April, 13 2009, 06:13pm EDT
Guantanamo Attorneys Urge Panetta To Preserve CIA Black Site Evidence
Attorneys
for detainee Abd Al-Rahim Hussain Mohammed al-Nashiri today sent a
letter to CIA Director Leon Panetta requesting that the CIA "black
site" buildings, interrogation cells, prisoner cells, shackles, water
boards and other equipment be preserved for inspection and
documentation. Al-Nashiri, who is now detained at Guantanamo, was held
in the secret CIA prison facilities from 2002 to 2006.
WASHINGTON
Attorneys
for detainee Abd Al-Rahim Hussain Mohammed al-Nashiri today sent a
letter to CIA Director Leon Panetta requesting that the CIA "black
site" buildings, interrogation cells, prisoner cells, shackles, water
boards and other equipment be preserved for inspection and
documentation. Al-Nashiri, who is now detained at Guantanamo, was held
in the secret CIA prison facilities from 2002 to 2006. Director Panetta
has ordered the closure of CIA black sites, but al-Nashiri's attorneys
are concerned that the CIA intends to destroy the sites - including the
buildings and the equipment used to interrogate and torture al-Nashiri
and other detainees - and in doing so destroy evidence of his
mistreatment.
The CIA has admitted that al-Nashiri
was subjected to waterboarding while in CIA custody. Videotapes
depicting his abusive interrogations have already been destroyed by the
agency and are the subject of ongoing ACLU litigation.
The ACLU, through its John Adams
Project with the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers,
worked with under-resourced military lawyers to provide legal counsel
for several of the Guantanamo detainees including al-Nashiri during the
military commissions process.
The full text of the letter, which
is signed by al-Nashiri's military and civilian defense counsel, is
below and available online at: www.aclu.org/safefree/detention/39348res20090413.html
April 13, 2009
Leon E. Panetta
Director, Central Intelligence Agency
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, DC 20505
RE: REQUEST TO PRESERVE CIA DETENTION FACILITIES USED TO DETAIN HIGH-VALUE DETAINEES--A.K.A. "BLACK SITES"
Dear Mr. Panetta:
We are counsel for Abd Al-Rahim
Hussain Mohammed Al-Nashiri. Mr. Al-Nashiri is currently detained at
Guantanamo Bay Naval Base. He has been there since September, 2006.
From sometime in late 2002 until 2006 he was incarcerated in the secret
prison facilities run by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
Your predecessor, General Michael V.
Hayden, has admitted that Mr. Al-Nashiri was subjected to water
boarding, which is a form of torture, while in the custody of the CIA.
According to the publicly released report from the International
Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) which was dated February 14, 2007,
and entitled ICRC Report on the Treatment of Fourteen "High Value Detainees" in CIA Custody, water boarding was only one of the many forms of torture inflicted on Mr. Al-Nashiri while in the custody of the CIA.
According to that report, while in
CIA custody, Mr. Al-Nashiri was also forced to stand with his wrists
shackled to a bar in the ceiling for prolonged periods of
time--extending to several days-- and was threatened with sodomy and with
the rape and arrest of his family members. Many of the prisoners the
ICRC interviewed did not want their names used in the report. As such,
though the ICRC report lists much more cruel, degrading and inhuman
treatment, the report is not specific as to what additional treatment
was inflicted on Mr. Al-Nashiri while held in the CIA's "black" sites.
Throughout that time he was not able
to communicate with his family, a lawyer or anyone. Effectively the CIA
"disappeared" him for four years while it tortured him at will and
beyond the eyes of the world.
The CIA and other government
agencies also admitted to the purposeful destruction of at least
ninety-two video tapes of interrogations and observations of prisoners
in its black sites, specifically including the destruction of video
tapes of water boarding and other observations of Mr. Al-Nashiri.
Had Mr. Al-Nashiri known that the
CIA possessed these video tapes and intended to destroy them, he would
have demanded their preservation. However, neither he, his lawyers nor
the courts learned of the CIA's plan until after the tapes had been
destroyed and now they are forever gone.
In light of the destruction of video
taped evidence of the torture inflicted upon Mr. Al-Nashiri and the
newly released report from the ICRC describing still more horrific
tortures, we noted with interest your message to CIA personnel on April
9, 2009, in which you stated that the CIA would be "decommissioning"
the CIA secret facilities.
Although we welcome your decision to
cease the secret detention and mistreatment of prisoners of the United
States Government, we are concerned that the CIA intends to actually
destroy the sites--including the buildings and the equipment used to
interrogate and torture Mr. Al-Nashiri--before Mr. Al-Nashiri has had
the opportunity to fully investigate his conditions of confinement. We
write to avoid the destruction of more evidence--namely the actual
secret facilities themselves.
