SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Supporters of the "yes" vote for marriage equality celebrate at Melbourne's Result Street Party on November 15, 2017 in Melbourne, Australia. (Photo: Scott Barbour/Getty Images)
Jubilation as Australians Vote in Favor of Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage
While celebrations broke out nationwide, some called for additional legislative efforts to more broadly improve the lives of LGBTQ Australians
Nov 15, 2017
Celebrations broke out across Australia on Wednesday after the Bureau of Statistics announced more than 60 percent of the nation's citizens voted in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage. Now, it is up to the Australian Parliament to sort out the details.
"The Australian people have spoken," said Boris Dittrich, advocacy director of the lesbian, gay bisexual, and transgender rights program at Human Rights Watch. "Now, the Australian government and parliament should end this period of political indecisiveness and adopt marriage equality legislation immediately. Gay, lesbian, and bisexual Australians have been waiting for a long time for marriage equality, and now is the time to deliver."
Nearly 80 percent of Australia's eligible voters participated in the voluntary national postal survey, which simply asked: "Should the law be changed to allow same-sex couples to marry?" Every state and territory in the country voted "yes," according to the Sydney Morning Herald.
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, who called the vote "unequivocal" and "overwhelming," said nationwide marriage equality should be legal before Christmas--challenging lawmakers to "get on with it and get this done."
"Turnbull, same-sex marriage supporters in Australia's ruling Liberal-National party Coalition, the Labor opposition, Greens, and other cross-bench parties have reached a consensus around a cross-party bill that makes minimalist changes to protect religious freedom without legalizing discrimination by commercial service providers, such as cake makers, as some conservatives in the Coalition government have demanded," the Guardian reports.
The bill will be introduced in the Senate on Wednesday and debated on Thursday. Ultimately, the measure is expected to pass, with many lawmakers who oppose marriage equality promising to respect the survey results. The Australian government amended the Marriage Act to ban same-sex marriage in 2004.
Despite the widespread jubilation, some pointed to the nearly 40 percent of voters who oppose marriage equality as a warning that there is much more work to be done to improve the lives of LGBTQ Australians.
In an op-ed published Wednesday by The Independent, Amrou Al-Kadhi wrote:
As I scrolled through the jubilant trends on Twitter this morning, it was this 40 percent that stopped me from partaking in the joy. For this 40 percent is an indication of something much larger than a population's view on marriage legislation--it is an indication that for a huge proportion of people, the LGBTQI+ community is unequal to them. And this, not the ability to get married, is what we should be addressing.
The ecstatic cheers around the world, in truth, rang a little hollow for me. For I fear that the online echoes of triumph mute the social realizations that actually, things are not that equal for LGBTQI+ people. As a queer person of color who struggles with anxiety and depression, "marriage equality" isn't that exciting a victory for me. Constant homophobia and racism throughout my life--and living in a society that systemically isolates queer people and people of color--has led to my lifelong battle with mental health.
"For many people in our communities, the legalization of marriage will not have meaningful effect," Al-Kadhi concluded. "What would, is legislative efforts to make mental health services more readily available for LGBTQI+ people, further strategies to eradicate bullying in school, and meaningful resources to advocate for trans rights."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Celebrations broke out across Australia on Wednesday after the Bureau of Statistics announced more than 60 percent of the nation's citizens voted in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage. Now, it is up to the Australian Parliament to sort out the details.
"The Australian people have spoken," said Boris Dittrich, advocacy director of the lesbian, gay bisexual, and transgender rights program at Human Rights Watch. "Now, the Australian government and parliament should end this period of political indecisiveness and adopt marriage equality legislation immediately. Gay, lesbian, and bisexual Australians have been waiting for a long time for marriage equality, and now is the time to deliver."
Nearly 80 percent of Australia's eligible voters participated in the voluntary national postal survey, which simply asked: "Should the law be changed to allow same-sex couples to marry?" Every state and territory in the country voted "yes," according to the Sydney Morning Herald.
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, who called the vote "unequivocal" and "overwhelming," said nationwide marriage equality should be legal before Christmas--challenging lawmakers to "get on with it and get this done."
"Turnbull, same-sex marriage supporters in Australia's ruling Liberal-National party Coalition, the Labor opposition, Greens, and other cross-bench parties have reached a consensus around a cross-party bill that makes minimalist changes to protect religious freedom without legalizing discrimination by commercial service providers, such as cake makers, as some conservatives in the Coalition government have demanded," the Guardian reports.
