SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
America's military yesterday began accepting openly gay recruits into
its ranks for the first time in its history as the controversial "don't
ask, don't tell" policy suffered another serious blow.
The move
comes after California judge Virginia Phillips ruled last week that the
policy - which had previously seen openly gay soldiers kicked out of the
US armed services - was illegal, and ordered a global injunction to
halt it.
Though the Obama administration
is seeking to appeal against that legal decision, the Pentagon has now
told its recruiters across the country to accept applications from
openly gay men and women.
However, the situation remains dogged by uncertainty. Some gay rights
activists have warned that gay applicants should still not reveal their
sexuality for fear that the policy may be reinstated if the
government's appeal is successful. At the same time, the Pentagon advice
to military recruiters directs them not to inquire of a person's
sexuality, and not to disqualify any candidates who openly admit to
being gay. It also adds that any such recruits should be warned that
"don't ask, don't tell" could come back into force if the legal
injunction quashing it is overturned.
"If they were to self-admit
that they are gay and want to enlist, we will process them for
enlistment, but will tell them that the legal situation could change,"
Douglas Smith, spokesman for US army recruiting command based at Fort
Knox in Kentucky, told the Associated Press.
Getting rid of "don't
ask, don't tell" has long been one of the main aims of gay rights
groups in America, who argue that it is highly discriminatory in a way
that would not be tolerated of any other social group. But it has now
become a political headache for the Obama administration.
The
president has frequently publicly committed himself to ditching the ban,
but has stated he wants it to be removed by a vote in Congress, not by
the actions of a judge. As such, the department of justice has committed
itself to appealing against the injunction halting the policy in the
hope of getting rid of it later with a political vote.
Many
Republicans, including former presidential candidate John McCain, have
spoken out in favour of keeping the ban. Previous attempts to ditch it
with a congressional vote have failed and Obama's political influence on
such a controversial subject is waning as Democrats gear up for a
potentially devastating defeat in November's midterm elections.
That
has left gay groups arguing that the best option to get rid of an
unjust practice is simply not to appeal against Phillips's ruling, which
the judge herself reinforced yesterday by refusing a government legal
request to delay enforcement of her injunction. That was met by further
delight among gay rights organisations.
"[We] applaud Justice
Phillips for her leadership helping end such a discriminatory policy,"
said a statement from the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation.
The
uncertain status of the law has caused much confusion within an
institution that has historically discriminated against gay people.
Before the 1993 law, the military banned them and declared them
incompatible with military service.
There have been instances in which gays have served, with the knowledge of their colleagues.
Twenty-nine
nations, including Israel, Canada, Germany and Sweden, allow openly gay
troops, according to the Log Cabin Republicans, a gay rights group and
plaintiff in the lawsuit before Phillips.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
America's military yesterday began accepting openly gay recruits into
its ranks for the first time in its history as the controversial "don't
ask, don't tell" policy suffered another serious blow.
The move
comes after California judge Virginia Phillips ruled last week that the
policy - which had previously seen openly gay soldiers kicked out of the
US armed services - was illegal, and ordered a global injunction to
halt it.
Though the Obama administration
is seeking to appeal against that legal decision, the Pentagon has now
told its recruiters across the country to accept applications from
openly gay men and women.
However, the situation remains dogged by uncertainty. Some gay rights
activists have warned that gay applicants should still not reveal their
sexuality for fear that the policy may be reinstated if the
government's appeal is successful. At the same time, the Pentagon advice
to military recruiters directs them not to inquire of a person's
sexuality, and not to disqualify any candidates who openly admit to
being gay. It also adds that any such recruits should be warned that
"don't ask, don't tell" could come back into force if the legal
injunction quashing it is overturned.
"If they were to self-admit
that they are gay and want to enlist, we will process them for
enlistment, but will tell them that the legal situation could change,"
Douglas Smith, spokesman for US army recruiting command based at Fort
Knox in Kentucky, told the Associated Press.
Getting rid of "don't
ask, don't tell" has long been one of the main aims of gay rights
groups in America, who argue that it is highly discriminatory in a way
that would not be tolerated of any other social group. But it has now
become a political headache for the Obama administration.
