To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
An aerial view of the downstream area of the Bakun hydroelectric dam project in Sarawak on the Balui River. Nearly 80% of the world's rivers are so badly affected by humanity's footprint that the water security of almost 5 billion people, and the survival of thousands of aquatic species, are threatened, scientists warned today.
(AFP/HO/File/Sarawak Hidro)
Nearly 80% of the world's rivers are so badly affected by humanity's footprint that the water security of almost 5 billion people, and the survival of thousands of aquatic species, are threatened, scientists warned today.
The global study put together by institutions across the globe is the first to simultaneously look at all types of human intervention - from dams and reservoirs to irrigation and pollution - on freshwater. It paints a devastating picture of a world whose rivers are in serious decline. While developing countries are suffering from threats to both water security and biodiversity - particularly in Africa and central Asia - the authors said they were surprised by the level of threat posed to wildlife in rich countries.
"What made our jaws drop is that some of the highest threat levels in the world are in the United States and Europe," says Prof Peter McIntyre, one of the lead authors, who began work on the project as a Smith Fellow at the University of Michigan. "Americans tend to think water pollution problems are pretty well under control, but we still face enormous challenges." Some of the worst threats to aquatic species in the US are in the south-eastern states, including the Mississippi river.
Prof Charles Vorosmarty of the City University of New York, lead author and an expert on global water, said the impact on wildlife in developed countries was the result of river systems that had been heavily engineered and altered by man.
"With all the protection the EU has in place for waterways, it was surprising to see it was a hotspot for biodiversity loss. But for a long time Europeans have altered their landscapes, including the removal of 90% of wetlands and floodplains, which are crucial parts of river ecosystems," he said.
Published in the journal Nature today, the international team behind the report looked at datasets to produce a map of how 23 different human influences - such as dams, the introduction of alien non-native fish and pollution - affect water security and biodiversity. Previous studies have tended to look at just one influence at a time.
Even the world's great rivers, such as the Yangtze, the Nile and the Ganges, are suffering serious biodiversity and water security stress, the map shows. Despite their size, more than 30 of the 47 largest rivers showed at least moderate threats to water security, due to a range of human impacts such as pollution and extracting water for irrigation.
Even the Amazon, which is considered to be relatively pristine, still has human fingerprints on it, said Vorosmarty. "While the Amazon is in generally good shape, in the upstream regions such as Peru, there are many high density areas of people that inject threat into the system. The legacy of that human threat passes downstream into the remote forested areas of the river."
Globally, between 10,000 and 20,000 aquatic wildlife species are at risk or face extinction because of the human degradation of global rivers, the report said.
The world's least affected rivers, the authors found, were those furthest from populated areas, such as remote parts of the tropics, Siberia and elsewhere in the polar regions.
Vorosmarty said he hopes the report highlights the need to address the root causes of the degradation of rivers. "We're spending trillions of US dollars to fix a problem we've created in the first place. It's much cheaper to treat the causes rather than the symptoms, which is what we do in the developed world today," he said.
In the UK, rivers have been getting cleaner over the past decade. But a report by the UK's Environment Agency last year admitted only five of 6,114 rivers in England and Wales are considered pristine and three-quarters were so polluted they are likely to fail new European quality standards.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Nearly 80% of the world's rivers are so badly affected by humanity's footprint that the water security of almost 5 billion people, and the survival of thousands of aquatic species, are threatened, scientists warned today.
The global study put together by institutions across the globe is the first to simultaneously look at all types of human intervention - from dams and reservoirs to irrigation and pollution - on freshwater. It paints a devastating picture of a world whose rivers are in serious decline. While developing countries are suffering from threats to both water security and biodiversity - particularly in Africa and central Asia - the authors said they were surprised by the level of threat posed to wildlife in rich countries.
"What made our jaws drop is that some of the highest threat levels in the world are in the United States and Europe," says Prof Peter McIntyre, one of the lead authors, who began work on the project as a Smith Fellow at the University of Michigan. "Americans tend to think water pollution problems are pretty well under control, but we still face enormous challenges." Some of the worst threats to aquatic species in the US are in the south-eastern states, including the Mississippi river.
Prof Charles Vorosmarty of the City University of New York, lead author and an expert on global water, said the impact on wildlife in developed countries was the result of river systems that had been heavily engineered and altered by man.
"With all the protection the EU has in place for waterways, it was surprising to see it was a hotspot for biodiversity loss. But for a long time Europeans have altered their landscapes, including the removal of 90% of wetlands and floodplains, which are crucial parts of river ecosystems," he said.
