

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Confirming the alarm raised by consumer advocates and financial watchdog groups when signed into law, a new report finds that Obama's JOBS Act has done little but 'undermine market transparency' and further perpetuate an environment of secrecy in our financial system.
In April, when President Obama signed the "Jumpstart Our Business Startups" bill, Barbara Roper of the Consumer Federation of America warned, "This legislation will unleash a new wave of damaging investment fraud, undermine market transparency, and increase the cost of capital for the small companies it purports to benefit."
A scant eight months later, James Temple at the San Francisco Chronicle reports on new research by accounting firm Ernst & Young that exposes how the Act's disclosure loopholes are readily being taken advantage of by new IPO registrants.
The JOBS Act effectively reduced the amount of information companies have to provide to the Securities and Exchange Commission about historic finances and executive compensation, and allows companies to file to go public without disclosing that fact until they are promoting the stock to institutional investors.
"In effect," the Chronicle reports, "it means the press and potential investors have less time to comb through financial information, as well as less information to examine."
Of those 57 firms that filed in 2012 and qualified as "emerging growth companies" by posting less than $1 billion in annual revenue, the report found "54 percent took advantage of the ability to file confidentially; 39 percent elected to hand over only two years or less of audited financial data, rather than the customary three; and 77 percent provided compensation information for only three or fewer executives, down from the usual five."
"Has the JOBS Act helped? No," said Kathleen Shelton Smith, principal at IPO research firm Renaissance Capital. She added:
Rebuilding public confidence in these markets requires more, not fewer, disclosures.
Among other things, the SEC should require real-time disclosures on things like insider sales as well as insight into the major parties moving the market, particularly in the early hours of an IPO.
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Confirming the alarm raised by consumer advocates and financial watchdog groups when signed into law, a new report finds that Obama's JOBS Act has done little but 'undermine market transparency' and further perpetuate an environment of secrecy in our financial system.
In April, when President Obama signed the "Jumpstart Our Business Startups" bill, Barbara Roper of the Consumer Federation of America warned, "This legislation will unleash a new wave of damaging investment fraud, undermine market transparency, and increase the cost of capital for the small companies it purports to benefit."
A scant eight months later, James Temple at the San Francisco Chronicle reports on new research by accounting firm Ernst & Young that exposes how the Act's disclosure loopholes are readily being taken advantage of by new IPO registrants.
The JOBS Act effectively reduced the amount of information companies have to provide to the Securities and Exchange Commission about historic finances and executive compensation, and allows companies to file to go public without disclosing that fact until they are promoting the stock to institutional investors.
"In effect," the Chronicle reports, "it means the press and potential investors have less time to comb through financial information, as well as less information to examine."
Of those 57 firms that filed in 2012 and qualified as "emerging growth companies" by posting less than $1 billion in annual revenue, the report found "54 percent took advantage of the ability to file confidentially; 39 percent elected to hand over only two years or less of audited financial data, rather than the customary three; and 77 percent provided compensation information for only three or fewer executives, down from the usual five."
"Has the JOBS Act helped? No," said Kathleen Shelton Smith, principal at IPO research firm Renaissance Capital. She added:
Rebuilding public confidence in these markets requires more, not fewer, disclosures.
Among other things, the SEC should require real-time disclosures on things like insider sales as well as insight into the major parties moving the market, particularly in the early hours of an IPO.
_____________________
Confirming the alarm raised by consumer advocates and financial watchdog groups when signed into law, a new report finds that Obama's JOBS Act has done little but 'undermine market transparency' and further perpetuate an environment of secrecy in our financial system.
In April, when President Obama signed the "Jumpstart Our Business Startups" bill, Barbara Roper of the Consumer Federation of America warned, "This legislation will unleash a new wave of damaging investment fraud, undermine market transparency, and increase the cost of capital for the small companies it purports to benefit."
A scant eight months later, James Temple at the San Francisco Chronicle reports on new research by accounting firm Ernst & Young that exposes how the Act's disclosure loopholes are readily being taken advantage of by new IPO registrants.
The JOBS Act effectively reduced the amount of information companies have to provide to the Securities and Exchange Commission about historic finances and executive compensation, and allows companies to file to go public without disclosing that fact until they are promoting the stock to institutional investors.
"In effect," the Chronicle reports, "it means the press and potential investors have less time to comb through financial information, as well as less information to examine."
Of those 57 firms that filed in 2012 and qualified as "emerging growth companies" by posting less than $1 billion in annual revenue, the report found "54 percent took advantage of the ability to file confidentially; 39 percent elected to hand over only two years or less of audited financial data, rather than the customary three; and 77 percent provided compensation information for only three or fewer executives, down from the usual five."
"Has the JOBS Act helped? No," said Kathleen Shelton Smith, principal at IPO research firm Renaissance Capital. She added:
Rebuilding public confidence in these markets requires more, not fewer, disclosures.
Among other things, the SEC should require real-time disclosures on things like insider sales as well as insight into the major parties moving the market, particularly in the early hours of an IPO.
_____________________