May, 08 2009, 11:44am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Taylor McKinnon, Center for Biological
Diversity, (928) 310-6713
Richard Mayol, Grand Canyon Trust, (928)
774-7488
Sandy Bahr, Sierra Club Grand Canyon
Chapter, (602) 999-5790
Suit Challenges New Uranium Exploration That Threatens the Grand Canyon
FLAGSTAFF, Ariz.
The Center for Biological Diversity, Grand Canyon Trust, and Sierra Club
today amended
their lawsuit against the Bureau of Land Management and the Department of
the Interior to challenge newly authorized uranium exploration near Grand Canyon National Park. The new uranium
projects are located within a 1-million acre area that was required to be
immediately withdrawn from new mining claims and exploration by a June 25,
2008 emergency resolution of the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources.
Today's amendment challenges new uranium projects authorized by the
Bureau of Land Management on April
23 and April
27, 2009. While the Bureau initially denied that new uranium
exploration activities had been authorized, it has since acknowledged that
exploration on the lands in question could begin whenever the companies
wish.
"The
Bureau's new uranium exploration runs afoul of both the law and a
congressional resolution protecting Grand Canyon,"
said Taylor McKinnon, public lands program director at the Center for
Biological Diversity. "This is an agency in dire need of leadership
from the new administration -- the Grand Canyon
deserves it."
The
U.S. House of Representatives' Committee on Natural Resources on June
25, 2008 voted 20-2 in favor of an emergency resolution
requiring the secretary of the interior to immediately withdraw 1 million
acres of public lands surrounding Grand Canyon
from new uranium claims and exploration. New exploration authorized by
then-Secretary Kempthorne violated the required withdrawal and prompted
conservation groups to file the suit in September 2008. The suit cites
violations of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, National
Environmental Policy Act, and other laws. Today's amendment
incorporates the Bureau's new uranium-drilling authorizations based
on the same violations.
Emergency
withdrawals have been enacted four times prior to this, most recently in
1981 and 1983 by the late Arizona Congressman Mo Udall and the House
Interior and Insular Affairs Committee to halt public lands mineral- and
energy-leasing programs pursued by Interior Secretary James Watt.
Congressman Raul Grijalva also introduced the Grand Canyon Watersheds Protection Act
in March of 2008 and again in 2009, legislation that would permanently
withdraw from mineral extraction the same 1 million acres encompassed by
the Committee resolution.
"The
Grand Canyon Trust encourages the Secretary of the Interior to take
immediate action on the emergency withdrawal of these lands in order to
allow time for the Grand Canyon Protection Act of 2009 to make its way
through the legislative process," said Richard Mayol, the Trust's
spokesperson.
Spikes
in the price of uranium in recent years have caused thousands of new
uranium claims, dozens of exploratory drilling projects, and movement to
open several uranium mines on public lands immediately north and south of Grand Canyon. Concerns about damage to wildlife
habitat as well as surface- and groundwater contamination of Grand Canyon
National Park and the Colorado River have been expressed by previous
Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano; the Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California; the Southern Nevada Water Authority; the Arizona Game
and Fish Department; the Navajo, Hopi, Havasupai, Hualapai, and Kaibab
Paiute nations; and the Coconino County Board of Supervisors.
"It
is just outrageous that the Bureau is putting the short-term profits of
these mining companies ahead of protection of one of the most amazing
places in our nation, Grand Canyon, risking our water resources, and
flaunting the law," said Sandy Bahr, chapter director of the Sierra
Club's Grand Canyon Chapter.
Plaintiffs
are being represented by attorneys Marc Fink of the Center for Biological
Diversity, Neil Levine of Grand Canyon Trust, and Roger Flynn of Western
Mining Action Project.
Click
on the links below to view the following documents:
April
23, 2007 Bureau of Land Management uranium exploration authorizations
April
27, 2009 Bureau of Land Management uranium exploration authorizations
Map
of newly authorized uranium exploration in violation of emergency
withdrawal
Map
of all uranium exploration authorized since and in violation of emergency
withdrawal
Conservationists'
lawsuit against Kempthorne
Map
of previous uranium exploration authorized in violation of emergency
withdrawal
Map
of uranium claims, seeps, and springs in withdrawal area
Letter
by former Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano
Letter
by Los Angeles Water District
Coconino
County Grand Canyon uranium resolution
Testimony
of Dr. Larry Stevens
Testimony
of Dr. Abe Springer
Testimony
of Robert Arnberger, former Grand Canyon National Park superintendent
Testimony
of Roger Clark
Testimony
of Chris Shuey
Supplement
to Chris Shuey Testimony
Letter
dated July 15 from Department of Interior
Letter
dated July 16 by Congressman Rahall
The
Grand Canyon Trust is a regional,
nonprofit conservation organization
committed to protecting and restoring the Colorado Plateau.
