

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
At this moment -- when 72 percent of the nation supports a public plan
option and 14,000 people lose their healthcare every day -- the House
Blue Dogs and conservative Democratic Senators are doing just about
everything they can to cripple real health care reform.
So why does the media keep ceding them the label of "centrist" or
"moderate" as if they are the guardians of mainstream values?
In a recent profile on reform slayer Max Baucus -- Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and creator of his majority Republican "Coalition of the Willing" -- Washington Post
reporter Dan Eggen refers to Baucus as "a longtime centrist in the
Democratic caucus." Even Harold Meyerson -- who along with E.J. Dionne
and Ruth Marcus keeps the Washington
Post op-ed page from being neocon central and is one of the best in
the business at understanding the ideologies at play in Washington -- in
a recent op-ed
repeatedly decries the "centrist Democrats" such as the Blue Dogs who
fight against taxing the richest 1 percent of Americans and promote a
"can't-do" view of government.
All Things Considered host Guy Raz recently introduced a story
on "forty centrist House Democrats from the so-called Blue Dog Coalition
[who] are threatening to block the proposal in its current form...." He
also spoke of "Congressman Mike Ross [who] heads up the Health Care
Taskforce for the centrist Blue Dog Democrats." Want to see how
"centrist" Mike Ross is? Check this out.
Even a good regional paper like Louisville's Courier-Journal--
in rightly blasting
the Blue Dogs as "deplorable" for being "unable to muster the spine to
pay for health care reform with even so innocuous a measure as higher
taxes on the richest 1 percent of Americans"--calls them "centrist".
The danger is that promoting the view that these conservative Democrats
are somehow at the center of our politics plays into the hands of those
who would like to marginalize progressives as far outside of the
mainstream. (And I have no doubt K Street is advising Republicans to
constantly refer to their Democratic allies as "moderate" and
"centrist".) It also misrepresents what most Americans want from the government in these times.
As Drew Westen, professor of psychology at Emory University, founder of
Westen Strategies, and author of the invaluable The Political
Brain,
told me: "The average American, according to all available
data, has largely moved slightly left of where it was in the Reagan
years, and with changing demographics, it will be far left of Reagan
and
Bush in twenty years. So to call Democrats who are substantially right
of the center of the electorate (let alone of their party), like Heath
Shuler, 'moderates,' is both to misrepresent the center of political
gravity in the general electorate and in the Democratic Party."
How we tell the story of this battle for health care reform matters and
will impact whether the battle is won or lost. So-called "centrists"
are far from the center of this debate. They are, in fact, out of touch
and out of the mainstream -- like the rest of their conservative
brethren.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
At this moment -- when 72 percent of the nation supports a public plan
option and 14,000 people lose their healthcare every day -- the House
Blue Dogs and conservative Democratic Senators are doing just about
everything they can to cripple real health care reform.
So why does the media keep ceding them the label of "centrist" or
"moderate" as if they are the guardians of mainstream values?
In a recent profile on reform slayer Max Baucus -- Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and creator of his majority Republican "Coalition of the Willing" -- Washington Post
reporter Dan Eggen refers to Baucus as "a longtime centrist in the
Democratic caucus." Even Harold Meyerson -- who along with E.J. Dionne
and Ruth Marcus keeps the Washington
Post op-ed page from being neocon central and is one of the best in
the business at understanding the ideologies at play in Washington -- in
a recent op-ed
repeatedly decries the "centrist Democrats" such as the Blue Dogs who
fight against taxing the richest 1 percent of Americans and promote a
"can't-do" view of government.
All Things Considered host Guy Raz recently introduced a story
on "forty centrist House Democrats from the so-called Blue Dog Coalition
[who] are threatening to block the proposal in its current form...." He
also spoke of "Congressman Mike Ross [who] heads up the Health Care
Taskforce for the centrist Blue Dog Democrats." Want to see how
"centrist" Mike Ross is? Check this out.
