Sep 11, 2013
The signs of a people's victory, after more than a decade of deadlock over the planned mine, left officials with Gabriel Resources Ltd.--the corporation pushing for the deal--furious and hurling threats Monday that, if parliament does not give the company a pass, they will sue for billions for "multiple breaches of international investment treaties."
Romanian residents and environmental activists have successfully opposed plans to build the mine since it was proposed in the 1990s, charging that it would blast off mountaintops, destroy ancient Roman ruins, and displace residents from the town of Rosia Montana and nearby villages.
Among their chief concern is the planned use of cyanide as part of the extraction process. In 2000, a cyanide spill at a Baie Mare gold mine released dangerous toxins into mud and water that seeped into Romania, Hungary, and Serbia in Europe's worst environmental accident since Chernobyl, heightening concerns about cyanide use in mining.
The company and some politicians have publicly championed the proposed mine on grounds it would bring much needed jobs to a country battling poverty and unemployment. However, critics charge that opening Romania for business to foreign corporations merely ensures that natural wealth will be siphoned out of the country while leaving a path of environmental and human destruction.
Ponta, who was initially opposed to the mine, changed course after negotiating higher state royalties and introduced a bill for the project to go through in late August. His move touched off a week of escalating protests, including 15,000 people who took to the streets in mobilizations across the country Sunday.
In the face of this opposition, Ponta announced on Monday that the bill in favor of the mine is no longer viable. "As long as it is obvious that there is a majority opposed to the bill, it is useless to waste too much time on it," he stated Monday, noting a majority of lawmakers oppose the plan.
Opponents to the mine say that the outcome of the struggle, which is not over until parliament votes a definitive "no," is vitally important for efforts to address poverty and joblessness without turning to false solutions that only make foreign corporations more wealthy.
"It is the symbolic fight of our generation," 26 year-old Oana Mondoc told the Guardian at a Sunday solidarity protest at the Romanian Embassy in London.
Opponents to the mine note that the outcome will impact people affected by destructive mining practices across the world. Lorna Howarth writes in Ecologist., "[I]t is indigenous people, first nations people, farm labourers and peasants who, all over the world, have to pick up the pieces after such corporate ransacking; who pay the price in terms of debilitating illness and unrelenting poverty as their crops fail and animals succumb to the poisoned land."
_____________________
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
The signs of a people's victory, after more than a decade of deadlock over the planned mine, left officials with Gabriel Resources Ltd.--the corporation pushing for the deal--furious and hurling threats Monday that, if parliament does not give the company a pass, they will sue for billions for "multiple breaches of international investment treaties."
Romanian residents and environmental activists have successfully opposed plans to build the mine since it was proposed in the 1990s, charging that it would blast off mountaintops, destroy ancient Roman ruins, and displace residents from the town of Rosia Montana and nearby villages.
Among their chief concern is the planned use of cyanide as part of the extraction process. In 2000, a cyanide spill at a Baie Mare gold mine released dangerous toxins into mud and water that seeped into Romania, Hungary, and Serbia in Europe's worst environmental accident since Chernobyl, heightening concerns about cyanide use in mining.
The company and some politicians have publicly championed the proposed mine on grounds it would bring much needed jobs to a country battling poverty and unemployment. However, critics charge that opening Romania for business to foreign corporations merely ensures that natural wealth will be siphoned out of the country while leaving a path of environmental and human destruction.
Ponta, who was initially opposed to the mine, changed course after negotiating higher state royalties and introduced a bill for the project to go through in late August. His move touched off a week of escalating protests, including 15,000 people who took to the streets in mobilizations across the country Sunday.
In the face of this opposition, Ponta announced on Monday that the bill in favor of the mine is no longer viable. "As long as it is obvious that there is a majority opposed to the bill, it is useless to waste too much time on it," he stated Monday, noting a majority of lawmakers oppose the plan.
Opponents to the mine say that the outcome of the struggle, which is not over until parliament votes a definitive "no," is vitally important for efforts to address poverty and joblessness without turning to false solutions that only make foreign corporations more wealthy.
"It is the symbolic fight of our generation," 26 year-old Oana Mondoc told the Guardian at a Sunday solidarity protest at the Romanian Embassy in London.
Opponents to the mine note that the outcome will impact people affected by destructive mining practices across the world. Lorna Howarth writes in Ecologist., "[I]t is indigenous people, first nations people, farm labourers and peasants who, all over the world, have to pick up the pieces after such corporate ransacking; who pay the price in terms of debilitating illness and unrelenting poverty as their crops fail and animals succumb to the poisoned land."
_____________________
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
The signs of a people's victory, after more than a decade of deadlock over the planned mine, left officials with Gabriel Resources Ltd.--the corporation pushing for the deal--furious and hurling threats Monday that, if parliament does not give the company a pass, they will sue for billions for "multiple breaches of international investment treaties."
Romanian residents and environmental activists have successfully opposed plans to build the mine since it was proposed in the 1990s, charging that it would blast off mountaintops, destroy ancient Roman ruins, and displace residents from the town of Rosia Montana and nearby villages.
Among their chief concern is the planned use of cyanide as part of the extraction process. In 2000, a cyanide spill at a Baie Mare gold mine released dangerous toxins into mud and water that seeped into Romania, Hungary, and Serbia in Europe's worst environmental accident since Chernobyl, heightening concerns about cyanide use in mining.
The company and some politicians have publicly championed the proposed mine on grounds it would bring much needed jobs to a country battling poverty and unemployment. However, critics charge that opening Romania for business to foreign corporations merely ensures that natural wealth will be siphoned out of the country while leaving a path of environmental and human destruction.
Ponta, who was initially opposed to the mine, changed course after negotiating higher state royalties and introduced a bill for the project to go through in late August. His move touched off a week of escalating protests, including 15,000 people who took to the streets in mobilizations across the country Sunday.
In the face of this opposition, Ponta announced on Monday that the bill in favor of the mine is no longer viable. "As long as it is obvious that there is a majority opposed to the bill, it is useless to waste too much time on it," he stated Monday, noting a majority of lawmakers oppose the plan.
Opponents to the mine say that the outcome of the struggle, which is not over until parliament votes a definitive "no," is vitally important for efforts to address poverty and joblessness without turning to false solutions that only make foreign corporations more wealthy.
"It is the symbolic fight of our generation," 26 year-old Oana Mondoc told the Guardian at a Sunday solidarity protest at the Romanian Embassy in London.
Opponents to the mine note that the outcome will impact people affected by destructive mining practices across the world. Lorna Howarth writes in Ecologist., "[I]t is indigenous people, first nations people, farm labourers and peasants who, all over the world, have to pick up the pieces after such corporate ransacking; who pay the price in terms of debilitating illness and unrelenting poverty as their crops fail and animals succumb to the poisoned land."
_____________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.