Feb 06, 2010
There are already at least two Christian broadcasting channels, so there is no need for CBS to be a right-wing revival tent for the Super Bowl.
Now, before all the knees start jerking, I want to be clear that this pro-choicer has no problem in the abstract with CBS's decision to air an ad featuring Florida football star Tim Tebow. The ad, funded by the conservative Christian group Focus on the Family, features the decision by Tebow's mother to reject the advice of doctors to have an abortion when she was very sick while the future Heisman Trophy winner was in her womb. That story is an unqualified, beautiful individual testament to faith and love.
But Focus on the Family wants to twist the free choice of this mother into a political vehicle to eliminate choice for all other women. But not even that ultimately offends me. Where CBS bears false witness is the fact that they accepted that ad while rejecting a Super Bowl ad for a gay dating service. The ad starts with one man in a Green Bay Packers jersey and the other in a Minnesota Vikings shirt cheering against each other. It ends with them making out on the couch.
Taste could not have been a consideration for rejection, especially when Super Bowls ads counsel men on the best drugs for erections (always for women, of course). After the 1993 Super Bowl, where the ads were nonstop promos for movies of mayhem, I wrote, "There were so many guns, fights and limp bodies I thought I was tuning into Bosnia.'' Virtually all the dead, unconscious, mutilated and threatened victims in the promos were women.
Advertising experts speculate that CBS relaxed its prior resistance to well-heeled advocacy ads to compensate for the loss of some traditional Super Bowl industrial advertisers in the recession. All CBS itself could do was speak in tongues about why it rejected the gay ad while accepting the ad from the far right. On the gay ad, CBS said, "After reviewing the ad, which is entirely commercial in nature, our Standards and Practices department decided not to accept this particular spot.'' The same department deemed that the Family on the Focus ad was "responsibly produced.''
It is a double standard that fits a pattern. In 2004, CBS and NBC rejected an ad from the United Church of Christ welcoming gay and lesbian people into its congregations. Back then, CBS said, "Because this commercial touches on the exclusion of gay couples and other minority groups by other individuals and organizations, and the fact that the (Bush administration) has recently proposed a constitutional amendment to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, this spot is unacceptable.''
By accepting the Focus on the Family ad in this context, CBS gives its political blessing to an organization that spends tremendous energy specifically excluding gay couples from full citizenship, and, with its support of conservative Supreme Court nominees, opposes full equality for people of color and women. It is a window to the future under the court's bitterly divided 5-4 ruling that frees corporations to spend unlimited money on political campaigns.
The paranoia of CBS is particularly needless when Americans now overwhelmingly support gay and lesbian rights short of marriage. CBS looks even more ridiculous when Admiral Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, this week declared that ending "don't ask, don't tell'' to let gay and lesbian soldiers serve openly is "the right thing to do,'' and former Joint Chiefs chairman Colin Powell recanted his 1990s opposition that led to the current "don't ask'' law.
It is particularly ironic when New Orleans Saints linebacker Scott Fujita told reporters this week he had no issue with broadcasting both the Tebow and the gay ad. "It's just me standing up for equal rights,'' Fujita said. He added, "Players are more tolerant than they get credit for.''
That is a lot more than can be said for CBS, where the C now stands for Chicken.
No one is coming to save us. Join with us.
The world is a pretty dark place right now. Economic inequality off the charts. The climate emergency. Supreme Court corruption in the U.S. and corporate capture worldwide. Democracy in many nations coming apart at the seams. Fascism threatens. It’s enough to make you wish for some powerful being to come along and save us. But the truth is this: no heroes are coming to save us. The only path to real and progressive change is when well-informed, well-intentioned people—fed up with being kicked around by the rich, the powerful, and the wicked—get organized and fight for the better world we all deserve. That’s why we created Common Dreams. We cover the issues that corporate media never will and lift up voices others would rather keep silent. But this people-powered media model can only survive with the support of readers like you. Can you join with us and donate right now to Common Dreams’ Mid-Year Campaign? |
© 2023 Boston Globe
Derrick Z. Jackson
Derrick Z. Jackson is a 2018 winner from the National Society of Newspaper Columnists, a 10-time winner from the National Association of Black Journalists and a Pulitzer Prize finalist and co-author of Project Puffin: The Improbable Quest to Bring a Beloved Seabird Back to Egg Rock (2015).
There are already at least two Christian broadcasting channels, so there is no need for CBS to be a right-wing revival tent for the Super Bowl.
Now, before all the knees start jerking, I want to be clear that this pro-choicer has no problem in the abstract with CBS's decision to air an ad featuring Florida football star Tim Tebow. The ad, funded by the conservative Christian group Focus on the Family, features the decision by Tebow's mother to reject the advice of doctors to have an abortion when she was very sick while the future Heisman Trophy winner was in her womb. That story is an unqualified, beautiful individual testament to faith and love.
But Focus on the Family wants to twist the free choice of this mother into a political vehicle to eliminate choice for all other women. But not even that ultimately offends me. Where CBS bears false witness is the fact that they accepted that ad while rejecting a Super Bowl ad for a gay dating service. The ad starts with one man in a Green Bay Packers jersey and the other in a Minnesota Vikings shirt cheering against each other. It ends with them making out on the couch.
Taste could not have been a consideration for rejection, especially when Super Bowls ads counsel men on the best drugs for erections (always for women, of course). After the 1993 Super Bowl, where the ads were nonstop promos for movies of mayhem, I wrote, "There were so many guns, fights and limp bodies I thought I was tuning into Bosnia.'' Virtually all the dead, unconscious, mutilated and threatened victims in the promos were women.
