SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
LGBT Community: Senate Dems 'Betrayed Us' on Immigration
As reform bill passes to full Senate, concerns of gay and lesbian familes are left in the dust
May 22, 2013
Champions of equality slammed Democratic members on the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday after it succumbed to the pressure of rightwing threats by removing a crucial amendment to the immigration reform package that would have provided inclusion and protection of LGBT members of immigrant and binational families.
The overall bill was ultimately passed, but only after Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the committee's chairman, removed an amendment that included protections and equal legal status for families that include same-sex partners who are non-US citizens.
"I'm committed to ending that discrimination," Leahy said before withdrawing the amendment which Republican lawmakers said would essentially kill the legislation either at the committee level or in the full Senate.
But LGBT activists, tired of their continued exclusion from equal treatment under the law, say the move is just another cave by the Democrats.
" Republicans came after LGBT families, and Democrats didn't stand up," said Rachel B. Tiven, executive director of the Immigration Equality Action Fund which advocates on behalf of the LGBT community in immigration matters.
"There should be shame on both sides of the political aisle for lawmakers who worked to deny LGBT immigrant families a vote," she said.
Though she acknowledge that both Sen. Leahy and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) had voiced strong support for the amendment's inclusion, Tiven said the Democratic leaders on the committee caved to bullying from the GOP and other regressive forces by accepting a "false choice" between LGBT families and immigration reform.
"Senators have lined up in recent months to proclaim their support for marriage equality and LGBT rights," Tiven added. "Yet, given the first opportunity to put their vote where their talking point is, they failed. Our families need deeds, not words."
According to Tiven's groups, an estimated 36,000 couples are raising more than 25,000 children within the United States (with countless others living in forced exile) are unable to sponsor their spouse or partner for residency under current immigration law because of their sexual status.
Lavi Soloway, an immigration attorney and co-founder of the DOMA Project which focuses on immigration for binational LGBT couples, was scathing in his rebuke, putting focus on Schumer and Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) by calling Tuesday's removal of the amendment a "betrayal" by Democrats.
"What's worse," Soloway wrote just ahead of the committee's vote, "there was never any chance that either [Schumer or Feinstein] were planning to go to bat for us. So, for weeks, we endured gay bashing by Republicans over amendments that were doomed to failure in Committee because they lacked the support of cowardly Democrats. This was a foregone conclusion, and it cost us dearly."
He continued:
Remember this when you are rejoicing about the seemingly inevitable momentum we are experiencing as one state after another passes Marriage Equality. Remember this when Facebook is filled with BREAKING NEWS telling you that 54 Senators have declared support for Marriage Equality. Remember this when staggering public polling results show support for marriage equality reaching new highs in places as far as Virginia, and with every demographic, including the oldest Americans. Certainly, this progress should be greeted with elation, but if our elected officials refuse to vote for our lives, for our equality, and for our future, our families will continue to be torn apart. Parents will continue to be separated from their children for years, couples will continue to be forced into exile or separated for many years, and foreign spouses and partners of lesbian and gay Americans will continue to be deported.
_________________________________________________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Champions of equality slammed Democratic members on the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday after it succumbed to the pressure of rightwing threats by removing a crucial amendment to the immigration reform package that would have provided inclusion and protection of LGBT members of immigrant and binational families.
The overall bill was ultimately passed, but only after Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the committee's chairman, removed an amendment that included protections and equal legal status for families that include same-sex partners who are non-US citizens.
"I'm committed to ending that discrimination," Leahy said before withdrawing the amendment which Republican lawmakers said would essentially kill the legislation either at the committee level or in the full Senate.
But LGBT activists, tired of their continued exclusion from equal treatment under the law, say the move is just another cave by the Democrats.
" Republicans came after LGBT families, and Democrats didn't stand up," said Rachel B. Tiven, executive director of the Immigration Equality Action Fund which advocates on behalf of the LGBT community in immigration matters.
"There should be shame on both sides of the political aisle for lawmakers who worked to deny LGBT immigrant families a vote," she said.
Though she acknowledge that both Sen. Leahy and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) had voiced strong support for the amendment's inclusion, Tiven said the Democratic leaders on the committee caved to bullying from the GOP and other regressive forces by accepting a "false choice" between LGBT families and immigration reform.
"Senators have lined up in recent months to proclaim their support for marriage equality and LGBT rights," Tiven added. "Yet, given the first opportunity to put their vote where their talking point is, they failed. Our families need deeds, not words."
