October, 28 2021, 01:28pm EDT

Poor, Low-Income Americans Say to Congress: "I Am the Cost of Cutting Build Back Better"
Faith leaders, US House members also join Poor People’s Campaign for Moral Witness Wednesday.
WASHINGTON
Poor and low-income Americans from across the country came to Washington, D.C., on Wednesday to put faces and stories on the numbers for infrastructure for bridges, for democracy and for people with the refrain: "I am the cost of cutting the Build Back Better plan."
Leaders of various faiths also joined Moral Witness Wednesday --- a news conference and rally held by the Poor People's Campaign: A National Call for Moral Revival to demand that Congress listen to the people who will be most hurt if the $3.5 trillion plan (over 10 years) isn't passed in full.
"I want you to hear me really clear when I say this: The relief that the child tax credit has provided me as a single mother -- to make an extra $300 -- has allowed me to meet my basic needs, my son's basic needs with less stress. .... "And to give me that relief in July and take it away in December is wrong," said Kristen Olsen of West Virginia, whose senator, Joe Manchin, is obstructing Build Back Better, including continued expansion of the credit.
"I'm Kristen. I'm a mother. I'm a teacher. And I am the cost of cutting the Build Back Better plan," she said.
Reps. Barbara Lee and Sara Jacobs of California and Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland spoke at the news conference.
"Essential workers are the backbone of our economy, the beating heart of our communities and the reason why stakes are so high in this Build Back Better package," Rep. Lee said. "From housing to voting rights to health care to immigrant rights, from child poverty to action on climate change, these are all the issues that just can't wait."
Congress is moving closer to a deal on Build Back Better, with Sens. Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona insisting on cuts to the program that includes Medicaid expansion, lower prescription drug costs, continued expansion of the child tax credit and other policies that lift from the bottom.
Several speakers addressed the lie that the country can't afford Build Back Better.
"We've said this stuff is absolutely critical. We've said we had the worst attack on voting rights since the end of the Civil War. We say that the climate is in trouble. And we say it's urgent. But then we treat it as though we've got options and more time. And we do not," said Rev. Dr. William J. Barber, a co-chair of PPC:NCMR and president of Repairers of the Breach. "This is not about $3 trillion. This is not about scarcity. This is not about we don't have enough. I'm so sick of that damn lie I don't know what to do. The wealthiest nation in the world in the history of the world cannot claim we don't have enough. What we don't have enough of is conscience and moral fiber and a concern for people."
Joan Steede, a home health care worker from Phoenix, said she specializes in caring for hospice patients.
"I say to myself I'm the last person that this person will see on this Earth but I can't get $15 an hour? Really?" she asked. "Let's put our money into where we want it to go and that's the American people."
Build Back Better is "not about how much it's going to cost. It's not about what is the price," said Rabbi Jonah Pesner, director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, speaking on the third anniversary of the killings of 11 people at a synagogue in Pittsburgh. "It's about what we are for. We are for living wages. We are for health care access. We are for the ability of families to take care of their children. And we are for a clean, green economy where people have a shot to actually make it in this world and have a right to live."
Speakers covered voting rights, immigrant rights, climate change and other issues that Build Back Better would address. They included two climate activists who were in the eighth day of a hunger strike outside the White House.
"We're here this morning to make clear that the people most impacted by compromises made to healthcare and paid sick leave, the child tax credit and earned income tax credit, saving the planet, early childhood education and veterans benefits will not be silent," said Rev. Dr. Liz Theoharis, co-chair of PPC: NCMR and director of the Kairos Center for Religions, Rights and Social Justice. "As it says in the Bible: If these people were silent, the stones would cry out. And indeed the people and earth are groaning. And we must be heard."
Partners for Moral Witness Wednesday included Sunrise Movement, SEIU, MoveOn, Black Voters Matter, Common Defense, 350.org, Until Freedom, the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, the Institute for Policy Studies, the Islamic Society of North America and United for Peace and Justice. After the rally, participants marched to the Hart Senate office building to try to deliver letters to Sens. Manchin and Sinema. The letters layout how Build Back Better helps the residents of their states and seeks a meeting with them.
The constituents weren't allowed to enter the building, and no one in the senators' offices answered their calls.
COMMENTS FROM OTHERS AT MORAL WITNESS WEDNESDAY:
Abby Leedy of Philadelphia, a youth climate activist who was on a hunger strike:
"I'm here because I am desperate, and I am furious. I am furious with the Democrats who will not stand for me, will not fight for my generation and who are going to let us burn and drown. I believe that he will, I demand, that Joe Biden, president of the United States, do everything in his power to cut emissions by as much as he can as soon as he can because my generation deserves to live. We deserve to live. I deserve to live."