Advertising experts speculate that CBS relaxed its prior resistance to well-heeled advocacy ads to compensate for the loss of some traditional Super Bowl industrial advertisers in the recession. All CBS itself could do was speak in tongues about why it rejected the gay ad while accepting the ad from the far right. On the gay ad, CBS said, "After reviewing the ad, which is entirely commercial in nature, our Standards and Practices department decided not to accept this particular spot.'' The same department deemed that the Family on the Focus ad was "responsibly produced.''
It is a double standard that fits a pattern. In 2004, CBS and NBC rejected an ad from the United Church of Christ welcoming gay and lesbian people into its congregations. Back then, CBS said, "Because this commercial touches on the exclusion of gay couples and other minority groups by other individuals and organizations, and the fact that the (Bush administration) has recently proposed a constitutional amendment to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, this spot is unacceptable.''
By accepting the Focus on the Family ad in this context, CBS gives its political blessing to an organization that spends tremendous energy specifically excluding gay couples from full citizenship, and, with its support of conservative Supreme Court nominees, opposes full equality for people of color and women. It is a window to the future under the court's bitterly divided 5-4 ruling that frees corporations to spend unlimited money on political campaigns.
The paranoia of CBS is particularly needless when Americans now overwhelmingly support gay and lesbian rights short of marriage. CBS looks even more ridiculous when Admiral Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, this week declared that ending "don't ask, don't tell'' to let gay and lesbian soldiers serve openly is "the right thing to do,'' and former Joint Chiefs chairman Colin Powell recanted his 1990s opposition that led to the current "don't ask'' law.
It is particularly ironic when New Orleans Saints linebacker Scott Fujita told reporters this week he had no issue with broadcasting both the Tebow and the gay ad. "It's just me standing up for equal rights,'' Fujita said. He added, "Players are more tolerant than they get credit for.''
That is a lot more than can be said for CBS, where the C now stands for Chicken.
Derrick Z. Jackson
Derrick Z. Jackson is a 2018 winner from the National Society of Newspaper Columnists, a 10-time winner from the National Association of Black Journalists and a Pulitzer Prize finalist and co-author of Project Puffin: The Improbable Quest to Bring a Beloved Seabird Back to Egg Rock (2015).
There are already at least two Christian broadcasting channels, so there is no need for CBS to be a right-wing revival tent for the Super Bowl.
Now, before all the knees start jerking, I want to be clear that this pro-choicer has no problem in the abstract with CBS's decision to air an ad featuring Florida football star Tim Tebow. The ad, funded by the conservative Christian group Focus on the Family, features the decision by Tebow's mother to reject the advice of doctors to have an abortion when she was very sick while the future Heisman Trophy winner was in her womb. That story is an unqualified, beautiful individual testament to faith and love.
But Focus on the Family wants to twist the free choice of this mother into a political vehicle to eliminate choice for all other women. But not even that ultimately offends me. Where CBS bears false witness is the fact that they accepted that ad while rejecting a Super Bowl ad for a gay dating service. The ad starts with one man in a Green Bay Packers jersey and the other in a Minnesota Vikings shirt cheering against each other. It ends with them making out on the couch.
Taste could not have been a consideration for rejection, especially when Super Bowls ads counsel men on the best drugs for erections (always for women, of course). After the 1993 Super Bowl, where the ads were nonstop promos for movies of mayhem, I wrote, "There were so many guns, fights and limp bodies I thought I was tuning into Bosnia.'' Virtually all the dead, unconscious, mutilated and threatened victims in the promos were women.
Advertising experts speculate that CBS relaxed its prior resistance to well-heeled advocacy ads to compensate for the loss of some traditional Super Bowl industrial advertisers in the recession. All CBS itself could do was speak in tongues about why it rejected the gay ad while accepting the ad from the far right. On the gay ad, CBS said, "After reviewing the ad, which is entirely commercial in nature, our Standards and Practices department decided not to accept this particular spot.'' The same department deemed that the Family on the Focus ad was "responsibly produced.''
It is a double standard that fits a pattern. In 2004, CBS and NBC rejected an ad from the United Church of Christ welcoming gay and lesbian people into its congregations. Back then, CBS said, "Because this commercial touches on the exclusion of gay couples and other minority groups by other individuals and organizations, and the fact that the (Bush administration) has recently proposed a constitutional amendment to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, this spot is unacceptable.''
By accepting the Focus on the Family ad in this context, CBS gives its political blessing to an organization that spends tremendous energy specifically excluding gay couples from full citizenship, and, with its support of conservative Supreme Court nominees, opposes full equality for people of color and women. It is a window to the future under the court's bitterly divided 5-4 ruling that frees corporations to spend unlimited money on political campaigns.
The paranoia of CBS is particularly needless when Americans now overwhelmingly support gay and lesbian rights short of marriage. CBS looks even more ridiculous when Admiral Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, this week declared that ending "don't ask, don't tell'' to let gay and lesbian soldiers serve openly is "the right thing to do,'' and former Joint Chiefs chairman Colin Powell recanted his 1990s opposition that led to the current "don't ask'' law.
It is particularly ironic when New Orleans Saints linebacker Scott Fujita told reporters this week he had no issue with broadcasting both the Tebow and the gay ad. "It's just me standing up for equal rights,'' Fujita said. He added, "Players are more tolerant than they get credit for.''
That is a lot more than can be said for CBS, where the C now stands for Chicken.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.