Mr. Al-Nashiri was charged in the
Military Commission with offenses that carried the penalty of death.
Although those charges have now been dismissed, we fully expect the
government to prosecute Mr. Al-Nashiri and again charge him with
offenses that could carry the death penalty. In fact the government is
now actively working to determine in what forum he will be prosecuted.
Regardless of the forum in which Mr.
Al-Nashiri is tried, evidence of his conditions of confinement will be
relevant in assessing the reliability of any of his statements and any
statements of other prisoners similarly held that the government plans
to use against him. This evidence will also be highly relevant during
any sentencing proceeding. It is exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and he will be entitled to it.
The CIA's secret prison facilities
and the inquisition-like treatment meted out to its prisoners were a
tragic, immoral and illegal period in our history that we all hope has
come to an end. But its effects are enduring, especially on someone
like Mr. Al-Nashiri who, according to the ICRC report, lived through
the horror chambers of at least three different secret prisons. Those
buildings, interrogation cells, prisoner cells, shackles, water boards
and other equipment must be preserved until such time as we have an
adequate opportunity to document it and a court can determine the
relevance and materiality of this evidence. As a criminal defendant,
the Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments to the United States
Constitution will entitle him to discovery of exculpatory evidence and
this is surely exculpatory evidence.
Therefore, we are requesting that
you preserve all the secret sites. By this letter you are now on notice
that we will be seeking discovery and inspection of this highly
relevant evidence in whatever court Mr. Al-Nashiri finds himself. We
have already lost the video tapes which would have allowed a jury to
see what happened to Mr. Al-Nashiri in those secret prisons. We cannot
lose the remaining tangible evidence of the actual prisons themselves
and the instruments of torture within them.
//s//
STEPHEN C. REYES
Lieutenant Commander
JAGC, USN
CHRISTOPHER CAZARES
Captain, USAF
Military Defense Counsel
NANCY HOLLANDER
Freedman Boyd Hollander Goldberg & Ives P.A.
20 First Plaza, Suite 700
Albuquerque, NM 87102
THERESA DUNCAN
Freedman Boyd Hollander Goldberg & Ives P.A.
20 First Plaza, Suite 700
Albuquerque, NM 87102
RICHARD KAMMEN
Gilroy, Kammen
One Indiana Square, #150
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Civilian Defense Counsel
Cc:
John Rizzo, CIA General Counsel (Acting)
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, DC 20505
Fax: 703-482-1739
Eric Holder, Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
Office of the Attorney General
950 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20530
Fax: 202-307-6777
The White House
ATTN: Greg Craig, Esq., White House Counsel
Office of White House Counsel
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20500
Gregory_b._craig@who.eop.gov
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666LATEST NEWS
New Rule From Agency Trump Wants Destroyed Would Save Consumers $5 Billion Per Year in Overdraft Fees
One advocate called the CFPB's new rule "a major milestone in its effort to level the playing field between regular people and big banks."
Dec 12, 2024
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, one of President-elect Donald Trump's top expected targets as he plans to dismantle parts of the federal government after taking office in January, announced on Thursday its latest action aimed at saving households across the U.S. hundreds of dollars in fees each year.
The agency issued a final rule to close a 55-year-old loophole that has allowed big banks to collect billions of dollars in overdraft fees from consumers each year,
The rule makes significant updates to federal regulations for financial institutions' overdraft fees, ordering banks with more than $10 billion in assets to choose between several options:
- Capping their overdraft fees at $5;
- Capping fees at an amount that covers costs and losses; or
- Disclosing the terms of overdraft loans as they do with other loans, giving consumers a choice regarding whether they open a line of overdraft credit and allowing them to comparison-shop.
The final rule is expected to save Americans $5 billion annually in overdraft fees, or about $225 per household that pays overdraft fees.
Adam Rust, director of financial services at the Consumer Federation of America, called the rule "a major milestone" in the CFPB's efforts "to level the playing field between regular people and big banks."
"No one should have to pick between paying a junk overdraft fee or buying groceries," said Rust. "This rule gives banks a choice: they can charge a reasonable fee that does not exploit their customers, or they can treat these loan products as an extension of credit and comply with existing lending laws."
The rule is set to go into effect next October, but the incoming Trump administration could put its implementation in jeopardy. Trump has named billionaire Tesla CEO Elon Musk to co-lead the Department of Government Efficiency, an advisory body he hopes to create. Musk has signaled that he wants to "delete" the CFPB, echoing a proposal within the right-wing policy agenda Project 2025, which was co-authored by many officials from the first Trump term.