Julie Paramo, 24, of Dallas, a climate activist who was on a hunger strike:
"I want to tell President Joe Biden that I'm tired of seeing communities struggle every day like mine back in Dallas. President Biden, I am tired of communities having to go through natural disasters like the one I went through back in February. I still remember the winter freeze like it was yesterday. Joe Biden, I don't want to wake up in a freezing cold room worried about my parents, about my dog, about my friends only a few miles away. ... . I don't want another child to die because of carbon monoxide poisoning because the infrastructure that could have prevented that from happening wasn't in place."
Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland:
One context for this moment "is the one that kicked off this year on Jan. 6 where we saw that American democracy is under attack. Our voting rights are under attack. There's an effort to disable the government as an instrument of the common good. And there's the use of every anti-democratic instrument in order to stop us -- whether we're talking about voter suppression statutes, we're talking about the gerrymandering of our congressional districts, we're talking about the filibuster, we're talking about right-wing judicial activism, we're talking about corporate dark money or whether we're talking about violence itself, a violent insurrection and political coups against democracy in order to keep the majority from governing."
Rep. Sara Jacobs of California:
"And lest anyone tell you otherwise because I know this is one of my colleagues' favorite talking points: Making these investments is fiscally responsible. I'm a foreign policy person. I can tell you, for a fact, that these investments are the single most important thing we can do to ensure American competitiveness with the world moving forward. Do not believe that we can't afford to make these investments. The truth is, we cannot afford to not make these investments."
Esti Lamonaca of Common Defense, a U.S. Army combat veteran who fought in Afghanistan:
"Tell me why the Iraq and Afghanistan wars cost $6.4 trillion and we are not willing to pass the Build Back Better plan. ... We want more than anything a democracy where we can thrive. We don't want that to be seen as too expensive. We the people are tired. Veterans are tired."
Casey Clowers of Working Families in Arizona:
"Sen. Sinema is standing in the way of Arizona receiving deep investments to tackle the climate crisis at a time when Arizona has experienced record heatwaves, resulting in lives lost. Sen. Sinema is going against the will of the people ... by holding up the Build Back Better agenda."
Ana Ilarraza-Blackburn of the North Carolina PPC:
"Immigrants contribute $13 billion to Social Security for the aging in this nation, and they will not see a single penny of that. If you incorporate immigrants into the workforce, regardless of skill level, you will increase spending and the economy of this nation. So it would only make economic sense to Build Back Better by giving all 7 million immigrants the right and clear path to citizenship."
Leon Tyer, an activist the Pennsylvania PPC, ACT-UP and Put People First PA:
"If Joe Manchin and Sinema can call themselves Christian, how can they turn their eyes -- their blind eyes (away) from what's going on today? It's like having Judas in your own party -- two Judases."
Dr. Jim Winkler, president and general secretary of the National Council of Churches.
"We're here to call for economic investment for the people, not for corporations and the greedy. Our people have been starved by disinvestment in human needs. Our roads and bridges and infrastructure have been neglected because in part we have poured more than $30 trillion" into military endeavors since World War II. "We're living in a militarized state, friends. Militarism and greed and racism are trying to destroy our country. Our government's been running deficits because the rich and the corporations don't pay their fair share."
Imam Saffet Catovic, head of the Office for Interfaith, Community Alliances and Government Relations for the Islamic Society of North America:
"We need to thank people. We need to thank our sisters and brothers here, members of our human family, who are putting their lives on the line and who are subjected to things which human beings should not be subjected to. We need to thank them for showing the way. but thankfulness is not just a word, it is an act."
Sheila Katz, CEO of the National Council of Jewish Women:
"On this day, we dare to dream of a country where every person can live with freedom, safety, dignity, equity and belonging no matter how we pray, what we look like or where we come from. We're here voicing our support for this once-in-a-generation opportunity to rebuild our economy, not just to where we were before the pandemic but toward an economy that is truly inclusive and responsive to the needs of everyone living in our country."
The Poor People's Campaign: A National Call for Moral Revival, is building a generationally transformative digital gathering called the Mass Poor People's Assembly and Moral March on Washington, on June 20, 2020. At that assembly, we will demand that both major political parties address the interlocking injustices of systemic racism, poverty, ecological devastation, militarism and the distorted moral narrative of religious nationalism by implementing our Moral Agenda.
