

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Right after the right-wing extremists in charge of the Trumpian outfit masquerading as Abraham Lincoln's Republican Party succeeded in confirming Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court, Sen. Mitch McConnell spiked the football. The Kentucky Republican attacked the thousands of activists and citizen lobbyists who almost pulled off the improbable feat of stopping the confirmation by smearing them as a "mob" and claiming, without any evidence, that their activism was some kind "political gift" for the Republican Party.
And the media hand-wringing started almost immediately. The so-called impartial reporters and pundits in traditional corporate media outlets (hereinafter I will refer to them as "trad-media") immediately adopted McConnell's talking points in their ridiculous "both sides" frame. As Media Matters documented, "The Washington Post's analysis of the week concluded that Democrats and Republicans are equally at fault for divisive politics." The dean of Washington's "both sides" nonsense, Chuck Todd, agreed with right-wing pundits that both sides in Washington are taking part in the "vulgarization" of politics. These claims were made, naturally, without any viable data or evidence as support.
These trad-media reporters and pundits went with what is clearly their gut instinct to punch down at liberals. In this case, they were denigrating the heroic advocacy of hundreds of activists--primarily women--who came to the Hart Senate Office Building from all over the country to engage in grassroots lobbying in an effort to make survivors of sexual assault visible to a mostly male Republican Party. And they were getting results.
I can list a couple of examples just off the top of my head:
First, the obvious one. Unless you have been hiding under a rock by now you have read the story about two survivors who confronted Arizona Republican Sen. Jeff Flake in an elevator before he was headed to the first crucial vote in the Senate Judiciary. They told their stories of assault, and tearfully both challenged and pleaded with Flake to at least look them in the eye. And by all accounts their powerful advocacy made an impact: They were able change his mind at least at that point of time. Second, Sen. Lisa Murkowski met with dozens of Alaskan women, including several sexual assault survivors, in what was reported as an "emotional, hour+ meeting." No one can argue that those meetings did not have an impact. It's worth noting that, unlike Sen. Murkowski, who took time to meet her constituents, Sen. Susan Collins cut and ran from her own.
Yet without a shred of evidence, the traditional corporate media outlets ran with McConnell's spin, and Democratic insiders in the beltway predictably took the bait. Instead of reflecting on the at best uninspiring and at worst incompetent leadership of Senate Democrats, Democratic insiders immediately joined in on the right-wing-inspired attack on the progressive base of their own party by trad-media reporters.
Then a funny thing happened. Actual data undercut the conventional wisdom within the elite political and media establishment living in the beltway bubble. A CNN poll Monday revealed data of a deeply tarnished Kavanaugh opposed by majority of Americans:
52% of Americans say they believe the women accusing Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct over the judge's denials of those accusations (38% said they believed him more than the women). And half (50%) said they thought he lied about his alcohol use as a young adult, more than thought he was telling the truth about it (37%). Half say Kavanaugh's personal conduct has disqualified him to serve on the court, and 53% say his professional qualifications do not outweigh any questions about his personal conduct.
The poll countered the conventional wisdom of backlash among previously unenthusiastic Republican voters. And that was not all. Fresh polls also came out on Monday showing Democrats leading in key battleground districts in House races across the country. The numbers underscored that the narrative driven by McConnell and the right-wing about progressive activism against Kavanaugh hurting Democratic chances was likely just hot air.
This was not the first time we have seen this movie. Time and time again, far-right extremists in Congress and the Trump regime inject their nonsensical spin without any basis in reality. Their foot soldiers in the right-wing echo chambers rinse, repeat, and lather that spin, sending it out like dutiful robots across all their channels. And then trad-media reporters run with it without any sort of pushback.
Again, just think about the absurdity of all that just happened in the last few days. McConnell went on overdrive talking about an assault by a bunch of activists around the Hill who were engaging in nothing more than boisterous lobbying and advocacy around one of the biggest legislative fights in recent years. And the serious reporters in trad-media outlets just ran with that spin.
The underlying activity of those progressive activists was not any different than that of the hundreds--if not thousands--of lobbyists in expensive suits who go to the Hill every single day to push for billions of dollars in handouts for big banks or for big pharma or big oil. They were making a case for their cause. And, full disclosure, I was one of the people lobbying Senators. I asked Sen. Murkowski in the Hart basement tunnel whether she cared about perjury. She stopped and provided an answer in a thoughtful manner. Progressive activists had a respectful and meaningful exchange with her, unlike right-wing extremist Sen. Bill Cassidy from Louisiana, who cut and ran from us when we just asked basic questions. He literally ran from us.
What we did was nothing compared to what (overwhelmingly white) Tea Partiers did a few years ago, when they actually physically assaulted Democratic members of Congress on their way to work. As noted by Crooked Media's Brian Beutler, who was around the Hill at the time:
Back in 2010 tea partiers spit on Emanuel Cleaver, hurled racist slurs at Andre Carson and John Lewis, and called Barney Frank a "faggot" to cheers. I personally witnessed the latter incident.
You can see what is going on here. No matter what Democrats do, they cannot win. As David Dayen noted, "the narrative stays the same":
The right-wing "aristocrats" in the Republican leadership, their Trumpian allies in the current regime, and the far-right echo chamber will always attack without any facts. They are experts at concern-trolling. The problem is not that these prevaricators exist, it's that the elites in trad-media outlets and the Democratic establishment will dutifully take their bait.
The last thing progressive activists--who have powered the unprecedented resistance to stop the effort by Trump, McConnell, and Ryan to gut our health care and came so close to stopping their hijacking of the Supreme Court--should do right now is listen to these trolls. If we had listened to these trolls who had been working so hard to weave a narrative of inevitability for Kavanaugh's confirmation, he would have been sworn into the Court weeks ago.
As I noted, the data we have seen so far indicates that despite the rights' best effort to undermine and denigrate the progressive movement's activism, the voters in battleground districts are not falling for it. Neither should we.
Let's keep our eyes on the prize, focus on our message, and get our voters out in massive numbers to win back at least one chamber of Congress. Then we can push for real accountability and start the process of restoring our democracy.
Denigrating women nationwide in an unsurprising but still "disgusting" tweet on Friday morning, President Trump was met with immediate rebuke as angered opponents of Brett Kavanaugh asked the final undecided lawmakers--specifically Sens. Joe Manchin (D-WV), Susan Collins (R-ME), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), and Jeff Flake (R-AZ)--if this is the president was the kind of person and behavior they will be serving if they ultimately vote to confirm the historically unpopular Supreme Court nominee.
"The very rude elevator screamers are paid professionals only looking to make Senators look bad. Don't fall for it! Also, look at all of the professionally made identical signs. Paid for by Soros and others. These are not signs made in the basement from love!" the president tweeted. He than added the hashtag: "#Troublemakers."
An obvious reference to the female sexual assault survivors who confronted Sen. Flake last week, as well as the much broader protests that have erupted on Capitol Hill in recent weeks, Trump's tweet was seen as the only the latest vulgar disparagement by the president of voters expressing their voice and women who have bravely come forward to share their stories of rape or abuse in solidarity with Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused Kavanaugh of assaulting her.
But with a procedural vote expected sometime Friday, women made clear they would not to be intimidated or dissuaded:
Meanwhile, others perceived longer-term impacts from Trump's decision to twist the knife into the wounds of the nation's sexual assault survivors, women standing up, and the broader political body:
With mass protests on Capitol Hill Thursday afternoon and a procedural vote set for Friday, North Dakota's Democratic Senator Heidi Heitkamp has declared she is a firm "no" on the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh, leaving Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) as the last remaining Democrat still on the fence against the historically unpopular and controversial Supreme Court nominee.
"The process has been bad but at the end of the day you have to make a decision and I have made that decision," Heitkamp told local radio station WDAY radio in Fargo, North Dakota. "I will be voting no on Judge Kavanaugh."
In addition to the intensified focus it puts on Manchin's decision, Heitkamp's announcement also puts heightened pressure on the three key Republicans: Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Jeff Flake of Arizona - all three of whom have expressed reservations about Kavanaugh and all three facing increased protests from their own consituents and the broader American public.
In her comments, Heitkamp said that last week's testimony by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, and the outpouring of women's voices since, was a serious consideration in her final decision.
"When I listened to Dr. Ford testify, I heard the voices of women I have known throughout my life who have similar stories of sexual assault and abuse," Heitkamp said. "Our actions right now are a poignant signal to young girls and women across our country. I will continue to stand up for them."