The
president has frequently publicly committed himself to ditching the ban,
but has stated he wants it to be removed by a vote in Congress, not by
the actions of a judge. As such, the department of justice has committed
itself to appealing against the injunction halting the policy in the
hope of getting rid of it later with a political vote.
Many
Republicans, including former presidential candidate John McCain, have
spoken out in favour of keeping the ban. Previous attempts to ditch it
with a congressional vote have failed and Obama's political influence on
such a controversial subject is waning as Democrats gear up for a
potentially devastating defeat in November's midterm elections.
That
has left gay groups arguing that the best option to get rid of an
unjust practice is simply not to appeal against Phillips's ruling, which
the judge herself reinforced yesterday by refusing a government legal
request to delay enforcement of her injunction. That was met by further
delight among gay rights organisations.
"[We] applaud Justice
Phillips for her leadership helping end such a discriminatory policy,"
said a statement from the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation.
The
uncertain status of the law has caused much confusion within an
institution that has historically discriminated against gay people.
Before the 1993 law, the military banned them and declared them
incompatible with military service.
There have been instances in which gays have served, with the knowledge of their colleagues.
Twenty-nine
nations, including Israel, Canada, Germany and Sweden, allow openly gay
troops, according to the Log Cabin Republicans, a gay rights group and
plaintiff in the lawsuit before Phillips.
America's military yesterday began accepting openly gay recruits into
its ranks for the first time in its history as the controversial "don't
ask, don't tell" policy suffered another serious blow.
The move
comes after California judge Virginia Phillips ruled last week that the
policy - which had previously seen openly gay soldiers kicked out of the
US armed services - was illegal, and ordered a global injunction to
halt it.
Though the Obama administration
is seeking to appeal against that legal decision, the Pentagon has now
told its recruiters across the country to accept applications from
openly gay men and women.
However, the situation remains dogged by uncertainty. Some gay rights
activists have warned that gay applicants should still not reveal their
sexuality for fear that the policy may be reinstated if the
government's appeal is successful. At the same time, the Pentagon advice
to military recruiters directs them not to inquire of a person's
sexuality, and not to disqualify any candidates who openly admit to
being gay. It also adds that any such recruits should be warned that
"don't ask, don't tell" could come back into force if the legal
injunction quashing it is overturned.
"If they were to self-admit
that they are gay and want to enlist, we will process them for
enlistment, but will tell them that the legal situation could change,"
Douglas Smith, spokesman for US army recruiting command based at Fort
Knox in Kentucky, told the Associated Press.
Getting rid of "don't
ask, don't tell" has long been one of the main aims of gay rights
groups in America, who argue that it is highly discriminatory in a way
that would not be tolerated of any other social group. But it has now
become a political headache for the Obama administration.
The
president has frequently publicly committed himself to ditching the ban,
but has stated he wants it to be removed by a vote in Congress, not by
the actions of a judge. As such, the department of justice has committed
itself to appealing against the injunction halting the policy in the
hope of getting rid of it later with a political vote.
Many
Republicans, including former presidential candidate John McCain, have
spoken out in favour of keeping the ban. Previous attempts to ditch it
with a congressional vote have failed and Obama's political influence on
such a controversial subject is waning as Democrats gear up for a
potentially devastating defeat in November's midterm elections.
That
has left gay groups arguing that the best option to get rid of an
unjust practice is simply not to appeal against Phillips's ruling, which
the judge herself reinforced yesterday by refusing a government legal
request to delay enforcement of her injunction. That was met by further
delight among gay rights organisations.
"[We] applaud Justice
Phillips for her leadership helping end such a discriminatory policy,"
said a statement from the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation.
The
uncertain status of the law has caused much confusion within an
institution that has historically discriminated against gay people.
Before the 1993 law, the military banned them and declared them
incompatible with military service.
There have been instances in which gays have served, with the knowledge of their colleagues.
Twenty-nine
nations, including Israel, Canada, Germany and Sweden, allow openly gay
troops, according to the Log Cabin Republicans, a gay rights group and
plaintiff in the lawsuit before Phillips.