October, 28 2021, 01:28pm EDT

Poor, Low-Income Americans Say to Congress: "I Am the Cost of Cutting Build Back Better"
Faith leaders, US House members also join Poor People’s Campaign for Moral Witness Wednesday.
WASHINGTON
Poor and low-income Americans from across the country came to Washington, D.C., on Wednesday to put faces and stories on the numbers for infrastructure for bridges, for democracy and for people with the refrain: "I am the cost of cutting the Build Back Better plan."
Leaders of various faiths also joined Moral Witness Wednesday --- a news conference and rally held by the Poor People's Campaign: A National Call for Moral Revival to demand that Congress listen to the people who will be most hurt if the $3.5 trillion plan (over 10 years) isn't passed in full.
"I want you to hear me really clear when I say this: The relief that the child tax credit has provided me as a single mother -- to make an extra $300 -- has allowed me to meet my basic needs, my son's basic needs with less stress. .... "And to give me that relief in July and take it away in December is wrong," said Kristen Olsen of West Virginia, whose senator, Joe Manchin, is obstructing Build Back Better, including continued expansion of the credit.
"I'm Kristen. I'm a mother. I'm a teacher. And I am the cost of cutting the Build Back Better plan," she said.
Reps. Barbara Lee and Sara Jacobs of California and Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland spoke at the news conference.
"Essential workers are the backbone of our economy, the beating heart of our communities and the reason why stakes are so high in this Build Back Better package," Rep. Lee said. "From housing to voting rights to health care to immigrant rights, from child poverty to action on climate change, these are all the issues that just can't wait."
Congress is moving closer to a deal on Build Back Better, with Sens. Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona insisting on cuts to the program that includes Medicaid expansion, lower prescription drug costs, continued expansion of the child tax credit and other policies that lift from the bottom.
Several speakers addressed the lie that the country can't afford Build Back Better.
"We've said this stuff is absolutely critical. We've said we had the worst attack on voting rights since the end of the Civil War. We say that the climate is in trouble. And we say it's urgent. But then we treat it as though we've got options and more time. And we do not," said Rev. Dr. William J. Barber, a co-chair of PPC:NCMR and president of Repairers of the Breach. "This is not about $3 trillion. This is not about scarcity. This is not about we don't have enough. I'm so sick of that damn lie I don't know what to do. The wealthiest nation in the world in the history of the world cannot claim we don't have enough. What we don't have enough of is conscience and moral fiber and a concern for people."
Joan Steede, a home health care worker from Phoenix, said she specializes in caring for hospice patients.
"I say to myself I'm the last person that this person will see on this Earth but I can't get $15 an hour? Really?" she asked. "Let's put our money into where we want it to go and that's the American people."
Build Back Better is "not about how much it's going to cost. It's not about what is the price," said Rabbi Jonah Pesner, director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, speaking on the third anniversary of the killings of 11 people at a synagogue in Pittsburgh. "It's about what we are for. We are for living wages. We are for health care access. We are for the ability of families to take care of their children. And we are for a clean, green economy where people have a shot to actually make it in this world and have a right to live."
Speakers covered voting rights, immigrant rights, climate change and other issues that Build Back Better would address. They included two climate activists who were in the eighth day of a hunger strike outside the White House.
"We're here this morning to make clear that the people most impacted by compromises made to healthcare and paid sick leave, the child tax credit and earned income tax credit, saving the planet, early childhood education and veterans benefits will not be silent," said Rev. Dr. Liz Theoharis, co-chair of PPC: NCMR and director of the Kairos Center for Religions, Rights and Social Justice. "As it says in the Bible: If these people were silent, the stones would cry out. And indeed the people and earth are groaning. And we must be heard."
Partners for Moral Witness Wednesday included Sunrise Movement, SEIU, MoveOn, Black Voters Matter, Common Defense, 350.org, Until Freedom, the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, the Institute for Policy Studies, the Islamic Society of North America and United for Peace and Justice. After the rally, participants marched to the Hart Senate office building to try to deliver letters to Sens. Manchin and Sinema. The letters layout how Build Back Better helps the residents of their states and seeks a meeting with them.