"The CFPB is cracking down on these excessive junk fees and requiring big banks to come clean about the interest rate they're charging on overdraft loans."
"It is critical that incoming and returning members of Congress and President-elect Trump side with voters struggling in this economy and support the CFPB's overdraft rule," said Lauren Saunders, associate director at the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC). "This rule is an example of the CFPB's hard work for everyday Americans."
In recent decades, banks have used overdraft fees as profit drivers which increase consumer costs by billions of dollars every year while causing tens of millions to lose access to banking services and face negative credit reports that can harm their financial futures.
The Federal Reserve Board exempted banks from Truth in Lending Act protections in 1969, allowing them to charge overdraft fees without disclosing their terms to consumers.
"For far too long, the largest banks have exploited a legal loophole that has drained billions of dollars from Americans' deposit accounts," said CFPB Director Rohit Chopra. "The CFPB is cracking down on these excessive junk fees and requiring big banks to come clean about the interest rate they're charging on overdraft loans."
Government watchdog Accountable.US credited the CFPB with cracking down on overdraft fees despite aggressive campaigning against the action by Wall Street, which has claimed the fees have benefits for American families.
Accountable.US noted that Republican Reps. Patrick McHenry of North Carolina and Andy Barr of Kentucky have appeared to lift their criticisms of the rule straight from industry talking points, claiming that reforming overdraft fee rules would "limit consumer choice, stifle innovation, and ultimately raise the cost of banking for all consumers."
Similarly, in April Barr claimed at a hearing that "the vast majority of Americans" believe credit card late fees are legitimate after the Biden administration unveiled a rule capping the fees at $8.
"Americans pay billions in overdraft fees every year, but the CFPB's final rule is putting an end to the $35 surprise fee," said Liz Zelnick, director of the Economic Security and Corporate Power Program at Accountable.US. "Despite efforts to block the rule and protect petty profits by big bank CEOs and lobbyists, the Biden administration's initiative will protect our wallets from an exploitative profit-maximizing tactic."
The new overdraft fee rule follows a $95 million enforcement action against Navy Federal Credit Union for illegal surprise overdraft fees and similar actions against Wells Fargo, Regions Bank, and Atlantic Union.
Consumers have saved $6 billion annually through the CFPB's initiative to curb junk fees, which has led multiple banks to reduce or eliminate their fees.
"Big banks that charge high fees for overdrafts are not providing a courtesy to consumers—it's a form of predatory lending that exacerbates wealth disparities and racial inequalities," said Carla Sanchez-Adams, senior attorney at NCLC. "The CFPB's overdraft rule ensures that the most vulnerable consumers are protected from big banks trying to pad their profits with junk fees."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Arrests of US Journalists Surged in 2024 Amid Crackdown on Gaza Protests
Police use of "catch-and-release" tactics is particularly worrying for press freedom advocates, according to the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker.
Dec 12, 2024
Arrests and detainments of journalists in the United States surged in 2024 compared to the year prior, according to the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker, a project of the Freedom of the Press Foundation.
The tracker reports that journalists were arrested or detained by police at least 48 times this year—eclipsing the number of arrests that took place in the previous two years combined, and constituting the third highest number of yearly arrests and detentions since the project began cataloging press freedom violations in 2017. 2020, however, still stands as far and away the year with the most arrests and detentions.
The 48 arrests and detentions this year is also part of a larger list of "press freedom incidents" that the tracker documents, including things like equipment damage, equipment seizure, and assault.
While a year with a high number of protests typically leads to more arrests, "it was protests in response to the Israel-Gaza war that caused this year's uptick," according to the tracker.
The vast majority of the arrests and detainments out of the total 48 were linked to these sorts of demonstrations, and it was protests at Columbia University's Manhattan campus that were the site of this year's largest detainment of journalists.
The report also recounts the story of Roni Jacobson, a freelance reporter whose experience on the last day of 2023 was a harbinger of press freedom incidents to come in 2024. Jacobson was on assignment to cover a pro-Palestinian demonstration for the New York Daily News on December 31, 2023 when she was told to leave by police because she didn't have city-issued press credentials with her. She recounted that she accidentally bumped into an officer and was arrested. She was held overnight at a precinct and then released after the charges against her, which included disorderly conduct, were dropped.
Even five arrests that the tracker deems "election-related" took place at protests that were "at least partially if not entirely focused on the Israel-Gaza war." Three of those election-related arrests took place at protests happening around the Democratic National Convention in August.
