

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Taxing the world's wealthiest individuals and placing a global tax on carbon emissions are just a couple of the ways that the world can achieve economic stability, adapt to out of control climate change, and improve prosperity for millions of people, according to a new UN survey.
The report, which cites the repeated failure of the world's wealthiest nations to fulfill development commitments and a nearly $167 billion shortfall in 2011 for projects designed to help the world's poor and most vulnerable, recommends a new regiment of revenue-generating programs including a carbon tax, a currency transaction tax and a billionaires tax to fill the widening gap.
Taken together, the UN estimates such programs could raise as much as $400 billion annually to aid the poor, fight climate change and help meet the Millennium Development Goals.
"We are suggesting various ways to tap resources through international mechanisms, such as coordinated taxes on carbon emissions, air traffic and financial and currency transactions," said Robert Vos, Director of the Development and Analysis Division in the Department of Economic and Social Affairs and lead author of World Economic and Social Survey 2012, which is subtitled "In Search of New Development Finance (pdf)".
While donors must still meet their commitments, new resources must be found, Vos stressed, and innovative mechanisms must be explored. Such taxes also make economic sense, the report argues, as they help stimulate green growth and mitigate financial market instability. "In short, such new financing mechanisms will help donor countries overcome their record of broken promises to their own benefit and the world at large," he said.
Responding to questions about the feasibility of a global carbon tax, Vos said some European countries, in addition to Australia and Canada, had already introduced it and most economists agreed that it was probably the best way to influence consumer behavior and reduce the use of fossil fuels.
The report recognizes, and Vos reinterated, that a global tax on billionaires would be difficult to achieve politically, especially in the United States. But, the report says, "The 'average' billionaire would own $3.7 billion after paying the tax. If that billionaire spent $1,000 per day, it would take him or her over 10,000 years to spend all his or her wealth."
There world is home to at least 1,225 billionaires from 58 countries, according to Forbes magazine. The United States alone is home to more than 400 of them.
In order to reach the $400 billion mark, the report suggest the following mechanisms:
# # #
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Taxing the world's wealthiest individuals and placing a global tax on carbon emissions are just a couple of the ways that the world can achieve economic stability, adapt to out of control climate change, and improve prosperity for millions of people, according to a new UN survey.
The report, which cites the repeated failure of the world's wealthiest nations to fulfill development commitments and a nearly $167 billion shortfall in 2011 for projects designed to help the world's poor and most vulnerable, recommends a new regiment of revenue-generating programs including a carbon tax, a currency transaction tax and a billionaires tax to fill the widening gap.
Taken together, the UN estimates such programs could raise as much as $400 billion annually to aid the poor, fight climate change and help meet the Millennium Development Goals.
"We are suggesting various ways to tap resources through international mechanisms, such as coordinated taxes on carbon emissions, air traffic and financial and currency transactions," said Robert Vos, Director of the Development and Analysis Division in the Department of Economic and Social Affairs and lead author of World Economic and Social Survey 2012, which is subtitled "In Search of New Development Finance (pdf)".
While donors must still meet their commitments, new resources must be found, Vos stressed, and innovative mechanisms must be explored. Such taxes also make economic sense, the report argues, as they help stimulate green growth and mitigate financial market instability. "In short, such new financing mechanisms will help donor countries overcome their record of broken promises to their own benefit and the world at large," he said.
Responding to questions about the feasibility of a global carbon tax, Vos said some European countries, in addition to Australia and Canada, had already introduced it and most economists agreed that it was probably the best way to influence consumer behavior and reduce the use of fossil fuels.
The report recognizes, and Vos reinterated, that a global tax on billionaires would be difficult to achieve politically, especially in the United States. But, the report says, "The 'average' billionaire would own $3.7 billion after paying the tax. If that billionaire spent $1,000 per day, it would take him or her over 10,000 years to spend all his or her wealth."
There world is home to at least 1,225 billionaires from 58 countries, according to Forbes magazine. The United States alone is home to more than 400 of them.
In order to reach the $400 billion mark, the report suggest the following mechanisms:
# # #
Taxing the world's wealthiest individuals and placing a global tax on carbon emissions are just a couple of the ways that the world can achieve economic stability, adapt to out of control climate change, and improve prosperity for millions of people, according to a new UN survey.
The report, which cites the repeated failure of the world's wealthiest nations to fulfill development commitments and a nearly $167 billion shortfall in 2011 for projects designed to help the world's poor and most vulnerable, recommends a new regiment of revenue-generating programs including a carbon tax, a currency transaction tax and a billionaires tax to fill the widening gap.
Taken together, the UN estimates such programs could raise as much as $400 billion annually to aid the poor, fight climate change and help meet the Millennium Development Goals.
"We are suggesting various ways to tap resources through international mechanisms, such as coordinated taxes on carbon emissions, air traffic and financial and currency transactions," said Robert Vos, Director of the Development and Analysis Division in the Department of Economic and Social Affairs and lead author of World Economic and Social Survey 2012, which is subtitled "In Search of New Development Finance (pdf)".
While donors must still meet their commitments, new resources must be found, Vos stressed, and innovative mechanisms must be explored. Such taxes also make economic sense, the report argues, as they help stimulate green growth and mitigate financial market instability. "In short, such new financing mechanisms will help donor countries overcome their record of broken promises to their own benefit and the world at large," he said.
Responding to questions about the feasibility of a global carbon tax, Vos said some European countries, in addition to Australia and Canada, had already introduced it and most economists agreed that it was probably the best way to influence consumer behavior and reduce the use of fossil fuels.
The report recognizes, and Vos reinterated, that a global tax on billionaires would be difficult to achieve politically, especially in the United States. But, the report says, "The 'average' billionaire would own $3.7 billion after paying the tax. If that billionaire spent $1,000 per day, it would take him or her over 10,000 years to spend all his or her wealth."
There world is home to at least 1,225 billionaires from 58 countries, according to Forbes magazine. The United States alone is home to more than 400 of them.
In order to reach the $400 billion mark, the report suggest the following mechanisms:
# # #