The constituents weren't allowed to enter the building, and no one in the senators' offices answered their calls.
COMMENTS FROM OTHERS AT MORAL WITNESS WEDNESDAY:
Abby Leedy of Philadelphia, a youth climate activist who was on a hunger strike:
"I'm here because I am desperate, and I am furious. I am furious with the Democrats who will not stand for me, will not fight for my generation and who are going to let us burn and drown. I believe that he will, I demand, that Joe Biden, president of the United States, do everything in his power to cut emissions by as much as he can as soon as he can because my generation deserves to live. We deserve to live. I deserve to live."
Julie Paramo, 24, of Dallas, a climate activist who was on a hunger strike:
"I want to tell President Joe Biden that I'm tired of seeing communities struggle every day like mine back in Dallas. President Biden, I am tired of communities having to go through natural disasters like the one I went through back in February. I still remember the winter freeze like it was yesterday. Joe Biden, I don't want to wake up in a freezing cold room worried about my parents, about my dog, about my friends only a few miles away. ... . I don't want another child to die because of carbon monoxide poisoning because the infrastructure that could have prevented that from happening wasn't in place."
Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland:
One context for this moment "is the one that kicked off this year on Jan. 6 where we saw that American democracy is under attack. Our voting rights are under attack. There's an effort to disable the government as an instrument of the common good. And there's the use of every anti-democratic instrument in order to stop us -- whether we're talking about voter suppression statutes, we're talking about the gerrymandering of our congressional districts, we're talking about the filibuster, we're talking about right-wing judicial activism, we're talking about corporate dark money or whether we're talking about violence itself, a violent insurrection and political coups against democracy in order to keep the majority from governing."
Rep. Sara Jacobs of California:
"And lest anyone tell you otherwise because I know this is one of my colleagues' favorite talking points: Making these investments is fiscally responsible. I'm a foreign policy person. I can tell you, for a fact, that these investments are the single most important thing we can do to ensure American competitiveness with the world moving forward. Do not believe that we can't afford to make these investments. The truth is, we cannot afford to not make these investments."
Esti Lamonaca of Common Defense, a U.S. Army combat veteran who fought in Afghanistan:
"Tell me why the Iraq and Afghanistan wars cost $6.4 trillion and we are not willing to pass the Build Back Better plan. ... We want more than anything a democracy where we can thrive. We don't want that to be seen as too expensive. We the people are tired. Veterans are tired."
Casey Clowers of Working Families in Arizona:
"Sen. Sinema is standing in the way of Arizona receiving deep investments to tackle the climate crisis at a time when Arizona has experienced record heatwaves, resulting in lives lost. Sen. Sinema is going against the will of the people ... by holding up the Build Back Better agenda."
Ana Ilarraza-Blackburn of the North Carolina PPC:
"Immigrants contribute $13 billion to Social Security for the aging in this nation, and they will not see a single penny of that. If you incorporate immigrants into the workforce, regardless of skill level, you will increase spending and the economy of this nation. So it would only make economic sense to Build Back Better by giving all 7 million immigrants the right and clear path to citizenship."
Leon Tyer, an activist the Pennsylvania PPC, ACT-UP and Put People First PA:
"If Joe Manchin and Sinema can call themselves Christian, how can they turn their eyes -- their blind eyes (away) from what's going on today? It's like having Judas in your own party -- two Judases."
Dr. Jim Winkler, president and general secretary of the National Council of Churches.
"We're here to call for economic investment for the people, not for corporations and the greedy. Our people have been starved by disinvestment in human needs. Our roads and bridges and infrastructure have been neglected because in part we have poured more than $30 trillion" into military endeavors since World War II. "We're living in a militarized state, friends. Militarism and greed and racism are trying to destroy our country. Our government's been running deficits because the rich and the corporations don't pay their fair share."
Imam Saffet Catovic, head of the Office for Interfaith, Community Alliances and Government Relations for the Islamic Society of North America:
"We need to thank people. We need to thank our sisters and brothers here, members of our human family, who are putting their lives on the line and who are subjected to things which human beings should not be subjected to. We need to thank them for showing the way. but thankfulness is not just a word, it is an act."
