SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
So That All May Drink
Jul 28, 2010
After years of grassroots pressure, the UN General Assembly will debate a resolution July 28th on the right to safe and clean drinking water and sanitation.
Maude Barlow, former senior advisor on water to the president of the UN General Assembly, has described the lack of access to clean water
as the "most violated human right." Currently, 1.2 billion people have
no access to safe drinking water and 2.6 billion live without proper
sanitation. Every eight seconds a child dies from preventable waterborne
disease.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in 1948, does not
explicitly recognize the human right to water, an omission which is
overdue for redress. As climate change aggravates water scarcity and
contamination, advocates say that a specific resolution on water is
essential to protect the most vulnerable.
At press time, many states, most notably the United States, Canada,
New Zealand, Australia, and England, oppose the human right to water and
sanitation resolution. The vote is likely to follow a North-South
split, with the co-sponsors predominantly from the South.
Anil Naidoo, coordinator of the Blue Planet Project,
called the vote "hard to predict as there will be procedural wrangling
and amendments to block passage. But we have seen substantial
vote-shifting with 34 co-sponsors and more coming on board. We are
heartened by grassroots support for the resolution." Naidoo lamented
that opposing countries tend to be the highest per-capita water
consumers, with virtually all their citizens enjoying the rights they
seek to deny the world.
Opposition to this resolution is increasingly hard to justify as the
grave nature of the global water crisis threatens water consumers
everywhere, and General Assembly resolutions are non-binding political
statements. Guaranteeing sanitation, however, represents an area of
concern for some states, despite the Millennium Development Goals
mandate to reduce by half the number of people without sanitation.
The resolution would heighten pressure on countries to guarantee the
human right to water and sanitation. As with the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights, the implementation of the resolution would likely be
uneven and won through local advocacy campaigns. Nevertheless, the
resolution would constitute a legal tool to strengthen advocacy for
thirsty people around the globe.
Although winning the right to water will not guarantee that the
globe's ecosystems also receive their fair share of water, Naidoo feels
that "this resolution would be an important step in a radical rethinking
of how our water commons around the globe are managed." Currently, Bolivia is building similar UN support for a resolution on the rights of Mother Earth, which would seek, among other goals, to ensure that the world's watersheds must remain healthy.
For More Information
Readers are encouraged to influence decision-makers. One way is to pressure the U.S. ambassador to the UN to support the resolution. The other is for elected officials from around the world to sign an Open Statement to the Member States of the UN General Assembly.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Foreign Policy In Focus
Daniel Moss
Daniel Moss was
a member of the People's Water Forum's media team covering the 5thWorld Water Forum. He is co-coordinator of Our Water Commons and lives
in Oaxaca, Mexico with his family.
After years of grassroots pressure, the UN General Assembly will debate a resolution July 28th on the right to safe and clean drinking water and sanitation.
Maude Barlow, former senior advisor on water to the president of the UN General Assembly, has described the lack of access to clean water
as the "most violated human right." Currently, 1.2 billion people have
no access to safe drinking water and 2.6 billion live without proper
sanitation. Every eight seconds a child dies from preventable waterborne
disease.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in 1948, does not
explicitly recognize the human right to water, an omission which is
overdue for redress. As climate change aggravates water scarcity and
contamination, advocates say that a specific resolution on water is
essential to protect the most vulnerable.
At press time, many states, most notably the United States, Canada,
New Zealand, Australia, and England, oppose the human right to water and
sanitation resolution. The vote is likely to follow a North-South
split, with the co-sponsors predominantly from the South.
Anil Naidoo, coordinator of the Blue Planet Project,
called the vote "hard to predict as there will be procedural wrangling
and amendments to block passage. But we have seen substantial
vote-shifting with 34 co-sponsors and more coming on board. We are
heartened by grassroots support for the resolution." Naidoo lamented
that opposing countries tend to be the highest per-capita water
consumers, with virtually all their citizens enjoying the rights they
seek to deny the world.
Opposition to this resolution is increasingly hard to justify as the
grave nature of the global water crisis threatens water consumers
everywhere, and General Assembly resolutions are non-binding political
statements. Guaranteeing sanitation, however, represents an area of
concern for some states, despite the Millennium Development Goals
mandate to reduce by half the number of people without sanitation.
The resolution would heighten pressure on countries to guarantee the
human right to water and sanitation. As with the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights, the implementation of the resolution would likely be
uneven and won through local advocacy campaigns. Nevertheless, the
resolution would constitute a legal tool to strengthen advocacy for
thirsty people around the globe.
Although winning the right to water will not guarantee that the
globe's ecosystems also receive their fair share of water, Naidoo feels
that "this resolution would be an important step in a radical rethinking
of how our water commons around the globe are managed." Currently, Bolivia is building similar UN support for a resolution on the rights of Mother Earth, which would seek, among other goals, to ensure that the world's watersheds must remain healthy.
For More Information
Readers are encouraged to influence decision-makers. One way is to pressure the U.S. ambassador to the UN to support the resolution. The other is for elected officials from around the world to sign an Open Statement to the Member States of the UN General Assembly.
Daniel Moss
Daniel Moss was
a member of the People's Water Forum's media team covering the 5thWorld Water Forum. He is co-coordinator of Our Water Commons and lives
in Oaxaca, Mexico with his family.
After years of grassroots pressure, the UN General Assembly will debate a resolution July 28th on the right to safe and clean drinking water and sanitation.
Maude Barlow, former senior advisor on water to the president of the UN General Assembly, has described the lack of access to clean water
as the "most violated human right." Currently, 1.2 billion people have
no access to safe drinking water and 2.6 billion live without proper
sanitation. Every eight seconds a child dies from preventable waterborne
disease.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in 1948, does not
explicitly recognize the human right to water, an omission which is
overdue for redress. As climate change aggravates water scarcity and
contamination, advocates say that a specific resolution on water is
essential to protect the most vulnerable.
At press time, many states, most notably the United States, Canada,
New Zealand, Australia, and England, oppose the human right to water and
sanitation resolution. The vote is likely to follow a North-South
split, with the co-sponsors predominantly from the South.
Anil Naidoo, coordinator of the Blue Planet Project,
called the vote "hard to predict as there will be procedural wrangling
and amendments to block passage. But we have seen substantial
vote-shifting with 34 co-sponsors and more coming on board. We are
heartened by grassroots support for the resolution." Naidoo lamented
that opposing countries tend to be the highest per-capita water
consumers, with virtually all their citizens enjoying the rights they
seek to deny the world.
Opposition to this resolution is increasingly hard to justify as the
grave nature of the global water crisis threatens water consumers
everywhere, and General Assembly resolutions are non-binding political
statements. Guaranteeing sanitation, however, represents an area of
concern for some states, despite the Millennium Development Goals
mandate to reduce by half the number of people without sanitation.
The resolution would heighten pressure on countries to guarantee the
human right to water and sanitation. As with the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights, the implementation of the resolution would likely be
uneven and won through local advocacy campaigns. Nevertheless, the
resolution would constitute a legal tool to strengthen advocacy for
thirsty people around the globe.
Although winning the right to water will not guarantee that the
globe's ecosystems also receive their fair share of water, Naidoo feels
that "this resolution would be an important step in a radical rethinking
of how our water commons around the globe are managed." Currently, Bolivia is building similar UN support for a resolution on the rights of Mother Earth, which would seek, among other goals, to ensure that the world's watersheds must remain healthy.
For More Information
Readers are encouraged to influence decision-makers. One way is to pressure the U.S. ambassador to the UN to support the resolution. The other is for elected officials from around the world to sign an Open Statement to the Member States of the UN General Assembly.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.