

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
An oil slick three miles long and three football fields wide that was discovered in the Gulf of Mexico last month has been traced back to the BP Deepwater Horizon oil disaster of 2010, the Coast Guard said Wednesday night.
The reason for the appearance of the new slick, which is currently about 50 miles off the Louisiana coast, was still unknown.
BP and Coast Guard officials said the slick could be residual oil from the Deepwater Horizon wreckage; oil debris left on the seabed from the original spill; or oil emanating from bent piping still on the sea floor.
However, Ian MacDonald, a professor of oceanography at Florida State University and a spill expert, said that the presence of the slick could mean that oil is till leaking from BP's Macondo well, the site of the blowout. "The jury is out here," he said, adding that it was too early "to rule out that this is oil freshly released from the reservoir.
"No one's 100 percent as to where it's coming from," said Frank Csulak, scientific support coordinator for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
As of Wednesday, there was no plan of action for determining the immediate source. The Coast Guard told the involved companies, BP and Transocean, to come up with a plan but added that the slick "does not pose a risk to the shoreline."
Recently, "tar balls" that had been washing up on the beaches of Alabama en masse in the wake of Hurricane Isaac were also traced back to the same spill, which poured 4.9 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, killed 11 workers and did untold damage to the ecosystem.
BP is currently haggling with the US Department of Justice over the amount of fines BP will face for the spill, ranging from $5 billion to $25 billion; however, either result will not likely resolve all civil and criminal damages and liabilities arising from the disaster or result in jail time for any of BP's senior management.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
An oil slick three miles long and three football fields wide that was discovered in the Gulf of Mexico last month has been traced back to the BP Deepwater Horizon oil disaster of 2010, the Coast Guard said Wednesday night.
The reason for the appearance of the new slick, which is currently about 50 miles off the Louisiana coast, was still unknown.
BP and Coast Guard officials said the slick could be residual oil from the Deepwater Horizon wreckage; oil debris left on the seabed from the original spill; or oil emanating from bent piping still on the sea floor.
However, Ian MacDonald, a professor of oceanography at Florida State University and a spill expert, said that the presence of the slick could mean that oil is till leaking from BP's Macondo well, the site of the blowout. "The jury is out here," he said, adding that it was too early "to rule out that this is oil freshly released from the reservoir.
"No one's 100 percent as to where it's coming from," said Frank Csulak, scientific support coordinator for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
As of Wednesday, there was no plan of action for determining the immediate source. The Coast Guard told the involved companies, BP and Transocean, to come up with a plan but added that the slick "does not pose a risk to the shoreline."
Recently, "tar balls" that had been washing up on the beaches of Alabama en masse in the wake of Hurricane Isaac were also traced back to the same spill, which poured 4.9 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, killed 11 workers and did untold damage to the ecosystem.
BP is currently haggling with the US Department of Justice over the amount of fines BP will face for the spill, ranging from $5 billion to $25 billion; however, either result will not likely resolve all civil and criminal damages and liabilities arising from the disaster or result in jail time for any of BP's senior management.
An oil slick three miles long and three football fields wide that was discovered in the Gulf of Mexico last month has been traced back to the BP Deepwater Horizon oil disaster of 2010, the Coast Guard said Wednesday night.
The reason for the appearance of the new slick, which is currently about 50 miles off the Louisiana coast, was still unknown.
BP and Coast Guard officials said the slick could be residual oil from the Deepwater Horizon wreckage; oil debris left on the seabed from the original spill; or oil emanating from bent piping still on the sea floor.
However, Ian MacDonald, a professor of oceanography at Florida State University and a spill expert, said that the presence of the slick could mean that oil is till leaking from BP's Macondo well, the site of the blowout. "The jury is out here," he said, adding that it was too early "to rule out that this is oil freshly released from the reservoir.
"No one's 100 percent as to where it's coming from," said Frank Csulak, scientific support coordinator for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
As of Wednesday, there was no plan of action for determining the immediate source. The Coast Guard told the involved companies, BP and Transocean, to come up with a plan but added that the slick "does not pose a risk to the shoreline."
Recently, "tar balls" that had been washing up on the beaches of Alabama en masse in the wake of Hurricane Isaac were also traced back to the same spill, which poured 4.9 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, killed 11 workers and did untold damage to the ecosystem.
BP is currently haggling with the US Department of Justice over the amount of fines BP will face for the spill, ranging from $5 billion to $25 billion; however, either result will not likely resolve all civil and criminal damages and liabilities arising from the disaster or result in jail time for any of BP's senior management.