SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
(Photo: Todd Wiseman)
Federal Judges Roll Back Wisconsin Voters' Rights
“This is a terrible, undemocratic ruling,” said Common Cause President Miles Rapoport.
Sep 13, 2014
In what critics say is a blow to voters' rights, a federal appeals court on Friday gave the state of Wisconsin the green-light to require voters to provide identification as a condition of casting a ballot.
Opponents of the rule say it imposes an unnecessary and often prohibitive requirement that disproportionately prevents people of color and low-income communities from voting. "This is a terrible, undemocratic ruling," said Common Cause President Miles Rapoport.
The decision was issued in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago by a panel of three judges, all of them appointed by republicans. "The State of Wisconsin may, if it wishes... enforce the photo ID requirement in this November's elections," they ruled. The Associated Press describes the decision as "stunningly fast" and likely orchestrated in time for the November elections.
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, an avid backer of the voter identification requirements, immediately applauded the ruling.
In April a Federal judge struck down the identification requirement, charging that it discriminates against Black, Latino/a, and low-income voters, disproportionately depriving them of their constitutionally-protected right to cast ballots.
In response to Friday's ruling, Rapaport declared, "We have a message for the elected officials who erect such barriers: we're determined to see that they don't work. And in the long term, we'll continue working across America to repeal unneeded and discriminatory voter ID requirements."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
In what critics say is a blow to voters' rights, a federal appeals court on Friday gave the state of Wisconsin the green-light to require voters to provide identification as a condition of casting a ballot.
Opponents of the rule say it imposes an unnecessary and often prohibitive requirement that disproportionately prevents people of color and low-income communities from voting. "This is a terrible, undemocratic ruling," said Common Cause President Miles Rapoport.
The decision was issued in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago by a panel of three judges, all of them appointed by republicans. "The State of Wisconsin may, if it wishes... enforce the photo ID requirement in this November's elections," they ruled. The Associated Press describes the decision as "stunningly fast" and likely orchestrated in time for the November elections.
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, an avid backer of the voter identification requirements, immediately applauded the ruling.
In April a Federal judge struck down the identification requirement, charging that it discriminates against Black, Latino/a, and low-income voters, disproportionately depriving them of their constitutionally-protected right to cast ballots.
In response to Friday's ruling, Rapaport declared, "We have a message for the elected officials who erect such barriers: we're determined to see that they don't work. And in the long term, we'll continue working across America to repeal unneeded and discriminatory voter ID requirements."
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
In what critics say is a blow to voters' rights, a federal appeals court on Friday gave the state of Wisconsin the green-light to require voters to provide identification as a condition of casting a ballot.
Opponents of the rule say it imposes an unnecessary and often prohibitive requirement that disproportionately prevents people of color and low-income communities from voting. "This is a terrible, undemocratic ruling," said Common Cause President Miles Rapoport.
The decision was issued in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago by a panel of three judges, all of them appointed by republicans. "The State of Wisconsin may, if it wishes... enforce the photo ID requirement in this November's elections," they ruled. The Associated Press describes the decision as "stunningly fast" and likely orchestrated in time for the November elections.
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, an avid backer of the voter identification requirements, immediately applauded the ruling.
In April a Federal judge struck down the identification requirement, charging that it discriminates against Black, Latino/a, and low-income voters, disproportionately depriving them of their constitutionally-protected right to cast ballots.
In response to Friday's ruling, Rapaport declared, "We have a message for the elected officials who erect such barriers: we're determined to see that they don't work. And in the long term, we'll continue working across America to repeal unneeded and discriminatory voter ID requirements."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.