SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Ronnie Long, 64, was realeased from prison on August 27, 2020 after serving 44 years behind bars for a rape he did not commit. (Photo: Democracy Now/Creative Commons)
A Black North Carolina man wrongfully imprisoned 44 years for a crime he did not commit was finally released Thursday afternoon, five years after his lawyers learned that investigators had withheld exculpatory evidence proving his innocence.
"They will never, ever, ever lock me up again," Long said shortly after his release.
The Charlotte Observer reports Ronnie Long, 64, walked out of the Albemarle Correctional Institution wearing a three-piece suit, fedora and wing-tip shoes at 5:13 p.m. on Thursday after the state of North Carolina filed a motion in federal court seeking to vacate his 1976 conviction by an all-white jury for the brutal rape of a prominent white woman in his hometown of Concord.
"Never give up," Long told gathered reporters and supporters after embracing his wife of six years, Ashleigh Long, whose birthday coincided with her husband's release.
When asked how he felt to be free, Long said "elated," adding that "it's over with--it's over with now."
Charlotte Mayor Vi Lyles tweeted her support for Long, who she said "suffered through 44 years of injustice." Lyles wrote that she "can't imagine the strength he and his loved ones needed to endure" his decades-long incarceration.
\u201cRonnie Long suffered through 44 years of injustice. I can't imagine the strength he and his loved ones needed to endure it. I am elated that he will soon be free. Many thanks to The Innocence Project, @DukeLaw Wrongful Convictions Clinic, & Atty. Jamie Lau. @innocence @LauDurham\u201d— Mayor Vi Lyles (@Mayor Vi Lyles) 1598553187
On April 25, 1976, 54-year-old Sarah Bost, the widow of an executive at Cannon Mills textile company, a leading local employer, called Concord police to report a forced entry into her home. According to court documents (pdf), "a man entered the home" and "put a knife to [Bost's] throat." His motive was apparently robbery; when Bost was unable to give him any money, her assailant "became angry, cursed her, threw her to the ground, ripped her clothes off, beat her, and raped her."
According to the documents, "the man repeatedly ordered Bost not to look at his face, but she defied him in hope that she could identify her attacker if she survived."
Bost was later invited by police to attend a court session at which she "identified" Long in the packed courtroom, telling officers that "there was no doubt" that Long had raped her.
"I will never forget the coloring of his skin," the victim told police.
"I will never forget... the coloring of his skin," Bost told police.
Long's trial began in the Cabbarus County Superior Court in September 1976. Despite a lack of physical evidence linking Long to the attack and the defendant's solid alibi--he was at home with his mother and young son on the night of the crime--the all-white jury found him guilty of first-degree rape and first-degree burglary and sentenced him to two life terms in prison.
He was 20 years old.
In 2005, a judge granted Long's motion to review biological evidence, and to allow him to submit his DNA for testing. The judge also ordered a review of the evidence in the case, a move that turned up hair, clothing fiber and other samples from the crime scene that did not match Long's.
None of that evidence had been shared with the defendant's legal team during the discovery phase of his 1976 trial. Nor was a rape kit, which had been prepared by the hospital where Bost was examined and treated.
Then, in 2015, the North Carolina Innocence Committee's Postconviction DNA Testing Assistance Program uncovered 43 fingerprints collected from the crime scene. They were not Long's.
Despite these shocking revelations, a tribunal of the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Long a new trial in a 2-1 decision this January. Judge Julius N. Richardson, appointed by President Donald Trump, argued that Long would have been convicted anyway, regardless of the exculpatory evidence.
Fortunately for Long, the sole dissenting judge, Stephanie D. Thacker, citing "a troubling and striking pattern of deliberate police suppression of material evidence," prompted a review by the full Fourth Circuit Court.
"Without a doubt, no reasonable jury could find Mr. Long guilty based on the undeniable facts before us today," the appeals court declared, citing "suppressed physical evidence failing to link Mr. Long to the crime scene, the perjured testimony of investigating officers, missing key biological evidence, and an eyewitness identification obtained through means now illegal in North Carolina."
"Justice demands that we immediately grant Mr. Long the relief he has pursued for 44 years," the court concluded.
"I'm glad it's over with now," Long declared after walking out of prison.
