More than a dozen Indian civil society organizations on Thursday implored U.S. President Joe Biden to use his authority to compel Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson to share its single-dose vaccine recipe with qualified manufacturers across the globe, a move the groups said would show he is \u0022indeed serious about vaccinating the world.\u0022\r\n\r\n\u0022His administration has the moral, legal, and if necessary, financial power to lift intellectual property barriers and persuade J\u0026amp;J to license its vaccine, with technology and assistance included, to every manufacturer currently engaged in making the Sputnik-V vaccine,\u0022 the 14 organizations wrote in a letter, referring to the inoculation produced by Russia.\r\n\r\n\u0022Even if a few companies... were put to work and given what they need, the world could have billions more J\u0026amp;J vaccine doses.\u0022\r\n\r\nThe groups argue that because the Sputnik-V and J\u0026amp;J shots are both adenovirus vaccines that rely on similar technology, the dozens of manufacturers around the world that are currently producing Russia\u0026#039;s vaccine could pivot to making the J\u0026amp;J shot with relative ease and speed.\r\n\r\n\u0022Of those manufacturers, 34 are based outside Russia, in countries ranging from India to Argentina and South Korea,\u0022 the letter notes. \u0022Even if a few companies from this long list were put to work and given what they need, the world could have billions more J\u0026amp;J vaccine doses to use in the pandemic. And finally, if licensed as we suggest here, the J\u0026amp;J vaccine would be made at the licensee\u0026#039;s cost, as manufacturers have done before with the Sputnik-V vaccine, thus solving both J\u0026amp;J\u0026#039;s problems and the world\u0026#039;s.\u0022\r\n\r\nJ\u0026amp;J, which is headquartered in New Jersey, has voluntarily licensed its vaccine technology to the Serum Institute of India and is currently in talks to license Aspen Pharmacare, the largest drug company in Africa.\r\n\r\nDespite growing pressure from public health advocates and experts, the Biden administration has refused to take steps to force U.S.-based pharmaceutical giants to broadly share their vaccine recipes and technological know-how. The White House has preferred instead to focus largely on vaccine donations to low-income countries and bilateral licensing arrangements.\r\n\r\nBut critics have long argued that such deals are insufficient to meet global vaccine production and distribution needs, which remain dire as billions of people in low-income countries still lack access to shots. The global humanitarian group Doctors Without Borders warned in a recent report (pdf) that \u0022voluntary licensing contains inherent limitations for its dependence on companies\u0026#039; willingness to set up the terms and conditions, and often come up with limiting factors.\u0022\r\n\r\n\u0022More than one year into the Covid-19 pandemic,\u0022 the group added, \u0022it is evident that relying on the willingness of multinational pharmaceutical companies does not guarantee supply diversity and global equity in access.\u0022\r\n\r\nAchal Prabhala, an author on the new open letter and a coordinator at the India-based initiative AccessIBSA, told Nature that the \u0022real barrier\u0022 preventing adequate vaccine production and equitable access is \u0022an unwillingness on the part of Western pharmaceutical companies to relinquish control over their patents and technology, even at the cost of millions of lives.\u0022\r\n\r\nThe coalition of Indian civil society organizations warned that under a current agreement between J\u0026amp;J and the Indian firm Biological E, 600 million doses of the J\u0026amp;J vaccine \u0022will likely be exported to the European Union and the United States, where more than 50% of adults have been fully vaccinated, instead of going to India, which has only vaccinated 13% of its population to date, or to the African continent, where the equivalent figure is 3%.\u0022\r\n\r\nA similar contract arrangement between J\u0026amp;J and South Africa\u0026#039;s Aspen Pharmacare sparked outrage last month. Just two weeks after the New York Times reported the details of the contract, South African officials announced that the deal had been suspended.\r\n\r\nIn their letter on Wednesday, the civil society organizations argued that Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson\u0026#039;s \u0022unwillingness to license other manufacturers around the world\u0022 is \u0022both inexcusable and inexplicable.\u0022\r\n\r\n\u0022J\u0026amp;J must send these 600 million vaccines, some of which are ready, to where they are most needed and not where they can make the most money,\u0022 the letter reads.