Sheila Katz, CEO of the National Council of Jewish Women:
"On this day, we dare to dream of a country where every person can live with freedom, safety, dignity, equity and belonging no matter how we pray, what we look like or where we come from. We're here voicing our support for this once-in-a-generation opportunity to rebuild our economy, not just to where we were before the pandemic but toward an economy that is truly inclusive and responsive to the needs of everyone living in our country."
The Poor People's Campaign: A National Call for Moral Revival, is building a generationally transformative digital gathering called the Mass Poor People's Assembly and Moral March on Washington, on June 20, 2020. At that assembly, we will demand that both major political parties address the interlocking injustices of systemic racism, poverty, ecological devastation, militarism and the distorted moral narrative of religious nationalism by implementing our Moral Agenda.
LATEST NEWS
Bayer Continues Push to 'Close the Door' on Glyphosate Victims at US Supreme Court
"Bayer is intent on preserving its right to harm at all costs—a pursuit the Trump administration is all too willing to endorse," said a Food and Water Watch campaigner.
Apr 27, 2026
As pesticide critics held a "The People v. Poison" rally outside the US Supreme Court on Monday, the justices heard arguments in Monsanto Company v. Durnell, a case whose conclusion is expected to have sweeping implications for cancer patients trying to take on the Roundup maker—now owned by Bayer—in the country's legal system.
The case stems from John Durnell's 2019 lawsuit against Monsanto in Missouri state court, alleging that exposure to the herbicide Roundup—whose active ingredient is glyphosate—caused his non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a type of blood cancer. A jury found that the company failed to warn users of the risks associated with the weedkiller, and awarded Durnell $1.25 million in damages.
Bayer argued before the Supreme Court on Monday that Durnell—and others like him—should not be able to bring such a suit because the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act preempts state rules for labeling pesticides when the Environmental Protection Agency doesn't require a cancer warning. Bayer and the EPA continue to insist that glyphosate is safe, despite the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classifying it as probably carcinogenic to humans over a decade ago.
As The Associated Press and Reuters reported, the justices appeared "divided" on Monday, with the AP noting that several "seemed sympathetic to the company's argument that it can't be sued under state law because federal regulators have found Roundup likely doesn't cause cancer. Others, though, grilled attorneys about whether that wrongly stops states from responding to changing research."
Patti Goldman, senior attorney at Earthjustice—which filed an amicus brief in this case on behalf of farmworker organizations—said in a statement that "questions from the justices recognized that the Environmental Protection Agency approves pesticide labels based on the evidence before the agency at a single moment in time, but that evidence can become outdated as real-world exposure grows and scientific studies document resulting harms."
"Federal law requires the manufacturers to update their labels to provide sufficient warnings and directions to protect the public," Goldman stressed, "and state failure-to-warn claims reinforce that obligation—while ensuring children, families, and workers have a path to seek remedies for the harm they suffer."
Other groups that have submitted amicus briefs include Environmental Protection Network—which is made up of former EPA staffers—and the Center for Food Safety, one of the advocacy organizations that joined the rally outside the court. The event was also attended by members of Congress from both major political parties.
"This isn't left v. right—it's right v. wrong," said US Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ). "Big corporations and their lobbyists have captured both parties, putting profits over our families' health. I've fought Monsanto and Bayer for years, and just filed an amicus brief to the Supreme Court to protect our right to sue them for illnesses caused by their products."
Despite President Donald Trump's campaign promise to "Make America Healthy Again," the Republican recently issued an executive order mandating the production of glyphosate, and the US Department of Justice has sided with Bayer in this case—part of a broader trend of his administration serving the pesticide industry's interests.
"Monsanto Company v. Durnell will have enormous consequences for environmental health litigation," Food and Water Watch legal director Tarah Heinzen said Monday. "Bayer is intent on preserving its right to harm at all costs—a pursuit the Trump administration is all too willing to endorse. This case threatens to close the courthouse doors to the many Americans harmed by pesticides."
