Department of Energy awards nuclear grant to design firm behind Three Mile Island. (Photo by joelsp via Flickr)
Nov 21, 2012
The Energy Department awarded a grant on Tuesday to Babcock & Wilcox--best known for its design of Three Mile Island--for a class of small nuclear reactors.
The North Carolina-based company will receive an unspecified portion of a $452 million Department of Energy grant that aims to speed commercialization of modular nuclear reactors.
"The Obama administration continues to believe that low-carbon nuclear energy has an important role to play in America's energy future," said Energy Secretary Steven Chu in a statement Tuesday.
Modular reactors, about one-third the size of a conventional nuclear power plant, are designed to be less expensive--and supposedly safer--than existing plants.
"The newest reactor is always the greatest thing since sliced bread," said Arjun Makhijani, president of the nonprofit Institute for Energy and Environmental Research in Maryland. "We've always been told that nuclear reactors are economical." He adds:
I simply do not believe that reactors properly designed with adequate safety systems would be cheaper than large reactors. You have to worry about if there are leaks. You have to worry about containment.
What will be the cost of guarding these reactors? All these things are being said about the safety and attractiveness of these reactors without a single one having gone through licensing with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Anti-nuclear activist Harvey Wasserman writes that the "small modular nukes must still be fought," adding that "the numbers on this imperfect technology do not work without massive taxpayer subsidies or public liability insurance."
The Obama administration is promoting their development as part of an "all-of-the-above" approach to American energy production.
After a "cooperative agreement" is reached with B&W, the DOE will use remaining program funds to finance other reactor designs.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Energy Department awarded a grant on Tuesday to Babcock & Wilcox--best known for its design of Three Mile Island--for a class of small nuclear reactors.
The North Carolina-based company will receive an unspecified portion of a $452 million Department of Energy grant that aims to speed commercialization of modular nuclear reactors.
"The Obama administration continues to believe that low-carbon nuclear energy has an important role to play in America's energy future," said Energy Secretary Steven Chu in a statement Tuesday.
Modular reactors, about one-third the size of a conventional nuclear power plant, are designed to be less expensive--and supposedly safer--than existing plants.
"The newest reactor is always the greatest thing since sliced bread," said Arjun Makhijani, president of the nonprofit Institute for Energy and Environmental Research in Maryland. "We've always been told that nuclear reactors are economical." He adds:
I simply do not believe that reactors properly designed with adequate safety systems would be cheaper than large reactors. You have to worry about if there are leaks. You have to worry about containment.
What will be the cost of guarding these reactors? All these things are being said about the safety and attractiveness of these reactors without a single one having gone through licensing with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Anti-nuclear activist Harvey Wasserman writes that the "small modular nukes must still be fought," adding that "the numbers on this imperfect technology do not work without massive taxpayer subsidies or public liability insurance."
The Obama administration is promoting their development as part of an "all-of-the-above" approach to American energy production.
After a "cooperative agreement" is reached with B&W, the DOE will use remaining program funds to finance other reactor designs.
The Energy Department awarded a grant on Tuesday to Babcock & Wilcox--best known for its design of Three Mile Island--for a class of small nuclear reactors.
The North Carolina-based company will receive an unspecified portion of a $452 million Department of Energy grant that aims to speed commercialization of modular nuclear reactors.
"The Obama administration continues to believe that low-carbon nuclear energy has an important role to play in America's energy future," said Energy Secretary Steven Chu in a statement Tuesday.
Modular reactors, about one-third the size of a conventional nuclear power plant, are designed to be less expensive--and supposedly safer--than existing plants.
"The newest reactor is always the greatest thing since sliced bread," said Arjun Makhijani, president of the nonprofit Institute for Energy and Environmental Research in Maryland. "We've always been told that nuclear reactors are economical." He adds:
I simply do not believe that reactors properly designed with adequate safety systems would be cheaper than large reactors. You have to worry about if there are leaks. You have to worry about containment.
What will be the cost of guarding these reactors? All these things are being said about the safety and attractiveness of these reactors without a single one having gone through licensing with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Anti-nuclear activist Harvey Wasserman writes that the "small modular nukes must still be fought," adding that "the numbers on this imperfect technology do not work without massive taxpayer subsidies or public liability insurance."
The Obama administration is promoting their development as part of an "all-of-the-above" approach to American energy production.
After a "cooperative agreement" is reached with B&W, the DOE will use remaining program funds to finance other reactor designs.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.