SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg speaks at a protest outside the White House in Washington, D.C. on Sept. 13, 2019. The teenager has spurred students around the world to strike from school every Friday under the rallying cry "Fridays for Future" to call on adults to act now to save the planet. (Photo: Alastair Pike/AFP/Getty Images)
Swedish 17-year-old Greta Thunberg, founder of the global youth-led climate action movement Fridays for Future, has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for the second consecutive year.
"The main reason she deserves the Nobel Peace Prize is that despite her young age, she has worked hard to make politicians open their eyes to the climate crisis."
--Jens Holm and Hakan Svenneling, Swedish parliamentarians
Nominations for the 2020 award were due Feb. 1. Thunberg was nominated by Jens Holm and Hakan Svenneling, members of Sweden's Left Party.
"Greta Thunberg is a climate activist, and the main reason she deserves the Nobel Peace Prize is that despite her young age, she has worked hard to make politicians open their eyes to the climate crisis," Holm and Svenneling reportedly wrote to the Norwegian Nobel Committee.
"The climate crisis will produce new conflicts and ultimately wars. Action for reducing our emissions and complying with the Paris agreement is therefore also an act of making peace," the parliamentarians continued. Without Thunberg and the movement she sparked, they added, "the climate issue would not have been on the agenda to such an extent as it is today."
Although Thunberg was considered a favorite to receive the 2019 prize, it ultimately went to Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed for his "efforts to achieve peace and international cooperation, and in particular for his decisive initiative to resolve the border conflict with neighboring Eritrea."
Thunberg has been granted several other honors since she started skipping school to protest outside the Swedish Parliament in 2018, at the age of 15, which inspired other students worldwide to walk out of classrooms and take to the streets to call for more ambitious efforts to combat the climate crisis.
Last year, Thunberg was named TIME magazine's Person of the Year and received Amnesty International's top human rights award. She also was one of four recipients of the Right Livelihood Award, often called the "alternative Nobel Peace Prize."
In October 2019, Thunberg declined the Nordic Council's annual environmental award after being nominated by her home country and Norway. At the time, she called the award "a huge honor" but explained that "the climate movement does not need any more awards. What we need is for our politicians and the people in power start to listen to the current, best available science."
The teen activist urged the Nordic countries that make up the council to "act in accordance with what the science says is needed to limit the global temperature rise below 1.5 degrees or even 2 degrees Celsius," referencing key targets from the 2015 Paris climate agreement.
As of press time, Thunberg had not publicly commented on her second nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize. However, the news came after Thunberg participated in a press conference on Friday that aimed to pressure the international community, and particularly global media, to pay more attention to the work of climate activists across Africa and how human-caused global heating is already impacting the continent.
Addressing reporters alongside Ell Ottosson Jarl, another Swedish Fridays for Future activist, Thunberg said Friday that "we have noticed that wherever we show up, people like us show up, there's a huge media interest... and since we have a platform, we must make sure that the voices of the people who should be heard are heard as well."
"That's why we're doing this press conference today, so that people who need to be heard can share their stories to the media," she added. "Today we will be focusing on Africa--activists and scientists from Africa--as the African perspective is always so under-reported."
The African participants of the press conference were three Fridays for Future activists--Vanessa Nakate of Uganda, Makenna Muigai of Kenya, and Ayakha Melithafa of South Africa--and Ndoni Mcunu, a climate scientist at the Global Change Institute at University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Swedish 17-year-old Greta Thunberg, founder of the global youth-led climate action movement Fridays for Future, has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for the second consecutive year.
"The main reason she deserves the Nobel Peace Prize is that despite her young age, she has worked hard to make politicians open their eyes to the climate crisis."
--Jens Holm and Hakan Svenneling, Swedish parliamentarians
Nominations for the 2020 award were due Feb. 1. Thunberg was nominated by Jens Holm and Hakan Svenneling, members of Sweden's Left Party.
"Greta Thunberg is a climate activist, and the main reason she deserves the Nobel Peace Prize is that despite her young age, she has worked hard to make politicians open their eyes to the climate crisis," Holm and Svenneling reportedly wrote to the Norwegian Nobel Committee.
"The climate crisis will produce new conflicts and ultimately wars. Action for reducing our emissions and complying with the Paris agreement is therefore also an act of making peace," the parliamentarians continued. Without Thunberg and the movement she sparked, they added, "the climate issue would not have been on the agenda to such an extent as it is today."
