April, 13 2009, 06:13pm EDT

Guantanamo Attorneys Urge Panetta To Preserve CIA Black Site Evidence
Attorneys
for detainee Abd Al-Rahim Hussain Mohammed al-Nashiri today sent a
letter to CIA Director Leon Panetta requesting that the CIA "black
site" buildings, interrogation cells, prisoner cells, shackles, water
boards and other equipment be preserved for inspection and
documentation. Al-Nashiri, who is now detained at Guantanamo, was held
in the secret CIA prison facilities from 2002 to 2006.
WASHINGTON
Attorneys
for detainee Abd Al-Rahim Hussain Mohammed al-Nashiri today sent a
letter to CIA Director Leon Panetta requesting that the CIA "black
site" buildings, interrogation cells, prisoner cells, shackles, water
boards and other equipment be preserved for inspection and
documentation. Al-Nashiri, who is now detained at Guantanamo, was held
in the secret CIA prison facilities from 2002 to 2006. Director Panetta
has ordered the closure of CIA black sites, but al-Nashiri's attorneys
are concerned that the CIA intends to destroy the sites - including the
buildings and the equipment used to interrogate and torture al-Nashiri
and other detainees - and in doing so destroy evidence of his
mistreatment.
The CIA has admitted that al-Nashiri
was subjected to waterboarding while in CIA custody. Videotapes
depicting his abusive interrogations have already been destroyed by the
agency and are the subject of ongoing ACLU litigation.
The ACLU, through its John Adams
Project with the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers,
worked with under-resourced military lawyers to provide legal counsel
for several of the Guantanamo detainees including al-Nashiri during the
military commissions process.
The full text of the letter, which
is signed by al-Nashiri's military and civilian defense counsel, is
below and available online at: www.aclu.org/safefree/detention/39348res20090413.html
April 13, 2009
Leon E. Panetta
Director, Central Intelligence Agency
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, DC 20505
RE: REQUEST TO PRESERVE CIA DETENTION FACILITIES USED TO DETAIN HIGH-VALUE DETAINEES--A.K.A. "BLACK SITES"
Dear Mr. Panetta:
We are counsel for Abd Al-Rahim
Hussain Mohammed Al-Nashiri. Mr. Al-Nashiri is currently detained at
Guantanamo Bay Naval Base. He has been there since September, 2006.
From sometime in late 2002 until 2006 he was incarcerated in the secret
prison facilities run by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
Your predecessor, General Michael V.
Hayden, has admitted that Mr. Al-Nashiri was subjected to water
boarding, which is a form of torture, while in the custody of the CIA.
According to the publicly released report from the International
Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) which was dated February 14, 2007,
and entitled ICRC Report on the Treatment of Fourteen "High Value Detainees" in CIA Custody, water boarding was only one of the many forms of torture inflicted on Mr. Al-Nashiri while in the custody of the CIA.
According to that report, while in
CIA custody, Mr. Al-Nashiri was also forced to stand with his wrists
shackled to a bar in the ceiling for prolonged periods of
time--extending to several days-- and was threatened with sodomy and with
the rape and arrest of his family members. Many of the prisoners the
ICRC interviewed did not want their names used in the report. As such,
though the ICRC report lists much more cruel, degrading and inhuman
treatment, the report is not specific as to what additional treatment
was inflicted on Mr. Al-Nashiri while held in the CIA's "black" sites.
Throughout that time he was not able
to communicate with his family, a lawyer or anyone. Effectively the CIA
"disappeared" him for four years while it tortured him at will and
beyond the eyes of the world.
The CIA and other government
agencies also admitted to the purposeful destruction of at least
ninety-two video tapes of interrogations and observations of prisoners
in its black sites, specifically including the destruction of video
tapes of water boarding and other observations of Mr. Al-Nashiri.
Had Mr. Al-Nashiri known that the
CIA possessed these video tapes and intended to destroy them, he would
have demanded their preservation. However, neither he, his lawyers nor
the courts learned of the CIA's plan until after the tapes had been
destroyed and now they are forever gone.
