(Photo: Todd Wiseman)
Sep 13, 2014
In what critics say is a blow to voters' rights, a federal appeals court on Friday gave the state of Wisconsin the green-light to require voters to provide identification as a condition of casting a ballot.
Opponents of the rule say it imposes an unnecessary and often prohibitive requirement that disproportionately prevents people of color and low-income communities from voting. "This is a terrible, undemocratic ruling," said Common Cause President Miles Rapoport.
The decision was issued in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago by a panel of three judges, all of them appointed by republicans. "The State of Wisconsin may, if it wishes... enforce the photo ID requirement in this November's elections," they ruled. The Associated Pressdescribes the decision as "stunningly fast" and likely orchestrated in time for the November elections.
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, an avid backer of the voter identification requirements, immediately applauded the ruling.
In April a Federal judge struck down the identification requirement, charging that it discriminates against Black, Latino/a, and low-income voters, disproportionately depriving them of their constitutionally-protected right to cast ballots.
In response to Friday's ruling, Rapaport declared, "We have a message for the elected officials who erect such barriers: we're determined to see that they don't work. And in the long term, we'll continue working across America to repeal unneeded and discriminatory voter ID requirements."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
In what critics say is a blow to voters' rights, a federal appeals court on Friday gave the state of Wisconsin the green-light to require voters to provide identification as a condition of casting a ballot.
Opponents of the rule say it imposes an unnecessary and often prohibitive requirement that disproportionately prevents people of color and low-income communities from voting. "This is a terrible, undemocratic ruling," said Common Cause President Miles Rapoport.
The decision was issued in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago by a panel of three judges, all of them appointed by republicans. "The State of Wisconsin may, if it wishes... enforce the photo ID requirement in this November's elections," they ruled. The Associated Pressdescribes the decision as "stunningly fast" and likely orchestrated in time for the November elections.
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, an avid backer of the voter identification requirements, immediately applauded the ruling.
In April a Federal judge struck down the identification requirement, charging that it discriminates against Black, Latino/a, and low-income voters, disproportionately depriving them of their constitutionally-protected right to cast ballots.
In response to Friday's ruling, Rapaport declared, "We have a message for the elected officials who erect such barriers: we're determined to see that they don't work. And in the long term, we'll continue working across America to repeal unneeded and discriminatory voter ID requirements."
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
In what critics say is a blow to voters' rights, a federal appeals court on Friday gave the state of Wisconsin the green-light to require voters to provide identification as a condition of casting a ballot.
Opponents of the rule say it imposes an unnecessary and often prohibitive requirement that disproportionately prevents people of color and low-income communities from voting. "This is a terrible, undemocratic ruling," said Common Cause President Miles Rapoport.
The decision was issued in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago by a panel of three judges, all of them appointed by republicans. "The State of Wisconsin may, if it wishes... enforce the photo ID requirement in this November's elections," they ruled. The Associated Pressdescribes the decision as "stunningly fast" and likely orchestrated in time for the November elections.
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, an avid backer of the voter identification requirements, immediately applauded the ruling.
In April a Federal judge struck down the identification requirement, charging that it discriminates against Black, Latino/a, and low-income voters, disproportionately depriving them of their constitutionally-protected right to cast ballots.
In response to Friday's ruling, Rapaport declared, "We have a message for the elected officials who erect such barriers: we're determined to see that they don't work. And in the long term, we'll continue working across America to repeal unneeded and discriminatory voter ID requirements."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.