Long said he was "disappointed in a system that is supposed to be about right and wrong," but that he always believed that he would "be standing right where I'm standing now."
"I never gave up that hope," Long added. "They will never, ever, ever lock me up again."
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
A Black North Carolina man wrongfully imprisoned 44 years for a crime he did not commit was finally released Thursday afternoon, five years after his lawyers learned that investigators had withheld exculpatory evidence proving his innocence.
"They will never, ever, ever lock me up again," Long said shortly after his release.
The Charlotte Observer reports Ronnie Long, 64, walked out of the Albemarle Correctional Institution wearing a three-piece suit, fedora and wing-tip shoes at 5:13 p.m. on Thursday after the state of North Carolina filed a motion in federal court seeking to vacate his 1976 conviction by an all-white jury for the brutal rape of a prominent white woman in his hometown of Concord.
"Never give up," Long told gathered reporters and supporters after embracing his wife of six years, Ashleigh Long, whose birthday coincided with her husband's release.
When asked how he felt to be free, Long said "elated," adding that "it's over with--it's over with now."
Charlotte Mayor Vi Lyles tweeted her support for Long, who she said "suffered through 44 years of injustice." Lyles wrote that she "can't imagine the strength he and his loved ones needed to endure" his decades-long incarceration.
\u201cRonnie Long suffered through 44 years of injustice. I can't imagine the strength he and his loved ones needed to endure it. I am elated that he will soon be free. Many thanks to The Innocence Project, @DukeLaw Wrongful Convictions Clinic, & Atty. Jamie Lau. @innocence @LauDurham\u201d— Mayor Vi Lyles (@Mayor Vi Lyles) 1598553187
On April 25, 1976, 54-year-old Sarah Bost, the widow of an executive at Cannon Mills textile company, a leading local employer, called Concord police to report a forced entry into her home. According to court documents (pdf), "a man entered the home" and "put a knife to [Bost's] throat." His motive was apparently robbery; when Bost was unable to give him any money, her assailant "became angry, cursed her, threw her to the ground, ripped her clothes off, beat her, and raped her."
According to the documents, "the man repeatedly ordered Bost not to look at his face, but she defied him in hope that she could identify her attacker if she survived."
Bost was later invited by police to attend a court session at which she "identified" Long in the packed courtroom, telling officers that "there was no doubt" that Long had raped her.
"I will never forget the coloring of his skin," the victim told police.
"I will never forget... the coloring of his skin," Bost told police.
Long's trial began in the Cabbarus County Superior Court in September 1976. Despite a lack of physical evidence linking Long to the attack and the defendant's solid alibi--he was at home with his mother and young son on the night of the crime--the all-white jury found him guilty of first-degree rape and first-degree burglary and sentenced him to two life terms in prison.
He was 20 years old.
In 2005, a judge granted Long's motion to review biological evidence, and to allow him to submit his DNA for testing. The judge also ordered a review of the evidence in the case, a move that turned up hair, clothing fiber and other samples from the crime scene that did not match Long's.
None of that evidence had been shared with the defendant's legal team during the discovery phase of his 1976 trial. Nor was a rape kit, which had been prepared by the hospital where Bost was examined and treated.
Then, in 2015, the North Carolina Innocence Committee's Postconviction DNA Testing Assistance Program uncovered 43 fingerprints collected from the crime scene. They were not Long's.
Despite these shocking revelations, a tribunal of the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Long a new trial in a 2-1 decision this January. Judge Julius N. Richardson, appointed by President Donald Trump, argued that Long would have been convicted anyway, regardless of the exculpatory evidence.
Fortunately for Long, the sole dissenting judge, Stephanie D. Thacker, citing "a troubling and striking pattern of deliberate police suppression of material evidence," prompted a review by the full Fourth Circuit Court.
"Without a doubt, no reasonable jury could find Mr. Long guilty based on the undeniable facts before us today," the appeals court declared, citing "suppressed physical evidence failing to link Mr. Long to the crime scene, the perjured testimony of investigating officers, missing key biological evidence, and an eyewitness identification obtained through means now illegal in North Carolina."
"Justice demands that we immediately grant Mr. Long the relief he has pursued for 44 years," the court concluded.
"I'm glad it's over with now," Long declared after walking out of prison.
