The Real Economic Crisis
Today I want to highlight an example of remarkably good and important journalism, namely, a story in the Washington Post
by Karin Brulliard that opens the door, a crack at least, on the
effects of the worldwide economic crisis on the most vulnerable: people
who live in Africa and other "least developed" countries.
The story is called: "Zambia's Copperbelt Reels from Global Crisis."
It's important because it points out that the effects of the crisis,
while bad here at home, are magnified a hundred-fold in many poor
countries, which are being pushed over the brink toward societal
disintegration.
First a quote:
Mines here in Zambia's Copperbelt region drive this
poor nation's economy, but a plunge in global trade has slashed demand
for the copper used to construct electronics and houses in the United
States and Asia. That is prompting mines here to slow and shut,
limiting tens of thousands of Zambians' access to schooling, health
care and regular meals.
And it's continent-wide:
Africa's resource-fueled economies have grown steadily
in recent years, improving the lives of millions of people. Now, as
prices drop for Botswana's diamonds, Chad's oil and Tanzania's cotton,
a crisis that began in the rich world is threatening to drive millions
more into poverty, according to the World Bank, and raising the specter
of unrest.
The article points out that the IMF has identified 26 countries as
"highly vulnerable" to the crisis, half in Africa. (Of course, that
understates the problem, since the entire Third World is suffering
enormously. Even Iraq, oil rich, can't pay the army and police it needs
to guarantee the peace as the US withdraws.) The article continues:
The problem is not just a collapse in commodities
prices. Foreign investment is receding in countries such as South
Africa and Kenya. Remittances are dropping in Liberia. Aid flows from
economically stressed donor countries might retreat. Much will depend
on how quickly advanced economies recover, according to experts and
African leaders, who warn that a prolonged downturn could stir turmoil.
At the IMF's website you can read the entire report,
in a .pdf document, which is depressing indeed, and scary. The point
is, while the United States is spending literally trillions to bail out
banks and insurance companies and to build infrastructure, etc., the
needs in the Third World are measured in billions, not trillions. But
the lives at risk are measured in billions, too.
Some quotes from the IMF report:
The study finds that the global crisis is squeezing
exports of low-income countries severely, while also curtailing inflows
of foreign direct investment and remittances, which had become
important sources of financing in recent years. As a result, many
countries will face sharply lower fiscal revenues and some may also
experience pressure on their foreign exchange reserves.
And:
The IMF analysis identifies 22 low-income countries
that face the most acute financing constraints. To keep their external
reserves at safe levels (around 3-4 months of imports), at least US$25
billion in additional concessional financing is needed in 2009. This
represents about 80 percent of annual aid to all low-income countries
in recent years.If global growth and financing conditions deteriorate further, the
number of vulnerable countries could almost double, while additional
financing needs could approach US$140 billion.
It seems to me that adding $140 billion to the multi-trillion dollar stimulus effort is pocket change, now.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Today I want to highlight an example of remarkably good and important journalism, namely, a story in the Washington Post
by Karin Brulliard that opens the door, a crack at least, on the
effects of the worldwide economic crisis on the most vulnerable: people
who live in Africa and other "least developed" countries.
The story is called: "Zambia's Copperbelt Reels from Global Crisis."
It's important because it points out that the effects of the crisis,
while bad here at home, are magnified a hundred-fold in many poor
countries, which are being pushed over the brink toward societal
disintegration.
First a quote:
Mines here in Zambia's Copperbelt region drive this
poor nation's economy, but a plunge in global trade has slashed demand
for the copper used to construct electronics and houses in the United
States and Asia. That is prompting mines here to slow and shut,
limiting tens of thousands of Zambians' access to schooling, health
care and regular meals.
And it's continent-wide:
Africa's resource-fueled economies have grown steadily
in recent years, improving the lives of millions of people. Now, as
prices drop for Botswana's diamonds, Chad's oil and Tanzania's cotton,
a crisis that began in the rich world is threatening to drive millions
more into poverty, according to the World Bank, and raising the specter
of unrest.