At the Center for Biological Diversity, we believe that the welfare of human beings is deeply linked to nature — to the existence in our world of a vast diversity of wild animals and plants. Because diversity has intrinsic value, and because its loss impoverishes society, we work to secure a future for all species, great and small, hovering on the brink of extinction. We do so through science, law and creative media, with a focus on protecting the lands, waters and climate that species need to survive.
(520) 623-5252LATEST NEWS
National Team Member Becomes at Least 265th Palestinian Footballer Killed by Israel in Gaza
Muhannad al-Lili's killing by Israeli airstrike came as the world mourned the death of Portugal and Liverpool star Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva in a car crash in Spain.
Jul 04, 2025
Muhannad Fadl al-Lili, captain of the Al-Maghazi Services Club and a member of Palestine's national football team, died Thursday from injuries suffered during an Israeli airstrike on his family home in the central Gaza Strip earlier this week, making him the latest of hundreds of Palestinian athletes killed since the start of Israel's genocidal onslaught.
Al-Maghazi Services Club announced al-Lili's death in a Facebook tribute offering condolences to "his family, relatives, friends, and colleagues" and asking "Allah to shower him with his mercy."
The Palestine Football Association (PFA) said that "on Monday, a drone fired a missile at Muhannad's room on the third floor of his house, which led to severe bleeding in the skull."
"During the war of extermination against our people, Muhannad tried to travel outside Gaza to catch up with his wife, who left the strip for Norway on a work mission before the outbreak of the war," the association added. "But he failed to do so, and was deprived of seeing his eldest son, who was born outside the Gaza Strip."
According to the PFA, al-Lili is at least the 265th Palestinian footballer and 585th athlete to be killed by Israeli forces since they launched their assault and siege on Gaza following the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel. Sports journalist Leyla Hamed says 439 Palestinian footballers have been killed by Israel.
Overall, Israel's war—which is the subject of an International Court of Justice (ICJ) genocide case—has left more than 206,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing, and around 2 million more forcibly displaced, starved, or sickened, according to Gaza officials.
The Palestine Chronicle contrasted the worldwide press coverage of the car crash deaths of Portuguese footballer Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva with the media's relative silence following al-Lili's killing.
"Jota's death was a tragedy that touched millions," the outlet wrote. "Yet the death of Muhannad al-Lili... was met with near-total silence from global sports media."
Last week, a group of legal experts including two United Nations special rapporteurs appealed to the Fédération Internationale de Football Association, the world football governing body, demanding that its Governance Audit and Compliance Committee take action against the Israel Football Association for violating FIFA rules by playing matches on occupied Palestinian territory.
In July 2024, the ICJ found that Israel's then-57-year occupation of Palestine—including Gaza—is an illegal form of apartheid that should be ended as soon as possible.
During their invasion and occupation of Gaza, Israeli forces have also used sporting facilities including Yarmouk Stadium for the detention of Palestinian men, women, and children—many of whom have reported torture and other abuse at the hands of their captors.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Highly Inspiring' Court Ruling Affirms Nations' Legal Duty to Combat Climate Emergency
"While the United States and some other major polluters have chosen to ignore climate science, the rest of the international community is advancing protections," said one observer.
Jul 04, 2025
In a landmark advisory opinion published Thursday, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights—of which the United States, the world's second-biggest carbon polluter, is not a member—affirmed the right to a stable climate and underscored nations' duty to act to protect it and address the worsening planetary emergency.
"States must refrain from any conduct that reverses, slows down, or truncates the outcome of measures necessary to protect human rights in the face of the impacts of climate change," a summary of the 234-page ruling states. "Any rollback of climate or environmental policies that affect human rights must be exceptional, duly justified based on objective criteria, and comply with standards of necessity and proportionality."
"The court also held that... states must take all necessary measures to reduce the risks arising, on the one hand, from the degradation of the global climate system and, on the other, from exposure and vulnerability to the effects of such degradation," the summary adds.
"States must refrain from any conduct that reverses, slows down, or truncates the outcome of measures necessary to protect human rights in the face of the impacts of climate change."
The case was brought before the Costa-Rica based IACtHR by Chile and Colombia, both of which "face the daily challenge of dealing with the consequences of the climate emergency, including the proliferation of droughts, floods, landslides, and fires, among others."
"These phenomena highlight the need to respond urgently and based on the principles of equity, justice, cooperation, and sustainability, with a human rights-based approach," the court asserted.
IACtHR President Judge Nancy Hernández López said following the ruling that "states must not only refrain from causing significant environmental damage but have the positive obligation to take measures to guarantee the protection, restoration, and regeneration of ecosystems."
"Causing massive and irreversible environmental harm...alters the conditions for a healthy life on Earth to such an extent that it creates consequences of existential proportions," she added. "Therefore, it demands universal and effective legal responses."
The advisory opinion builds on two landmark decisions last year. In April 2024, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the Swiss government violated senior citizens' human rights by refusing to abide by scientists' warnings to rapidly phase out fossil fuel production.