Long said he was "disappointed in a system that is supposed to be about right and wrong," but that he always believed that he would "be standing right where I'm standing now."
"I never gave up that hope," Long added. "They will never, ever, ever lock me up again."
A Black North Carolina man wrongfully imprisoned 44 years for a crime he did not commit was finally released Thursday afternoon, five years after his lawyers learned that investigators had withheld exculpatory evidence proving his innocence.
"They will never, ever, ever lock me up again," Long said shortly after his release.
The Charlotte Observer reports Ronnie Long, 64, walked out of the Albemarle Correctional Institution wearing a three-piece suit, fedora and wing-tip shoes at 5:13 p.m. on Thursday after the state of North Carolina filed a motion in federal court seeking to vacate his 1976 conviction by an all-white jury for the brutal rape of a prominent white woman in his hometown of Concord.
"Never give up," Long told gathered reporters and supporters after embracing his wife of six years, Ashleigh Long, whose birthday coincided with her husband's release.
When asked how he felt to be free, Long said "elated," adding that "it's over with--it's over with now."
Charlotte Mayor Vi Lyles tweeted her support for Long, who she said "suffered through 44 years of injustice." Lyles wrote that she "can't imagine the strength he and his loved ones needed to endure" his decades-long incarceration.
\u201cRonnie Long suffered through 44 years of injustice. I can't imagine the strength he and his loved ones needed to endure it. I am elated that he will soon be free. Many thanks to The Innocence Project, @DukeLaw Wrongful Convictions Clinic, & Atty. Jamie Lau. @innocence @LauDurham\u201d— Mayor Vi Lyles (@Mayor Vi Lyles) 1598553187
On April 25, 1976, 54-year-old Sarah Bost, the widow of an executive at Cannon Mills textile company, a leading local employer, called Concord police to report a forced entry into her home. According to court documents (pdf), "a man entered the home" and "put a knife to [Bost's] throat." His motive was apparently robbery; when Bost was unable to give him any money, her assailant "became angry, cursed her, threw her to the ground, ripped her clothes off, beat her, and raped her."
According to the documents, "the man repeatedly ordered Bost not to look at his face, but she defied him in hope that she could identify her attacker if she survived."
Bost was later invited by police to attend a court session at which she "identified" Long in the packed courtroom, telling officers that "there was no doubt" that Long had raped her.
"I will never forget the coloring of his skin," the victim told police.
"I will never forget... the coloring of his skin," Bost told police.
Long's trial began in the Cabbarus County Superior Court in September 1976. Despite a lack of physical evidence linking Long to the attack and the defendant's solid alibi--he was at home with his mother and young son on the night of the crime--the all-white jury found him guilty of first-degree rape and first-degree burglary and sentenced him to two life terms in prison.
He was 20 years old.
In 2005, a judge granted Long's motion to review biological evidence, and to allow him to submit his DNA for testing. The judge also ordered a review of the evidence in the case, a move that turned up hair, clothing fiber and other samples from the crime scene that did not match Long's.
None of that evidence had been shared with the defendant's legal team during the discovery phase of his 1976 trial. Nor was a rape kit, which had been prepared by the hospital where Bost was examined and treated.
Then, in 2015, the North Carolina Innocence Committee's Postconviction DNA Testing Assistance Program uncovered 43 fingerprints collected from the crime scene. They were not Long's.
Despite these shocking revelations, a tribunal of the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Long a new trial in a 2-1 decision this January. Judge Julius N. Richardson, appointed by President Donald Trump, argued that Long would have been convicted anyway, regardless of the exculpatory evidence.
Fortunately for Long, the sole dissenting judge, Stephanie D. Thacker, citing "a troubling and striking pattern of deliberate police suppression of material evidence," prompted a review by the full Fourth Circuit Court.
"Without a doubt, no reasonable jury could find Mr. Long guilty based on the undeniable facts before us today," the appeals court declared, citing "suppressed physical evidence failing to link Mr. Long to the crime scene, the perjured testimony of investigating officers, missing key biological evidence, and an eyewitness identification obtained through means now illegal in North Carolina."
"Justice demands that we immediately grant Mr. Long the relief he has pursued for 44 years," the court concluded.
