(Photo: Todd Wiseman)
Sep 13, 2014
In what critics say is a blow to voters' rights, a federal appeals court on Friday gave the state of Wisconsin the green-light to require voters to provide identification as a condition of casting a ballot.
Opponents of the rule say it imposes an unnecessary and often prohibitive requirement that disproportionately prevents people of color and low-income communities from voting. "This is a terrible, undemocratic ruling," said Common Cause President Miles Rapoport.
The decision was issued in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago by a panel of three judges, all of them appointed by republicans. "The State of Wisconsin may, if it wishes... enforce the photo ID requirement in this November's elections," they ruled. The Associated Pressdescribes the decision as "stunningly fast" and likely orchestrated in time for the November elections.
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, an avid backer of the voter identification requirements, immediately applauded the ruling.
In April a Federal judge struck down the identification requirement, charging that it discriminates against Black, Latino/a, and low-income voters, disproportionately depriving them of their constitutionally-protected right to cast ballots.
In response to Friday's ruling, Rapaport declared, "We have a message for the elected officials who erect such barriers: we're determined to see that they don't work. And in the long term, we'll continue working across America to repeal unneeded and discriminatory voter ID requirements."
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
In what critics say is a blow to voters' rights, a federal appeals court on Friday gave the state of Wisconsin the green-light to require voters to provide identification as a condition of casting a ballot.
Opponents of the rule say it imposes an unnecessary and often prohibitive requirement that disproportionately prevents people of color and low-income communities from voting. "This is a terrible, undemocratic ruling," said Common Cause President Miles Rapoport.
The decision was issued in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago by a panel of three judges, all of them appointed by republicans. "The State of Wisconsin may, if it wishes... enforce the photo ID requirement in this November's elections," they ruled. The Associated Pressdescribes the decision as "stunningly fast" and likely orchestrated in time for the November elections.
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, an avid backer of the voter identification requirements, immediately applauded the ruling.
In April a Federal judge struck down the identification requirement, charging that it discriminates against Black, Latino/a, and low-income voters, disproportionately depriving them of their constitutionally-protected right to cast ballots.
In response to Friday's ruling, Rapaport declared, "We have a message for the elected officials who erect such barriers: we're determined to see that they don't work. And in the long term, we'll continue working across America to repeal unneeded and discriminatory voter ID requirements."
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
In what critics say is a blow to voters' rights, a federal appeals court on Friday gave the state of Wisconsin the green-light to require voters to provide identification as a condition of casting a ballot.
Opponents of the rule say it imposes an unnecessary and often prohibitive requirement that disproportionately prevents people of color and low-income communities from voting. "This is a terrible, undemocratic ruling," said Common Cause President Miles Rapoport.
The decision was issued in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago by a panel of three judges, all of them appointed by republicans. "The State of Wisconsin may, if it wishes... enforce the photo ID requirement in this November's elections," they ruled. The Associated Pressdescribes the decision as "stunningly fast" and likely orchestrated in time for the November elections.
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, an avid backer of the voter identification requirements, immediately applauded the ruling.
In April a Federal judge struck down the identification requirement, charging that it discriminates against Black, Latino/a, and low-income voters, disproportionately depriving them of their constitutionally-protected right to cast ballots.
In response to Friday's ruling, Rapaport declared, "We have a message for the elected officials who erect such barriers: we're determined to see that they don't work. And in the long term, we'll continue working across America to repeal unneeded and discriminatory voter ID requirements."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.