Heinzen argued that "should the Supreme Court hold that the Environmental Protection Agency's failed pesticide regulatory scheme preempts state failure to warn lawsuits, leaving tens of thousands of sick Americans without legal recourse, Trump and his industry-dominated EPA will be to blame."
"This high stakes case should be a wake-up call for Congress to act," the campaigner added. "Industrial agriculture's pesticide addiction is poisoning America. Congress must pass the Pesticide Injury Accountability Act to safeguard access to justice for all harmed by toxic pesticides."
As The American Prospect noted Monday in its "three-part series on Bayer's crusade for immunity from Roundup-related cancer claims," the company "is now aggressively lobbying Congress to permanently close the door" on the weedkiller's victims, and managed to get an immunity provision included in the 2026 Farm Bill that advanced out of the US House Agriculture Committee last month.
After joining the rally at the Supreme Court on Monday, Friends of the Earth (FOE) US led a protest outside Bayer's headquarters in downtown Washington, DC, delivering hundreds of thousands of petition signatures are calling on the company to phase out the production of toxic pesticides, including glyphosate and neonicotinoids.
"People are sick and tired of being exposed to toxic pesticides while pesticide corporations shirk responsibility," said FOE senior campaigner Sarah Starman, who spoke at the rally. "Bayer and other pesticide companies should not be allowed to profit from chemicals that threaten our health, harm our environment, and undermine the future of our food system. The hundreds of people who rallied outside the Supreme Court and the 200,000 people who signed comments to Bayer are demanding change."
In the leadup to the arguments before the nation's top court, the Environmental Working Group last week sued the Trump administration at the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, accusing the EPA of unlawfully delaying its response to an EWG petition seeking stronger restrictions on glyphosate.
"The EPA's silence leaves families in the dark and falls far short of its responsibility to protect public health," declared EWG president and co-founder Ken Cook. "It's time for the agency to stop stalling and do its job."Keep ReadingShow Less
'This Is Actually Illegal': DeSantis Unveils Unconstitutionally Rigged Congressional Map
"Republicans lost a HUGE special election in Florida and now they're determined to CHEAT in the November election by rigging the maps in a back room deal," said one observer.
Apr 27, 2026
Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Monday unveiled his plan to unconstitutionally gerrymander the Sunshine State's congressional map amid pressure from the Trump administration, a move GOP officials hope will help their party retain control of both houses of Congress after November's midterm elections.
DeSantis handed state lawmakers a proposed map that would dramatically redraw the districts of several House incumbents, giving legislators less than 24 hours to review the redistricting plan ahead of a special session on Tuesday during which the Republican-controlled Legislature is expected to approve the gerrymandering.
Republicans currently hold 20 of Florida's 28 US House seats. The new map is projected to increase that number to 24. Four Democrat-held seats will be most affected, with Reps. Kathy Castor, Lois Frankel, Darren Soto, and Debbie Wasserman Schultz facing markedly different maps and Rep. Jared Moskowitz in a new district.
🚨Florida voters are being denied any say on the new electoral maps. Ron DeSantis knows they won’t go for it, which is why he’s bypassing them — just like they did in Texas. This is actually ILLEGAL. In California and Virginia, voters got to decide.#StopIllegalFloridaMaps
[image or embed]
— Jon Cooper (@joncooper-us.bsky.social) April 27, 2026 at 12:19 PM
However, the mid-decade partisan redistricting is expressly illegal under Florida's Constitution, which states in Section 20 of Article II that “no apportionment plan or individual district shall be drawn with the intent to favor or disfavor a political party.”
While Republicans claim the new maps are racially neutral, state Rep. Anna Eskamani (D-42) called that assertion "obvious horseshit."
"The map goes out of its way to split up the growing Puerto Rican population in Central Florida between multiple districts. It's racial cracking at a textbook level," she said, referring to the practice of drawing maps so that minority communities are spread across multiple districts, depriving them of the opportunity to form effective voting blocs.
Republicans lost a HUGE special election in Florida and now they're determined to CHEAT in the November election by rigging the maps in a back room deal. Florida voters banned partisan political maps 15 years ago.DO NOT STANDBY AND LET THEM.#StopIllegalFloridaMaps
— Grant Stern (@grantstern.bsky.social) April 27, 2026 at 1:38 PM
US House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) warned last week that Florida's move could backfire.
"If Florida Republicans proceed with this illegal scheme, they will only create more prime pick-up opportunities for Democrats," Jeffries said. "We are prepared to take them all on, and we are prepared to win.”
National and state Democrats are already vowing legal challenges to Florida's plan.
“If DeSantis forces this unconstitutional gerrymander forward in Florida, it won’t be because the voters asked him to,” National Democratic Redistricting Committee president John Bisognano said Monday. "Republicans will only have themselves to blame when they face resistance in the courtroom and at the ballot box for this egregious power grab.”
"Poll after poll has shown that the overwhelming majority of Floridian voters do not want a mid-decade gerrymander," Bisognano added. "They aren’t alone. Local editorial boards across the state are slamming this blatantly partisan power grab."
The gerrymandering war kicked off last year when, under pressure from President Donald Trump, the Republican-controlled Texas Legislature redrew the state's congressional map in a bid to eliminate all Democratic districts. The right-wing US Supreme Court gave Texas its blessing to use the rigged map in a ruling last December.
Texas' move was countered last November when California voters approved redrawn districts favoring Democrats.
Since then, Republican-controlled legislatures in states including Missouri and North Carolina and Democratic-controlled states like Virginia, Maryland, and Washington have redrawn or are in the process of redrawing their congressional maps.
Last week, a district court judge subsequently blocked Virginia's new map a day after it was approved, setting up a battle in the state Supreme Court.
Responding to last week's voter-approved redistricting in Virginia, former US Attorney General Eric Holder noted major differences between the bottom-up redraws in Democratic states and top-down rigging by Republicans.
“The mere existence of this special election stands in stark contrast to the gerrymanders forced on constituents in Texas, Missouri, and North Carolina and shows that voters are tired of Republican attempts to silence their power at the voting booth," Holder said.
All Voting Is Local Action Florida state director Brad Ashwell said in a statement Monday that "it is clear that the end goal in this state is to redraw maps in order to give one party an advantage over another, essentially putting partisan politics over the voters."
"What’s even more egregious is that this move is in direct conflict with the fair districts ballot amendments these same voters approved by a supermajority in 2010, meaning our governor and lawmakers are directly undermining our state Constitution and the will of the voters," he continued.
“This move is unnecessary, illegal, and a power grab, and it takes away time from addressing real issues, like passing a state budget, which hasn’t happened yet," Ashwell said. "Additionally, passing and implementing a new map will create new precincts right before the election, causing voter confusion and unnecessary work for local election officials who are already bogged down by frequent policy changes and new hurdles."
"For once, Florida should stand by its voters and election officials and shut this undemocratic move down," he added. "No new maps!”'
This isn't Desantis' first foray into gerrymandering. A state judge in 2022 invalidated parts of a previously redrawn congressional map, siding with plaintiffs in a lawsuit who argued that Republicans violated the state Constitution by racially rigging districts. However, in 2024 a federal appellate panel ruled that Florida could proceed with use of the map.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Study Shows Trump's Tightened Embargo on Cuba 'Has Killed a Lot of Babies'
“The question is how many more babies will have to die before the current economic siege against Cuba is lifted.”
Apr 27, 2026
The publication Monday of another report showing that President Donald Trump's tightening of the 65-year US embargo of Cuba over his two terms in office is "likely the primary cause of a major increase in infant mortality" on the economically besieged island prompted renewed calls for the lifting of deadly sanctions.
The report by Alexander Main, Joe Sammut, Mark Weisbrot, and Guillaume Long of the Center for Economic Policy and Research (CEPR) found an "unprecedented increase" in Cuba’s infant mortality rate (IMR), which soared 148% between 2018 and 2025.
In the early-to-mid 2010s, Cuba’s IRM was typically around 4–5 deaths per 1,000 live births, with the country regularly ranked in the top 10-15 nations with the lowest infant mortality. By 2025, the figure had soared to 9.9 deaths out of every 1,000 infants born alive.
The report's authors said that had Cuba's IMR remained unchanged since 2018, roughly 1,800 fewer babies would have died.
“The blockade has had a particularly dire effect on Cuba’s healthcare infrastructure, with frequent power outages interrupting the use of critical equipment for the treatment of patients, including incubators for premature babies, and ventilators to help sick newborns breathe,” said Sammut, CEPR's senior research fellow.
The report examines the social and economic consequences of Trump's tightened sanctions regime, focusing on the impact of the embargo on Cuba’s healthcare sector.
According to CEPR:
Trump administration pressure on Cuba has included restrictions that have sharply diminished the island’s important tourism sector; severely limited exports of goods to Cuba—including essential medication and medical equipment; cut Cuba’s access to international financial markets by putting the country back on the State Sponsors of Terrorism list; curbed remittances; pressured countries to end their partnerships with Cuba’s medical missions; and notably imposed a recent fuel blockade that prevents Venezuelan oil from reaching the island.
Trump has recently ratcheted up military threats and economic pressure on Cuba, which was already reeling from decades of US sanctions and the inefficiencies of centralized state control. His tightened embargo has severely restricted fuel imports, exacerbating an energy emergency characterized by blackouts and deadly suffering among the most vulnerable Cubans, including sick people and children.
“The Trump policy of ‘maximum pressure’ on Cuba has killed a lot of babies—and, although we don’t yet have data for the last few months, it’s highly likely that more babies are dying now, and at an even higher rate than last year as a result of the current US fuel blockade targeting Cuba,” said Main, CEPR's director of international policy. “The question is how many more babies will have to die before the current economic siege against Cuba is lifted.”
It's not just babies. As Common Dreams reported last month, nearly 100,000 Cubans—including 11,000 children—werer waiting for surgery. Childhood cancer survival rates have also fallen significantly.
"The sanctions on Cuba starkly illustrate how these economic sanctions work: They target the civilian population, often with the goal of provoking regime change,” said Weisbrot, CEPR's co-director. “This can dramatically increase death rates."
During his first term, Trump began rolling back the Obama administration’s diplomatic normalization with Cuba's socialist government. He activated a provision of the Helms-Burton Act allowing lawsuits over property confiscated after the Cuban Revolution, and on his last day in office he redesignated Cuba a state sponsor of terrorism.
Critics denounced the move as absurd, especially given that Cuba has never carried out any acts of terrorism—unlike the United States and the militant Cuban exiles it harbors, who have a decadeslong record of terrorist bombings and other attacks, as well as numerous failed or aborted attempts to assassinate former revolutionary leader Fidel Castro.
The United Nations General Assembly has overwhelmingly condemned the blockade—which Cuba's government says has cost the island more than $1 trillion—33 times.
“The collective punishment of civilians is prohibited by the Fourth Geneva Convention when there is armed conflict, and can be prosecuted as a war crime," Weisbrot noted. "This would appear to be applicable now that the current naval blockade involves the US military.”
Previous reports have sounded the alarm on Cuba's rising IMR, including a United Nations Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation published in February that put the 2025 infant mortality rate a 7.4, considerably lower than the CEPR analysis. The British Medical Journal Pediatrics Open in February reported a 9.9 IMR for Cuba.
The IMR surge comes amid reporting that the Pentagon is “quietly ramping up” preparations to wage war on Cuba, which would be the 11th country attacked by Trump, the self-proclaimed president of peace, the most of any US leader ever.
US Sens. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), and Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) introduced a war powers resolution aimed at preventing Trump from attacking Cuba without congressional authorization as required by law. The resolution could be put to a vote as soon as Tuesday.
Numerous war powers resolutions related to Iran, Venezuela, and Trump’s extralegal high seas boat bombings have failed to pass.
World leaders, activists, and academics are among those urging the US to lift the embargo on Cuba.
"Stop this damned blockade on Cuba and let the Cuban people live their lives," Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva said last week in Barcelona. "Cuba has problems. But they are Cuba's problems. Not Lula's. Not Trump's. Not the empire's."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