One police force in particular bears responsibility for this year's crackdown: Nearly 50% of the arrests of journalists this year were at the hands of the New York Police Department (NYPD). Many of those taken into custody had their charges dropped quickly, but the tracker notes that the NYPD's use of "catch-and-release" tactics was particularly worrying to press freedom advocates.
Two photojournalists, Josh Pacheco and Olga Federova, were detained four times this year in both New York City and Chicago while photographing protests. They were both "assaulted and arrested and [had] their equipment damaged" while documenting police clearing a student encampment at Manhattan's Fashion Institute of Technology; however, they were released the next day and told their arrests had been voided.
"While [we are] glad that some common sense prevailed by the NYPD not charging these two photographers with any crime, we are very concerned that they are perfecting 'catch-and-release' to an art form,” Mickey Osterreicher, general counsel for the National Press Photographers Association, told the tracker.
"The fact that they took two photojournalists off the street, preventing them from making any more images or transmitting the ones they already had on a matter of extreme public concern, is very disturbing," he said.
Besides covering protests, 2024 also saw the continued practice of "criminally charging journalists for standard journalistic practices," according to the tracker. For example, one investigative journalist in Los Angeles was repeatedly threatened with arrest while attempting to cover a homeless encampment sweep in the city, and then was detained in October, though he was let go without charges.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Stuff of Parody': Trump Taps Election-Denying Ally Kari Lake to Run Voice of America
"Authoritarians love to control and instrumentalize media organizations, especially state-funded ones," journalist Mehdi Hasan wrote in response to the news.
Dec 12, 2024
President-elect Donald Trump said Wednesday that he has chosen Kari Lake, a far-right election denier and failed U.S. Senate candidate, to lead the federally funded international broadcast network Voice of America, a move that critics said underscores Trump's effort to transform government entities into vehicles to advance his own interests.
In a Truth Social post, Trump wrote that as director of VOA, Lake would "ensure that the American values of Freedom and Liberty are broadcast around the World FAIRLY and ACCURATELY, unlike the lies spread by the Fake News Media."
Lake, a former television news anchor in Arizona who has echoed Trump's insidious attacks on journalists, wrote in response to the president-elect's announcement that she was "honored" to be asked to lead VOA, which she characterized as "a vital international media outlet dedicated to advancing the interests of the United States by engaging directly with people across the globe and promoting democracy and truth." VOA, which is supposed to have editorial independence, has long faced criticism for its coverage and treatment of employees.
Though the VOA's Charter states that the outlet will "present a balanced and comprehensive projection of significant American thought and institutions," Lake made clear that she views the network as a propaganda channel for the United States.
"Under my leadership, the VOA will excel in its mission: chronicling America's achievements worldwide," Lake, an outspoken Trump loyalist, wrote Wednesday.
Hours after Trump's announcement that she's his pick to lead VOA, Lake applaudedTIME magazine for naming Trump its "Person of the Year" and gushed that he "should have been the Person of the Year every year for the last decade."
Journalists and watchdogs expressed a mixture of alarm and mockery in response to Trump's attempt to elevate Lake to VOA director.
"Kari Lake as (head of) Voice of America is the stuff of parody. Or tragedy," Robert Weissman, co-president of Public Citizen, wrote on social media. "VOA matters."
Zeteo's Mehdi Hasan added that "authoritarians love to control and instrumentalize media organizations, especially state-funded ones."
"Good luck to the VOA," he wrote.
VOA is the largest federally funded international broadcaster and is overseen by the U.S. Agency for Global Media.
It is not clear whether Trump will be able to easily install Lake as VOA director. The Washington Post noted that "under rules passed in 2020, the VOA director is appointed by a majority vote of a seven-member advisory board."
"Six members of the board are named by the president and require Senate consent, and the seventh member is the secretary of state," the Post explained.
During his first term in the White House, Trump's pick to lead the U.S. Agency for Global Media worked aggressively to influence VOA coverage.
"In 2020, Mr. Trump appointed Michael Pack, an ally of his former aide Stephen K. Bannon, to run the U.S. Agency for Global Media," The New York Timessummarized on Thursday. "Mr. Pack was accused of trying to turn Voice of America into a mouthpiece for the Trump administration, and a federal judge ruled that Mr. Pack had violated the First Amendment rights of the outlet's journalists. A federal investigation later found that Mr. Pack had grossly mismanaged the U.S. Agency for Global Media, repeatedly abusing his power by sidelining executives he felt did not sufficiently support Mr. Trump."
The far-right Project 2025 agenda, which some members of the incoming Trump administration helped craft, includes a section that proposes placing the U.S. Agency for Global Media "under the supervision of the [White House National Security Council], the State Department, or both."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular