public schools in heavily African-American cities like Milwaukee. And we already know Walker's plans include shrinking Medicaid while privatizing public utilities, cutting off yet more routes for public revenue.
Tea Partiers convening in Phoenix this week reportedly sprang to their feet at the mention of Walker, but they're only one side of this argument. According to the latest New York Times& poll, Americans oppose weakening the bargaining rights of public employee unions - as Walker would -- by a margin of nearly two to one. Given a list of options to reduce the deficit, 40 percent said they would increase taxes; only 3 percent opt for cutting education.
What's really playing out here isn't a battle over numbers. It's a debate over what government is for. Is it, as Walker and his backers' believe, for stripping profit of all responsibility to people, or as the American people seem to believe, for protecting the public welfare? Walker's staked out his position clearly. The good news out of his state is that the conflict, as "Fighting Bob" LaFollette said, has been joined by the people. It is wealth vs. the common weal. Capital or community. We have a choice.