"I'm glad it's over with now," Long declared after walking out of prison.
Long said he was "disappointed in a system that is supposed to be about right and wrong," but that he always believed that he would "be standing right where I'm standing now."
"I never gave up that hope," Long added. "They will never, ever, ever lock me up again."
Fire-related deaths were reported in Turkey, Spain, Montenegro, and Albania.
With firefighters in southern Europe battling blazes that have killed people in multiple countries and forced thousands to evacuate, Spain's environment minister on Wednesday called the wildfires a "clear warning" of the climate emergency driven by the fossil fuel industry.
While authorities have cited a variety of causes for current fires across the continent, from arson to "careless farming practices, improperly maintained power cables, and summer lightning storms," scientists have long stressed that wildfires are getting worse as humanity heats the planet with fossil fuels.
The Spanish minister, Sara Aagesen, told the radio network Cadena SER that "the fires are one of the parts of the impact of that climate change, which is why we have to do all we can when it comes to prevention."
"Our country is especially vulnerable to climate change. We have resources now but, given that the scientific evidence and the general expectation point to it having an ever greater impact, we need to work to reinforce and professionalize those resources," Aagesen added in remarks translated by The Guardian.
The Spanish meteorological agency, AEMET, said on social media Wednesday that "the danger of wildfires continues at very high or extreme levels in most of Spain, despite the likelihood of showers in many areas," and urged residents to "take extreme precautions!"
The heatwave impacting Spain "peaked on Tuesday with temperatures as high as 45°C (113°F)," according to Reuters. AEMET warned that "starting Thursday, the heat will intensify again," and is likely to continue through Monday.
The heatwave is also a sign of climate change, Akshay Deoras, a research scientist in the Meteorology Department at the U.K.'s University of Reading, told Agence France-Presse this week.
"Thanks to climate change, we now live in a significantly warmer world," Deoras said, adding that "many still underestimate the danger."
There have been at least two fire-related deaths in Spain this week: a man working at a horse stable on the outskirts of the Spanish capital Madrid, and a 35-year-old volunteer firefighter trying to make firebreaks near the town of Nogarejas, in the Castile and León region.
Acknowledging the firefighter's death on social media Tuesday, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez sent his "deepest condolences to their family, friends, and colleagues," and wished "much strength and a speedy recovery to the people injured in that same fire."
According to The New York Times, deaths tied to the fires were also reported in Turkey, Montenegro, and Albania. Additionally, The Guardian noted, "a 4-year-old boy who was found unconscious in his family's car in Sardinia died in Rome on Monday after suffering irreversible brain damage caused by heatstroke."
There are also fires in Greece, France, and Portugal, where the mayor of Vila Real, Alexandre Favaios, declared that "we are being cooked alive, this cannot continue."
Reuters on Wednesday highlighted Greenpeace estimates that investing €1 billion, or $1.17 billion, annually in forest management could save 9.9 million hectares or 24.5 million acres—an area bigger than Portugal—and tens of billions of euros spent on firefighting and restoration work.
The European fires are raging roughly three months out from the next United Nations Climate Change Conference, or COP30, which is scheduled to begin on November 10 in Belém, Brazil.
"These are not abstract numbers," wrote National Education Association president Becky Pringle. "These are real children who show up to school eager to learn but are instead distracted by hunger."
The leader of the largest teachers union in the United States is sounding the alarm over the impact that President Donald Trump's newly enacted budget law will have on young students, specifically warning that massive cuts to federal nutrition assistance will intensify the nation's child hunger crisis.
Becky Pringle, president of the National Education Association (NEA)—which represents millions of educators across the U.S.—wrote for Time magazine earlier this week that "as families across America prepare for the new school year, millions of children face the threat of returning to classrooms without access to school meals" under the budget measure that Trump signed into law last month after it cleared the Republican-controlled Congress.
Estimates indicate that more than 18 million children nationwide could lose access to free school meals due to the law's unprecedented cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Medicaid, which are used to determine eligibility for free meals in most U.S. states.
The Trump-GOP budget law imposes more strict work-reporting requirements on SNAP recipients and expands the mandates to adults between the ages of 55 and 64 and parents with children aged 14 and older. The Congressional Budget Office said earlier this week that the more aggressive work requirements would kick millions of adults off SNAP over the next decade—with cascading effects for children and other family members who rely on the program.
