Jul 25, 2009
At this moment -- when 72 percent of the nation supports a public plan
option and 14,000 people lose their healthcare every day -- the House
Blue Dogs and conservative Democratic Senators are doing just about
everything they can to cripple real health care reform.
So why does the media keep ceding them the label of "centrist" or
"moderate" as if they are the guardians of mainstream values?
In a recent profile on reform slayer Max Baucus -- Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and creator of his majority Republican "Coalition of the Willing" -- Washington Post
reporter Dan Eggen refers to Baucus as "a longtime centrist in the
Democratic caucus." Even Harold Meyerson -- who along with E.J. Dionne
and Ruth Marcus keeps the Washington
Post op-ed page from being neocon central and is one of the best in
the business at understanding the ideologies at play in Washington -- in
a recent op-ed
repeatedly decries the "centrist Democrats" such as the Blue Dogs who
fight against taxing the richest 1 percent of Americans and promote a
"can't-do" view of government.
All Things Considered host Guy Raz recently introduced a story
on "forty centrist House Democrats from the so-called Blue Dog Coalition
[who] are threatening to block the proposal in its current form...." He
also spoke of "Congressman Mike Ross [who] heads up the Health Care
Taskforce for the centrist Blue Dog Democrats." Want to see how
"centrist" Mike Ross is? Check this out.
Even a good regional paper like Louisville's Courier-Journal--
in rightly blasting
the Blue Dogs as "deplorable" for being "unable to muster the spine to
pay for health care reform with even so innocuous a measure as higher
taxes on the richest 1 percent of Americans"--calls them "centrist".
The danger is that promoting the view that these conservative Democrats
are somehow at the center of our politics plays into the hands of those
who would like to marginalize progressives as far outside of the
mainstream. (And I have no doubt K Street is advising Republicans to
constantly refer to their Democratic allies as "moderate" and
"centrist".) It also misrepresents what most Americans want from the government in these times.
As Drew Westen, professor of psychology at Emory University, founder of
Westen Strategies, and author of the invaluable The Political
Brain,
told me: "The average American, according to all available
data, has largely moved slightly left of where it was in the Reagan
years, and with changing demographics, it will be far left of Reagan
and
Bush in twenty years. So to call Democrats who are substantially right
of the center of the electorate (let alone of their party), like Heath
Shuler, 'moderates,' is both to misrepresent the center of political
gravity in the general electorate and in the Democratic Party."
How we tell the story of this battle for health care reform matters and
will impact whether the battle is won or lost. So-called "centrists"
are far from the center of this debate. They are, in fact, out of touch
and out of the mainstream -- like the rest of their conservative
brethren.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
© 2023 The Nation
Katrina Vanden Heuvel
Katrina vanden Heuvel is an American editor and publisher. She is the editor, publisher, and part-owner of the magazine The Nation. She has been the magazine's editor since 1995.
At this moment -- when 72 percent of the nation supports a public plan
option and 14,000 people lose their healthcare every day -- the House
Blue Dogs and conservative Democratic Senators are doing just about
everything they can to cripple real health care reform.
So why does the media keep ceding them the label of "centrist" or
"moderate" as if they are the guardians of mainstream values?
In a recent profile on reform slayer Max Baucus -- Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and creator of his majority Republican "Coalition of the Willing" -- Washington Post
reporter Dan Eggen refers to Baucus as "a longtime centrist in the
Democratic caucus." Even Harold Meyerson -- who along with E.J. Dionne
and Ruth Marcus keeps the Washington
Post op-ed page from being neocon central and is one of the best in
the business at understanding the ideologies at play in Washington -- in
a recent op-ed
repeatedly decries the "centrist Democrats" such as the Blue Dogs who
fight against taxing the richest 1 percent of Americans and promote a
"can't-do" view of government.
All Things Considered host Guy Raz recently introduced a story
on "forty centrist House Democrats from the so-called Blue Dog Coalition
[who] are threatening to block the proposal in its current form...." He
also spoke of "Congressman Mike Ross [who] heads up the Health Care
Taskforce for the centrist Blue Dog Democrats." Want to see how
"centrist" Mike Ross is? Check this out.
