SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Re-Calculated Results in Pennsylvania Show Charter Schools Fail Their Own Hype
The nationwide push for privatization of education through corporate-backed charter schools received a rebuke this week after newly calculated data in Pennsylvania showed that such schools are markedly out-performed by their public counterparts.
Both brick-and-mortar charters and online institutions called "cyber charters" came up short in comparisons with traditional public schools.
As the Philadelphia Inquirer reports:
Jan 25, 2013
The nationwide push for privatization of education through corporate-backed charter schools received a rebuke this week after newly calculated data in Pennsylvania showed that such schools are markedly out-performed by their public counterparts.
Both brick-and-mortar charters and online institutions called "cyber charters" came up short in comparisons with traditional public schools.
As the Philadelphia Inquirer reports:
The percentage of Pennsylvania charter schools that met academic benchmarks plummeted after the state Department of Education was forced to recalculate the performance rates.
Under a new and controversial method the department used last fall, 49 percent of 156 charter schools met benchmarks based on student tests scores in 2011-12.
The rate dropped to 28 percent after the department released a recalculation this week. In Philadelphia, the percentage of the 80 charter schools that met the standards declined from 54 percent to 29 percent.
None of the 12 cyber charter schools that provide online in-home instruction to students statewide met the benchmarks. Previously, one met the standard.
As the state's association of school boards said in a statement, its members "had expressed concerns that [the earlier calculations were an] attempt to artificially inflate the number of charter schools regarded as making annual yearly progress (AYP)"--a key measure of a school's success in this age of high-stakes testing and amid mantras of "accountability."
In addition, the group suggested, the attempt may have been an effort "to mask deficiencies in charter schools," but that charter school advocates repeated insistence that charter schools are the solution to education reform should mean that "academic achievement issues" should be critical considerations in the charter school renewal process.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The nationwide push for privatization of education through corporate-backed charter schools received a rebuke this week after newly calculated data in Pennsylvania showed that such schools are markedly out-performed by their public counterparts.
Both brick-and-mortar charters and online institutions called "cyber charters" came up short in comparisons with traditional public schools.
As the Philadelphia Inquirer reports:
The percentage of Pennsylvania charter schools that met academic benchmarks plummeted after the state Department of Education was forced to recalculate the performance rates.
Under a new and controversial method the department used last fall, 49 percent of 156 charter schools met benchmarks based on student tests scores in 2011-12.
The rate dropped to 28 percent after the department released a recalculation this week. In Philadelphia, the percentage of the 80 charter schools that met the standards declined from 54 percent to 29 percent.
None of the 12 cyber charter schools that provide online in-home instruction to students statewide met the benchmarks. Previously, one met the standard.
As the state's association of school boards said in a statement, its members "had expressed concerns that [the earlier calculations were an] attempt to artificially inflate the number of charter schools regarded as making annual yearly progress (AYP)"--a key measure of a school's success in this age of high-stakes testing and amid mantras of "accountability."
In addition, the group suggested, the attempt may have been an effort "to mask deficiencies in charter schools," but that charter school advocates repeated insistence that charter schools are the solution to education reform should mean that "academic achievement issues" should be critical considerations in the charter school renewal process.
The nationwide push for privatization of education through corporate-backed charter schools received a rebuke this week after newly calculated data in Pennsylvania showed that such schools are markedly out-performed by their public counterparts.
Both brick-and-mortar charters and online institutions called "cyber charters" came up short in comparisons with traditional public schools.
As the Philadelphia Inquirer reports:
The percentage of Pennsylvania charter schools that met academic benchmarks plummeted after the state Department of Education was forced to recalculate the performance rates.
Under a new and controversial method the department used last fall, 49 percent of 156 charter schools met benchmarks based on student tests scores in 2011-12.
The rate dropped to 28 percent after the department released a recalculation this week. In Philadelphia, the percentage of the 80 charter schools that met the standards declined from 54 percent to 29 percent.
None of the 12 cyber charter schools that provide online in-home instruction to students statewide met the benchmarks. Previously, one met the standard.
As the state's association of school boards said in a statement, its members "had expressed concerns that [the earlier calculations were an] attempt to artificially inflate the number of charter schools regarded as making annual yearly progress (AYP)"--a key measure of a school's success in this age of high-stakes testing and amid mantras of "accountability."
In addition, the group suggested, the attempt may have been an effort "to mask deficiencies in charter schools," but that charter school advocates repeated insistence that charter schools are the solution to education reform should mean that "academic achievement issues" should be critical considerations in the charter school renewal process.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy