SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'Unfounded' Wars Heighten Impact of Soldiers' PTSD, Study Suggests
When a country wages war for reasons that ultimately prove 'unfounded'--not to mention 'illegal' 'immoral' or 'socially abhorrent'--the impact on those asked to fight it can be profound.
This is the central finding of a new study to be released next month in the journal Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and reported on by Raw Story.
Mar 26, 2013
When a country wages war for reasons that ultimately prove 'unfounded'--not to mention 'illegal' 'immoral' or 'socially abhorrent'--the impact on those asked to fight it can be profound.
This is the central finding of a new study to be released next month in the journal Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and reported on by Raw Story.
Employing "an experimental design to better understand the relationship between social validation for killing and PTSD," the researchers attempted to create a controlled experience that could at least partially replicate the way that social and moral pressures interact with soldiers asked to perform violence on the battlefield.
As Raw Story explains:
For their study, Webber and his colleagues had undergraduate students complete an "extermination task," which involved killing ten woodlice with a coffee grinder. During one scenario, the student witnessed another participant completely refuse to kill the bugs because doing so was wrong. In a second scenario, the student witnessed another participant readily agree to kill the bug. In a third scenario, which was used as a control condition, the student had no interaction with another participant.
The study found that the students reported more distress and guilt when they perceived their actions to be social invalidated by others. When the killing of bugs appeared to be socially validated, on the other hand, the students reported less distress and guilt.
Webber told Raw Story that the research did not directly address PTSD in veterans, since killing bugs was obviously far removed from killing another human. But the study did find evidence that socially-constructed moral standards influenced feelings of distress and guilt.
Describing the impact that social opposition--such as public protest or condemnation of the war effort--has on soldiers, lead researcher Prof. David Webber told Raw Story that "War protest usually only occurs when that war is unfounded. If war is enacted for legitimate reasons, the public will usually support that effort. It is during times when there is no clear end goal for a war, or when the reasons for fighting are unclear that protest escalates, which leads to a war being invalidated."
Read the full story here.
________________________________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
When a country wages war for reasons that ultimately prove 'unfounded'--not to mention 'illegal' 'immoral' or 'socially abhorrent'--the impact on those asked to fight it can be profound.
This is the central finding of a new study to be released next month in the journal Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and reported on by Raw Story.
Employing "an experimental design to better understand the relationship between social validation for killing and PTSD," the researchers attempted to create a controlled experience that could at least partially replicate the way that social and moral pressures interact with soldiers asked to perform violence on the battlefield.
As Raw Story explains:
For their study, Webber and his colleagues had undergraduate students complete an "extermination task," which involved killing ten woodlice with a coffee grinder. During one scenario, the student witnessed another participant completely refuse to kill the bugs because doing so was wrong. In a second scenario, the student witnessed another participant readily agree to kill the bug. In a third scenario, which was used as a control condition, the student had no interaction with another participant.
The study found that the students reported more distress and guilt when they perceived their actions to be social invalidated by others. When the killing of bugs appeared to be socially validated, on the other hand, the students reported less distress and guilt.
Webber told Raw Story that the research did not directly address PTSD in veterans, since killing bugs was obviously far removed from killing another human. But the study did find evidence that socially-constructed moral standards influenced feelings of distress and guilt.
Describing the impact that social opposition--such as public protest or condemnation of the war effort--has on soldiers, lead researcher Prof. David Webber told Raw Story that "War protest usually only occurs when that war is unfounded. If war is enacted for legitimate reasons, the public will usually support that effort. It is during times when there is no clear end goal for a war, or when the reasons for fighting are unclear that protest escalates, which leads to a war being invalidated."
Read the full story here.
________________________________________
When a country wages war for reasons that ultimately prove 'unfounded'--not to mention 'illegal' 'immoral' or 'socially abhorrent'--the impact on those asked to fight it can be profound.
This is the central finding of a new study to be released next month in the journal Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and reported on by Raw Story.
Employing "an experimental design to better understand the relationship between social validation for killing and PTSD," the researchers attempted to create a controlled experience that could at least partially replicate the way that social and moral pressures interact with soldiers asked to perform violence on the battlefield.
As Raw Story explains:
For their study, Webber and his colleagues had undergraduate students complete an "extermination task," which involved killing ten woodlice with a coffee grinder. During one scenario, the student witnessed another participant completely refuse to kill the bugs because doing so was wrong. In a second scenario, the student witnessed another participant readily agree to kill the bug. In a third scenario, which was used as a control condition, the student had no interaction with another participant.
The study found that the students reported more distress and guilt when they perceived their actions to be social invalidated by others. When the killing of bugs appeared to be socially validated, on the other hand, the students reported less distress and guilt.
Webber told Raw Story that the research did not directly address PTSD in veterans, since killing bugs was obviously far removed from killing another human. But the study did find evidence that socially-constructed moral standards influenced feelings of distress and guilt.
Describing the impact that social opposition--such as public protest or condemnation of the war effort--has on soldiers, lead researcher Prof. David Webber told Raw Story that "War protest usually only occurs when that war is unfounded. If war is enacted for legitimate reasons, the public will usually support that effort. It is during times when there is no clear end goal for a war, or when the reasons for fighting are unclear that protest escalates, which leads to a war being invalidated."
Read the full story here.
________________________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.