Concern Grows as Military Weapons Flood Police Departments
New York Times reveals Obama has overseen rapid militarization of local law enforcement
Under the Obama administration, surplus weapons from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan--from grenade launchers to machine guns to silencers--have militarized police departments across the United States at unprecedented levels, the New York Times revealed in an investigation published Sunday.
Pentagon data shows a massive transfer of military weapons to local law enforcement on Obama's watch, including "tens of thousands of machine guns; nearly 200,000 ammunition magazines; thousands of pieces of camouflage and night-vision equipment; and hundreds of silencers, armored cars and aircraft," writes journalist Matt Apuzzo.
Since 2006, police departments across the United States have received 432 Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) armored vehicles, 435 other armored vehicles, and 533 planes and helicopters, the report reveals.
The trend is attracting increasing attention from journalists. Mark Alesia writes for the Indianapolis Star, "[T]o some, the introduction of equipment designed for war in Fallujah, Iraq, to the streets of U.S. towns and cities raises questions about the militarization of civilian police departments." He adds, "Does it blur the line between civilian police and the military?"
The weapons have been handed over through the little-known military transfer program, which was established by Congress in the early 90s and allows the Department of Defense to give "surplus" weapons to local police and sheriffs. In addition to the free giveaway program, several police departments have applied for federal grant money to purchase military fighting vehicles and other equipment, Apuzzo notes.
These weapons are sent to police departments that are already heavily weaponized, thanks in part to the surge in SWAT teams since the 1980s.
People across the United States are pushing back against the militarization of local police. From Oakland, California to Boston, Massachusetts, opposition is growing against the increased militarization of policing across the United States.
"It just seems like ramping up a police department for a problem we don't have," said Shay Korittnig, speaking at a public meeting against Neenah, Wisconsin's acquisition of an armored, according to the Times. "This is not what I was looking for when I moved here, that my children would view their local police officer as an M-16-toting, SWAT-apparel-wearing officer."
"People who are under assault by police and other U.S. law enforcement agents want resources invested that will actually strengthen our communities, from affordable housing to better health care and schools, and support for other vital community institutions," wrote Laila Murad, Boston organizer with the Free Tarek Mehanna campaign, in a Waging Nonviolence article about community efforts to oppose militarized policing.
_____________________
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Under the Obama administration, surplus weapons from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan--from grenade launchers to machine guns to silencers--have militarized police departments across the United States at unprecedented levels, the New York Times revealed in an investigation published Sunday.
Pentagon data shows a massive transfer of military weapons to local law enforcement on Obama's watch, including "tens of thousands of machine guns; nearly 200,000 ammunition magazines; thousands of pieces of camouflage and night-vision equipment; and hundreds of silencers, armored cars and aircraft," writes journalist Matt Apuzzo.
Since 2006, police departments across the United States have received 432 Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) armored vehicles, 435 other armored vehicles, and 533 planes and helicopters, the report reveals.
The trend is attracting increasing attention from journalists. Mark Alesia writes for the Indianapolis Star, "[T]o some, the introduction of equipment designed for war in Fallujah, Iraq, to the streets of U.S. towns and cities raises questions about the militarization of civilian police departments." He adds, "Does it blur the line between civilian police and the military?"
The weapons have been handed over through the little-known military transfer program, which was established by Congress in the early 90s and allows the Department of Defense to give "surplus" weapons to local police and sheriffs. In addition to the free giveaway program, several police departments have applied for federal grant money to purchase military fighting vehicles and other equipment, Apuzzo notes.
These weapons are sent to police departments that are already heavily weaponized, thanks in part to the surge in SWAT teams since the 1980s.
People across the United States are pushing back against the militarization of local police. From Oakland, California to Boston, Massachusetts, opposition is growing against the increased militarization of policing across the United States.
"It just seems like ramping up a police department for a problem we don't have," said Shay Korittnig, speaking at a public meeting against Neenah, Wisconsin's acquisition of an armored, according to the Times. "This is not what I was looking for when I moved here, that my children would view their local police officer as an M-16-toting, SWAT-apparel-wearing officer."
"People who are under assault by police and other U.S. law enforcement agents want resources invested that will actually strengthen our communities, from affordable housing to better health care and schools, and support for other vital community institutions," wrote Laila Murad, Boston organizer with the Free Tarek Mehanna campaign, in a Waging Nonviolence article about community efforts to oppose militarized policing.
_____________________
Under the Obama administration, surplus weapons from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan--from grenade launchers to machine guns to silencers--have militarized police departments across the United States at unprecedented levels, the New York Times revealed in an investigation published Sunday.
Pentagon data shows a massive transfer of military weapons to local law enforcement on Obama's watch, including "tens of thousands of machine guns; nearly 200,000 ammunition magazines; thousands of pieces of camouflage and night-vision equipment; and hundreds of silencers, armored cars and aircraft," writes journalist Matt Apuzzo.
Since 2006, police departments across the United States have received 432 Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) armored vehicles, 435 other armored vehicles, and 533 planes and helicopters, the report reveals.
The trend is attracting increasing attention from journalists. Mark Alesia writes for the Indianapolis Star, "[T]o some, the introduction of equipment designed for war in Fallujah, Iraq, to the streets of U.S. towns and cities raises questions about the militarization of civilian police departments." He adds, "Does it blur the line between civilian police and the military?"
The weapons have been handed over through the little-known military transfer program, which was established by Congress in the early 90s and allows the Department of Defense to give "surplus" weapons to local police and sheriffs. In addition to the free giveaway program, several police departments have applied for federal grant money to purchase military fighting vehicles and other equipment, Apuzzo notes.
These weapons are sent to police departments that are already heavily weaponized, thanks in part to the surge in SWAT teams since the 1980s.
People across the United States are pushing back against the militarization of local police. From Oakland, California to Boston, Massachusetts, opposition is growing against the increased militarization of policing across the United States.
"It just seems like ramping up a police department for a problem we don't have," said Shay Korittnig, speaking at a public meeting against Neenah, Wisconsin's acquisition of an armored, according to the Times. "This is not what I was looking for when I moved here, that my children would view their local police officer as an M-16-toting, SWAT-apparel-wearing officer."
"People who are under assault by police and other U.S. law enforcement agents want resources invested that will actually strengthen our communities, from affordable housing to better health care and schools, and support for other vital community institutions," wrote Laila Murad, Boston organizer with the Free Tarek Mehanna campaign, in a Waging Nonviolence article about community efforts to oppose militarized policing.
_____________________