News of Heitkamp's "no" came as West Virginian voters maintained an ongoing occupation of Manchin's office in the U.S. Senate Building:
While both Collins and Flake indicated their satisfaction with the report generated by the FBI and handed over for senator's to review on Thursday, they--along with Murkowski--remain the target of protesters who have vowed not to give up until Kavanaugh's confirmation is defeated:
An intense week of riveting cultural moments amplified by assorted news media. Is he lying under oath to get on the Supreme Court? Is she a pawn of the Democrats? Is Lindsey Graham melting down or showboating? Is Jeff Flake a flake?
I appreciate the weeklong reprieve as the FBI investigates.
Uncounted numbers of women around the world and more than 20 million Americans followed Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and Judge Brett Kavanaugh. Most victimized women haven't a snowball's chance in hell of being heard in the US Senate Judiciary (or their country's equivalent), but women around the world watch and support our American sisters. Lightyears ahead of women in other parts of the world in publicly acknowledging sexual violence and indignity at the hands of men, we know that as American women go so go we--eventually...We hope.
As Chuck Grassley, Orrin Hatch, Lindsey Graham, Brett Kavanaugh et al, undermine women's latest efflorescence toward equality, Dr. Ford highlighted essential elements of ubiquitous toxic patriarchy. And she did so from the epicenter that dispenses male power.
Enter serendipity
Perpetuating entrenched power means following a cultural script. Yet, now and again the extraordinary human heart urges someone off script. Then, serendipity happens. This time, serendipity brought together Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), Ana Maria Archila, and Maria Gallagher. Had it been Sens. Chuck Grassley, Orrin Hatch, or Lindsey Graham in that elevator, Brett Kavanaugh would be on his way to fulfilling his Trump-designated role as president's protector on the Supreme Court.
Throughout Ford's testimony and Kavanaugh's dissembling, Flake's demeanor suggested his discomfort. He admitted he was "unsettled" although not discomforted or unsettled enough to go against his Republican brothers. He'd agreed to vote for Kavanaugh when Ana's and Maria's elevator pitch rattled his defenses. Soon after, he conferred with Senator Coons, a colleague and a Democrat... and together they made history.
Pundits judge, even scorn Flake; the few progressives who acknowledge his courage do so dismissively. Yes, the guy is conservative. Many people are. (Believing that conservatism/Republican--or liberalism/Democrat--is intrinsically offensive describes our nation's current polarization). Flake didn't transform into Liberal Man (he's admitted that were he not retiring from the Senate there's "Not a chance," he'd buck his party's line) but cut the guy some slack. Bucking the trend is tough. The payoff is heart-felt rather than monetized.
Transformation is tough. Lasting transformation, the kind that results in spiritual growth after reevaluating one's Self and culture, is iterative, discouraging, uncertain. It requires patience, compassion, nerve, and a generous spirit.
What the...?
Imagine you're a privileged white male who's learned, implicitly, and accepted, explicitly, that white male culture will protect you, no matter what, if you stick to the script. If you can't imagine that, recall Chuck Grassley, Orrin Hatch, Lindsey Graham, and Brett Kavanaugh during the hearing. After lifetimes, from 53 to 85 years, of things going your way, of never facing discomfort, powerlessness, or indifference, a woman, a lesser being, goes off--and stays off --the script of male-hegemony. Ford, herself white and privileged, stood in their bastion and spoke against their version of truth, nobility, and right-thinking. This, moreover, after Orrin Hatch described her an "attractive witness" and "pleasing." This is how she repays his gallantry?
Interruptions to the dominant narrative-- this "culture"--present enormous disorientations in individual and collective psyches. Interruptions rattle, demand one think creatively and on one's feet, pose dilemmas, and threaten change. Faced with a Dr. Ford, chinks appear in the system and dominant beneficiaries respond by stalling, dismissing, shoring up, protecting the system by feverishly applying that which has worked in the past. Cover up. Undermine, but not too openly. Humiliate, but not too openly. Rage. (Don't cry.) Then emulate Donald Trump and "punch back ten times harder," search and destroy, wage war.