According to Tiven's groups, an estimated 36,000 couples are raising more than 25,000 children within the United States (with countless others living in forced exile) are unable to sponsor their spouse or partner for residency under current immigration law because of their sexual status.
Lavi Soloway, an immigration attorney and co-founder of the DOMA Project which focuses on immigration for binational LGBT couples, was scathing in his rebuke, putting focus on Schumer and Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) by calling Tuesday's removal of the amendment a "betrayal" by Democrats.
"What's worse," Soloway wrote just ahead of the committee's vote, "there was never any chance that either [Schumer or Feinstein] were planning to go to bat for us. So, for weeks, we endured gay bashing by Republicans over amendments that were doomed to failure in Committee because they lacked the support of cowardly Democrats. This was a foregone conclusion, and it cost us dearly."
He continued:
Remember this when you are rejoicing about the seemingly inevitable momentum we are experiencing as one state after another passes Marriage Equality. Remember this when Facebook is filled with BREAKING NEWS telling you that 54 Senators have declared support for Marriage Equality. Remember this when staggering public polling results show support for marriage equality reaching new highs in places as far as Virginia, and with every demographic, including the oldest Americans. Certainly, this progress should be greeted with elation, but if our elected officials refuse to vote for our lives, for our equality, and for our future, our families will continue to be torn apart. Parents will continue to be separated from their children for years, couples will continue to be forced into exile or separated for many years, and foreign spouses and partners of lesbian and gay Americans will continue to be deported.
_________________________________________________________
Champions of equality slammed Democratic members on the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday after it succumbed to the pressure of rightwing threats by removing a crucial amendment to the immigration reform package that would have provided inclusion and protection of LGBT members of immigrant and binational families.
The overall bill was ultimately passed, but only after Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the committee's chairman, removed an amendment that included protections and equal legal status for families that include same-sex partners who are non-US citizens.
"I'm committed to ending that discrimination," Leahy said before withdrawing the amendment which Republican lawmakers said would essentially kill the legislation either at the committee level or in the full Senate.
But LGBT activists, tired of their continued exclusion from equal treatment under the law, say the move is just another cave by the Democrats.
" Republicans came after LGBT families, and Democrats didn't stand up," said Rachel B. Tiven, executive director of the Immigration Equality Action Fund which advocates on behalf of the LGBT community in immigration matters.
"There should be shame on both sides of the political aisle for lawmakers who worked to deny LGBT immigrant families a vote," she said.
Though she acknowledge that both Sen. Leahy and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) had voiced strong support for the amendment's inclusion, Tiven said the Democratic leaders on the committee caved to bullying from the GOP and other regressive forces by accepting a "false choice" between LGBT families and immigration reform.
"Senators have lined up in recent months to proclaim their support for marriage equality and LGBT rights," Tiven added. "Yet, given the first opportunity to put their vote where their talking point is, they failed. Our families need deeds, not words."
According to Tiven's groups, an estimated 36,000 couples are raising more than 25,000 children within the United States (with countless others living in forced exile) are unable to sponsor their spouse or partner for residency under current immigration law because of their sexual status.
Lavi Soloway, an immigration attorney and co-founder of the DOMA Project which focuses on immigration for binational LGBT couples, was scathing in his rebuke, putting focus on Schumer and Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) by calling Tuesday's removal of the amendment a "betrayal" by Democrats.
"What's worse," Soloway wrote just ahead of the committee's vote, "there was never any chance that either [Schumer or Feinstein] were planning to go to bat for us. So, for weeks, we endured gay bashing by Republicans over amendments that were doomed to failure in Committee because they lacked the support of cowardly Democrats. This was a foregone conclusion, and it cost us dearly."
He continued:
Remember this when you are rejoicing about the seemingly inevitable momentum we are experiencing as one state after another passes Marriage Equality. Remember this when Facebook is filled with BREAKING NEWS telling you that 54 Senators have declared support for Marriage Equality. Remember this when staggering public polling results show support for marriage equality reaching new highs in places as far as Virginia, and with every demographic, including the oldest Americans. Certainly, this progress should be greeted with elation, but if our elected officials refuse to vote for our lives, for our equality, and for our future, our families will continue to be torn apart. Parents will continue to be separated from their children for years, couples will continue to be forced into exile or separated for many years, and foreign spouses and partners of lesbian and gay Americans will continue to be deported.
_________________________________________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.