Even a good regional paper like Louisville's Courier-Journal--
in rightly blasting
the Blue Dogs as "deplorable" for being "unable to muster the spine to
pay for health care reform with even so innocuous a measure as higher
taxes on the richest 1 percent of Americans"--calls them "centrist".
The danger is that promoting the view that these conservative Democrats
are somehow at the center of our politics plays into the hands of those
who would like to marginalize progressives as far outside of the
mainstream. (And I have no doubt K Street is advising Republicans to
constantly refer to their Democratic allies as "moderate" and
"centrist".) It also misrepresents what most Americans want from the government in these times.
As Drew Westen, professor of psychology at Emory University, founder of
Westen Strategies, and author of the invaluable The Political
Brain,
told me: "The average American, according to all available
data, has largely moved slightly left of where it was in the Reagan
years, and with changing demographics, it will be far left of Reagan
and
Bush in twenty years. So to call Democrats who are substantially right
of the center of the electorate (let alone of their party), like Heath
Shuler, 'moderates,' is both to misrepresent the center of political
gravity in the general electorate and in the Democratic Party."
How we tell the story of this battle for health care reform matters and
will impact whether the battle is won or lost. So-called "centrists"
are far from the center of this debate. They are, in fact, out of touch
and out of the mainstream -- like the rest of their conservative
brethren.
Katrina Vanden Heuvel
Katrina vanden Heuvel is an American editor and publisher. She is the editor, publisher, and part-owner of the magazine The Nation. She has been the magazine's editor since 1995.
At this moment -- when 72 percent of the nation supports a public plan
option and 14,000 people lose their healthcare every day -- the House
Blue Dogs and conservative Democratic Senators are doing just about
everything they can to cripple real health care reform.
So why does the media keep ceding them the label of "centrist" or
"moderate" as if they are the guardians of mainstream values?
In a recent profile on reform slayer Max Baucus -- Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and creator of his majority Republican "Coalition of the Willing" -- Washington Post
reporter Dan Eggen refers to Baucus as "a longtime centrist in the
Democratic caucus." Even Harold Meyerson -- who along with E.J. Dionne
and Ruth Marcus keeps the Washington
Post op-ed page from being neocon central and is one of the best in
the business at understanding the ideologies at play in Washington -- in
a recent op-ed
repeatedly decries the "centrist Democrats" such as the Blue Dogs who
fight against taxing the richest 1 percent of Americans and promote a
"can't-do" view of government.
All Things Considered host Guy Raz recently introduced a story
on "forty centrist House Democrats from the so-called Blue Dog Coalition
[who] are threatening to block the proposal in its current form...." He
also spoke of "Congressman Mike Ross [who] heads up the Health Care
Taskforce for the centrist Blue Dog Democrats." Want to see how
"centrist" Mike Ross is? Check this out.
Even a good regional paper like Louisville's Courier-Journal--
in rightly blasting
the Blue Dogs as "deplorable" for being "unable to muster the spine to
pay for health care reform with even so innocuous a measure as higher
taxes on the richest 1 percent of Americans"--calls them "centrist".
The danger is that promoting the view that these conservative Democrats
are somehow at the center of our politics plays into the hands of those
who would like to marginalize progressives as far outside of the
mainstream. (And I have no doubt K Street is advising Republicans to
constantly refer to their Democratic allies as "moderate" and
"centrist".) It also misrepresents what most Americans want from the government in these times.
As Drew Westen, professor of psychology at Emory University, founder of
Westen Strategies, and author of the invaluable The Political
Brain,
told me: "The average American, according to all available
data, has largely moved slightly left of where it was in the Reagan
years, and with changing demographics, it will be far left of Reagan
and
Bush in twenty years. So to call Democrats who are substantially right
of the center of the electorate (let alone of their party), like Heath
Shuler, 'moderates,' is both to misrepresent the center of political
gravity in the general electorate and in the Democratic Party."
How we tell the story of this battle for health care reform matters and
will impact whether the battle is won or lost. So-called "centrists"
are far from the center of this debate. They are, in fact, out of touch
and out of the mainstream -- like the rest of their conservative
brethren.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.