Ironically, if Judge Brett Kavanaugh had admitted abusing alcohol he'd already be on the Supreme Court. (George W. Bush, a fellow Yalie, admitted, "When I was young and irresponsible, I was young and irresponsible," and he became a two-term president.) But admitting to "youthful hijinks" doesn't sit well with Kavanaugh. Gripped by self-righteousness, he sees himself the way his culture portrays masculinity: boot strapping, busting his butt, athletic, charitable. Reports among the thousands of pages from earlier investigations suggest Kavanaugh tends to "dissemble," a culturally appropriate way of saying he lies. If he'd admitted his high school and college years included booze-addled blurs, and if Ford's claims were true (they're not! He's "innocent") he must have been drunk (implicitly not responsible). If he'd expressed shame, if he'd apologized, he would be on the Supreme Court. That's the power of male culture. Instead, he foisted a false narrative and "dissembled" under oath about Maryland's legal drinking age, that he never ralphed, about the meaning of "boof" and "devil's triangle." He raged. He cried. Now he and his supporters seek to search and destroy.
Cultural baggage
Brett Kavanaugh is a culturally damaged creature of toxic male hegemony who lacks a broad understanding of and pleasure in our complex, multicultural world. He's confused --outraged--about why this is being done to him. He's played the culture game right: "had no connections" to assist him into Yale, "worked his butt off," excelled at academics and athletics, attended church, enjoyed the occasional beer, and kept his calendars from high school and college to prove it. His version of American culture (Grassley's, Hatch's, and Graham's, too), the only version that matters, entitles him to his spot on the Supreme Court. He deserves it. The job of lesser beings--regular Americans--is to get out of his way.
Damaged himself, Kavanaugh is also a highly damaging man. He can wreak havoc. He can harm. We, the People, the Supreme Court, our sisters and brothers beyond our borders, are entitled to, deserve, a well-rounded, judicious Justice. That's not Brett Kavanaugh.
During a remarkable, emotional three-minute encounter at the door of a Capitol Hill elevator, Gallagher -- a young woman who'd never protested anything before last week's showdown over Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and never spoken with an elected official before -- didn't just find the courage and the voice to tell her story. In doing so, she became the vessel for the rage that millions of American women had carried after watching the judge testify the day before. Gallagher's voice was infused with the raw emotion that so many women had long felt compelled to repress.
"Don't look away from me," Gallagher, whose face could not be seen on camera but whose rising emotion demanded to be heard, told the GOP senator in the Friday morning encounter's most powerful moment. Flake appeared stunned, looking down and only muttering "thank you" in response.
"Look at me and tell me that it doesn't matter what happened to me, that you will let people like that go into the highest court of the land and tell everyone what they can do to their bodies," said Gallagher, tearful, her voice now a crescendo, building upon the also powerful but more measured words of a veteran activist and Colombian immigrant, Ana Maria Archila, who had initiated the confrontation with Flake.
It was the elevator pitch that altered the trajectory of American history. The TV cameras had all been focused on Flake because just a few moments earlier the Arizonan -- a conservative who's leaving the Senate after clashing verbally (but not on policy) with President Trump -- had announced he would vote for Kavanaugh after hearing the judge's story and that of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who said the judge is "the boy who sexually assaulted me" when both were teens in 1982.
But not long after the encounter, as Flake sat around a semi-circle with 20 other senators about to vote to send Kavanaugh's embattled nomination to the full Senate, the TV cameras again panned his way, and his face was white, as if he'd just seen a ghost. I'd only once seen anything like it in politics, and that wasn't in real life but in a Hollywood movie -- the scene in 1939's Mr. Smith Goes to Washington where Claude Rains' once-idealistic-now-corrupted senator simmers with guilt as he's exposed by Jimmy Stewart's hoarse filibuster.
What happened on Friday lacked the matinee theatrics of Rains' "Expel me, not him!" monologue in the film, but it was also more powerful because it was real. The rattled Flake was pulled out of the room by his close friend from the Democratic side of the committee table, Sen. Chris Coons, and returned to say that while he would still vote Kavanaugh out of committee, any final vote was contingent on an FBI probe of allegations against the judge and a delay of at least one week.
The elevator moment has been rehashed countless times in the last 48 hours, but it's hard to stop thinking about it because it speaks so much to the moral quandary that so many people have expressed, in one form or another, over the last two years: In a moment when American democracy seems to be circling the drain, how could any one individual voice -- one, lonely voice -- possibly make a difference?
