Information Secured Through Torture Proved Unreliable, CIA Concluded
Peter Finn and Joby Warrick at the Washington Post:
When CIA officials subjected their first
high-value captive, Abu Zubaida, to waterboarding and other harsh
interrogation methods, they were convinced that they had in their
custody an al-Qaeda leader who knew details of operations yet to be
unleashed, and they were facing increasing pressure from the White
House to get those secrets out of him. The methods succeeded in
breaking him, and the stories he told of al-Qaeda terrorism plots sent
CIA officers around the globe chasing leads.In the end,
though, not a single significant plot was foiled as a result of Abu
Zubaida's tortured confessions, according to former senior government
officials who closely followed the interrogations. Nearly all of the
leads attained through the harsh measures quickly evaporated, while
most of the useful information from Abu Zubaida - chiefly names of
al-Qaeda members and associates - was obtained before waterboarding was
introduced, they said.
Lie No. 1: We do not torture. Since that doesn't work any more, it's time for the fallback.
Lie No. 2: We saved thousands of American lives by torture.
Note that Dick Cheney makes bald claims to the effect that
the security and safety of the nation rests on the use of torture
techniques that he introduced and hammered down on intelligence agents
who didn't want to use them. He doesn't ever cite a for-instance. When
pressed, he insists that this is all "top secret." This is another
instance of the use of security classifications to cover lies-in this
case, lies on top of other lies.
The truth is very clear. President Bush's torture
techniques provided our terrorist adversaries with their most
compelling recruitment theme ever. Thousands were mustered to their
side as a result. Four thousand Americans died in Iraq as a
consequence, and thousands of other Americans suffered severe injuries
from IEDs and other attacks. And the balance? Did America secure any
meaningful, actionable intelligence through the use of torture? Let's
turn to Bush's FBI Director for the answer. Here's the close of David
Rose's memorable recent article in Vanity Fair:
I ask Mueller: So far as he is aware, have
any attacks on America been disrupted thanks to intelligence obtained
through what the administration still calls "enhanced techniques"? "I'm
really reluctant to answer that," Mueller says. He pauses, looks at an
aide, and then says quietly, declining to elaborate: "I don't believe that has been the case."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Peter Finn and Joby Warrick at the Washington Post:
When CIA officials subjected their first
high-value captive, Abu Zubaida, to waterboarding and other harsh
interrogation methods, they were convinced that they had in their
custody an al-Qaeda leader who knew details of operations yet to be
unleashed, and they were facing increasing pressure from the White
House to get those secrets out of him. The methods succeeded in
breaking him, and the stories he told of al-Qaeda terrorism plots sent
CIA officers around the globe chasing leads.In the end,
though, not a single significant plot was foiled as a result of Abu
Zubaida's tortured confessions, according to former senior government
officials who closely followed the interrogations. Nearly all of the
leads attained through the harsh measures quickly evaporated, while
most of the useful information from Abu Zubaida - chiefly names of
al-Qaeda members and associates - was obtained before waterboarding was
introduced, they said.
Lie No. 1: We do not torture. Since that doesn't work any more, it's time for the fallback.
Lie No. 2: We saved thousands of American lives by torture.
Note that Dick Cheney makes bald claims to the effect that
the security and safety of the nation rests on the use of torture
techniques that he introduced and hammered down on intelligence agents
who didn't want to use them. He doesn't ever cite a for-instance. When
pressed, he insists that this is all "top secret." This is another
instance of the use of security classifications to cover lies-in this
case, lies on top of other lies.
The truth is very clear. President Bush's torture
techniques provided our terrorist adversaries with their most
compelling recruitment theme ever. Thousands were mustered to their
side as a result. Four thousand Americans died in Iraq as a
consequence, and thousands of other Americans suffered severe injuries
from IEDs and other attacks. And the balance? Did America secure any
meaningful, actionable intelligence through the use of torture? Let's
turn to Bush's FBI Director for the answer. Here's the close of David
Rose's memorable recent article in Vanity Fair:
I ask Mueller: So far as he is aware, have
any attacks on America been disrupted thanks to intelligence obtained
through what the administration still calls "enhanced techniques"? "I'm
really reluctant to answer that," Mueller says. He pauses, looks at an
aide, and then says quietly, declining to elaborate: "I don't believe that has been the case."
Peter Finn and Joby Warrick at the Washington Post:
When CIA officials subjected their first
high-value captive, Abu Zubaida, to waterboarding and other harsh
interrogation methods, they were convinced that they had in their
custody an al-Qaeda leader who knew details of operations yet to be
unleashed, and they were facing increasing pressure from the White
House to get those secrets out of him. The methods succeeded in
breaking him, and the stories he told of al-Qaeda terrorism plots sent
CIA officers around the globe chasing leads.In the end,
though, not a single significant plot was foiled as a result of Abu
Zubaida's tortured confessions, according to former senior government
officials who closely followed the interrogations. Nearly all of the
leads attained through the harsh measures quickly evaporated, while
most of the useful information from Abu Zubaida - chiefly names of
al-Qaeda members and associates - was obtained before waterboarding was
introduced, they said.
Lie No. 1: We do not torture. Since that doesn't work any more, it's time for the fallback.
Lie No. 2: We saved thousands of American lives by torture.
Note that Dick Cheney makes bald claims to the effect that
the security and safety of the nation rests on the use of torture
techniques that he introduced and hammered down on intelligence agents
who didn't want to use them. He doesn't ever cite a for-instance. When
pressed, he insists that this is all "top secret." This is another
instance of the use of security classifications to cover lies-in this
case, lies on top of other lies.
The truth is very clear. President Bush's torture
techniques provided our terrorist adversaries with their most
compelling recruitment theme ever. Thousands were mustered to their
side as a result. Four thousand Americans died in Iraq as a
consequence, and thousands of other Americans suffered severe injuries
from IEDs and other attacks. And the balance? Did America secure any
meaningful, actionable intelligence through the use of torture? Let's
turn to Bush's FBI Director for the answer. Here's the close of David
Rose's memorable recent article in Vanity Fair:
I ask Mueller: So far as he is aware, have
any attacks on America been disrupted thanks to intelligence obtained
through what the administration still calls "enhanced techniques"? "I'm
really reluctant to answer that," Mueller says. He pauses, looks at an
aide, and then says quietly, declining to elaborate: "I don't believe that has been the case."