LATEST NEWS
Analysis Shows How GOP Attack on SNAP Could Cut Food Assistance 'From Millions' in Low-Income Households
"With economic uncertainty and the risk of recession rising, now is a particularly bad time for Congress to pursue these harmful changes," according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
Apr 30, 2025
As congressional Republicans mull potentially imposing stricter work requirements for adults who rely on federal nutrition aid as part of a push to pass a GOP-backed reconciliation bill, an analysis from the progressive think tank the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities released Wednesday states that such a move could take away food "from millions of people in low-income households" who are having a hard time finding steady employment or face hurdles to finding work.
The analysis is based on a proposal regarding the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) from House Agriculture Committee member Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.), which, if enacted, the group estimates would translate into an estimated 6 million people being at risk of losing their food assistance.
"In total, nearly 11 million people—about 1 in 4 SNAP participants, including more than 4 million children and more than half a million adults aged 65 or older and adults with disabilities—live in households that would be at risk of losing at least some of their food assistance" under Johnson's proposed rules, according to the analysis.
Per CBPP, current SNAP rules mandate that most adults ages 18-54 without children may receive food benefits for only three months in a three-year period unless they prove they are participating in a 20-hour-per-week work program or prove they have a qualifying exemption.
Under Johnson's proposal, work requirements would apply to adults ages 18-65, and they would also be expanded to adults who have children over the age of seven. Per CBPP, Johnson's proposal would also "virtually eliminate" the ability of states to waive the three-month time limit in response to local labor market conditions, like in cases where there are insufficient jobs
According to CBPP, its report is based on analysis of "the number of participants meeting the age and other characteristics of the populations that would be newly subject to the work requirement under U.S. Department of Agriculture 2022 SNAP Household Characteristics data," as well as the number of participants potentially subject to work requirements in areas that are typically subject to the waivers mentioned above.
The House Agriculture Committee, which oversees SNAP—formerly known as food stamps—has been tasked with finding $230 billion in cuts as part of a House budget reconciliation plan. To come up with that amount, the committee would need to enact steep cuts to SNAP.
According to CBPP, most SNAP recipients who can work are already working, or are temporarily in between jobs. Per the report, U.S. Department of Agriculture data undercount the SNAP households who are working because the numbers come from SNAP's "Quality Control" sample, which gives point-in-time data about a household in a given month.
This snapshot does "not indicate whether a household had earnings before or after the sample month, nor do they show how long a household participates in SNAP."
What's more, "with economic uncertainty and the risk of recession rising, now is a particularly bad time for Congress to pursue these harmful changes," according to the authors of the analysis.
Keep ReadingShow Less
SOS: Migrants Awaiting Deportation Use Their Bodies to Cry for Help
The 31 men were nearly deported earlier this month before the U.S. Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to return them to a detention facility in Texas.
Apr 30, 2025
Ten days after a U.S. Supreme Court order forced buses carrying dozens of Venezuelan migrants to an airport in Texas to immediately turn around and return them to Bluebonnet Detention Facility in the small city of Anson, 31 of the men formed the letters SOS by standing in the detention center's dirt yard.
As Reutersreported, the families of several of the men have denied that they are members of the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang, contrary to the Trump administration's claims.
Immigration enforcement agents have detained and expelled numerous people with no criminal records, basing accusations that they're members of Tren de Aragua and MS-13 solely on the fact that they have tattoos in some cases.
After the reprieve from the Supreme Court earlier this month, with the justices ordering the government "not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this court," the migrants still face potential deportation to El Salvador's notorious Terrorism Confinement Center under the Alien Enemies Act.
Reuters flew a drone over Bluebonnet in recent days to capture images of the migrants, after being denied access to the facility. One flight captured the men forming the letters—the internationally used distress signal.
Reuters spoke to one of the men, 19-year-old Jeferson Escalona, after identifying him with the drone images.
He was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in January and initially sent to the U.S. migrant detention center at Guantánamo Bay before being transferred to Bluebonnet. A Department of Homeland Security official said, without providing evidence, that he was a "self-admitted" member of Tren de Aragua, but Escalona vehemently denied the claim and told Reuters he had trained to be a police officer in Venezuela before coming to the United States.
"They're making false accusations about me. I don't belong to any gang," he told Reuters, adding that he has asked to return to his home country but has been denied.
"I fear for my life here," he told the outlet. "I want to go to Venezuela."
Earlier this month in a separate decision, the Supreme Court ruled that migrants being deported under the Alien Enemies Act must be provided with due process to challenge their removal.
"Remember," said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick of the American Immigration Council, "the Trump administration refuses to give these men a chance to day in court, despite the Supreme Court telling them that they must give people a chance to take their case in front of a judge!"
Keep ReadingShow Less
US Supreme Court Could OK Religious Public Charter School in Oklahoma
"Allowing taxpayer dollars to fund religious charter schools would put both public education and religious freedom at risk," warned one teachers union leader.