In light of the destruction of video
taped evidence of the torture inflicted upon Mr. Al-Nashiri and the
newly released report from the ICRC describing still more horrific
tortures, we noted with interest your message to CIA personnel on April
9, 2009, in which you stated that the CIA would be "decommissioning"
the CIA secret facilities.
Although we welcome your decision to
cease the secret detention and mistreatment of prisoners of the United
States Government, we are concerned that the CIA intends to actually
destroy the sites--including the buildings and the equipment used to
interrogate and torture Mr. Al-Nashiri--before Mr. Al-Nashiri has had
the opportunity to fully investigate his conditions of confinement. We
write to avoid the destruction of more evidence--namely the actual
secret facilities themselves.
Mr. Al-Nashiri was charged in the
Military Commission with offenses that carried the penalty of death.
Although those charges have now been dismissed, we fully expect the
government to prosecute Mr. Al-Nashiri and again charge him with
offenses that could carry the death penalty. In fact the government is
now actively working to determine in what forum he will be prosecuted.
Regardless of the forum in which Mr.
Al-Nashiri is tried, evidence of his conditions of confinement will be
relevant in assessing the reliability of any of his statements and any
statements of other prisoners similarly held that the government plans
to use against him. This evidence will also be highly relevant during
any sentencing proceeding. It is exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and he will be entitled to it.
The CIA's secret prison facilities
and the inquisition-like treatment meted out to its prisoners were a
tragic, immoral and illegal period in our history that we all hope has
come to an end. But its effects are enduring, especially on someone
like Mr. Al-Nashiri who, according to the ICRC report, lived through
the horror chambers of at least three different secret prisons. Those
buildings, interrogation cells, prisoner cells, shackles, water boards
and other equipment must be preserved until such time as we have an
adequate opportunity to document it and a court can determine the
relevance and materiality of this evidence. As a criminal defendant,
the Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments to the United States
Constitution will entitle him to discovery of exculpatory evidence and
this is surely exculpatory evidence.
Therefore, we are requesting that
you preserve all the secret sites. By this letter you are now on notice
that we will be seeking discovery and inspection of this highly
relevant evidence in whatever court Mr. Al-Nashiri finds himself. We
have already lost the video tapes which would have allowed a jury to
see what happened to Mr. Al-Nashiri in those secret prisons. We cannot
lose the remaining tangible evidence of the actual prisons themselves
and the instruments of torture within them.
//s//
STEPHEN C. REYES
Lieutenant Commander
JAGC, USN
CHRISTOPHER CAZARES
Captain, USAF
Military Defense Counsel
NANCY HOLLANDER
Freedman Boyd Hollander Goldberg & Ives P.A.
20 First Plaza, Suite 700
Albuquerque, NM 87102
THERESA DUNCAN
Freedman Boyd Hollander Goldberg & Ives P.A.
20 First Plaza, Suite 700
Albuquerque, NM 87102
RICHARD KAMMEN
Gilroy, Kammen
One Indiana Square, #150
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Civilian Defense Counsel
Cc:
John Rizzo, CIA General Counsel (Acting)
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, DC 20505
Fax: 703-482-1739
Eric Holder, Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
Office of the Attorney General
950 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20530
Fax: 202-307-6777
The White House
ATTN: Greg Craig, Esq., White House Counsel
Office of White House Counsel
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20500
Gregory_b._craig@who.eop.gov
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666LATEST NEWS
Labor Celebrates as Michigan Senate Votes to Overturn 'Right-to-Work' Law
The legislation will end "the failed experiment of gutting Michigan workers' rights," said one lawmaker.
Mar 15, 2023
Just over a decade after union members and labor advocates from across the United States rallied at the Michigan State Capitol to protest state Republicans' passage of a so-called "right-to-work" law, many of the same people were present in Lansing on Tuesday as the Democratic-led state Senate voted to end what one lawmaker called "the failed experiment of gutting Michigan workers' rights."
Lawmakers voted along party lines, 20-17, in favor of a package of bills that will repeal the right-to-work law—which barred unions from requiring that all workers in unionized jobs pay dues—and restore a "prevailing wage" requirement that construction contractors pay union wages and and benefits on state-funded projects.
Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer indicated on Monday that she intends to sign the bills, which will make Michigan the first state to roll back right-to-work laws in nearly six decades.
