SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Fossil Fuel Industry Trumps Climate Change in Public Land Sell-Off for Oil Shale, Tar Sands
Bureau of Land Management opens over 800,000 acres for oil shale and tar sands development in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming
Nov 13, 2012
An Obama administration plan to open over 800,000 acres of public land for oil shale and tar sands development in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming is another sign of the fossil fuel industry's reign of control trumping environmental and climate change concerns, say environmental groups.
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announced on Friday its new proposal based on changes made to 2008 Bush administration land allocation decisions that were challenged by environmental groups over environmental, water and habitat concerns.
While the amended proposal allows for less than the 2 million acres under the Bush plan, it's still disastrous, says Taylor McKinnon, public lands campaigns director with the Center for Biological Diversity.
"Today's plan isn't as bad as the Bush administration's, but it makes clear that the Department of the Interior is still listening to the fossil fuel industry and its politicians more than climate scientists," stated McKinnon.
With both oil shale drilling and tar sands production set to pollute and destroy public lands and habitat, the plan turns a blind eye to climate change, adds McKinnon.
"Oil shale and tar sands development would be ruinous for the Colorado River basin and for the struggle to curb the greenhouse emissions that are causing climate change," said McKinnon. "The BLM should have chosen a plan that avoided those impacts by simply prohibiting those forms of development on public lands."
"In the face of global warming, a drying West and Frankenstorms like Hurricane Sandy, devoting public lands to dirty, high-carbon development is very destructive public policy," added McKinnon.
Utah Tar Sands Resistance also sees the climate folly in the decision, saying they are
convinced that the BLM decision to surrender roughly 830,000 acres of remote wild lands to tar sands and oil shale exploitation must be reversed to preserve human life on this planet. Tar sands and oil shale development proposed by the BLM will perpetuate climate change with extreme carbon emissions and poison the water supply of millions of people. We invite people to join our resistance actions in Utah next spring.
The acquisition of the environmentally sensitive areas for fossil fuel exploitation may amount to a Faustian bargain, said Kate Zimmerman, the National Wildlife Federation public lands policy director.
"We need to understand fully the trade-offs we are making before we seal the deal to commit a thousand square miles of public land to this risky business,'' said Zimmerman. "If we don't, good air and water quality, fish and wildlife values could be lost forever."
Before the proposal is final there is a 30-day protest period and 60-day period for review by the affected governors.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
An Obama administration plan to open over 800,000 acres of public land for oil shale and tar sands development in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming is another sign of the fossil fuel industry's reign of control trumping environmental and climate change concerns, say environmental groups.
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announced on Friday its new proposal based on changes made to 2008 Bush administration land allocation decisions that were challenged by environmental groups over environmental, water and habitat concerns.
While the amended proposal allows for less than the 2 million acres under the Bush plan, it's still disastrous, says Taylor McKinnon, public lands campaigns director with the Center for Biological Diversity.
"Today's plan isn't as bad as the Bush administration's, but it makes clear that the Department of the Interior is still listening to the fossil fuel industry and its politicians more than climate scientists," stated McKinnon.
With both oil shale drilling and tar sands production set to pollute and destroy public lands and habitat, the plan turns a blind eye to climate change, adds McKinnon.
"Oil shale and tar sands development would be ruinous for the Colorado River basin and for the struggle to curb the greenhouse emissions that are causing climate change," said McKinnon. "The BLM should have chosen a plan that avoided those impacts by simply prohibiting those forms of development on public lands."
"In the face of global warming, a drying West and Frankenstorms like Hurricane Sandy, devoting public lands to dirty, high-carbon development is very destructive public policy," added McKinnon.
Utah Tar Sands Resistance also sees the climate folly in the decision, saying they are
convinced that the BLM decision to surrender roughly 830,000 acres of remote wild lands to tar sands and oil shale exploitation must be reversed to preserve human life on this planet. Tar sands and oil shale development proposed by the BLM will perpetuate climate change with extreme carbon emissions and poison the water supply of millions of people. We invite people to join our resistance actions in Utah next spring.
The acquisition of the environmentally sensitive areas for fossil fuel exploitation may amount to a Faustian bargain, said Kate Zimmerman, the National Wildlife Federation public lands policy director.
"We need to understand fully the trade-offs we are making before we seal the deal to commit a thousand square miles of public land to this risky business,'' said Zimmerman. "If we don't, good air and water quality, fish and wildlife values could be lost forever."
Before the proposal is final there is a 30-day protest period and 60-day period for review by the affected governors.
An Obama administration plan to open over 800,000 acres of public land for oil shale and tar sands development in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming is another sign of the fossil fuel industry's reign of control trumping environmental and climate change concerns, say environmental groups.
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announced on Friday its new proposal based on changes made to 2008 Bush administration land allocation decisions that were challenged by environmental groups over environmental, water and habitat concerns.
While the amended proposal allows for less than the 2 million acres under the Bush plan, it's still disastrous, says Taylor McKinnon, public lands campaigns director with the Center for Biological Diversity.
"Today's plan isn't as bad as the Bush administration's, but it makes clear that the Department of the Interior is still listening to the fossil fuel industry and its politicians more than climate scientists," stated McKinnon.
With both oil shale drilling and tar sands production set to pollute and destroy public lands and habitat, the plan turns a blind eye to climate change, adds McKinnon.
"Oil shale and tar sands development would be ruinous for the Colorado River basin and for the struggle to curb the greenhouse emissions that are causing climate change," said McKinnon. "The BLM should have chosen a plan that avoided those impacts by simply prohibiting those forms of development on public lands."
"In the face of global warming, a drying West and Frankenstorms like Hurricane Sandy, devoting public lands to dirty, high-carbon development is very destructive public policy," added McKinnon.
Utah Tar Sands Resistance also sees the climate folly in the decision, saying they are
convinced that the BLM decision to surrender roughly 830,000 acres of remote wild lands to tar sands and oil shale exploitation must be reversed to preserve human life on this planet. Tar sands and oil shale development proposed by the BLM will perpetuate climate change with extreme carbon emissions and poison the water supply of millions of people. We invite people to join our resistance actions in Utah next spring.
The acquisition of the environmentally sensitive areas for fossil fuel exploitation may amount to a Faustian bargain, said Kate Zimmerman, the National Wildlife Federation public lands policy director.
"We need to understand fully the trade-offs we are making before we seal the deal to commit a thousand square miles of public land to this risky business,'' said Zimmerman. "If we don't, good air and water quality, fish and wildlife values could be lost forever."
Before the proposal is final there is a 30-day protest period and 60-day period for review by the affected governors.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.