SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Supreme Court Halts Marriage Equality in Utah
Though disappointing, halt to same sex marriage likely only temporary
Jan 06, 2014
Though more than 900 same sex couples have married in Utah since a lower federal court approved marriage equality in the state last month, the US Supreme Court on Monday put a temporary block on the additional marriages until a federal appelate court hears a challenge.
As the Associated Press reports, the order from the nation's highest court "grants an emergency appeal by the state following the Dec. 20 ruling by U.S. District Judge Robert Shelby that the state's ban on same-sex marriage violates gay and lesbian couples' constitutional rights."
As the New York Times explains:
Judge Shelby's decision made Utah the 18th state, along with the District of Columbia, to allow same-sex marriages, and many hundreds of gay and lesbian couples have married there in the intervening weeks. Should a higher court ultimately reverse Judge Shelby's ruling, it is not clear what would happen to those marriages.
In their Supreme Court brief, Utah officials said Judge Shelby's decision should be stayed "to minimize the enormous disruption to the state and its citizens of potentially having to 'unwind' thousands of same-sex marriages." The brief did not explain why it took officials so long to ask the Supreme Court for a stay; they filed on Dec. 31, a week after the appeals court declined to issue one.
Judge Shelby was only the second federal judge to strike down a state ban on same-sex marriages, along with Judge Vaughn R. Walker in San Francisco, who in 2010 struck down Proposition 8, California's ban. That ruling was stayed while it was considered by an appeals court, which affirmed it, and by the Supreme Court.
In June, the Supreme Court effectively sustained Judge Walker's decision on technical grounds and without reaching the question of whether there is a constitutional right to same-sex marriage.
Though disappointing, same-sex marriage advocates seemed to look at the move by the court as a hiccup on the road to full national marriage equality.
According to Adam Polaski, writing on the blog for the advocacy group Freedom to Marry, the decision "merely marks a pause in the ruling" by the lower court.
"Hundreds of same-sex couples and their families were able to share in the freedom to marry over the past three weeks in Utah," he writes, "and while it is disappointing that many other families are being put on hold as the courts system considers the state's appeal, it is clear that in the end, justice will prevail. The couples who have legally married in Utah are just that--legally married."
___________________________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Though more than 900 same sex couples have married in Utah since a lower federal court approved marriage equality in the state last month, the US Supreme Court on Monday put a temporary block on the additional marriages until a federal appelate court hears a challenge.
As the Associated Press reports, the order from the nation's highest court "grants an emergency appeal by the state following the Dec. 20 ruling by U.S. District Judge Robert Shelby that the state's ban on same-sex marriage violates gay and lesbian couples' constitutional rights."
As the New York Times explains:
Judge Shelby's decision made Utah the 18th state, along with the District of Columbia, to allow same-sex marriages, and many hundreds of gay and lesbian couples have married there in the intervening weeks. Should a higher court ultimately reverse Judge Shelby's ruling, it is not clear what would happen to those marriages.
In their Supreme Court brief, Utah officials said Judge Shelby's decision should be stayed "to minimize the enormous disruption to the state and its citizens of potentially having to 'unwind' thousands of same-sex marriages." The brief did not explain why it took officials so long to ask the Supreme Court for a stay; they filed on Dec. 31, a week after the appeals court declined to issue one.
Judge Shelby was only the second federal judge to strike down a state ban on same-sex marriages, along with Judge Vaughn R. Walker in San Francisco, who in 2010 struck down Proposition 8, California's ban. That ruling was stayed while it was considered by an appeals court, which affirmed it, and by the Supreme Court.
In June, the Supreme Court effectively sustained Judge Walker's decision on technical grounds and without reaching the question of whether there is a constitutional right to same-sex marriage.
Though disappointing, same-sex marriage advocates seemed to look at the move by the court as a hiccup on the road to full national marriage equality.
According to Adam Polaski, writing on the blog for the advocacy group Freedom to Marry, the decision "merely marks a pause in the ruling" by the lower court.
"Hundreds of same-sex couples and their families were able to share in the freedom to marry over the past three weeks in Utah," he writes, "and while it is disappointing that many other families are being put on hold as the courts system considers the state's appeal, it is clear that in the end, justice will prevail. The couples who have legally married in Utah are just that--legally married."
___________________________________
Though more than 900 same sex couples have married in Utah since a lower federal court approved marriage equality in the state last month, the US Supreme Court on Monday put a temporary block on the additional marriages until a federal appelate court hears a challenge.
As the Associated Press reports, the order from the nation's highest court "grants an emergency appeal by the state following the Dec. 20 ruling by U.S. District Judge Robert Shelby that the state's ban on same-sex marriage violates gay and lesbian couples' constitutional rights."
As the New York Times explains:
Judge Shelby's decision made Utah the 18th state, along with the District of Columbia, to allow same-sex marriages, and many hundreds of gay and lesbian couples have married there in the intervening weeks. Should a higher court ultimately reverse Judge Shelby's ruling, it is not clear what would happen to those marriages.
In their Supreme Court brief, Utah officials said Judge Shelby's decision should be stayed "to minimize the enormous disruption to the state and its citizens of potentially having to 'unwind' thousands of same-sex marriages." The brief did not explain why it took officials so long to ask the Supreme Court for a stay; they filed on Dec. 31, a week after the appeals court declined to issue one.
Judge Shelby was only the second federal judge to strike down a state ban on same-sex marriages, along with Judge Vaughn R. Walker in San Francisco, who in 2010 struck down Proposition 8, California's ban. That ruling was stayed while it was considered by an appeals court, which affirmed it, and by the Supreme Court.
In June, the Supreme Court effectively sustained Judge Walker's decision on technical grounds and without reaching the question of whether there is a constitutional right to same-sex marriage.
Though disappointing, same-sex marriage advocates seemed to look at the move by the court as a hiccup on the road to full national marriage equality.
According to Adam Polaski, writing on the blog for the advocacy group Freedom to Marry, the decision "merely marks a pause in the ruling" by the lower court.
"Hundreds of same-sex couples and their families were able to share in the freedom to marry over the past three weeks in Utah," he writes, "and while it is disappointing that many other families are being put on hold as the courts system considers the state's appeal, it is clear that in the end, justice will prevail. The couples who have legally married in Utah are just that--legally married."
___________________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy