SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Tap Water's Budget Bottleneck
Feb 21, 2011
Washington is humming with debate about how to trim the debt without stunting our economic recovery. Yet somehow, with all the recent rancor over spending cuts, pundits and politicians have largely overlooked one of our most essential public services--supplying the public with clean tap water.
Interestingly, House lawmakers, who control many federal purse strings for the nation's water supplies, spend nearly $1 million a year on bottled water.
Given the House of Representatives' commitment to rein in its own office budgets, you would think bottled water would be an easy place to start cutting. Not only is bottled water far less regulated than what comes from the tap, up to 44 percent of bottled water originates from the tap.
But not only is the expense needless, it sends the wrong message about both the quality of the tap and our commitment to public water as a nation.
Bottled water marketing has had a profound impact on the public's confidence in the tap and the political will to adequately resource public water systems. Today, these water systems face a $23 billion annual funding gap that the proposed 2012 budget threatens only to deepen.
Nestle, the corporation that provides the House the bulk of its water, knows the impact of its marketing. It is staking its future fortunes on the ultimate decline of public water infrastructure--a trend it abets by leading people to believe its product is somehow "Born Better" than other water. Not coincidentally, that's the name of its most recent advertising campaign.
In 2003, one in five people drank only bottled water. Public opinion has come around after years of education by campaigns, including our own Think Outside the Bottle initiative. In 2010, a Harris poll found that about 40 percent of Americans had returned to the tap.
There's a new spirit among some lawmakers. After my organization, Corporate Accountability International, released a report about the volume of bottled water members of Congress drink, 16 lawmakers from both sides of the aisle stated they had either abandoned bottled water or intended to do so. The move helped Congress join the ranks of more than 1,200 cities that have already resolved to buck the bottle and support the tap, as well as the states of Colorado, Illinois, and New York.
These moves are the first steps in trimming the fat so that national, state, and city governments can refocus their resources on economic recovery and growth. According to a report by the U.S. Conference of Mayors, every dollar invested in water and sewer infrastructure increases GDP in the long-term by $6.35. Furthermore, every job added in the water and sewer industry creates nearly four additional jobs in the national economy.
In other words, water systems are today what they always have been: the engine behind economic development and the guarantor of our public health for generations to come. And by cutting the flow of dollars to a non-essential use of our most essential resource--except in emergencies--we can take the first important step in rebuilding public confidence and funding for the tap.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This column was distributed by OtherWords.
Leslie Samuelrich
Leslie Samuelrich is the chief of staff of Corporate Accountability International. www.stopcorporateabuse.org
Washington is humming with debate about how to trim the debt without stunting our economic recovery. Yet somehow, with all the recent rancor over spending cuts, pundits and politicians have largely overlooked one of our most essential public services--supplying the public with clean tap water.
Interestingly, House lawmakers, who control many federal purse strings for the nation's water supplies, spend nearly $1 million a year on bottled water.
Given the House of Representatives' commitment to rein in its own office budgets, you would think bottled water would be an easy place to start cutting. Not only is bottled water far less regulated than what comes from the tap, up to 44 percent of bottled water originates from the tap.
But not only is the expense needless, it sends the wrong message about both the quality of the tap and our commitment to public water as a nation.
Bottled water marketing has had a profound impact on the public's confidence in the tap and the political will to adequately resource public water systems. Today, these water systems face a $23 billion annual funding gap that the proposed 2012 budget threatens only to deepen.
Nestle, the corporation that provides the House the bulk of its water, knows the impact of its marketing. It is staking its future fortunes on the ultimate decline of public water infrastructure--a trend it abets by leading people to believe its product is somehow "Born Better" than other water. Not coincidentally, that's the name of its most recent advertising campaign.
In 2003, one in five people drank only bottled water. Public opinion has come around after years of education by campaigns, including our own Think Outside the Bottle initiative. In 2010, a Harris poll found that about 40 percent of Americans had returned to the tap.
There's a new spirit among some lawmakers. After my organization, Corporate Accountability International, released a report about the volume of bottled water members of Congress drink, 16 lawmakers from both sides of the aisle stated they had either abandoned bottled water or intended to do so. The move helped Congress join the ranks of more than 1,200 cities that have already resolved to buck the bottle and support the tap, as well as the states of Colorado, Illinois, and New York.
These moves are the first steps in trimming the fat so that national, state, and city governments can refocus their resources on economic recovery and growth. According to a report by the U.S. Conference of Mayors, every dollar invested in water and sewer infrastructure increases GDP in the long-term by $6.35. Furthermore, every job added in the water and sewer industry creates nearly four additional jobs in the national economy.
In other words, water systems are today what they always have been: the engine behind economic development and the guarantor of our public health for generations to come. And by cutting the flow of dollars to a non-essential use of our most essential resource--except in emergencies--we can take the first important step in rebuilding public confidence and funding for the tap.
Leslie Samuelrich
Leslie Samuelrich is the chief of staff of Corporate Accountability International. www.stopcorporateabuse.org
Washington is humming with debate about how to trim the debt without stunting our economic recovery. Yet somehow, with all the recent rancor over spending cuts, pundits and politicians have largely overlooked one of our most essential public services--supplying the public with clean tap water.
Interestingly, House lawmakers, who control many federal purse strings for the nation's water supplies, spend nearly $1 million a year on bottled water.
Given the House of Representatives' commitment to rein in its own office budgets, you would think bottled water would be an easy place to start cutting. Not only is bottled water far less regulated than what comes from the tap, up to 44 percent of bottled water originates from the tap.
But not only is the expense needless, it sends the wrong message about both the quality of the tap and our commitment to public water as a nation.
Bottled water marketing has had a profound impact on the public's confidence in the tap and the political will to adequately resource public water systems. Today, these water systems face a $23 billion annual funding gap that the proposed 2012 budget threatens only to deepen.
Nestle, the corporation that provides the House the bulk of its water, knows the impact of its marketing. It is staking its future fortunes on the ultimate decline of public water infrastructure--a trend it abets by leading people to believe its product is somehow "Born Better" than other water. Not coincidentally, that's the name of its most recent advertising campaign.
In 2003, one in five people drank only bottled water. Public opinion has come around after years of education by campaigns, including our own Think Outside the Bottle initiative. In 2010, a Harris poll found that about 40 percent of Americans had returned to the tap.
There's a new spirit among some lawmakers. After my organization, Corporate Accountability International, released a report about the volume of bottled water members of Congress drink, 16 lawmakers from both sides of the aisle stated they had either abandoned bottled water or intended to do so. The move helped Congress join the ranks of more than 1,200 cities that have already resolved to buck the bottle and support the tap, as well as the states of Colorado, Illinois, and New York.
These moves are the first steps in trimming the fat so that national, state, and city governments can refocus their resources on economic recovery and growth. According to a report by the U.S. Conference of Mayors, every dollar invested in water and sewer infrastructure increases GDP in the long-term by $6.35. Furthermore, every job added in the water and sewer industry creates nearly four additional jobs in the national economy.
In other words, water systems are today what they always have been: the engine behind economic development and the guarantor of our public health for generations to come. And by cutting the flow of dollars to a non-essential use of our most essential resource--except in emergencies--we can take the first important step in rebuilding public confidence and funding for the tap.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.