Especially when America is led by a president who governs as an autocrat despite 3 million fewer votes than the woman he was running against, and a Congress which, thanks to gerrymandering in the House and the outsized clout of small rural states in the Senate, also fails to represent the will of the people. The race to ram through the most unpopular modern Supreme Court nominee in Kavanaugh is testament to that feeling of helplessness.
That was only reinforced last Thursday by Kavanaugh's bombastic and belligerent performance before the Senate committee. To the judge's defenders, his anger was the righteous indignation of the falsely accused, and -- who knows? -- maybe this week's FBI ridiculously limited investigation will find the piece of evidence that proves him right.
But separate and apart from the truth of 36 years ago is the indisputable fact that Kavanaugh, in the fall of 2018, is also furious that anyone dare challenge a system of privilege and entitlement for certain kinds of people who come from the right families and go to the right schools, and who are used to using their power to get away with things -- and are very much not used to common people challenging that authority.
The courage of Gallagher and Archila in confronting a powerful U.S. senator on his own turf, and in saying things on live national television that before Friday they'd not wanted to tell even their own parents, was an epic event -- yet it was not an isolated incident.
The story of brave, once-anonymous citizens taking risks, speaking out and altering the seemingly unbendable course of history starts with Dr. Ford, who frequently said it was her sense of civic duty that led her to take action to inform America about Kavanaugh's moral fitness -- or, more appropriately, lack of it -- for sitting on America's highest court. There can be no doubt that her decision -- which came with no personal upside beyond her unshakable belief that she is speaking the truth -- offered an adrenaline shot of bravery to others like Gallagher.
But Gallagher and Archila were hardly the end of the story, either, but the leading edge of a tidal wave of truth. The flood of callers, including a 76-year-old woman from Missouri, who overwhelmed a live call-in show on C-SPAN with their own vivid revelations of the times they were sexually assaulted. The 83-year-old New Jersey legislator who went public with the story of how she was groped. Each truth-teller buoyed by the strength of the one who came before.
This last week has in many ways echoed the famous words of the Berkeley student activist Mario Savio when he said in 1964 that "[t]here's a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart that you can't take part! ... And you've got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus -- and you've got to make it stop!" Fifty-four years later, women like Dr. Ford, Gallagher and Archila are throwing themselves in front of the runaway train that is the Kavanaugh confirmation, armed with little but their words.
Will it be enough, though? This weekend's disconcerting news that the White House is significantly constricting the FBI probe that Flake and other key senators asked for on Friday is one more sign that the established order is in a testosterone-fueled rush to preserve the patriarchy and is terrified of the one thing that could derail it: Honesty. For three glorious minutes on Friday, the truth was liberating for Gallagher.
"It is frustrating and something that needs to change," she told the Daily Beast, "and I think things like this are hopefully a step in the right direction for our country."
That step also answered the question that has hovered over America like a cloud for nearly 23 months. Your voice can make a difference. If you're still sitting on the sidelines, what are you waiting for?
Over the last few weeks, Senator Jeff Flake (R-Arizona) has been conflicted and waffling about the Kavanaugh vote. The moment when Ana Maria Archila co-executive director of the nonprofit Center for Popular Democracy Action confronted him in the elevator of the Senate office building appears to be when he shifted. After that encounter, which can be seen here, Flake called for an investigation of the allegations--prior to the final Senate vote, saying that he will otherwise vote "no" to the nomination.
In a Facebook status, Jeffrey St. Clair publisher of CounterPunch points out that, "the FBI investigation will be overseen by director Christopher Wray, who was two years behind Brett-boy at both Yale and Yale Law. After graduation, they entered the same rightwing political orbit and both took jobs in the Bush Administration. How do you think it's going to turn out?"
St Clair has a point. The scope and time frame have been limited. It's therefore realistic to expect another Republican attempt to whitewash Brett Kavanaugh and shoehorn him into the Supreme Court. The concern is that more political drama will lead to more public exhaustion, more reasons for cynicism, and the same end result.