The following month, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea found in an advisory opinion that greenhouse gas emissions are marine pollution under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and that signatories to the accord "have the specific obligation to adopt laws and regulations to prevent, reduce, and control" them.
The IACtHR advisory opinion is expected to boost climate and human rights lawsuits throughout the Americas, and to impact talks ahead of November's United Nations Climate Change Conference, or COP30, in Belém, Brazil.
Climate defenders around the world hailed Thursday's advisory opinion, with United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk calling it "a landmark step forward for the region—and beyond."
"As the impact of climate change becomes ever more visible across the world, the court is clear: People have a right to a stable climate and a healthy environment," Türk added. "States have a bedrock obligation under international law not to take steps that cause irreversible climate and environmental damage, and they have a duty to act urgently to take the necessary measures to protect the lives and rights of everyone—both those alive now and the interests of future generations."
Amnesty International head of strategic litigation Mandi Mudarikwa said, "Today, the Inter-American Court affirmed and clarified the obligations of states to respect, ensure, prevent, and cooperate in order to realize human rights in the context of the climate crisis."
"Crucially, the court recognized the autonomous right to a healthy climate for both individuals and communities, linked to the right to a healthy environment," Mudarikwa added. "The court also underscored the obligation of states to protect cross-border climate-displaced persons, including through the issuance of humanitarian visas and protection from deportation."
Delta Merner, lead scientist at the Science Hub for Climate Litigation at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said in a statement that "this opinion sets an important precedent affirming that governments have a legal duty to regulate corporate conduct that drives climate harm."
"Though the United States is not a party to the treaty governing the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, this opinion should be a clarion call for transnational fossil fuel companies that have deceived the public for decades about the risks of their products," Merner added. "The era of accountability is here."
Markus Gehring, a fellow and director of studies in law at Hughes Hall at the University of Cambridge in England, called the advisory opinion "highly inspiring" and "seminal."
Drew Caputo, vice president of litigation for lands, wildlife, and oceans at Earthjustice, said that "the Inter-American Court's ruling makes clear that climate change is an overriding threat to human rights in the world."
"Governments must act to cut carbon emissions drastically," Caputo stressed. "While the United States and some other major polluters have chosen to ignore climate science, the rest of the international community is advancing protections for all from the realities of climate harm."
Climate litigation is increasing globally in the wake of the 2015 Paris climate agreement. In the Americas, Indigenous peoples, children, and green groups are among those who have been seeking climate justice via litigation.
However, in the United States, instead of acknowledging the climate emergency, President Donald Trump has declared an "energy emergency" while pursuing a "drill, baby, drill" policy of fossil fuel extraction and expansion.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Admin Quietly Approves Massive Crude Oil Expansion Project
"This thinly analyzed decision threatens the lifeblood of the American Southwest," said one environmental attorney.
Jul 04, 2025
The Trump administration has quietly fast-tracked a massive oil expansion project that environmentalists and Democratic lawmakers warned could have a destructive impact on local communities and the climate.
As reported recently by the Oil and Gas Journal, the plan "involves expanding the Wildcat Loadout Facility, a key transfer point for moving Uinta basin crude oil to rail lines that transport it to refineries along the Gulf Coast."
The goal of the plan is to transfer an additional 70,000 barrels of oil per day from the Wildcat Loadout Facility, which is located in Utah, down to the Gulf Coast refineries via a route that runs along the Colorado River. Controversially, the Trump administration is also plowing ahead with the project by invoking emergency powers to address energy shortages despite the fact that the United States for the last couple of years has been producing record levels of domestic oil.
Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) issued a joint statement condemning the Trump administration's push to approve the project while rushing through environmental impact reviews.
"The Bureau of Land Management's decision to fast-track the Wildcat Loadout expansion—a project that would transport an additional 70,000 barrels of crude oil on train tracks along the Colorado River—using emergency procedures is profoundly flawed," the Colorado Democrats said. "These procedures give the agency just 14 days to complete an environmental review—with no opportunity for public input or administrative appeal—despite the project's clear risks to Colorado. There is no credible energy emergency to justify bypassing public involvement and environmental safeguards. The United States is currently producing more oil and gas than any country in the world."
On Thursday, the Bureau of Land Management announced the completion of its accelerated environmental review of the project, drawing condemnation from climate advocates.
Wendy Park, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, described the administration's rush to approve the project as "pure hubris," especially given its "refusal to hear community concerns about oil spill risks." She added that "this fast-tracked review breezed past vital protections for clean air, public safety and endangered species."
Landon Newell, staff attorney for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, accused the Trump administration of manufacturing an energy emergency to justify plans that could have a dire impact on local habitats.
"This thinly analyzed decision threatens the lifeblood of the American Southwest by authorizing the transport of more than 1 billion gallons annually of additional oil on railcars traveling alongside the Colorado River," he said. "Any derailment and oil spill would have a devastating impact on the Colorado River and the communities and ecosystems that rely upon it."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular