SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Supreme Court Halts Marriage Equality in Utah
Though disappointing, halt to same sex marriage likely only temporary
Jan 06, 2014
Though more than 900 same sex couples have married in Utah since a lower federal court approved marriage equality in the state last month, the US Supreme Court on Monday put a temporary block on the additional marriages until a federal appelate court hears a challenge.
As the Associated Press reports, the order from the nation's highest court "grants an emergency appeal by the state following the Dec. 20 ruling by U.S. District Judge Robert Shelby that the state's ban on same-sex marriage violates gay and lesbian couples' constitutional rights."
As the New York Times explains:
Judge Shelby's decision made Utah the 18th state, along with the District of Columbia, to allow same-sex marriages, and many hundreds of gay and lesbian couples have married there in the intervening weeks. Should a higher court ultimately reverse Judge Shelby's ruling, it is not clear what would happen to those marriages.
In their Supreme Court brief, Utah officials said Judge Shelby's decision should be stayed "to minimize the enormous disruption to the state and its citizens of potentially having to 'unwind' thousands of same-sex marriages." The brief did not explain why it took officials so long to ask the Supreme Court for a stay; they filed on Dec. 31, a week after the appeals court declined to issue one.
Judge Shelby was only the second federal judge to strike down a state ban on same-sex marriages, along with Judge Vaughn R. Walker in San Francisco, who in 2010 struck down Proposition 8, California's ban. That ruling was stayed while it was considered by an appeals court, which affirmed it, and by the Supreme Court.
In June, the Supreme Court effectively sustained Judge Walker's decision on technical grounds and without reaching the question of whether there is a constitutional right to same-sex marriage.
Though disappointing, same-sex marriage advocates seemed to look at the move by the court as a hiccup on the road to full national marriage equality.
According to Adam Polaski, writing on the blog for the advocacy group Freedom to Marry, the decision "merely marks a pause in the ruling" by the lower court.
"Hundreds of same-sex couples and their families were able to share in the freedom to marry over the past three weeks in Utah," he writes, "and while it is disappointing that many other families are being put on hold as the courts system considers the state's appeal, it is clear that in the end, justice will prevail. The couples who have legally married in Utah are just that--legally married."
___________________________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Though more than 900 same sex couples have married in Utah since a lower federal court approved marriage equality in the state last month, the US Supreme Court on Monday put a temporary block on the additional marriages until a federal appelate court hears a challenge.
As the Associated Press reports, the order from the nation's highest court "grants an emergency appeal by the state following the Dec. 20 ruling by U.S. District Judge Robert Shelby that the state's ban on same-sex marriage violates gay and lesbian couples' constitutional rights."
As the New York Times explains:
Judge Shelby's decision made Utah the 18th state, along with the District of Columbia, to allow same-sex marriages, and many hundreds of gay and lesbian couples have married there in the intervening weeks. Should a higher court ultimately reverse Judge Shelby's ruling, it is not clear what would happen to those marriages.
In their Supreme Court brief, Utah officials said Judge Shelby's decision should be stayed "to minimize the enormous disruption to the state and its citizens of potentially having to 'unwind' thousands of same-sex marriages." The brief did not explain why it took officials so long to ask the Supreme Court for a stay; they filed on Dec. 31, a week after the appeals court declined to issue one.
Judge Shelby was only the second federal judge to strike down a state ban on same-sex marriages, along with Judge Vaughn R. Walker in San Francisco, who in 2010 struck down Proposition 8, California's ban. That ruling was stayed while it was considered by an appeals court, which affirmed it, and by the Supreme Court.
In June, the Supreme Court effectively sustained Judge Walker's decision on technical grounds and without reaching the question of whether there is a constitutional right to same-sex marriage.
Though disappointing, same-sex marriage advocates seemed to look at the move by the court as a hiccup on the road to full national marriage equality.
According to Adam Polaski, writing on the blog for the advocacy group Freedom to Marry, the decision "merely marks a pause in the ruling" by the lower court.
"Hundreds of same-sex couples and their families were able to share in the freedom to marry over the past three weeks in Utah," he writes, "and while it is disappointing that many other families are being put on hold as the courts system considers the state's appeal, it is clear that in the end, justice will prevail. The couples who have legally married in Utah are just that--legally married."
___________________________________
Though more than 900 same sex couples have married in Utah since a lower federal court approved marriage equality in the state last month, the US Supreme Court on Monday put a temporary block on the additional marriages until a federal appelate court hears a challenge.
As the Associated Press reports, the order from the nation's highest court "grants an emergency appeal by the state following the Dec. 20 ruling by U.S. District Judge Robert Shelby that the state's ban on same-sex marriage violates gay and lesbian couples' constitutional rights."
As the New York Times explains:
Judge Shelby's decision made Utah the 18th state, along with the District of Columbia, to allow same-sex marriages, and many hundreds of gay and lesbian couples have married there in the intervening weeks. Should a higher court ultimately reverse Judge Shelby's ruling, it is not clear what would happen to those marriages.
In their Supreme Court brief, Utah officials said Judge Shelby's decision should be stayed "to minimize the enormous disruption to the state and its citizens of potentially having to 'unwind' thousands of same-sex marriages." The brief did not explain why it took officials so long to ask the Supreme Court for a stay; they filed on Dec. 31, a week after the appeals court declined to issue one.
Judge Shelby was only the second federal judge to strike down a state ban on same-sex marriages, along with Judge Vaughn R. Walker in San Francisco, who in 2010 struck down Proposition 8, California's ban. That ruling was stayed while it was considered by an appeals court, which affirmed it, and by the Supreme Court.
In June, the Supreme Court effectively sustained Judge Walker's decision on technical grounds and without reaching the question of whether there is a constitutional right to same-sex marriage.
Though disappointing, same-sex marriage advocates seemed to look at the move by the court as a hiccup on the road to full national marriage equality.
According to Adam Polaski, writing on the blog for the advocacy group Freedom to Marry, the decision "merely marks a pause in the ruling" by the lower court.
"Hundreds of same-sex couples and their families were able to share in the freedom to marry over the past three weeks in Utah," he writes, "and while it is disappointing that many other families are being put on hold as the courts system considers the state's appeal, it is clear that in the end, justice will prevail. The couples who have legally married in Utah are just that--legally married."
___________________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.