Although Thunberg was considered a favorite to receive the 2019 prize, it ultimately went to Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed for his "efforts to achieve peace and international cooperation, and in particular for his decisive initiative to resolve the border conflict with neighboring Eritrea."
Thunberg has been granted several other honors since she started skipping school to protest outside the Swedish Parliament in 2018, at the age of 15, which inspired other students worldwide to walk out of classrooms and take to the streets to call for more ambitious efforts to combat the climate crisis.
Last year, Thunberg was named TIME magazine's Person of the Year and received Amnesty International's top human rights award. She also was one of four recipients of the Right Livelihood Award, often called the "alternative Nobel Peace Prize."
In October 2019, Thunberg declined the Nordic Council's annual environmental award after being nominated by her home country and Norway. At the time, she called the award "a huge honor" but explained that "the climate movement does not need any more awards. What we need is for our politicians and the people in power start to listen to the current, best available science."
The teen activist urged the Nordic countries that make up the council to "act in accordance with what the science says is needed to limit the global temperature rise below 1.5 degrees or even 2 degrees Celsius," referencing key targets from the 2015 Paris climate agreement.
As of press time, Thunberg had not publicly commented on her second nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize. However, the news came after Thunberg participated in a press conference on Friday that aimed to pressure the international community, and particularly global media, to pay more attention to the work of climate activists across Africa and how human-caused global heating is already impacting the continent.
Addressing reporters alongside Ell Ottosson Jarl, another Swedish Fridays for Future activist, Thunberg said Friday that "we have noticed that wherever we show up, people like us show up, there's a huge media interest... and since we have a platform, we must make sure that the voices of the people who should be heard are heard as well."
"That's why we're doing this press conference today, so that people who need to be heard can share their stories to the media," she added. "Today we will be focusing on Africa--activists and scientists from Africa--as the African perspective is always so under-reported."
The African participants of the press conference were three Fridays for Future activists--Vanessa Nakate of Uganda, Makenna Muigai of Kenya, and Ayakha Melithafa of South Africa--and Ndoni Mcunu, a climate scientist at the Global Change Institute at University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa.
Swedish 17-year-old Greta Thunberg, founder of the global youth-led climate action movement Fridays for Future, has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for the second consecutive year.
"The main reason she deserves the Nobel Peace Prize is that despite her young age, she has worked hard to make politicians open their eyes to the climate crisis."
--Jens Holm and Hakan Svenneling, Swedish parliamentarians
Nominations for the 2020 award were due Feb. 1. Thunberg was nominated by Jens Holm and Hakan Svenneling, members of Sweden's Left Party.
"Greta Thunberg is a climate activist, and the main reason she deserves the Nobel Peace Prize is that despite her young age, she has worked hard to make politicians open their eyes to the climate crisis," Holm and Svenneling reportedly wrote to the Norwegian Nobel Committee.
"The climate crisis will produce new conflicts and ultimately wars. Action for reducing our emissions and complying with the Paris agreement is therefore also an act of making peace," the parliamentarians continued. Without Thunberg and the movement she sparked, they added, "the climate issue would not have been on the agenda to such an extent as it is today."
Although Thunberg was considered a favorite to receive the 2019 prize, it ultimately went to Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed for his "efforts to achieve peace and international cooperation, and in particular for his decisive initiative to resolve the border conflict with neighboring Eritrea."
Thunberg has been granted several other honors since she started skipping school to protest outside the Swedish Parliament in 2018, at the age of 15, which inspired other students worldwide to walk out of classrooms and take to the streets to call for more ambitious efforts to combat the climate crisis.
Last year, Thunberg was named TIME magazine's Person of the Year and received Amnesty International's top human rights award. She also was one of four recipients of the Right Livelihood Award, often called the "alternative Nobel Peace Prize."
In October 2019, Thunberg declined the Nordic Council's annual environmental award after being nominated by her home country and Norway. At the time, she called the award "a huge honor" but explained that "the climate movement does not need any more awards. What we need is for our politicians and the people in power start to listen to the current, best available science."
The teen activist urged the Nordic countries that make up the council to "act in accordance with what the science says is needed to limit the global temperature rise below 1.5 degrees or even 2 degrees Celsius," referencing key targets from the 2015 Paris climate agreement.
As of press time, Thunberg had not publicly commented on her second nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize. However, the news came after Thunberg participated in a press conference on Friday that aimed to pressure the international community, and particularly global media, to pay more attention to the work of climate activists across Africa and how human-caused global heating is already impacting the continent.
Addressing reporters alongside Ell Ottosson Jarl, another Swedish Fridays for Future activist, Thunberg said Friday that "we have noticed that wherever we show up, people like us show up, there's a huge media interest... and since we have a platform, we must make sure that the voices of the people who should be heard are heard as well."
"That's why we're doing this press conference today, so that people who need to be heard can share their stories to the media," she added. "Today we will be focusing on Africa--activists and scientists from Africa--as the African perspective is always so under-reported."
The African participants of the press conference were three Fridays for Future activists--Vanessa Nakate of Uganda, Makenna Muigai of Kenya, and Ayakha Melithafa of South Africa--and Ndoni Mcunu, a climate scientist at the Global Change Institute at University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa.
Rep. Greg Casar accused Trump and his Republican allies of "trying to pull off the most corrupt bargain I've ever seen."
Progressives rallied across the country on Saturday to protest against US President Donald Trump's attempts to get Republican-run state legislatures to redraw their maps to benefit GOP candidates in the 2026 midterm elections.
The anchor rally for the nationwide "Fight the Trump Takeover" protests was held in Austin, Texas, where Republicans in the state are poised to become the first in the nation to redraw their maps at the president's behest.
Progressives in the Lone Star State capital rallied against Trump and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott for breaking with historical precedent by carrying out congressional redistricting in the middle of the decade. Independent experts have estimated that the Texas gerrymandering alone could yield the GOP five additional seats in the US House of Representatives.
Speaking before a boisterous crowd of thousands of people, Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) charged that the Texas GOP was drawing up "districts set up to elect a Trump minion" in next year's midterms. However, Doggett also said that progressives should still try to compete in these districts, whose residents voted for Trump in the 2024 election but who also have histories of supporting Democratic candidates.
"Next year, [Trump is] not going to be on the ballot to draw the MAGA vote," said Doggett. "Is there anyone here who believes that we ought to abandon any of these redrawn districts and surrender them to Trump?"
Leonard Aguilar, the secretary-treasurer of Texas AFL-CIO, attacked Abbott for doing the president's bidding even as people in central Texas are still struggling in the aftermath of the deadly floods last month that killed at least 136 people.
"It's time for Gov. Abbott to cut the bullshit," he said. "We need help now but he's working at the behest of the president, on behalf of Trump... He's letting Trump take over Texas!"
Aguilar also speculated that Trump is fixated on having Texas redraw its maps because he "knows he's in trouble and he wants to change the rules midstream."
Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) went through a litany of grievances against Trump and the Republican Party, ranging from the Texas redistricting plan, to hardline immigration policies, to the massive GOP budget package passed last month that is projected to kick 17 million Americans off of Medicaid.
However, Casar also said that he felt hope watching how people in Austin were fighting back against Trump and his policies.
"I'm proud that our city is fighting," he said. "I'm proud of the grit that we have even when the odds are stacked against us. The only answer to oligarchy is organization."
Casar went on to accuse Trump and Republicans or "trying to pull off the most corrupt bargain I've ever seen," and then added that "as they try to kick us off our healthcare, as they try to rig this election, we're not going to let them!"
Saturday's protests are being done in partnership with several prominent progressive groups, including Indivisible, MoveOn, Human Rights Campaign, Public Citizen, and the Communication Workers of America. Some Texas-specific groups—including Texas Freedom Network, Texas AFL-CIO, and Texas for All—are also partners in the protest.
Judge Rossie Alston Jr. ruled the plaintiffs had failed to prove the groups provided "ongoing, continuous, systematic, and material support for Hamas and its affiliates."
A federal judge appointed in 2019 by US President Donald Trump has dismissed a lawsuit filed against pro-Palestinian organizations that alleged they were fronts for the terrorist organization Hamas.
In a ruling issued on Friday, Judge Rossie Alston Jr. of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia found that the plaintiffs who filed the case against the pro-Palestine groups had not sufficiently demonstrated a clear link between the groups and Hamas' attack on Israel on October 7, 2023.
The plaintiffs in the case—consisting of seven Americans and two Israelis—were all victims of the Hamas attack that killed an estimated 1,200 people, including more than 700 Israeli civilians.
They alleged that the pro-Palestinian groups—including National Students for Justice in Palestine, WESPAC Foundation, and Americans for Justice in Palestine Educational Foundation—provided material support to Hamas that directly led to injuries they suffered as a result of the October 7 attack.
This alleged support for Hamas, the plaintiffs argued, violated both the Anti-Terrorism Act and the Alien Tort Statute.
However, after examining all the evidence presented by the plaintiffs, Alston found they had not proven their claim that the organizations in question provide "ongoing, continuous, systematic, and material support for Hamas and its affiliates."
Specifically, Alston said that the claims made by the plaintiffs "are all very general and conclusory and do not specifically relate to the injuries" that they suffered in the Hamas attack.
"Although plaintiffs conclude that defendants have aided and abetted Hamas by providing it with 'material support despite knowledge of Hamas' terrorist activity both before, during, and after its October 7 terrorist attack,' plaintiffs do not allege that any planning, preparation, funding, or execution of the October 7, 2023 attack or any violations of international law by Hamas occurred in the United States," Alston emphasized. "None of the direct attackers are alleged to be citizens of the United States."
Alston was unconvinced by the plaintiffs' claims that the pro-Palestinian organizations "act as Hamas' public relations division, recruiting domestic foot soldiers to disseminate Hamas’s propaganda," and he similarly dismissed them as "vague and conclusory."
He then said that the plaintiffs did not establish that these "public relations" activities purportedly done on behalf of Hamas had "aided and abetted Hamas in carrying out the specific October 7, 2023 attack (or subsequent or continuing Hamas violations) that caused the Israeli Plaintiffs' injuries."
Alston concluded by dismissing the plaintiffs' case without prejudice, meaning they are free to file an amended lawsuit against the plaintiffs within 30 days of the judge's ruling.
"Putin got one hell of a photo op out of Trump," wrote one critic.
US President Donald Trump on Saturday morning tried to put his best spin on a Friday summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin that yielded neither a cease-fire agreement nor a comprehensive peace deal to end the war in Ukraine.
Writing on his Truth Social page, the president took a victory lap over the summit despite coming home completely empty-handed when he flew back from Alaska on Friday night.
"A great and very successful day in Alaska!" Trump began. "The meeting with President Vladimir Putin of Russia went very well, as did a late night phone call with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine, and various European Leaders, including the highly respected Secretary General of NATO."
Trump then pivoted to saying that he was fine with not obtaining a cease-fire agreement, even though he said just days before that he'd impose "severe consequences" on Russia if it did not agree to one.
"It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Cease-fire Agreement, which often times do not hold up," Trump said. "President Zelenskyy will be coming to DC, the Oval Office, on Monday afternoon. If all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin. Potentially, millions of people's lives will be saved."
While Trump did his best to put a happy face on the summit, many critics contended it was nothing short of a debacle for the US president.
Writing in The New Yorker, Susan Glasser argued that the entire summit with Putin was a "self-own of embarrassing proportions," given that he literally rolled out the red carpet for his Russian counterpart and did not achieve any success in bringing the war to a close.
"Putin got one hell of a photo op out of Trump, and still more time on the clock to prosecute his war against the 'brotherly' Ukrainian people, as he had the chutzpah to call them during his remarks in Alaska," she wrote. "The most enduring images from Anchorage, it seems, will be its grotesque displays of bonhomie between the dictator and his longtime American admirer."
She also noted that Trump appeared to shift the entire burden of ending the war onto Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and he even said after the Putin summit that "it's really up to President Zelenskyy to get it done."
This led Glasser to comment that "if there's one unwavering Law of Trump, this is it: Whatever happens, it is never, ever, his fault."
Glasser wasn't the only critic to offer a scathing assessment of the summit. The Economist blasted Trump in an editorial about the meeting, which it labeled a "gift" to Putin. The magazine also contrasted the way that Trump treated Putin during his visit to American soil with the way that he treated Zelenskyy during an Oval Office meeting earlier this year.
"The honors for Mr. Putin were in sharp contrast to the public humiliation that Mr. Trump and his advisers inflicted on Mr. Zelenskyy during his first visit to the White House earlier this year," they wrote. "Since then relations with Ukraine have improved, but Mr. Trump has often been quick to blame it for being invaded; and he has proved strangely indulgent with Mr. Putin."
Michael McFaul, an American ambassador to Russia under former President Barack Obama, was struck by just how much effort went into holding a summit that accomplished nothing.
"Summits usually have deliverables," he told The Atlantic. "This meeting had none... I hope that they made some progress towards next steps in the peace process. But there is no evidence of that yet."