

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
How to best sum up the first decade of this century? Frank Rich, the New York Times columnist, recently used the Tiger Woods story to suggest that the 00's were years of fantasy and denial, where we believed what we wanted to believe, despite facts and evidence. He's right.
I'd broaden Rich's analysis to focus on the result of our cognitive dissonance: A decade in which we missed historic opportunities to change course - opportunities that are rare and precious. Big events repeatedly offered us a chance to step onto the road less traveled - a road we can walk together to a better, more just, more sustainable, and more peaceful future. Yet we took familiar, often foolish paths.
The '00s began with a presidential election that highlighted the deep, structural flaws in our electoral system. That includes an Electoral College scheme that excludes two-thirds of Americans - those living in "safe states" - from meaningful participation in choosing a president, makes a mockery of the democratic principle of "one person, one vote," and enables partisan shenanigans in one closely divided state to change the national outcome.
But we did little. Politicians elected under the current system are loathe to change "what brung 'em," lofty speeches about democracy notwithstanding. Despite new awareness, and the tireless of efforts of dedicated reformers, no broad-based movement for democracy reform was born. The system remains largely the same.
The murder of innocents on September 11 created an historic opportunity to rally the world to a new way forward, one in which international cooperation routinely triumphs over division, conflict and war. Much of humanity stood by our side, ready for bold American leadership. Instead, led by small-minded ideologues, we further entrenched militarism and violence as acceptable tools of foreign policy, and the opportunity soon vanished. We rewarded those ideologues with four more years in office.
We bombed and invaded two nations, killing hundreds of thousands, displacing millions, spending trillions. And for much of the decade, our use of mechanized, high-tech violence has been just another story on the news - and rarely the lead story.
Has the result of this bloodshed been greater security? At decade's end, a hapless criminal intent on murder - and known to our intelligence services - bought a plane ticket with cash, traveled internationally with no luggage, and still boarded an aircraft with a bomb.
When more than 1,000 of America's poor and mostly black residents of New Orleans died during Hurricane Katrina, we were outraged - at incompetent decision-makers and our own indifference to poverty and injustice. In our national anguish, we vowed to address systemic poverty across America. Have we? Today, the gap between rich and poor is wider, more families survive on food stamps, and long-term unemployment has skyrocketed.
In the latter half of the decade, a financial system that handsomely compensates those who make money on money led us to disaster, hollowed out our economy, eliminated millions of jobs, and destroyed the savings of tens of millions. Our response? We rewarded the perpetrators with bailouts and trillions in low-interest loans they quickly flipped into easy profits by doing the same things they always do. Fool me once? Twice? A thousand times?
Have we used this opportunity for substantial change? It seems not. We continue to focus too much of our wealth of human capital - creativity, ingenuity, imagination, compassion - on production and consumption and growth-at-all-costs, rather than on solving longstanding, intractable problems. (See "poverty," above.) We do this even as we learn, day by day, how our extractive, consumption-based economy pushes our fragile ecosystems to the brink.
The decade was capped by a president accepting a peace prize with a speech defending war, an address that wholly misrepresented and ignored successful, nonviolent movements for change in eastern Europe and elsewhere. He perpetuated the myth that a just cause can be advanced justly with violence - a belief shared by murderous fanatics.
Will the next decade be different? Will we seize opportunities for change instead of being distracted by pop-culture spectacle or retreating into the short-term comfort of denial? Can we move away from greed, competition, consumerism, and violence - and toward community, sustainability, commonwealth, and love?
Of course we can. Opportunity exists in every moment, should we choose - individually and collectively - to seize it.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
How to best sum up the first decade of this century? Frank Rich, the New York Times columnist, recently used the Tiger Woods story to suggest that the 00's were years of fantasy and denial, where we believed what we wanted to believe, despite facts and evidence. He's right.
I'd broaden Rich's analysis to focus on the result of our cognitive dissonance: A decade in which we missed historic opportunities to change course - opportunities that are rare and precious. Big events repeatedly offered us a chance to step onto the road less traveled - a road we can walk together to a better, more just, more sustainable, and more peaceful future. Yet we took familiar, often foolish paths.
The '00s began with a presidential election that highlighted the deep, structural flaws in our electoral system. That includes an Electoral College scheme that excludes two-thirds of Americans - those living in "safe states" - from meaningful participation in choosing a president, makes a mockery of the democratic principle of "one person, one vote," and enables partisan shenanigans in one closely divided state to change the national outcome.
But we did little. Politicians elected under the current system are loathe to change "what brung 'em," lofty speeches about democracy notwithstanding. Despite new awareness, and the tireless of efforts of dedicated reformers, no broad-based movement for democracy reform was born. The system remains largely the same.
The murder of innocents on September 11 created an historic opportunity to rally the world to a new way forward, one in which international cooperation routinely triumphs over division, conflict and war. Much of humanity stood by our side, ready for bold American leadership. Instead, led by small-minded ideologues, we further entrenched militarism and violence as acceptable tools of foreign policy, and the opportunity soon vanished. We rewarded those ideologues with four more years in office.
We bombed and invaded two nations, killing hundreds of thousands, displacing millions, spending trillions. And for much of the decade, our use of mechanized, high-tech violence has been just another story on the news - and rarely the lead story.
