SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
FOR YEARS, critics have accused the Bush administration of being in
bed with the oil industry. They thought they were speaking
figuratively, but they weren't.
According
to a scathing new report by the inspector general of the Interior
Department, employees of the department who handle royalty payments
from the oil and gas industry for drilling on federal land have
accepted gifts from industry executives - and had sexual relations with
them as well. With admirable understatement, Inspector General Earl
Devaney declared, "Sexual relationships with prohibited sources cannot,
by definition, be arms-length."
His office's investigations, he said, revealed "a culture of ethical failure" and an agency rife with conflicts of interest.
The
report justifies the skepticism of many in Congress over the industry's
recent push to use high oil prices to win permission to drill in the
Outer Continental Shelf. A department that is as cozy with industry as
the report spells out cannot be counted on to protect the public's
financial, safety, or environmental interests - especially if the oil
industry starts drilling in crucial fishing areas like New England's
Georges Bank.
Devaney's report zeroed in on officials in the
department's Minerals Management Service who handled contracts with oil
companies that paid their royalties in barrels of petroleum, which the
government then sold. But the report also puts a new light on
revelations in recent years that the service has looked the other way
and allowed the industry to escape royalties altogether for offshore
drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. According to government auditors, the
failure of service employees to collect payments aggressively could
cost taxpayers $10.5 billion over 25 years.
The Clinton
administration shares blame for this loss of revenue. In the 1990s, the
administration persuaded oil companies to drill in deep-water areas
with the promise they would not have to pay royalties on oil they
discovered. Interior officials failed to include a standard provision
that royalties would be due if the barrel price of oil exceeded $34,
which it long since has. This omission was brought to the attention of
Bush administration officials no later than 2004, but they never made
any effort to renegotiate the contracts.
Members of Congress are
already planning hearings in response to the new report. They should
expand its scope to ask broadly whether the Interior Department has
sufficient independence from the oil industry to oversee the drilling
that is already going on - not to mention any new drilling in
environmentally sensitive areas.
Â
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
FOR YEARS, critics have accused the Bush administration of being in
bed with the oil industry. They thought they were speaking
figuratively, but they weren't.
According
to a scathing new report by the inspector general of the Interior
Department, employees of the department who handle royalty payments
from the oil and gas industry for drilling on federal land have
accepted gifts from industry executives - and had sexual relations with
them as well. With admirable understatement, Inspector General Earl
Devaney declared, "Sexual relationships with prohibited sources cannot,
by definition, be arms-length."
His office's investigations, he said, revealed "a culture of ethical failure" and an agency rife with conflicts of interest.
The
report justifies the skepticism of many in Congress over the industry's
recent push to use high oil prices to win permission to drill in the
Outer Continental Shelf. A department that is as cozy with industry as
the report spells out cannot be counted on to protect the public's
financial, safety, or environmental interests - especially if the oil
industry starts drilling in crucial fishing areas like New England's
Georges Bank.
Devaney's report zeroed in on officials in the
department's Minerals Management Service who handled contracts with oil
companies that paid their royalties in barrels of petroleum, which the
government then sold. But the report also puts a new light on
revelations in recent years that the service has looked the other way
and allowed the industry to escape royalties altogether for offshore
drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. According to government auditors, the
failure of service employees to collect payments aggressively could
cost taxpayers $10.5 billion over 25 years.
The Clinton
administration shares blame for this loss of revenue. In the 1990s, the
administration persuaded oil companies to drill in deep-water areas
with the promise they would not have to pay royalties on oil they
discovered. Interior officials failed to include a standard provision
that royalties would be due if the barrel price of oil exceeded $34,
which it long since has. This omission was brought to the attention of
Bush administration officials no later than 2004, but they never made
any effort to renegotiate the contracts.
Members of Congress are
already planning hearings in response to the new report. They should
expand its scope to ask broadly whether the Interior Department has
sufficient independence from the oil industry to oversee the drilling
that is already going on - not to mention any new drilling in
environmentally sensitive areas.
Â
FOR YEARS, critics have accused the Bush administration of being in
bed with the oil industry. They thought they were speaking
figuratively, but they weren't.
According
to a scathing new report by the inspector general of the Interior
Department, employees of the department who handle royalty payments
from the oil and gas industry for drilling on federal land have
accepted gifts from industry executives - and had sexual relations with
them as well. With admirable understatement, Inspector General Earl
Devaney declared, "Sexual relationships with prohibited sources cannot,
by definition, be arms-length."
His office's investigations, he said, revealed "a culture of ethical failure" and an agency rife with conflicts of interest.
The
report justifies the skepticism of many in Congress over the industry's
recent push to use high oil prices to win permission to drill in the
Outer Continental Shelf. A department that is as cozy with industry as
the report spells out cannot be counted on to protect the public's
financial, safety, or environmental interests - especially if the oil
industry starts drilling in crucial fishing areas like New England's
Georges Bank.
Devaney's report zeroed in on officials in the
department's Minerals Management Service who handled contracts with oil
companies that paid their royalties in barrels of petroleum, which the
government then sold. But the report also puts a new light on
revelations in recent years that the service has looked the other way
and allowed the industry to escape royalties altogether for offshore
drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. According to government auditors, the
failure of service employees to collect payments aggressively could
cost taxpayers $10.5 billion over 25 years.
The Clinton
administration shares blame for this loss of revenue. In the 1990s, the
administration persuaded oil companies to drill in deep-water areas
with the promise they would not have to pay royalties on oil they
discovered. Interior officials failed to include a standard provision
that royalties would be due if the barrel price of oil exceeded $34,
which it long since has. This omission was brought to the attention of
Bush administration officials no later than 2004, but they never made
any effort to renegotiate the contracts.
Members of Congress are
already planning hearings in response to the new report. They should
expand its scope to ask broadly whether the Interior Department has
sufficient independence from the oil industry to oversee the drilling
that is already going on - not to mention any new drilling in
environmentally sensitive areas.
Â