While we don't know the outcome of the investigation, given the Republican's short time frame to get a right-wing ideologue into the SCOTUS swing seat prior to the mid-terms, delays and running out the clock are tactics favorable to Kavanaugh opponents. The only danger is that the weary public will in a week's time forget the horrifying revelation of Kavanaugh's true character on display in Thursday's hearing--which confirmed accounts that he was a heavy drinker and a Jekyll and Hyde mean drunk during the time period of the alleged rape attempt.
Nevertheless, both the investigation and the delay open the door to other elected officials shifting their positions, as well as to other events that may influence the outcome, such as further revelations about Kavanaugh or Mark Judge, the eye witness to the rape attempt--or further validation of any of the multiple allegations that were not considered in Thursday Senate Judiciary committee's hearing.
Before the protests began, many people believed that, "We can't win. The numbers make that impossible." In a current New Yorker commentary, Doreen St. Felix echoes this sentiment:
"Judge Brett Kavanaugh is almost certainly going to be appointed the next member of the Supreme Court of the United States. Whatever Christine Blasey Ford said in her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday, and whatever Kavanaugh said in his, and however credible and convincing either one seemed, none of it was going to affect this virtual inevitability."
In the end, it's certainly possible that such predictions may prove accurate. In fact, odds are that they will. At the same time, they fail to consider the role of progressive action-- through which tiny changes can sometimes lead to big results.
As this country faces the end game of an authoritarian, corporate financed takeover, long odds are what we have to work with. One reason for that sad state of affairs is that too many people for too many years sat around passively believing what establishment pundits have told them--there was nothing to be done. It may sound world weary and wise, and but at this critical juncture, it's non-strategic and counter productive. This is the time when this country has seen enough to inform action. We can win if everyone stands up and gets involved.
Activists have creativity and imagination. They see openings and opportunities where others see walls. Without a guaranteed win in every instance, participating in activism increases the odds of a better outcome. You never know.
The elevator confrontation with Jeff Flake didn't happen out of the blue. Even though Democrats paraded through MSNBC nightly news programming claiming credit for Flake's change of heart, few in mainstream media offered the true context, nor listed Archila's affiliation with the Center she co-directs.
The "chance" confrontation happened because for the last ten days thousands of people came from all over the country to participate in protests, organized by the Women's March, Cancel Kavanaugh, Be A Hero and other affiliated groups. These protests are currently ongoing with open calls for participation and support.
The heroic action happened because Archila was in the Senate building as one among:
But most of all Archila and thousands more came to the Senate office building to support Christine Blasey Ford, who left her home and hired security guards so that she could do her civic duty: opening an honest accounting about the true costs and consequences of sexual assault-- and why women must not be the sole ones to bear them, while institutionalized and systemic male entitlement allows the commission of illegal, corrupted, or criminal acts that harm and disenfranchise half of the population-- or more.
Critical thinking is essential, but defeatist attitudes are retrogressive. Enlisting more people to step up to participate and support activism--even at long odds--is the only way to win.
In a move that could give fence-sitting senators from both parties "political cover" in a full Senate vote to confirm U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) called for a one-week delay so that the FBI can probe sexual assault allegations against Kavanaugh, even as he voted with 10 other Republicans on the Judiciary Committee on Friday to advance the nomination to the full chamber.
"If the FBI finds nothing new (as is likely), Collins, Murkowski, and Manchin are unquestionably more likely to vote yes."
--Lachlan Markay, Daily Beast
While Flake's threat to oppose Kavanaugh unless Republican leaders allow an investigation comes after Democratic lawmakers and protesters across the nation have spent days demanding such a probe, observers are warning that Flake and others may use it to eventually vote in favor of President Donald Trump's nominee.
After Flake, during a committee meeting on Friday, called for federal investigators to look into "current allegations"--Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, Deborah Ramirez, and Julie Swetnick have publicly accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault--Splinter News senior writer Hamilton Nolan tweeted:
Flake is considered a key swing vote if and when Kavanaugh's nomination is brought to the Senate floor--along with Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Susan Collins (Maine) as well as Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.) and Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.).
Murkowski told CNN on Friday that as long a probe is "limited in time and scope," she also supports "the FBI having an opportunity to bring some closure to this." Manchin and Collins released separate statements declaring their support for a one-week FBI investigation.