"Educators see this pain every day, and that's why they go above and beyond—buying classroom snacks with their own money—to support their students."
Pringle wrote in her Time op-ed that "our children can't learn if they are hungry," adding that as a middle school science teacher she has seen first-hand "the pain that hunger creates."
"Educators see this pain every day, and that's why they go above and beyond—buying classroom snacks with their own money—to support their students," she wrote.
The NEA president warned that cuts from the Trump-GOP law "will hit hardest in places where families are already struggling the most, especially in rural and Southern states where school nutrition programs are a lifeline to many."
"In Texas, 3.4 million kids, nearly two-thirds of students, are eligible for free and reduced lunch," Pringle wrote. "In Mississippi, 439,000 kids, 99.7% of the student population, were eligible for free and reduced-cost lunch during the 2022-23 school year."
"These are not abstract numbers," she added. "These are real children who show up to school eager to learn but are instead distracted by hunger and uncertainty about when they will eat again. America's kids deserve better.
Pringle's op-ed came as school leaders, advocates, and lawmakers across the country braced for the impacts of Trump's budget law.
"We're going to see cuts to programs such as SNAP and Medicaid, resulting in domino effects for the children we serve," Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) said during a recent gathering of lawmakers and experts. "For many of our communities, these policies mean life or death."
In some cases, corporate groups have posed as small business owners besieged by rising crime rates.
U.S. President Donald Trump's military occupation of Washington, D.C. has been egged on for months by corporate lobbyists. In some cases, they have posed as small business owners besieged by rising crime rates.
According to a report Tuesday in The Lever:
Last February, the American Investment Council, private equity's $24 million lobbying shop, penned a letter to D.C. city leaders demanding "immediate action" to address an "alarming increase" in crime.
That letter was published as an exclusive by Axios with the headline: "Downtown D.C. Business Leaders Demand Crime Solutions."
But far from a group of beleaguered mom-and-pops, the letter's signatories "included some of the biggest trade groups on K Street," The Lever observed:
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which boasts its status as the largest business organization in the world; the National Retail Federation, a powerful retail alliance representing giants like Walmart and Target; and Airlines for America, which represents the major U.S. airlines, among others. These lobbying juggernauts spend tens of millions of dollars every year lobbying federal lawmakers to get their way in Washington."
It was one of many efforts by right-wing groups to agitate for a more fearsome police crackdown in the city and oppose criminal justice reforms.
On multiple occasions, business groups and police unions have helped to thwart efforts by the D.C. city council to rewrite the city's criminal code, which has not been updated in over a century, to eliminate many mandatory minimum sentences and reduce sentences for some nonviolent offenses.
The reforms were vetoed by D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser in 2023. After the veto was overridden by the city council, Democrats helped Republicans pass a law squashing the reforms, which was signed by then-President Joe Biden.
In 2024, groups like the Chamber of Commerce pushed the "Secure D.C." bill in the city council, which expanded pre-trial detention, weakened restrictions on chokeholds, and limited public access to police disciplinary records.
At the time, business groups lauded these changes as necessary to fight the post-pandemic crime spike D.C. was experiencing.
But crime rates in D.C. have fallen precipitously, to a 30-year low over the course of 2024. As a press release from the U.S. attorney's office released on January 3, 2025 stated: "homicides are down 32%; robberies are down 39%; armed carjackings are down 53%; assaults with a dangerous weapon are down 27% when compared with 2023 levels."
Nevertheless, as Trump sends federal troops into D.C., many in the corporate world are still cheering.
In a statement Monday, the D.C. Chamber of Commerce described itself as a "strong supporter" of the Home Rule Act, which Trump used to enact his federal crackdown.
The Washington Business Journal quoted multiple consultancy executives—including Yaman Coskum, who exclaimed that "It is about time somebody did something to make D.C. great again," and Kirk McLaren who said, "If local leaders won't protect residents and businesses, let's see if the federal government will step in and do what's necessary to create a safe and prosperous city."
Despite crime also being on the decline in every other city he has singled out—Los Angeles, Baltimore, Oakland, New York, and Chicago—Trump has said his deployment of federal troops "will go further."