Even a good regional paper like Louisville's Courier-Journal--
in rightly blasting
the Blue Dogs as "deplorable" for being "unable to muster the spine to
pay for health care reform with even so innocuous a measure as higher
taxes on the richest 1 percent of Americans"--calls them "centrist".
The danger is that promoting the view that these conservative Democrats
are somehow at the center of our politics plays into the hands of those
who would like to marginalize progressives as far outside of the
mainstream. (And I have no doubt K Street is advising Republicans to
constantly refer to their Democratic allies as "moderate" and
"centrist".) It also misrepresents what most Americans want from the government in these times.
As Drew Westen, professor of psychology at Emory University, founder of
Westen Strategies, and author of the invaluable The Political
Brain,
told me: "The average American, according to all available
data, has largely moved slightly left of where it was in the Reagan
years, and with changing demographics, it will be far left of Reagan
and
Bush in twenty years. So to call Democrats who are substantially right
of the center of the electorate (let alone of their party), like Heath
Shuler, 'moderates,' is both to misrepresent the center of political
gravity in the general electorate and in the Democratic Party."
How we tell the story of this battle for health care reform matters and
will impact whether the battle is won or lost. So-called "centrists"
are far from the center of this debate. They are, in fact, out of touch
and out of the mainstream -- like the rest of their conservative
brethren.
At this moment -- when 72 percent of the nation supports a public plan
option and 14,000 people lose their healthcare every day -- the House
Blue Dogs and conservative Democratic Senators are doing just about
everything they can to cripple real health care reform.
So why does the media keep ceding them the label of "centrist" or
"moderate" as if they are the guardians of mainstream values?
In a recent profile on reform slayer Max Baucus -- Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and creator of his majority Republican "Coalition of the Willing" -- Washington Post
reporter Dan Eggen refers to Baucus as "a longtime centrist in the
Democratic caucus." Even Harold Meyerson -- who along with E.J. Dionne
and Ruth Marcus keeps the Washington
Post op-ed page from being neocon central and is one of the best in
the business at understanding the ideologies at play in Washington -- in
a recent op-ed
repeatedly decries the "centrist Democrats" such as the Blue Dogs who
fight against taxing the richest 1 percent of Americans and promote a
"can't-do" view of government.
All Things Considered host Guy Raz recently introduced a story
on "forty centrist House Democrats from the so-called Blue Dog Coalition
[who] are threatening to block the proposal in its current form...." He
also spoke of "Congressman Mike Ross [who] heads up the Health Care
Taskforce for the centrist Blue Dog Democrats." Want to see how
"centrist" Mike Ross is? Check this out.
Even a good regional paper like Louisville's Courier-Journal--
in rightly blasting
the Blue Dogs as "deplorable" for being "unable to muster the spine to
pay for health care reform with even so innocuous a measure as higher
taxes on the richest 1 percent of Americans"--calls them "centrist".
The danger is that promoting the view that these conservative Democrats
are somehow at the center of our politics plays into the hands of those
who would like to marginalize progressives as far outside of the
mainstream. (And I have no doubt K Street is advising Republicans to
constantly refer to their Democratic allies as "moderate" and
"centrist".) It also misrepresents what most Americans want from the government in these times.
As Drew Westen, professor of psychology at Emory University, founder of
Westen Strategies, and author of the invaluable The Political
Brain,
told me: "The average American, according to all available
data, has largely moved slightly left of where it was in the Reagan
years, and with changing demographics, it will be far left of Reagan
and
Bush in twenty years. So to call Democrats who are substantially right
of the center of the electorate (let alone of their party), like Heath
Shuler, 'moderates,' is both to misrepresent the center of political
gravity in the general electorate and in the Democratic Party."
How we tell the story of this battle for health care reform matters and
will impact whether the battle is won or lost. So-called "centrists"
are far from the center of this debate. They are, in fact, out of touch
and out of the mainstream -- like the rest of their conservative
brethren.