

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney's comments last year that FEMA should be eliminated or, ideally, privatized are gaining renewed attention as the disaster from Hurricane Sandy continues.
In June 2011 answering a question from a CNN correspondent during a Republican debate about whether states should have a bigger role in emergencies, Romney stated: "Every time you have an occasion to take something from the federal government and send it back to the states, that's the right direction. And if you can go even further and send it back to the private sector, that's even better."
On Tuesday Romney ignored repeated questions by reporters regarding his position on FEMA. At the event billed as a "storm relief" effort, the Washington Post reports on Romney's repeated ducking of the question:
"Governor, are you going to see some storm damage?" one reporter asked.
Several others again asked Romney whether he would eliminate FEMA.
"Governor, you've been asked 14 times. Why are you refusing to answer the question?" one asked.
Romney ignored the reporters' queries and continued loading up the truck. Earlier, during the event, he ignored similar queries.
NPR reports on anecdote from the presidential hopeful at the Ohio event that continues his emphasis on the private sector:
On Tuesday in Ohio, Mitt Romney sponsored a canned food drive for storm victims and told a parable about the virtue of individual action. When he was in high school, Romney said, a small group of students managed the big task of cleaning up a trash-strewn football field, after each student was given responsibility for scouring one small section.
"And if everybody cleans their lane, why, we'll be able to get the job done," he said. "And so today we're cleaning one lane, if you will. We're able to gather some goods for some people that are in our lane. We're going to help them."
Under a "Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan administration, FEMA's ability to respond quickly and effectively to natural disasters could be severely inhibited," Mother Jones reporter Tim Murphy wrote in the wake of Hurricane Isaac. Romney may be dodging questions about his FEMA plans, but in August post-Isaac and in these days following Hurricane Sandy, the impacts climate change-fueled natural disasters are getting harder to ignore. Murphy adds:
the GOP ticket's likely cuts to disaster management and weather forecasting budgets would come at a time in which, fueled by climate change, natural disasters are becoming increasingly more potent and expensive. There were 14 billion-dollar disasters in the United States in 2011--the most on record. For the GOP in Tampa, Hurricane Isaac isn't just a nuisance; it's the elephant in the room.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney's comments last year that FEMA should be eliminated or, ideally, privatized are gaining renewed attention as the disaster from Hurricane Sandy continues.
In June 2011 answering a question from a CNN correspondent during a Republican debate about whether states should have a bigger role in emergencies, Romney stated: "Every time you have an occasion to take something from the federal government and send it back to the states, that's the right direction. And if you can go even further and send it back to the private sector, that's even better."
On Tuesday Romney ignored repeated questions by reporters regarding his position on FEMA. At the event billed as a "storm relief" effort, the Washington Post reports on Romney's repeated ducking of the question:
"Governor, are you going to see some storm damage?" one reporter asked.
Several others again asked Romney whether he would eliminate FEMA.
"Governor, you've been asked 14 times. Why are you refusing to answer the question?" one asked.
Romney ignored the reporters' queries and continued loading up the truck. Earlier, during the event, he ignored similar queries.
NPR reports on anecdote from the presidential hopeful at the Ohio event that continues his emphasis on the private sector:
On Tuesday in Ohio, Mitt Romney sponsored a canned food drive for storm victims and told a parable about the virtue of individual action. When he was in high school, Romney said, a small group of students managed the big task of cleaning up a trash-strewn football field, after each student was given responsibility for scouring one small section.
"And if everybody cleans their lane, why, we'll be able to get the job done," he said. "And so today we're cleaning one lane, if you will. We're able to gather some goods for some people that are in our lane. We're going to help them."
Under a "Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan administration, FEMA's ability to respond quickly and effectively to natural disasters could be severely inhibited," Mother Jones reporter Tim Murphy wrote in the wake of Hurricane Isaac. Romney may be dodging questions about his FEMA plans, but in August post-Isaac and in these days following Hurricane Sandy, the impacts climate change-fueled natural disasters are getting harder to ignore. Murphy adds:
the GOP ticket's likely cuts to disaster management and weather forecasting budgets would come at a time in which, fueled by climate change, natural disasters are becoming increasingly more potent and expensive. There were 14 billion-dollar disasters in the United States in 2011--the most on record. For the GOP in Tampa, Hurricane Isaac isn't just a nuisance; it's the elephant in the room.
Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney's comments last year that FEMA should be eliminated or, ideally, privatized are gaining renewed attention as the disaster from Hurricane Sandy continues.
In June 2011 answering a question from a CNN correspondent during a Republican debate about whether states should have a bigger role in emergencies, Romney stated: "Every time you have an occasion to take something from the federal government and send it back to the states, that's the right direction. And if you can go even further and send it back to the private sector, that's even better."
On Tuesday Romney ignored repeated questions by reporters regarding his position on FEMA. At the event billed as a "storm relief" effort, the Washington Post reports on Romney's repeated ducking of the question:
"Governor, are you going to see some storm damage?" one reporter asked.
Several others again asked Romney whether he would eliminate FEMA.
"Governor, you've been asked 14 times. Why are you refusing to answer the question?" one asked.
Romney ignored the reporters' queries and continued loading up the truck. Earlier, during the event, he ignored similar queries.
NPR reports on anecdote from the presidential hopeful at the Ohio event that continues his emphasis on the private sector:
On Tuesday in Ohio, Mitt Romney sponsored a canned food drive for storm victims and told a parable about the virtue of individual action. When he was in high school, Romney said, a small group of students managed the big task of cleaning up a trash-strewn football field, after each student was given responsibility for scouring one small section.
"And if everybody cleans their lane, why, we'll be able to get the job done," he said. "And so today we're cleaning one lane, if you will. We're able to gather some goods for some people that are in our lane. We're going to help them."
Under a "Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan administration, FEMA's ability to respond quickly and effectively to natural disasters could be severely inhibited," Mother Jones reporter Tim Murphy wrote in the wake of Hurricane Isaac. Romney may be dodging questions about his FEMA plans, but in August post-Isaac and in these days following Hurricane Sandy, the impacts climate change-fueled natural disasters are getting harder to ignore. Murphy adds:
the GOP ticket's likely cuts to disaster management and weather forecasting budgets would come at a time in which, fueled by climate change, natural disasters are becoming increasingly more potent and expensive. There were 14 billion-dollar disasters in the United States in 2011--the most on record. For the GOP in Tampa, Hurricane Isaac isn't just a nuisance; it's the elephant in the room.