Published in the journal Nature today, the international team behind the report looked at datasets to produce a map of how 23 different human influences - such as dams, the introduction of alien non-native fish and pollution - affect water security and biodiversity. Previous studies have tended to look at just one influence at a time.
Even the world's great rivers, such as the Yangtze, the Nile and the Ganges, are suffering serious biodiversity and water security stress, the map shows. Despite their size, more than 30 of the 47 largest rivers showed at least moderate threats to water security, due to a range of human impacts such as pollution and extracting water for irrigation.
Even the Amazon, which is considered to be relatively pristine, still has human fingerprints on it, said Vorosmarty. "While the Amazon is in generally good shape, in the upstream regions such as Peru, there are many high density areas of people that inject threat into the system. The legacy of that human threat passes downstream into the remote forested areas of the river."
Globally, between 10,000 and 20,000 aquatic wildlife species are at risk or face extinction because of the human degradation of global rivers, the report said.
The world's least affected rivers, the authors found, were those furthest from populated areas, such as remote parts of the tropics, Siberia and elsewhere in the polar regions.
Vorosmarty said he hopes the report highlights the need to address the root causes of the degradation of rivers. "We're spending trillions of US dollars to fix a problem we've created in the first place. It's much cheaper to treat the causes rather than the symptoms, which is what we do in the developed world today," he said.
In the UK, rivers have been getting cleaner over the past decade. But a report by the UK's Environment Agency last year admitted only five of 6,114 rivers in England and Wales are considered pristine and three-quarters were so polluted they are likely to fail new European quality standards.
Nearly 80% of the world's rivers are so badly affected by humanity's footprint that the water security of almost 5 billion people, and the survival of thousands of aquatic species, are threatened, scientists warned today.
The global study put together by institutions across the globe is the first to simultaneously look at all types of human intervention - from dams and reservoirs to irrigation and pollution - on freshwater. It paints a devastating picture of a world whose rivers are in serious decline. While developing countries are suffering from threats to both water security and biodiversity - particularly in Africa and central Asia - the authors said they were surprised by the level of threat posed to wildlife in rich countries.
"What made our jaws drop is that some of the highest threat levels in the world are in the United States and Europe," says Prof Peter McIntyre, one of the lead authors, who began work on the project as a Smith Fellow at the University of Michigan. "Americans tend to think water pollution problems are pretty well under control, but we still face enormous challenges." Some of the worst threats to aquatic species in the US are in the south-eastern states, including the Mississippi river.
Prof Charles Vorosmarty of the City University of New York, lead author and an expert on global water, said the impact on wildlife in developed countries was the result of river systems that had been heavily engineered and altered by man.
"With all the protection the EU has in place for waterways, it was surprising to see it was a hotspot for biodiversity loss. But for a long time Europeans have altered their landscapes, including the removal of 90% of wetlands and floodplains, which are crucial parts of river ecosystems," he said.
Published in the journal Nature today, the international team behind the report looked at datasets to produce a map of how 23 different human influences - such as dams, the introduction of alien non-native fish and pollution - affect water security and biodiversity. Previous studies have tended to look at just one influence at a time.
Even the world's great rivers, such as the Yangtze, the Nile and the Ganges, are suffering serious biodiversity and water security stress, the map shows. Despite their size, more than 30 of the 47 largest rivers showed at least moderate threats to water security, due to a range of human impacts such as pollution and extracting water for irrigation.
Even the Amazon, which is considered to be relatively pristine, still has human fingerprints on it, said Vorosmarty. "While the Amazon is in generally good shape, in the upstream regions such as Peru, there are many high density areas of people that inject threat into the system. The legacy of that human threat passes downstream into the remote forested areas of the river."
Globally, between 10,000 and 20,000 aquatic wildlife species are at risk or face extinction because of the human degradation of global rivers, the report said.
The world's least affected rivers, the authors found, were those furthest from populated areas, such as remote parts of the tropics, Siberia and elsewhere in the polar regions.
Vorosmarty said he hopes the report highlights the need to address the root causes of the degradation of rivers. "We're spending trillions of US dollars to fix a problem we've created in the first place. It's much cheaper to treat the causes rather than the symptoms, which is what we do in the developed world today," he said.
In the UK, rivers have been getting cleaner over the past decade. But a report by the UK's Environment Agency last year admitted only five of 6,114 rivers in England and Wales are considered pristine and three-quarters were so polluted they are likely to fail new European quality standards.