Dec 23, 2009
The Senate health care bill betrays the promise of fundamental
"change" Democrats made during the 2008 election. It cloaks a handout
to the health industry in the veneer of "reform."
Though it includes some positive subsidies and regulatory tweaks,
the bill creates few mechanisms to halt premium increases, bust
insurance monopolies and end price discrimination - and it includes no
public insurance option.
Worst of all, it doesn't actually extend "new coverage" to 30
million more Americans. Through the "individual mandate," it simply
makes people criminals if they don't buy expensive insurance from the
private corporations that helped create the health care crisis in the
first place.
President Obama says this legislation "stand(s) up to the special
interests" - but after spending millions of dollars on campaign
contributions and lobbying, the special interests clearly disagree.
When the Senate bill was unveiled, health stocks skyrocketed. Meanwhile, an insurance insider told reporters, "We win."
For these reasons, the Senate must vote "no" and start over.
Notice the loudest argument against that move is procedural, not
substantive. While Senate Democrats acknowledge the bill's
shortcomings, they nonetheless echo Princess Leia's melodramatic plea
in Star Wars, insisting their bill is our "only hope." This, from lawmakers who didn't even allow floor votes on a stronger bill.
The "only hope" rationale, of course, is an artificially
manufactured assumption, not some Law of Nature. It's the same
assumption that justified unregulated bank bailouts and hasty war
resolutions - and it is a canard because it comes from the very
politicians controlling the legislative schedule. Indeed, there's no
concrete reason Democrats cannot take a month to rewrite this bill.
Some counter that quick passage is necessary to immediately help the
uninsured. But since many of this legislation's minimal benefits don't begin until 2014, there's no obvious rush.
Others cite the aftermath of 1994's health care defeat as proof
Congress will drop the issue if this bill dies. Unlike the past,
though, Democrats are publicly staking their entire name on passing a
bill. As Rep.
To date, such desperation has compromised away nearly every genuine
reform that might have been in this legislation. But if the Senate now
musters a "no" vote, that same desperation means Democrats will almost
certainly go back to the drawing board. And when they do, public
outrage at the current bill's corruption will compel them to fulfill,
rather than ignore, their original promise of "change we can believe
in."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
© 2023 USA Today
David Sirota
David Sirota is an award-winning journalist and bestselling author living in Denver, Colorado. He was nominated for an Academy Award for his work helping create the story for the film DON'T LOOK UP, which became one of the most widely viewed movies in Netflix's history. He is the founder and editor of The Daily Poster, an editor at large at Jacobin Magazine and a columnist at The Guardian. He served as Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign speechwriter in 2020. Sirota is the author of "Back to Our Future" and "Hostile Takeover: How Big Money & Corruption Conquered Our Government--And How We Take It Back". His website: www.davidsirota.com.
The Senate health care bill betrays the promise of fundamental
"change" Democrats made during the 2008 election. It cloaks a handout
to the health industry in the veneer of "reform."
Though it includes some positive subsidies and regulatory tweaks,
the bill creates few mechanisms to halt premium increases, bust
insurance monopolies and end price discrimination - and it includes no
public insurance option.
Worst of all, it doesn't actually extend "new coverage" to 30
million more Americans. Through the "individual mandate," it simply
makes people criminals if they don't buy expensive insurance from the
private corporations that helped create the health care crisis in the
first place.
President Obama says this legislation "stand(s) up to the special
interests" - but after spending millions of dollars on campaign
contributions and lobbying, the special interests clearly disagree.
When the Senate bill was unveiled, health stocks skyrocketed. Meanwhile, an insurance insider told reporters, "We win."
For these reasons, the Senate must vote "no" and start over.
Notice the loudest argument against that move is procedural, not
substantive. While Senate Democrats acknowledge the bill's
shortcomings, they nonetheless echo Princess Leia's melodramatic plea
in Star Wars, insisting their bill is our "only hope." This, from lawmakers who didn't even allow floor votes on a stronger bill.
The "only hope" rationale, of course, is an artificially
manufactured assumption, not some Law of Nature. It's the same
assumption that justified unregulated bank bailouts and hasty war
resolutions - and it is a canard because it comes from the very
politicians controlling the legislative schedule. Indeed, there's no
concrete reason Democrats cannot take a month to rewrite this bill.
Some counter that quick passage is necessary to immediately help the
uninsured. But since many of this legislation's minimal benefits don't begin until 2014, there's no obvious rush.
Others cite the aftermath of 1994's health care defeat as proof
Congress will drop the issue if this bill dies. Unlike the past,
though, Democrats are publicly staking their entire name on passing a
bill. As Rep.
To date, such desperation has compromised away nearly every genuine
reform that might have been in this legislation. But if the Senate now
musters a "no" vote, that same desperation means Democrats will almost
certainly go back to the drawing board. And when they do, public
outrage at the current bill's corruption will compel them to fulfill,
rather than ignore, their original promise of "change we can believe
in."
David Sirota
David Sirota is an award-winning journalist and bestselling author living in Denver, Colorado. He was nominated for an Academy Award for his work helping create the story for the film DON'T LOOK UP, which became one of the most widely viewed movies in Netflix's history. He is the founder and editor of The Daily Poster, an editor at large at Jacobin Magazine and a columnist at The Guardian. He served as Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign speechwriter in 2020. Sirota is the author of "Back to Our Future" and "Hostile Takeover: How Big Money & Corruption Conquered Our Government--And How We Take It Back". His website: www.davidsirota.com.
The Senate health care bill betrays the promise of fundamental
"change" Democrats made during the 2008 election. It cloaks a handout
to the health industry in the veneer of "reform."
Though it includes some positive subsidies and regulatory tweaks,
the bill creates few mechanisms to halt premium increases, bust
insurance monopolies and end price discrimination - and it includes no
public insurance option.
Worst of all, it doesn't actually extend "new coverage" to 30
million more Americans. Through the "individual mandate," it simply
makes people criminals if they don't buy expensive insurance from the
private corporations that helped create the health care crisis in the
first place.
President Obama says this legislation "stand(s) up to the special
interests" - but after spending millions of dollars on campaign
contributions and lobbying, the special interests clearly disagree.
When the Senate bill was unveiled, health stocks skyrocketed. Meanwhile, an insurance insider told reporters, "We win."
For these reasons, the Senate must vote "no" and start over.
Notice the loudest argument against that move is procedural, not
substantive. While Senate Democrats acknowledge the bill's
shortcomings, they nonetheless echo Princess Leia's melodramatic plea
in Star Wars, insisting their bill is our "only hope." This, from lawmakers who didn't even allow floor votes on a stronger bill.
The "only hope" rationale, of course, is an artificially
manufactured assumption, not some Law of Nature. It's the same
assumption that justified unregulated bank bailouts and hasty war
resolutions - and it is a canard because it comes from the very
politicians controlling the legislative schedule. Indeed, there's no
concrete reason Democrats cannot take a month to rewrite this bill.
Some counter that quick passage is necessary to immediately help the
uninsured. But since many of this legislation's minimal benefits don't begin until 2014, there's no obvious rush.
Others cite the aftermath of 1994's health care defeat as proof
Congress will drop the issue if this bill dies. Unlike the past,
though, Democrats are publicly staking their entire name on passing a
bill. As Rep.
To date, such desperation has compromised away nearly every genuine
reform that might have been in this legislation. But if the Senate now
musters a "no" vote, that same desperation means Democrats will almost
certainly go back to the drawing board. And when they do, public
outrage at the current bill's corruption will compel them to fulfill,
rather than ignore, their original promise of "change we can believe
in."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.