SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Without even one cable news outlet promoting the event and even without Glenn Beck--even without corporate lobbyists sending in activists by the thousands, and corporate advertisers publicizing it--the National Equality March on the D.C. mall on October 11 drew one hell of a crowd.
If for-profit media had given each equality marcher the air time dedicated to the 60,000 or so teabaggers that came to D.C. a month ago, they'd still be hogging the airwaves, dawn to dusk. Most reports estimate October 11's turnout at between 100 and 200,000. The DC Fire Department put the September 12 crowd at 60-70,000, max.
If we had seen commensurate coverage, we might have learned that October 11's march was organized by locally-focused, nationally-connected activists representing every race, class and faith. Everyone keeps calling it a gay rights march, but that was not actually its name.
The National Equality March was named as it was for a reason. Organizers see themselves as part of something larger.
Said one speaker after another: We want Justice but not just for us.
Equal Protection. Equal Rights. We need to add Equal Coverage.
If we'd seen it on the news, we might have learned that the Equality March wasn't called by the big established DC organizations: it was pushed by the fringe, and the youth, and the not-established-yet. Decentralized organizers, with a close eye on Congress, and an agenda that's national, local, and still has time for state-based stuff? Fancy that. It seems like the kind of structure that could change politics. Imagine what we'd learn, given half a chance.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Without even one cable news outlet promoting the event and even without Glenn Beck--even without corporate lobbyists sending in activists by the thousands, and corporate advertisers publicizing it--the National Equality March on the D.C. mall on October 11 drew one hell of a crowd.
If for-profit media had given each equality marcher the air time dedicated to the 60,000 or so teabaggers that came to D.C. a month ago, they'd still be hogging the airwaves, dawn to dusk. Most reports estimate October 11's turnout at between 100 and 200,000. The DC Fire Department put the September 12 crowd at 60-70,000, max.
If we had seen commensurate coverage, we might have learned that October 11's march was organized by locally-focused, nationally-connected activists representing every race, class and faith. Everyone keeps calling it a gay rights march, but that was not actually its name.
The National Equality March was named as it was for a reason. Organizers see themselves as part of something larger.
Said one speaker after another: We want Justice but not just for us.
Equal Protection. Equal Rights. We need to add Equal Coverage.
If we'd seen it on the news, we might have learned that the Equality March wasn't called by the big established DC organizations: it was pushed by the fringe, and the youth, and the not-established-yet. Decentralized organizers, with a close eye on Congress, and an agenda that's national, local, and still has time for state-based stuff? Fancy that. It seems like the kind of structure that could change politics. Imagine what we'd learn, given half a chance.
Without even one cable news outlet promoting the event and even without Glenn Beck--even without corporate lobbyists sending in activists by the thousands, and corporate advertisers publicizing it--the National Equality March on the D.C. mall on October 11 drew one hell of a crowd.
If for-profit media had given each equality marcher the air time dedicated to the 60,000 or so teabaggers that came to D.C. a month ago, they'd still be hogging the airwaves, dawn to dusk. Most reports estimate October 11's turnout at between 100 and 200,000. The DC Fire Department put the September 12 crowd at 60-70,000, max.
If we had seen commensurate coverage, we might have learned that October 11's march was organized by locally-focused, nationally-connected activists representing every race, class and faith. Everyone keeps calling it a gay rights march, but that was not actually its name.
The National Equality March was named as it was for a reason. Organizers see themselves as part of something larger.
Said one speaker after another: We want Justice but not just for us.
Equal Protection. Equal Rights. We need to add Equal Coverage.
If we'd seen it on the news, we might have learned that the Equality March wasn't called by the big established DC organizations: it was pushed by the fringe, and the youth, and the not-established-yet. Decentralized organizers, with a close eye on Congress, and an agenda that's national, local, and still has time for state-based stuff? Fancy that. It seems like the kind of structure that could change politics. Imagine what we'd learn, given half a chance.