Apr 30, 2025
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday heard arguments over what could become the country's first taxpayer-funded religious charter school—and opponents of the St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School renewed their warnings about the proposal.
Faith leaders, parents, and educators celebrated last June, when the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled against establishing St. Isidore. The test case for all such schools has now advanced to the country's highest court, which has a right-wing supermajority.
Reporting on over two hours of arguments Wednesday, Law Dork's Chris Geidner wrote that "the religious supremacy movement from the right's majority on the U.S. Supreme Court—with its outside helpers—appeared likely to... OK the first religious charter school in the country."
"Justices Clarence Thomas, Sam Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh appeared eager to do so, and Justice Neil Gorsuch's past writing in a related case signaled his alignment with the move, at least in principle," Geidner detailed. "Chief Justice John Roberts—the key vote then since Justice Amy Coney Barrett has recused herself from the case—appeared to be open to the idea as well."
Other legal reporters also concluded that Roberts appears to be the "key vote," given that the three liberals—Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor—all "expressed significant reservations" about allowing a religious charter school.
It appears very likely that the Supreme Court will force Oklahoma to approve and fund a Catholic charter school that reserves the right to indoctrinate students in Catholicism, force them to attend mass, and discriminate against non-Catholics. The three liberals sound increasingly exasperated.
— Mark Joseph Stern ( @mjsdc.bsky.social) April 30, 2025 at 11:52 AM
According toThe Associated Press:
If Roberts sides with the liberals, the court would be tied 4-4, an outcome that would leave the state court decision in place, but would leave the issue unresolved nationally.
If he joins his conservative colleagues, on the other hand, the court could find that the taxpayer-funded school is in line with a string of high court decisions that have allowed public funds to flow to religious entities. Those rulings were based on a different part of the First Amendment that protects religious freedom.
Roberts wrote the last three of those decisions. He acknowledged at one point that the court had previously ruled that states "couldn't exclude religious participants," suggesting support for St. Isidore.
But he also said the state's involvement in this case is "much more comprehensive" than in the earlier ones, a point that could lead him in the other direction.
American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten said in a statement after the arguments that "we respect religious education and the Founders' intention in separating church and state."
"Public schools, including public charter schools, are funded by taxpayer dollars because they are dedicated to helping all—not just some—children have a shot at success," the union leader said. "They are the bedrock of our democracy, and states have long worked to ensure that they remain secular, open, and accessible to all. They are not, and never have been, Sunday schools."
"The petitioners are seeking to change that," Weingarten warned. "Religious schools should be able to operate in the U.S., but they are not public schools, and they shouldn't be able to get the benefits and the funding yet ignore the obligations and responsibilities."
"Our hope is that the justices will uphold the Supreme Court of Oklahoma's decision, correctly siding with religious pluralism over sectarianism," she concluded. "A reversal would be a devastating blow to public education and the 90% of young people who rely on it. We must preserve and nurture the roots of our democracy, not tear up its very foundations."
The country's other leading teachers union also opposes the establishment of the Oklahoma school. National Education Association president Becky Pringle said in a statement this week that "every student—no matter where they live, what they look like, or their religion—deserves access to a fully funded neighborhood public school that gives them a sense of belonging and prepares them with the lessons and life skills they need."
"Allowing taxpayer dollars to fund religious charter schools would put both public education and religious freedom at risk," Pringle asserted, "opening the door to more privatization that undermines our public education system."
Proud to join @faithfulamerica.bsky.social outside of SCOTUS ahead of oral arguments in the OK religious charter school case, which challenges whether public funds can be used to support religious charter schools. As religious Americans, we say the separation of church and state is good for both!
[image or embed]
— Interfaith Alliance (@interfaithalliance.org) April 30, 2025 at 10:12 AM
Chris Yarrell, an attorney at the Center for Law and Education, similarly warned in a Common Dreams opinion piece earlier this month that "if the court sides with St. Isidore, the ripple effects could be seismic, triggering a wave of religious charter school applications and fundamentally altering the landscape of public education."
In addition to fighting for a taxpayer-funded religious school, Christian nationalists in Oklahoma want to put Bibles in public school classrooms—an effort the state Supreme Court has temporarily impeded.
The court last month blocked Oklahoma's superintendent of public instruction, Ryan Walters, and education department from spending taxpayer dollars on Bibles and Bible-infused instructional materials.
“This victory is an important step toward protecting the religious freedom of every student and parent in Oklahoma," legal groups supporting plaintiffs who challenged the policy
said at the time. "Walters has been abusing his power, and the court checked those abuses today. Our diverse coalition of families and clergy remains united against Walters' extremism and in favor of a core First Amendment principle: the separation of church and state."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular