

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Note from The Nation editors: Socialism's all the rage. "We Are All Socialists Now,"Newsweek
declares. As the right wing tells it, we're already living in the
U.S.S.A. But what do self-identified socialists (and their progressive
friends) have to say about the global economic crisis? We hope that
Barbara Ehrenreich and Bill Fletcher Jr.'s "Reimagining Socialism: Rising to the Occasion will kick off a spirited dialogue.
Note from The Nation editors: Socialism's all the rage. "We Are All Socialists Now,"Newsweek
declares. As the right wing tells it, we're already living in the
U.S.S.A. But what do self-identified socialists (and their progressive
friends) have to say about the global economic crisis? We hope that
Barbara Ehrenreich and Bill Fletcher Jr.'s "Reimagining Socialism: Rising to the Occasion will kick off a spirited dialogue. Four replies are featured in this issue, with more to come at TheNation.com.
Barbara Ehrenreich and Bill Fletcher write mournfully that there was
supposed to be a revolution--but there was and is a revolution, just not
one that looks the way socialists and a lot of '60s radicals imagined
it. The Sandinista revolution thirty years ago may well have been the
last of its kind. The revolutions that have mattered since have been
less interested in seizing and becoming the state than circumventing it
to go straight to becoming other people doing other things without state
permission. The fifteen-year-old Zapatista revolution, which never
sought state power and (though badgered constantly) was never defeated,
is the revolution for our times, or really only the most dramatic of
countless thousands involving Native Americans and Indian farmers and
South African cooperatives and Argentinian workplaces and European
utopian communities.
In the United States the most obvious realm in which this has transpired
is food and farming. Organic, urban, community-assisted and guerrilla
agriculture are still small parts of the picture, but effective ones--a
revolt against what transnational corporate food and capitalism
generally produce. This revolt is taking place in the vast open space of
Detroit, in the inner-city farms of West Oakland, in the victory gardens
and public-housing of Alemany Farm in San Francisco, in Growing Power in
Milwaukee and many other places around the country. These are blows
against alienation, poor health, hunger and other woes fought with
shovels and seeds, not guns. At its best, tending one's garden leads to
tending one's community and policy, and ultimately becomes a way of
entering the public sphere rather than withdrawing from it.
"Do we have a plan, people?" Ehrenreich and Fletcher ask. We have
thousands of them, being carried out quite spectacularly over the past
few decades, for gardens and childcare co-ops and bicycle lanes and
farmers' markets and countless ways of doing things differently and
better. The underlying vision is neither state socialist nor corporate
capitalist, but something humane, local and accountable--anarchist,
basically, as in direct democracy. The revolution exists in little bits
everywhere, but not much has been done to connect its dots. We need to
say that there are alternatives being realized all around us and
theorize the underlying ideals and possibilities. But we need to start
from the confidence that the revolution has been with us for a while and
is succeeding in bits and pieces. Enlarged and clarified, it could
answer a lot of the urgent needs the depression brings.
If anarchists and neoliberals had one thing in common, it was an
interest in shrinking the state that socialists hoped would solve
things. Right now nothing but that state exists on a scale to drag us
back out of what the corporations and international markets dragged us
into, but one of the questions for the long term is about scale. Small
isn't always beautiful, but big beyond accountability or comprehension
got crazy as well as ugly.
Other Contributions to the Forum
Immanuel Wallerstein, "Follow Brazil's Example."
Bill McKibben, "Together, We Save the Planet."
Tariq Ali, "Capitalism's Deadly Logic."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Note from The Nation editors: Socialism's all the rage. "We Are All Socialists Now,"Newsweek
declares. As the right wing tells it, we're already living in the
U.S.S.A. But what do self-identified socialists (and their progressive
friends) have to say about the global economic crisis? We hope that
Barbara Ehrenreich and Bill Fletcher Jr.'s "Reimagining Socialism: Rising to the Occasion will kick off a spirited dialogue. Four replies are featured in this issue, with more to come at TheNation.com.
Barbara Ehrenreich and Bill Fletcher write mournfully that there was
supposed to be a revolution--but there was and is a revolution, just not
one that looks the way socialists and a lot of '60s radicals imagined
it. The Sandinista revolution thirty years ago may well have been the
last of its kind. The revolutions that have mattered since have been
less interested in seizing and becoming the state than circumventing it
to go straight to becoming other people doing other things without state
permission. The fifteen-year-old Zapatista revolution, which never
sought state power and (though badgered constantly) was never defeated,
is the revolution for our times, or really only the most dramatic of
countless thousands involving Native Americans and Indian farmers and
South African cooperatives and Argentinian workplaces and European
utopian communities.
