
(Photo: Selbe B via Flickr)
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
(Photo: Selbe B via Flickr)
A federal judge has overturned a Missouri law which exempted employers from mandatory birth control coverage.
Citing a provision in the US constitution which declares that federal laws take precedence over contradictory state laws, US district judge Audrey Fleissig ruled the exemption unlawful because it conflicts with an Affordable Care Act requirement that insurers cover contraception at no additional cost to women.
Though the ruling was dated Thursday of last week, it was not made public until Monday.
"This is a victory for Missouri women and their families," said Peter Brownlie, President of Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri in a statement. "This ruling ensures that all Missouri women--no matter who their boss is--have access to basic preventive health care without a co-pay, including birth control. This is a decision for women, not their bosses to make. Bosses don't have to take birth control, and they don't have to pay for it - and thanks to the Federal court ruling, they can't decide whether the women who work for them are able to have birth control covered by their insurance like any other prescription."
The Missouri version of the law required insurers to issue policies without contraception coverage if individuals or employers assert that the use of birth control violates their "moral, ethical or religious beliefs."
According to the Associated Press, the law "which appeared to be the first in the nation to directly rebut the Obama administration's contraception policy," was previously vetoed by Democratic governor Jay Nixon until the state's Republican-led Legislature overrode the veto last September to enact the law.
_____________________
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
A federal judge has overturned a Missouri law which exempted employers from mandatory birth control coverage.
Citing a provision in the US constitution which declares that federal laws take precedence over contradictory state laws, US district judge Audrey Fleissig ruled the exemption unlawful because it conflicts with an Affordable Care Act requirement that insurers cover contraception at no additional cost to women.
Though the ruling was dated Thursday of last week, it was not made public until Monday.
"This is a victory for Missouri women and their families," said Peter Brownlie, President of Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri in a statement. "This ruling ensures that all Missouri women--no matter who their boss is--have access to basic preventive health care without a co-pay, including birth control. This is a decision for women, not their bosses to make. Bosses don't have to take birth control, and they don't have to pay for it - and thanks to the Federal court ruling, they can't decide whether the women who work for them are able to have birth control covered by their insurance like any other prescription."
The Missouri version of the law required insurers to issue policies without contraception coverage if individuals or employers assert that the use of birth control violates their "moral, ethical or religious beliefs."
According to the Associated Press, the law "which appeared to be the first in the nation to directly rebut the Obama administration's contraception policy," was previously vetoed by Democratic governor Jay Nixon until the state's Republican-led Legislature overrode the veto last September to enact the law.
_____________________
A federal judge has overturned a Missouri law which exempted employers from mandatory birth control coverage.
Citing a provision in the US constitution which declares that federal laws take precedence over contradictory state laws, US district judge Audrey Fleissig ruled the exemption unlawful because it conflicts with an Affordable Care Act requirement that insurers cover contraception at no additional cost to women.
Though the ruling was dated Thursday of last week, it was not made public until Monday.
"This is a victory for Missouri women and their families," said Peter Brownlie, President of Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri in a statement. "This ruling ensures that all Missouri women--no matter who their boss is--have access to basic preventive health care without a co-pay, including birth control. This is a decision for women, not their bosses to make. Bosses don't have to take birth control, and they don't have to pay for it - and thanks to the Federal court ruling, they can't decide whether the women who work for them are able to have birth control covered by their insurance like any other prescription."
The Missouri version of the law required insurers to issue policies without contraception coverage if individuals or employers assert that the use of birth control violates their "moral, ethical or religious beliefs."
According to the Associated Press, the law "which appeared to be the first in the nation to directly rebut the Obama administration's contraception policy," was previously vetoed by Democratic governor Jay Nixon until the state's Republican-led Legislature overrode the veto last September to enact the law.
_____________________