The bill will be introduced in the Senate on Wednesday and debated on Thursday. Ultimately, the measure is expected to pass, with many lawmakers who oppose marriage equality promising to respect the survey results. The Australian government amended the Marriage Act to ban same-sex marriage in 2004.
Despite the widespread jubilation, some pointed to the nearly 40 percent of voters who oppose marriage equality as a warning that there is much more work to be done to improve the lives of LGBTQ Australians.
In an op-ed published Wednesday by The Independent, Amrou Al-Kadhi wrote:
As I scrolled through the jubilant trends on Twitter this morning, it was this 40 percent that stopped me from partaking in the joy. For this 40 percent is an indication of something much larger than a population's view on marriage legislation--it is an indication that for a huge proportion of people, the LGBTQI+ community is unequal to them. And this, not the ability to get married, is what we should be addressing.
The ecstatic cheers around the world, in truth, rang a little hollow for me. For I fear that the online echoes of triumph mute the social realizations that actually, things are not that equal for LGBTQI+ people. As a queer person of color who struggles with anxiety and depression, "marriage equality" isn't that exciting a victory for me. Constant homophobia and racism throughout my life--and living in a society that systemically isolates queer people and people of color--has led to my lifelong battle with mental health.
"For many people in our communities, the legalization of marriage will not have meaningful effect," Al-Kadhi concluded. "What would, is legislative efforts to make mental health services more readily available for LGBTQI+ people, further strategies to eradicate bullying in school, and meaningful resources to advocate for trans rights."
Celebrations broke out across Australia on Wednesday after the Bureau of Statistics announced more than 60 percent of the nation's citizens voted in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage. Now, it is up to the Australian Parliament to sort out the details.
"The Australian people have spoken," said Boris Dittrich, advocacy director of the lesbian, gay bisexual, and transgender rights program at Human Rights Watch. "Now, the Australian government and parliament should end this period of political indecisiveness and adopt marriage equality legislation immediately. Gay, lesbian, and bisexual Australians have been waiting for a long time for marriage equality, and now is the time to deliver."
Nearly 80 percent of Australia's eligible voters participated in the voluntary national postal survey, which simply asked: "Should the law be changed to allow same-sex couples to marry?" Every state and territory in the country voted "yes," according to the Sydney Morning Herald.
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, who called the vote "unequivocal" and "overwhelming," said nationwide marriage equality should be legal before Christmas--challenging lawmakers to "get on with it and get this done."
"Turnbull, same-sex marriage supporters in Australia's ruling Liberal-National party Coalition, the Labor opposition, Greens, and other cross-bench parties have reached a consensus around a cross-party bill that makes minimalist changes to protect religious freedom without legalizing discrimination by commercial service providers, such as cake makers, as some conservatives in the Coalition government have demanded," the Guardian reports.
The bill will be introduced in the Senate on Wednesday and debated on Thursday. Ultimately, the measure is expected to pass, with many lawmakers who oppose marriage equality promising to respect the survey results. The Australian government amended the Marriage Act to ban same-sex marriage in 2004.
Despite the widespread jubilation, some pointed to the nearly 40 percent of voters who oppose marriage equality as a warning that there is much more work to be done to improve the lives of LGBTQ Australians.
In an op-ed published Wednesday by The Independent, Amrou Al-Kadhi wrote:
As I scrolled through the jubilant trends on Twitter this morning, it was this 40 percent that stopped me from partaking in the joy. For this 40 percent is an indication of something much larger than a population's view on marriage legislation--it is an indication that for a huge proportion of people, the LGBTQI+ community is unequal to them. And this, not the ability to get married, is what we should be addressing.
The ecstatic cheers around the world, in truth, rang a little hollow for me. For I fear that the online echoes of triumph mute the social realizations that actually, things are not that equal for LGBTQI+ people. As a queer person of color who struggles with anxiety and depression, "marriage equality" isn't that exciting a victory for me. Constant homophobia and racism throughout my life--and living in a society that systemically isolates queer people and people of color--has led to my lifelong battle with mental health.
"For many people in our communities, the legalization of marriage will not have meaningful effect," Al-Kadhi concluded. "What would, is legislative efforts to make mental health services more readily available for LGBTQI+ people, further strategies to eradicate bullying in school, and meaningful resources to advocate for trans rights."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.