

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
There were grumblings from all corners of the AFL-CIO at its winter
meeting in Orlando recently. "Disappointment", "disillusionment",
"unengaged", these words and worse peppered press reports describing
labor's view of President Obama and the Democrats.
Organized labor spent $200 million to help elect the president and
support of its 15 million members is considered absolutely critical for
Democrats to hold the line this November.
The president's failure to deliver on two key issues: labor law
reform and taxing Cadillac health plans, have enraged union members who
see cumbersome rules as an impediment to organizing new workplaces and
taxes on their hard-won health benefit packages as just plain wrong.
There are plenty of other places to get new tax revenue, as they see it.
While Wall Street continues to show signs of stability--in fact,
2009 was a very profitable year for America's financial community--Main
Street continues to hurt and hurt bad. Bailout money kept Wall Street
alive, say unionists, but little of it has made its way to American
working families. Many economists now project unemployment above 8% for
years to come, with growth in jobs centered in the low-paying service
sector, where unions have little presence.
President Obama's emphasis on renewable energy projects as a source
of job creation gets few cheers from labor, who see developments in
that sector as very slow-moving: get consumers to buy energy-saving
things and the work will follow. That could be years in the making.
What's to happen to American families in need this year?
We are fast approaching 100 million Americans--one third this
country's population--living at twice the poverty level or less,
according to the Brookings' Institution. That translates into take-home
pay of just three thousand dollars a month or less for a family of
four. Union Families expect more -- and top union officials are already
expressing strong concerns -- that if they don't get more, soon --
don't expect them to be able to deliver for Democrats in the fall.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
There were grumblings from all corners of the AFL-CIO at its winter
meeting in Orlando recently. "Disappointment", "disillusionment",
"unengaged", these words and worse peppered press reports describing
labor's view of President Obama and the Democrats.
Organized labor spent $200 million to help elect the president and
support of its 15 million members is considered absolutely critical for
Democrats to hold the line this November.
The president's failure to deliver on two key issues: labor law
reform and taxing Cadillac health plans, have enraged union members who
see cumbersome rules as an impediment to organizing new workplaces and
taxes on their hard-won health benefit packages as just plain wrong.
There are plenty of other places to get new tax revenue, as they see it.
While Wall Street continues to show signs of stability--in fact,
2009 was a very profitable year for America's financial community--Main
Street continues to hurt and hurt bad. Bailout money kept Wall Street
alive, say unionists, but little of it has made its way to American
working families. Many economists now project unemployment above 8% for
years to come, with growth in jobs centered in the low-paying service
sector, where unions have little presence.
President Obama's emphasis on renewable energy projects as a source
of job creation gets few cheers from labor, who see developments in
that sector as very slow-moving: get consumers to buy energy-saving
things and the work will follow. That could be years in the making.
What's to happen to American families in need this year?
We are fast approaching 100 million Americans--one third this
country's population--living at twice the poverty level or less,
according to the Brookings' Institution. That translates into take-home
pay of just three thousand dollars a month or less for a family of
four. Union Families expect more -- and top union officials are already
expressing strong concerns -- that if they don't get more, soon --
don't expect them to be able to deliver for Democrats in the fall.
There were grumblings from all corners of the AFL-CIO at its winter
meeting in Orlando recently. "Disappointment", "disillusionment",
"unengaged", these words and worse peppered press reports describing
labor's view of President Obama and the Democrats.
Organized labor spent $200 million to help elect the president and
support of its 15 million members is considered absolutely critical for
Democrats to hold the line this November.
The president's failure to deliver on two key issues: labor law
reform and taxing Cadillac health plans, have enraged union members who
see cumbersome rules as an impediment to organizing new workplaces and
taxes on their hard-won health benefit packages as just plain wrong.
There are plenty of other places to get new tax revenue, as they see it.
While Wall Street continues to show signs of stability--in fact,
2009 was a very profitable year for America's financial community--Main
Street continues to hurt and hurt bad. Bailout money kept Wall Street
alive, say unionists, but little of it has made its way to American
working families. Many economists now project unemployment above 8% for
years to come, with growth in jobs centered in the low-paying service
sector, where unions have little presence.
President Obama's emphasis on renewable energy projects as a source
of job creation gets few cheers from labor, who see developments in
that sector as very slow-moving: get consumers to buy energy-saving
things and the work will follow. That could be years in the making.
What's to happen to American families in need this year?
We are fast approaching 100 million Americans--one third this
country's population--living at twice the poverty level or less,
according to the Brookings' Institution. That translates into take-home
pay of just three thousand dollars a month or less for a family of
four. Union Families expect more -- and top union officials are already
expressing strong concerns -- that if they don't get more, soon --
don't expect them to be able to deliver for Democrats in the fall.