Since Republicans pushed the passage of the right-to-work law in December 2012, union membership in Michigan has fallen by about 40,000, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
State Sen. Darrin Camilleri (D-4), the lead sponsor of the bills to repeal the right-to-work law, said on the Senate floor Tuesday that the 2012 law "systematically made it harder for unions to do their job" and "created an environment where unions were put at a disadvantage when it came to negotiating for better pay and benefits across the board."
"People came to Michigan because of the promise of a union," Camilleri tweeted after the bills passed. "My family included. Unions fought for good pay and benefits so that all workers get ahead. Today we restored that promise and said to all workers that Michigan has their back."
Camilleri added that lawmakers could hear union members and supporters "loud and clear" as they cheered the passage of the bills.
"This is what happens when we elect union members to halls of power," said Liz Shuler, president of the AFL-CIO, the largest federation of unions in the U.S. "We fight and we WIN for working people. Right to work, hit the curb!"
According toThe Detroit News, two of the three bills passed on Tuesday will have to go back to the state House for approval before reaching Whitmer's desk. The bills include $1 million in appropriations to "inform employers, employees, and labor organizations about changes to their rights and responsibilities."
The appropriations made the legislation referendum-proof, and opponents would need to gather enough support to propose a constitutional amendment restoring right-to-work on the ballot in 2024. Under state law, they would need to collect more than 446,000 signatures to propose the amendment.
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, 26 other states have right-to-work policies in place.
"Michigan is now on its way to becoming the first state to repeal 'right-to-work' legislation in nearly 60 years," said former Kentucky state Rep. Charles Booker. "Let's make sure they aren't the last."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Dems Push Biden DOJ to Probe Possible 'Criminal' Violations by SVB Execs
"SVB officials showed a pattern of risky and questionable decision-making that may have contributed to the bank's instability," wrote Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Richard Blumenthal.
Mar 15, 2023
Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Richard Blumenthal demanded Tuesday that the Biden Justice Department and Securities and Exchange Commission investigate whether Silicon Valley Bank executives "violated civil or criminal law" in the lead-up to the firm's collapse, which sent shockwaves through the entire U.S. financial system.
"This was a colossal failure in asset liability risk management," the Democratic senators in a letter to SEC Chairman Gary Gensler and Attorney General Merrick Garland. The letter was first reported by CNBC on Wednesday morning.
The lawmakers pointed to recent reporting detailing how "SVB officials showed a pattern of risky and questionable decision making that may have contributed to the bank's instability and collapse and the ripple effects being felt throughout the economy."
Warren and Blumenthal asked the Biden administration to launch a probe to determine "whether senior bank executives and other key officials involved in the collapse met their statutory and regulatory responsibilities or violated civil or criminal law."
"One of the enduring failures in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis was the inability or unwillingness of DOJ and bank regulators to hold bank executives accountable for behavior that destroyed millions of lives and cost trillions of dollars of wealth," they wrote. "The nation's bank regulators cannot make the same mistake twice."
The fallout from SVB's collapse has brought intense scrutiny to the venture capital lender's ill-considered investment moves as well as the conduct of its top executives, who sold tens of millions of dollars worth of stock in the two years leading up to the bank's failure last week—raising questions about possible insider trading.
Greg Becker, SVB's former CEO, sold millions of dollars of shares as recently as late last month.
The bank's leadership has also come under fire for dishing out bonuses hours before federal regulators took over on Friday.
"You have nobody to blame for the failure at your bank but yourself and your fellow executives."
In a letter to Becker earlier this week, Warren—a member of the Senate Banking Committee—slammed SVB for lobbying against bank regulations in recent years and argued that "you have nobody to blame for the failure at your bank but yourself and your fellow executives."
"SVB failed—while its chief risk officer position sat vacant for eight months as its financial standing deteriorated—because it failed to address two key risks: concentration in your client base, and rising interest rates," the Massachusetts Democrat wrote. "This is a failure of 'Banking 101'—what one analyst called 'sheer incompetence.' Had SVB been subject to Dodd-Frank rules undone by [a 2018 GOP law], the bank would have been required to maintain stronger liquidity and capital requirements and conduct regular stress tests that would have required SVB to shore up its business to weather the type of stress it experienced last week."