The article points out that the IMF has identified 26 countries as
"highly vulnerable" to the crisis, half in Africa. (Of course, that
understates the problem, since the entire Third World is suffering
enormously. Even Iraq, oil rich, can't pay the army and police it needs
to guarantee the peace as the US withdraws.) The article continues:
The problem is not just a collapse in commodities
prices. Foreign investment is receding in countries such as South
Africa and Kenya. Remittances are dropping in Liberia. Aid flows from
economically stressed donor countries might retreat. Much will depend
on how quickly advanced economies recover, according to experts and
African leaders, who warn that a prolonged downturn could stir turmoil.
At the IMF's website you can read the entire report,
in a .pdf document, which is depressing indeed, and scary. The point
is, while the United States is spending literally trillions to bail out
banks and insurance companies and to build infrastructure, etc., the
needs in the Third World are measured in billions, not trillions. But
the lives at risk are measured in billions, too.
Some quotes from the IMF report:
The study finds that the global crisis is squeezing
exports of low-income countries severely, while also curtailing inflows
of foreign direct investment and remittances, which had become
important sources of financing in recent years. As a result, many
countries will face sharply lower fiscal revenues and some may also
experience pressure on their foreign exchange reserves.
And:
The IMF analysis identifies 22 low-income countries
that face the most acute financing constraints. To keep their external
reserves at safe levels (around 3-4 months of imports), at least US$25
billion in additional concessional financing is needed in 2009. This
represents about 80 percent of annual aid to all low-income countries
in recent years.If global growth and financing conditions deteriorate further, the
number of vulnerable countries could almost double, while additional
financing needs could approach US$140 billion.
It seems to me that adding $140 billion to the multi-trillion dollar stimulus effort is pocket change, now.
Today I want to highlight an example of remarkably good and important journalism, namely, a story in the Washington Post
by Karin Brulliard that opens the door, a crack at least, on the
effects of the worldwide economic crisis on the most vulnerable: people
who live in Africa and other "least developed" countries.
The story is called: "Zambia's Copperbelt Reels from Global Crisis."
It's important because it points out that the effects of the crisis,
while bad here at home, are magnified a hundred-fold in many poor
countries, which are being pushed over the brink toward societal
disintegration.
First a quote:
Mines here in Zambia's Copperbelt region drive this
poor nation's economy, but a plunge in global trade has slashed demand
for the copper used to construct electronics and houses in the United
States and Asia. That is prompting mines here to slow and shut,
limiting tens of thousands of Zambians' access to schooling, health
care and regular meals.
And it's continent-wide:
Africa's resource-fueled economies have grown steadily
in recent years, improving the lives of millions of people. Now, as
prices drop for Botswana's diamonds, Chad's oil and Tanzania's cotton,
a crisis that began in the rich world is threatening to drive millions
more into poverty, according to the World Bank, and raising the specter
of unrest.
The article points out that the IMF has identified 26 countries as
"highly vulnerable" to the crisis, half in Africa. (Of course, that
understates the problem, since the entire Third World is suffering
enormously. Even Iraq, oil rich, can't pay the army and police it needs
to guarantee the peace as the US withdraws.) The article continues:
The problem is not just a collapse in commodities
prices. Foreign investment is receding in countries such as South
Africa and Kenya. Remittances are dropping in Liberia. Aid flows from
economically stressed donor countries might retreat. Much will depend
on how quickly advanced economies recover, according to experts and
African leaders, who warn that a prolonged downturn could stir turmoil.
At the IMF's website you can read the entire report,
in a .pdf document, which is depressing indeed, and scary. The point
is, while the United States is spending literally trillions to bail out
banks and insurance companies and to build infrastructure, etc., the
needs in the Third World are measured in billions, not trillions. But
the lives at risk are measured in billions, too.
Some quotes from the IMF report:
The study finds that the global crisis is squeezing
exports of low-income countries severely, while also curtailing inflows
of foreign direct investment and remittances, which had become
important sources of financing in recent years. As a result, many
countries will face sharply lower fiscal revenues and some may also
experience pressure on their foreign exchange reserves.
And:
The IMF analysis identifies 22 low-income countries
that face the most acute financing constraints. To keep their external
reserves at safe levels (around 3-4 months of imports), at least US$25
billion in additional concessional financing is needed in 2009. This
represents about 80 percent of annual aid to all low-income countries
in recent years.If global growth and financing conditions deteriorate further, the
number of vulnerable countries could almost double, while additional
financing needs could approach US$140 billion.
It seems to me that adding $140 billion to the multi-trillion dollar stimulus effort is pocket change, now.