

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Virginia congressman Eric Cantor may be a GOP rising star, but he sure
is a hypocrite. How else to describe someone who's a leading critic of
President Obama's Recovery Act and joins his congressional colleagues
to urge Virginia's Department of Transportation to apply for stimulus
money for high-speed rail? If that isn't two-faced, what is ?
He's also a demagogue: "Millions of jobs will be crushed by the
Administration's policies." Say what? The stimulus may have been too
small and overemphasized tax cuts, but it's helped states, including
his own, with longer unemployment benefits, expanded food stamps and
subsidies for people who've lost jobs to extend their health insurance.
It's also kept teachers in the classroom, cops on the street and got
workers rehired. Hours after Cantor delivered the GOP's weekly radio
address blasting the stimulus, Vice-President Biden announced that $1.5
million of the bill's money would go to the Richmond Police Department
to retain officers. And $20 million is going to Chesterfield County, a
suburb of Richmond, to help 275 teachers from being fired. Virginia's
working men and women should remember that Cantor fought hard to cut a
provision in the stimulus bill that was designed to help low-income
workers.
As Obama marks his sixth month in office, his Presidency will be judged
by its laser-like focus on creating jobs, good jobs, and many of them.
Double-digit unemployment is a ticking time bomb and his economic team
needs to work quickly to defuse it. But Cantor & crew don't care
about creating jobs. They want to spin the debate about the economy so
their party, which has absolutely nothing to offer working people,
games the 2010 midterm elections.
It may be, as some argue, that the politics of getting a second
stimulus through a Congress filled with GOP obstructionists and
conservative Democrats is too tough at this time -- especially with the
battle for healthcare reform in full gear. If that's the case, what's
needed instead is a simple and comprehensive package that focuses on
job creation. In their must-read Nation article, "A Jobless Recovery"
(July 13), Leo Hindery Jr. and Leo Gerard lay out a set of common-sense
proposals for a job-led recovery. "We can either focus our economic
recovery efforts on creating full employment for the 150 million
workers who are not part of the top 0.2 percent and on rebuilding the
country's manufacturing base. Or, as we have been doing for nearly
three decades, we can concentrate on policies that mostly just benefit
the incomes of the wealthiest 300,000."
The economic spin battle underway -- disconnected from the real economy
and working Americans' lives -- is filled with demagogic and alarmist
rhetoric about out-of-control government spending and federal debt. But
in the absence of consumer spending and with banks failing to lend --
even while they report record profits and hand out huge bonuses --
government is the last resort. It must spend in order to avert a deeper
recession.
But Eric Cantor and his crew just don't get it. Instead of laying out
job creation policies, they whine. And they whine. The question is, why
are we still listening to people who broke the back of the middle
class, engineered the largest redistribution of wealth upwards to the
very rich, and now dare to attack fairly modest government-led efforts
to help working families weather this economic crisis?
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Virginia congressman Eric Cantor may be a GOP rising star, but he sure
is a hypocrite. How else to describe someone who's a leading critic of
President Obama's Recovery Act and joins his congressional colleagues
to urge Virginia's Department of Transportation to apply for stimulus
money for high-speed rail? If that isn't two-faced, what is ?
He's also a demagogue: "Millions of jobs will be crushed by the
Administration's policies." Say what? The stimulus may have been too
small and overemphasized tax cuts, but it's helped states, including
his own, with longer unemployment benefits, expanded food stamps and
subsidies for people who've lost jobs to extend their health insurance.
It's also kept teachers in the classroom, cops on the street and got
workers rehired. Hours after Cantor delivered the GOP's weekly radio
address blasting the stimulus, Vice-President Biden announced that $1.5
million of the bill's money would go to the Richmond Police Department
to retain officers. And $20 million is going to Chesterfield County, a
suburb of Richmond, to help 275 teachers from being fired. Virginia's
working men and women should remember that Cantor fought hard to cut a
provision in the stimulus bill that was designed to help low-income
workers.
As Obama marks his sixth month in office, his Presidency will be judged
by its laser-like focus on creating jobs, good jobs, and many of them.
Double-digit unemployment is a ticking time bomb and his economic team
needs to work quickly to defuse it. But Cantor & crew don't care
about creating jobs. They want to spin the debate about the economy so
their party, which has absolutely nothing to offer working people,
games the 2010 midterm elections.