"You lobbied for weaker rules, got what you wanted, and used this opportunity to abdicate your basic responsibilities to your clients and the public—facilitating a near-economic disaster," Warren added.
The Wall Street Journalreported Tuesday that the DOJ and SEC have both opened investigations into the SVB failure, which was the second-largest bank collapse in U.S. history.
"The separate probes are in their preliminary phases and may not lead to charges or allegations of wrongdoing," the Journalnoted. "The investigations are... examining stock sales that SVB Financial's officers made days before the bank failed."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Warren and Porter Lead SVB Act to Repeal Trump-Era Bank Deregulation Law
Sen. Elizabeth Warren said a 2018 law backed by Republicans and dozens of Democrats allowed banks to "load up on risk to boost their profits," endangering "our entire economy."
Mar 15, 2023
Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Rep. Katie Porter unveiled legislation Tuesday to repeal the section of a Trump-era law that weakened regulations for banks with between $50 billion to $250 billion in assets, a move that experts and lawmakers have blamed for the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and the resulting turmoil.
"In 2018, I rang the alarm bell about what would happen if Congress rolled back critical Dodd-Frank protections: banks would load up on risk to boost their profits and collapse, threatening our entire economy—and that is precisely what happened," Warren (D-Mass.) said in a statement. "President Biden called on Congress to strengthen the rules for banks, and I'm proposing legislation to do just that by repealing the core of Trump's bank law."
That law, authored by Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) and backed by dozens of Democrats, raised the asset threshold for more stringent regulations to $250 billion or higher, exempting firms such as Silicon Valley Bank (SVB)—a major venture capital lender that controlled around $212 billion—from enhanced liquidity requirements and more frequent federal stress tests imposed on banks considered "systemically important."
SVB's leadership specifically lobbied for the higher threshold, insisting the tougher regulations were unnecessary even as experts and lawmakers raised concerns that gutting them would increase the risk of bank failures and cascading effects on the financial system.
"Americans deserve to know their money is safe when they deposit it in the bank," Porter (D-Calif.) said Tuesday. "In 2018, politicians rolled back critical regulations protecting Americans' deposits—ignoring warnings from financial experts in favor of Wall Street special interests. I'm calling on Congress to restore commonsense guardrails that keep corporate greed in check and restore confidence in our financial system."
Titled the Secure Viable Banking (SVB) Act, Warren and Porter's legislation would place more stringent regulations on institutions like Silicon Valley Bank by reviving safeguards for firms with between $50 billion and $250 billion in assets.
Facing backlash from Warren and others for glaring oversight failures, the Federal Reserve is considering stronger regulations for banks with between $100 billion and $250 billion in assets, Reutersreported late Tuesday.
Warren and Porter introduced their bill with the support of 31 Democrats in the House and 17 members of the Senate Democratic caucus, including Sens. Bernie Sanders(I-Vt.) and Ed Markey(D-Mass.).
"Taxpayers should not have to pay for the mistakes and mismanagement of big bank executives," Markey said in a statement. "The American people should have confidence in their financial institutions, and that starts with undoing Trump-era deregulation so that we can ensure a collapse like we saw last week never happens again."
Notably absent from the list of co-sponsors were the Democrats who helped Republicans usher the bill through Congress in 2018, often misleadingly arguing that the measure was chiefly about providing relief for "community banks."
In the Senate, 16 Democrats and Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) supported the bill, giving Republicans the votes they needed to overcome the chamber's legislative filibuster.
One of the Democratic supporters, Mark Warner of Virginia, defended the 2018 law over the weekend, tellingABC News that he believes it "put in place an appropriate level of regulation on mid-sized banks" and that "these mid-sized banks needed some regulatory relief."
The Leverreported last week that SVB chief Greg Becker held a fundraiser for Warner in 2016.
"The bank’s political action committee also donated a total of $10,000 to Warner’s campaigns in the 2016 and 2018 election cycles," the outlet noted.
Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), another major backer of the 2018 law, held a fundraiser in Silicon Valley earlier this week, just days after SVB collapsed.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular
SUPPORT OUR WORK.
We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100%
reader supported.
reader supported.