

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Kevin Egler is a teacher in Kent, Ohio.
To say the least, he is displeased with George W. Bush and the President's performance in office.
So much so that Egler has placed more than 400 "Impeach Bush" signs around town, often on public property.
On July 25, he got a ticket for placing one of them in a public garden.
He was cited for "unlawful advertising."
Egler asked the police officer why he didn't have a right to place his sign there, but realtors can place their "For Sale" signs on public medians any time they want, the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported.
According to Egler, the officer said, "You don't know the difference?"
The officer didn't answer his own question.
But as Egler's attorney, Bob Fitrakis, points out, the answer seems obvious: Commercial speech is permitted; political speech is verboten, even though political speech is the most protected kind of speech under our Constitution.
This is discrimination on the basis of the content of speech, which is supposed to be against the law.
Egler had a court date on August 9, and he brought with him "two dozen photos of other posters that appear to have gone unchallenged by the city, including announcements of poker tournaments, garage sales, and military recruiting drives," the Plain Dealer reported.
In court, the city of Kent moved to dismiss the "unlawful advertising" charge against Egler.
But it didn't give up on its prosecution of Egler.
"I was offered a deal by the city today: Plead guilty to disorderly conduct and pay a $25 fine, or else they would file a littering charge against me," Egler reported back to friends via e-mail. "I feel I'm not guilty of anything so we took the 'or else part' of the deal."
Now instead of facing a $100 fine, Egler could have to fork over $500.
Egler appreciated the fact that fifteen free-speech and pro-impeachment activists showed up to support him.
"I had to chuckle to myself when we all filed out of the courtroom," he wrote. "The place was pretty empty after we all left."
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2007 The Progressive
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Kevin Egler is a teacher in Kent, Ohio.
To say the least, he is displeased with George W. Bush and the President's performance in office.
So much so that Egler has placed more than 400 "Impeach Bush" signs around town, often on public property.
On July 25, he got a ticket for placing one of them in a public garden.
He was cited for "unlawful advertising."
Egler asked the police officer why he didn't have a right to place his sign there, but realtors can place their "For Sale" signs on public medians any time they want, the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported.
According to Egler, the officer said, "You don't know the difference?"
The officer didn't answer his own question.
But as Egler's attorney, Bob Fitrakis, points out, the answer seems obvious: Commercial speech is permitted; political speech is verboten, even though political speech is the most protected kind of speech under our Constitution.
This is discrimination on the basis of the content of speech, which is supposed to be against the law.
Egler had a court date on August 9, and he brought with him "two dozen photos of other posters that appear to have gone unchallenged by the city, including announcements of poker tournaments, garage sales, and military recruiting drives," the Plain Dealer reported.
In court, the city of Kent moved to dismiss the "unlawful advertising" charge against Egler.
But it didn't give up on its prosecution of Egler.
"I was offered a deal by the city today: Plead guilty to disorderly conduct and pay a $25 fine, or else they would file a littering charge against me," Egler reported back to friends via e-mail. "I feel I'm not guilty of anything so we took the 'or else part' of the deal."
Now instead of facing a $100 fine, Egler could have to fork over $500.
Egler appreciated the fact that fifteen free-speech and pro-impeachment activists showed up to support him.
"I had to chuckle to myself when we all filed out of the courtroom," he wrote. "The place was pretty empty after we all left."
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2007 The Progressive
Kevin Egler is a teacher in Kent, Ohio.
To say the least, he is displeased with George W. Bush and the President's performance in office.
So much so that Egler has placed more than 400 "Impeach Bush" signs around town, often on public property.
On July 25, he got a ticket for placing one of them in a public garden.
He was cited for "unlawful advertising."
Egler asked the police officer why he didn't have a right to place his sign there, but realtors can place their "For Sale" signs on public medians any time they want, the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported.
According to Egler, the officer said, "You don't know the difference?"
The officer didn't answer his own question.
But as Egler's attorney, Bob Fitrakis, points out, the answer seems obvious: Commercial speech is permitted; political speech is verboten, even though political speech is the most protected kind of speech under our Constitution.
This is discrimination on the basis of the content of speech, which is supposed to be against the law.
Egler had a court date on August 9, and he brought with him "two dozen photos of other posters that appear to have gone unchallenged by the city, including announcements of poker tournaments, garage sales, and military recruiting drives," the Plain Dealer reported.
In court, the city of Kent moved to dismiss the "unlawful advertising" charge against Egler.
But it didn't give up on its prosecution of Egler.
"I was offered a deal by the city today: Plead guilty to disorderly conduct and pay a $25 fine, or else they would file a littering charge against me," Egler reported back to friends via e-mail. "I feel I'm not guilty of anything so we took the 'or else part' of the deal."
Now instead of facing a $100 fine, Egler could have to fork over $500.
Egler appreciated the fact that fifteen free-speech and pro-impeachment activists showed up to support him.
"I had to chuckle to myself when we all filed out of the courtroom," he wrote. "The place was pretty empty after we all left."
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2007 The Progressive