Daily Beast reporter Lachlan Markay posited on Twitter that if federal investigators don't uncover any new information about the alleged assaults that hasn't already been revealed in Thursday's hearing--which featured testimony from Ford--or media reports, "Collins, Murkowski, and Manchin are unquestionably more likely to vote yes."
Trump is required to sign off on the FBI reopening its background investigation into Kavanaugh. Asked about his willingness to do so by reporters at the White House on Friday, the president said that he "will be totally reliant on what" Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) "and the group decides to do."
The Senate Judiciary Committee, in a short statement on Friday, confirmed that it "will request that the administration instruct the FBI to conduct a supplemental FBI background investigation" that "would be limited to current credible allegations against the nominee and must be completed no later than one week from today," or Oct. 5.
"Yes, of course there should be an FBI investigation. But whatever they find doesn't change the fact that Kavanaugh, especially after his performance yesterday, is the most dangerous Supreme Court pick of our lifetime."
--Sen. Chris Murphy
When the committee's ranking member, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), asked Kavanaugh during Thursday's hearing why he wasn't demanding an FBI probe himself, he said, "I'll do whatever the committee wants."
The Senate's second-ranking Republican, John Cornyn of Texas, told Bloomberg on Friday that while party leaders have agreed to a one-week delay to allow for an investigation, they still plan to hold a procedural vote on Saturday, as previously planned.
While some Senate Democrats expressed support for the investigation, they also noted that Kavanaugh's record as a federal judge had raised widespread alarm even before multiple sexual assault allegations surfaced.
"Yes, of course there should be an FBI investigation," Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) tweeted Friday. "But whatever they find doesn't change the fact that Kavanaugh, especially after his performance yesterday, is the most dangerous Supreme Court pick of our lifetime."
Sexual assault survivors berated Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) on Friday morning after it he announced that he would vote Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh out of the Senate Judiciary Committee despite the serious accusations against him and the performance he offered during his testimony on Thursday.
"Senator Flake, do you think that Brett Kavanaugh is telling the truth?" asked one, according to ThinkProgress. "Do you think that he's able to hold the pain of these countries and prepare it, that is the work of justice, the way that justice work is you recognize harm. You take responsibility for it and then you begin to repair it. You are allowing someone unwilling to take responsibility for his own actions and willing to hold the harm he has done to one woman, actually three women and not repair it. You are allowing someone who is unwilling to take responsibility for his own actions."
While Flake had entered an elevator, the women held the door open but the Senator repeatedly looked away or down and would not answer their questions or respond to their outrage.
"Look at me when I'm talking to you," yelled another woman in visible anger. "You're telling me that my assault doesn't matter!"
Watch:
The clip quickly went viral with many declaring online that the exchange, and Flake's behavior, is representative of the deplorable historical moment that the GOP has ushered forth:
BREAKING - 7:00 PM EDT
Sen. Jeff Flake, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said in an interview Sunday evening that until he learns more about the sexual assault allegation regarding Brett Kavanaugh, he is "not comfortable voting yes" on Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court at a scheduled Judiciary Committee hearing Thursday.
The Arizona senator is one of 11 Republicans on the narrowly divided panel, and without his support, the nomination cannot move forward given Democratic opposition. "We need to hear from her. And I don't think I'm alone in this," Flake told POLITICO.
EARLIER
Christine Blasey Ford, a 51-year-old professor at Palo Alto University in California, has identified herself as the woman who wrote a confidential letter that detailed allegations of sexual assault against the Supreme Court nominee.
Ford is speaking publicly about her allegations against Kavanaugh for the first time, according to a Washington Post investigation published Sunday afternoon.
The Post wrote:
Speaking publicly for the first time, Ford said that one summer in the early 1980s, Kavanaugh and a friend -- both "stumbling drunk," Ford alleges -- corralled her into a bedroom during a gathering of teenagers at a house in Montgomery County.
While his friend watched, she said, Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed on her back and groped her over her clothes, grinding his body against hers and clumsily attempting to pull off her one-piece bathing suit and the clothing she wore over it. When she tried to scream, she said, he put his hand over her mouth.
"I thought he might inadvertently kill me," said Ford, now a 51-year-old research psychologist in northern California. "He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.
The Washington Post reports that Ford has already submitted to a polygraph and passed.
Read the whole Washington Post report here.