In the United States the most obvious realm in which this has transpired
is food and farming. Organic, urban, community-assisted and guerrilla
agriculture are still small parts of the picture, but effective ones--a
revolt against what transnational corporate food and capitalism
generally produce. This revolt is taking place in the vast open space of
Detroit, in the inner-city farms of West Oakland, in the victory gardens
and public-housing of Alemany Farm in San Francisco, in Growing Power in
Milwaukee and many other places around the country. These are blows
against alienation, poor health, hunger and other woes fought with
shovels and seeds, not guns. At its best, tending one's garden leads to
tending one's community and policy, and ultimately becomes a way of
entering the public sphere rather than withdrawing from it.
"Do we have a plan, people?" Ehrenreich and Fletcher ask. We have
thousands of them, being carried out quite spectacularly over the past
few decades, for gardens and childcare co-ops and bicycle lanes and
farmers' markets and countless ways of doing things differently and
better. The underlying vision is neither state socialist nor corporate
capitalist, but something humane, local and accountable--anarchist,
basically, as in direct democracy. The revolution exists in little bits
everywhere, but not much has been done to connect its dots. We need to
say that there are alternatives being realized all around us and
theorize the underlying ideals and possibilities. But we need to start
from the confidence that the revolution has been with us for a while and
is succeeding in bits and pieces. Enlarged and clarified, it could
answer a lot of the urgent needs the depression brings.
If anarchists and neoliberals had one thing in common, it was an
interest in shrinking the state that socialists hoped would solve
things. Right now nothing but that state exists on a scale to drag us
back out of what the corporations and international markets dragged us
into, but one of the questions for the long term is about scale. Small
isn't always beautiful, but big beyond accountability or comprehension
got crazy as well as ugly.
Other Contributions to the Forum
Immanuel Wallerstein, "Follow Brazil's Example."
Bill McKibben, "Together, We Save the Planet."
Tariq Ali, "Capitalism's Deadly Logic."
Note from The Nation editors: Socialism's all the rage. "We Are All Socialists Now,"Newsweek
declares. As the right wing tells it, we're already living in the
U.S.S.A. But what do self-identified socialists (and their progressive
friends) have to say about the global economic crisis? We hope that
Barbara Ehrenreich and Bill Fletcher Jr.'s "Reimagining Socialism: Rising to the Occasion will kick off a spirited dialogue. Four replies are featured in this issue, with more to come at TheNation.com.
Barbara Ehrenreich and Bill Fletcher write mournfully that there was
supposed to be a revolution--but there was and is a revolution, just not
one that looks the way socialists and a lot of '60s radicals imagined
it. The Sandinista revolution thirty years ago may well have been the
last of its kind. The revolutions that have mattered since have been
less interested in seizing and becoming the state than circumventing it
to go straight to becoming other people doing other things without state
permission. The fifteen-year-old Zapatista revolution, which never
sought state power and (though badgered constantly) was never defeated,
is the revolution for our times, or really only the most dramatic of
countless thousands involving Native Americans and Indian farmers and
South African cooperatives and Argentinian workplaces and European
utopian communities.
In the United States the most obvious realm in which this has transpired
is food and farming. Organic, urban, community-assisted and guerrilla
agriculture are still small parts of the picture, but effective ones--a
revolt against what transnational corporate food and capitalism
generally produce. This revolt is taking place in the vast open space of
Detroit, in the inner-city farms of West Oakland, in the victory gardens
and public-housing of Alemany Farm in San Francisco, in Growing Power in
Milwaukee and many other places around the country. These are blows
against alienation, poor health, hunger and other woes fought with
shovels and seeds, not guns. At its best, tending one's garden leads to
tending one's community and policy, and ultimately becomes a way of
entering the public sphere rather than withdrawing from it.
"Do we have a plan, people?" Ehrenreich and Fletcher ask. We have
thousands of them, being carried out quite spectacularly over the past
few decades, for gardens and childcare co-ops and bicycle lanes and
farmers' markets and countless ways of doing things differently and
better. The underlying vision is neither state socialist nor corporate
capitalist, but something humane, local and accountable--anarchist,
basically, as in direct democracy. The revolution exists in little bits
everywhere, but not much has been done to connect its dots. We need to
say that there are alternatives being realized all around us and
theorize the underlying ideals and possibilities. But we need to start
from the confidence that the revolution has been with us for a while and
is succeeding in bits and pieces. Enlarged and clarified, it could
answer a lot of the urgent needs the depression brings.
If anarchists and neoliberals had one thing in common, it was an
interest in shrinking the state that socialists hoped would solve
things. Right now nothing but that state exists on a scale to drag us
back out of what the corporations and international markets dragged us
into, but one of the questions for the long term is about scale. Small
isn't always beautiful, but big beyond accountability or comprehension
got crazy as well as ugly.
Other Contributions to the Forum
Immanuel Wallerstein, "Follow Brazil's Example."
Bill McKibben, "Together, We Save the Planet."
Tariq Ali, "Capitalism's Deadly Logic."