It may be, as some argue, that the politics of getting a second
stimulus through a Congress filled with GOP obstructionists and
conservative Democrats is too tough at this time -- especially with the
battle for healthcare reform in full gear. If that's the case, what's
needed instead is a simple and comprehensive package that focuses on
job creation. In their must-read Nation article, "A Jobless Recovery"
(July 13), Leo Hindery Jr. and Leo Gerard lay out a set of common-sense
proposals for a job-led recovery. "We can either focus our economic
recovery efforts on creating full employment for the 150 million
workers who are not part of the top 0.2 percent and on rebuilding the
country's manufacturing base. Or, as we have been doing for nearly
three decades, we can concentrate on policies that mostly just benefit
the incomes of the wealthiest 300,000."
The economic spin battle underway -- disconnected from the real economy
and working Americans' lives -- is filled with demagogic and alarmist
rhetoric about out-of-control government spending and federal debt. But
in the absence of consumer spending and with banks failing to lend --
even while they report record profits and hand out huge bonuses --
government is the last resort. It must spend in order to avert a deeper
recession.
But Eric Cantor and his crew just don't get it. Instead of laying out
job creation policies, they whine. And they whine. The question is, why
are we still listening to people who broke the back of the middle
class, engineered the largest redistribution of wealth upwards to the
very rich, and now dare to attack fairly modest government-led efforts
to help working families weather this economic crisis?
Virginia congressman Eric Cantor may be a GOP rising star, but he sure
is a hypocrite. How else to describe someone who's a leading critic of
President Obama's Recovery Act and joins his congressional colleagues
to urge Virginia's Department of Transportation to apply for stimulus
money for high-speed rail? If that isn't two-faced, what is ?
He's also a demagogue: "Millions of jobs will be crushed by the
Administration's policies." Say what? The stimulus may have been too
small and overemphasized tax cuts, but it's helped states, including
his own, with longer unemployment benefits, expanded food stamps and
subsidies for people who've lost jobs to extend their health insurance.
It's also kept teachers in the classroom, cops on the street and got
workers rehired. Hours after Cantor delivered the GOP's weekly radio
address blasting the stimulus, Vice-President Biden announced that $1.5
million of the bill's money would go to the Richmond Police Department
to retain officers. And $20 million is going to Chesterfield County, a
suburb of Richmond, to help 275 teachers from being fired. Virginia's
working men and women should remember that Cantor fought hard to cut a
provision in the stimulus bill that was designed to help low-income
workers.
As Obama marks his sixth month in office, his Presidency will be judged
by its laser-like focus on creating jobs, good jobs, and many of them.
Double-digit unemployment is a ticking time bomb and his economic team
needs to work quickly to defuse it. But Cantor & crew don't care
about creating jobs. They want to spin the debate about the economy so
their party, which has absolutely nothing to offer working people,
games the 2010 midterm elections.
It may be, as some argue, that the politics of getting a second
stimulus through a Congress filled with GOP obstructionists and
conservative Democrats is too tough at this time -- especially with the
battle for healthcare reform in full gear. If that's the case, what's
needed instead is a simple and comprehensive package that focuses on
job creation. In their must-read Nation article, "A Jobless Recovery"
(July 13), Leo Hindery Jr. and Leo Gerard lay out a set of common-sense
proposals for a job-led recovery. "We can either focus our economic
recovery efforts on creating full employment for the 150 million
workers who are not part of the top 0.2 percent and on rebuilding the
country's manufacturing base. Or, as we have been doing for nearly
three decades, we can concentrate on policies that mostly just benefit
the incomes of the wealthiest 300,000."
The economic spin battle underway -- disconnected from the real economy
and working Americans' lives -- is filled with demagogic and alarmist
rhetoric about out-of-control government spending and federal debt. But
in the absence of consumer spending and with banks failing to lend --
even while they report record profits and hand out huge bonuses --
government is the last resort. It must spend in order to avert a deeper
recession.
But Eric Cantor and his crew just don't get it. Instead of laying out
job creation policies, they whine. And they whine. The question is, why
are we still listening to people who broke the back of the middle
class, engineered the largest redistribution of wealth upwards to the
very rich, and now dare to attack fairly modest government-led efforts
to help working families weather this economic crisis?