SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A gay marriage supporter at last year's San Francisco pride parade. (Photograph: Susana Bates/Reuters)
Calif. Judge Declares Federal 'Defense of Marriage Act' Unconstitutional
May 26, 2012
A federal judge in California this week, ruling in favor of a lawsuit brought by state workers who sued the public-employee pension system for its refusal to cover same-sex couples, declared the Defense of Marriage Act (or DOMA) to be unconstitutional and an assault on the equal protections clause.
US District Judge Claudia Wilken said there was no evidence that the federally mandated DOMA provision was "rationally related to a legitimate government interest."
Wilken went on to say that gays and lesbians are constitutionally protected from "burdensome legislation that is the product of sheer antigay animus and devoid of any legitimate governmental purpose."
* * *
Silicon Valley Mercury News: Judge Strikes Down Defense of Marriage Act Provision in CalPERS Case
Wilken issued her ruling in a lawsuit filed against the California Public Employees' Retirement System, known as CalPERS, by same-sex couples. The system has refused to let gay spouses enroll in its federally approved insurance program on the ground that they were excluded by DOMA.
Wilken said the DOMA ban violated the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of equal treatment. She wrote that there was no proof the DOMA provision was "rationally related to a legitimate government interest."
Thursday's decision makes Wilken the second trial judge in the U.S. District Court for Northern California to strike down that section of the 1996 law.
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White of San Francisco issued a similar ruling in February in a lawsuit filed by Karen Golinski, a federal appeals court staff attorney who wants to enroll her wife in the court's employee health plan.
* * *
The San Francisco Chronicle: 2nd Federal judge overturns law
Wilken's ruling is noteworthy because more than 2,600 state employees have sought long-term insurance for their domestic partners, in addition to 328 employees seeking the same coverage for their same-sex spouses, said attorney Elizabeth Kristen of the Legal Aid Society's Employment Law Center in San Francisco.
"It's a huge validation of civil rights for gay and lesbian Californians," she said.
# # #
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A federal judge in California this week, ruling in favor of a lawsuit brought by state workers who sued the public-employee pension system for its refusal to cover same-sex couples, declared the Defense of Marriage Act (or DOMA) to be unconstitutional and an assault on the equal protections clause.
US District Judge Claudia Wilken said there was no evidence that the federally mandated DOMA provision was "rationally related to a legitimate government interest."
Wilken went on to say that gays and lesbians are constitutionally protected from "burdensome legislation that is the product of sheer antigay animus and devoid of any legitimate governmental purpose."
* * *
Silicon Valley Mercury News: Judge Strikes Down Defense of Marriage Act Provision in CalPERS Case
Wilken issued her ruling in a lawsuit filed against the California Public Employees' Retirement System, known as CalPERS, by same-sex couples. The system has refused to let gay spouses enroll in its federally approved insurance program on the ground that they were excluded by DOMA.
Wilken said the DOMA ban violated the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of equal treatment. She wrote that there was no proof the DOMA provision was "rationally related to a legitimate government interest."
Thursday's decision makes Wilken the second trial judge in the U.S. District Court for Northern California to strike down that section of the 1996 law.
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White of San Francisco issued a similar ruling in February in a lawsuit filed by Karen Golinski, a federal appeals court staff attorney who wants to enroll her wife in the court's employee health plan.
* * *
The San Francisco Chronicle: 2nd Federal judge overturns law
Wilken's ruling is noteworthy because more than 2,600 state employees have sought long-term insurance for their domestic partners, in addition to 328 employees seeking the same coverage for their same-sex spouses, said attorney Elizabeth Kristen of the Legal Aid Society's Employment Law Center in San Francisco.
"It's a huge validation of civil rights for gay and lesbian Californians," she said.
# # #
A federal judge in California this week, ruling in favor of a lawsuit brought by state workers who sued the public-employee pension system for its refusal to cover same-sex couples, declared the Defense of Marriage Act (or DOMA) to be unconstitutional and an assault on the equal protections clause.
US District Judge Claudia Wilken said there was no evidence that the federally mandated DOMA provision was "rationally related to a legitimate government interest."
Wilken went on to say that gays and lesbians are constitutionally protected from "burdensome legislation that is the product of sheer antigay animus and devoid of any legitimate governmental purpose."
* * *
Silicon Valley Mercury News: Judge Strikes Down Defense of Marriage Act Provision in CalPERS Case
Wilken issued her ruling in a lawsuit filed against the California Public Employees' Retirement System, known as CalPERS, by same-sex couples. The system has refused to let gay spouses enroll in its federally approved insurance program on the ground that they were excluded by DOMA.
Wilken said the DOMA ban violated the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of equal treatment. She wrote that there was no proof the DOMA provision was "rationally related to a legitimate government interest."
Thursday's decision makes Wilken the second trial judge in the U.S. District Court for Northern California to strike down that section of the 1996 law.
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White of San Francisco issued a similar ruling in February in a lawsuit filed by Karen Golinski, a federal appeals court staff attorney who wants to enroll her wife in the court's employee health plan.
* * *
The San Francisco Chronicle: 2nd Federal judge overturns law
Wilken's ruling is noteworthy because more than 2,600 state employees have sought long-term insurance for their domestic partners, in addition to 328 employees seeking the same coverage for their same-sex spouses, said attorney Elizabeth Kristen of the Legal Aid Society's Employment Law Center in San Francisco.
"It's a huge validation of civil rights for gay and lesbian Californians," she said.
# # #
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.