Has the result of this bloodshed been greater security? At decade's end, a hapless criminal intent on murder - and known to our intelligence services - bought a plane ticket with cash, traveled internationally with no luggage, and still boarded an aircraft with a bomb.
When more than 1,000 of America's poor and mostly black residents of New Orleans died during Hurricane Katrina, we were outraged - at incompetent decision-makers and our own indifference to poverty and injustice. In our national anguish, we vowed to address systemic poverty across America. Have we? Today, the gap between rich and poor is wider, more families survive on food stamps, and long-term unemployment has skyrocketed.
In the latter half of the decade, a financial system that handsomely compensates those who make money on money led us to disaster, hollowed out our economy, eliminated millions of jobs, and destroyed the savings of tens of millions. Our response? We rewarded the perpetrators with bailouts and trillions in low-interest loans they quickly flipped into easy profits by doing the same things they always do. Fool me once? Twice? A thousand times?
Have we used this opportunity for substantial change? It seems not. We continue to focus too much of our wealth of human capital - creativity, ingenuity, imagination, compassion - on production and consumption and growth-at-all-costs, rather than on solving longstanding, intractable problems. (See "poverty," above.) We do this even as we learn, day by day, how our extractive, consumption-based economy pushes our fragile ecosystems to the brink.
The decade was capped by a president accepting a peace prize with a speech defending war, an address that wholly misrepresented and ignored successful, nonviolent movements for change in eastern Europe and elsewhere. He perpetuated the myth that a just cause can be advanced justly with violence - a belief shared by murderous fanatics.
Will the next decade be different? Will we seize opportunities for change instead of being distracted by pop-culture spectacle or retreating into the short-term comfort of denial? Can we move away from greed, competition, consumerism, and violence - and toward community, sustainability, commonwealth, and love?
Of course we can. Opportunity exists in every moment, should we choose - individually and collectively - to seize it.
How to best sum up the first decade of this century? Frank Rich, the New York Times columnist, recently used the Tiger Woods story to suggest that the 00's were years of fantasy and denial, where we believed what we wanted to believe, despite facts and evidence. He's right.
I'd broaden Rich's analysis to focus on the result of our cognitive dissonance: A decade in which we missed historic opportunities to change course - opportunities that are rare and precious. Big events repeatedly offered us a chance to step onto the road less traveled - a road we can walk together to a better, more just, more sustainable, and more peaceful future. Yet we took familiar, often foolish paths.
The '00s began with a presidential election that highlighted the deep, structural flaws in our electoral system. That includes an Electoral College scheme that excludes two-thirds of Americans - those living in "safe states" - from meaningful participation in choosing a president, makes a mockery of the democratic principle of "one person, one vote," and enables partisan shenanigans in one closely divided state to change the national outcome.
But we did little. Politicians elected under the current system are loathe to change "what brung 'em," lofty speeches about democracy notwithstanding. Despite new awareness, and the tireless of efforts of dedicated reformers, no broad-based movement for democracy reform was born. The system remains largely the same.
The murder of innocents on September 11 created an historic opportunity to rally the world to a new way forward, one in which international cooperation routinely triumphs over division, conflict and war. Much of humanity stood by our side, ready for bold American leadership. Instead, led by small-minded ideologues, we further entrenched militarism and violence as acceptable tools of foreign policy, and the opportunity soon vanished. We rewarded those ideologues with four more years in office.
We bombed and invaded two nations, killing hundreds of thousands, displacing millions, spending trillions. And for much of the decade, our use of mechanized, high-tech violence has been just another story on the news - and rarely the lead story.
Has the result of this bloodshed been greater security? At decade's end, a hapless criminal intent on murder - and known to our intelligence services - bought a plane ticket with cash, traveled internationally with no luggage, and still boarded an aircraft with a bomb.
When more than 1,000 of America's poor and mostly black residents of New Orleans died during Hurricane Katrina, we were outraged - at incompetent decision-makers and our own indifference to poverty and injustice. In our national anguish, we vowed to address systemic poverty across America. Have we? Today, the gap between rich and poor is wider, more families survive on food stamps, and long-term unemployment has skyrocketed.
In the latter half of the decade, a financial system that handsomely compensates those who make money on money led us to disaster, hollowed out our economy, eliminated millions of jobs, and destroyed the savings of tens of millions. Our response? We rewarded the perpetrators with bailouts and trillions in low-interest loans they quickly flipped into easy profits by doing the same things they always do. Fool me once? Twice? A thousand times?
Have we used this opportunity for substantial change? It seems not. We continue to focus too much of our wealth of human capital - creativity, ingenuity, imagination, compassion - on production and consumption and growth-at-all-costs, rather than on solving longstanding, intractable problems. (See "poverty," above.) We do this even as we learn, day by day, how our extractive, consumption-based economy pushes our fragile ecosystems to the brink.
The decade was capped by a president accepting a peace prize with a speech defending war, an address that wholly misrepresented and ignored successful, nonviolent movements for change in eastern Europe and elsewhere. He perpetuated the myth that a just cause can be advanced justly with violence - a belief shared by murderous fanatics.
Will the next decade be different? Will we seize opportunities for change instead of being distracted by pop-culture spectacle or retreating into the short-term comfort of denial? Can we move away from greed, competition, consumerism, and violence - and toward community, sustainability, commonwealth, and love?
Of course we can. Opportunity exists in every moment, should we choose - individually and collectively - to seize it.