SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
HCAN on WellPoint: 'Murder By Spreadsheet'
Apr 22, 2010
Using some of the strongest language I've ever seen from this group,
Health Care for America Now basically charged WellPoint with murder
today, responding to the Murray Waas article
showing that the insurance giant systematically dropped breast cancer
patients from the rolls. HCAN spokesman Avram Goldstein released this
statement, intimating that criminal prosecutions should be pursued in
this case:
"WellPoint is committing murder by
spreadsheet, and it has to stop now. This is a matter of life and
death, and the executives and board members of WellPoint need to be
held to account to the fullest extent of the law."WellPoint's Blue Cross-Blue Shield companies' disregard for human
life to maximize profits is immoral and outrageous. The Reuters report
shows an unconscionable pattern of denying needed health care to line
the pockets of wealthy executives and shareholders."Today's disclosure provides more evidence of why Congress needed to
pass national health reform in the first place, and it also shows why
we need to curb the extraordinary influence of insurance companies so
they don't interfere with enforcement of the new law. We need the
forthcoming federal regulations to shine a light on the insurance
companies and hold them accountable for their bad practices."
Actually, what we needed is for groups like HCAN to ensure during
the debate that practices like this would truly get outlawed by the
Affordable Care Act. In actuality, insurance companies, led by
WellPoint, lobbied for changes to the restrictions on their business
and a de-fanging of the law. Much like in the current financial reform
debate, they ended up leaving a lot of the regulatory authority
open-ended and at the discretion of regulators, in this case the Health
and Human Services Secretary and the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners. Jon Walker laid out how WellPoint successfully removed independent third-party review of all rescission cases.
Reuters reports that WellPoint is under
federal investigation for singling out breast cancer patients and
dropping their coverage "based on either erroneous or flimsy
information." They also report that language in the House bill would
have protected these women, but it was removed in the Senate version of
the bill because "lobbyists for WellPoint and other top insurance
companies successfully fought proposed provisions of the legislation."Max Baucus, head of the Senate Finance Committee, credits former
WellPoint VP Liz Fowler with writing the "blueuprint" of the bill, and
her name appears as "author" on the bill PDF released by the committee
[...]As you can see, the Senate bill does not mandate either independent
third party review or the continuation of coverage while the review is
taking place. Theoretically it's possible for the Secretary of HHS to
require a similar independent third party review framework for
rescission, but unlike the House bill, the Senate bill which ultimately
passed does not require her to do so - something WellPoint actively
lobbied for.
The White House might argue that rescission is a thing of the past
because the law guarantees issue of health insurance, and with risk
adjustment insurers will have an incentive to even pick up sick
patients. However, in reality the risk adjustment mechanism is far
smaller than the liability of sick patients, and insurers will
undoubtedly work hard to avoid as many patients with pre-existing
conditions as possible.
We now have a whodunit, where we have to ask who in the Senate
pushed to eliminate the toughest regulatory restrictions from insurance
companies who obviously have no compunction against systematically
denying coverage to breast cancer patients. Obviously Liz Fowler, the
former WellPoint VP, is a good place to start. So far, nobody privy to
those discussions has been willing to say on the record that Fowler is
culpable. But the insurance industry, already hated in the country, has
now committed what even cautious groups like HCAN call murder. Covering
for the culprit here is tantamount to being an accessory to the crime.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Using some of the strongest language I've ever seen from this group,
Health Care for America Now basically charged WellPoint with murder
today, responding to the Murray Waas article
showing that the insurance giant systematically dropped breast cancer
patients from the rolls. HCAN spokesman Avram Goldstein released this
statement, intimating that criminal prosecutions should be pursued in
this case:
"WellPoint is committing murder by
spreadsheet, and it has to stop now. This is a matter of life and
death, and the executives and board members of WellPoint need to be
held to account to the fullest extent of the law."WellPoint's Blue Cross-Blue Shield companies' disregard for human
life to maximize profits is immoral and outrageous. The Reuters report
shows an unconscionable pattern of denying needed health care to line
the pockets of wealthy executives and shareholders."Today's disclosure provides more evidence of why Congress needed to
pass national health reform in the first place, and it also shows why
we need to curb the extraordinary influence of insurance companies so
they don't interfere with enforcement of the new law. We need the
forthcoming federal regulations to shine a light on the insurance
companies and hold them accountable for their bad practices."
Actually, what we needed is for groups like HCAN to ensure during
the debate that practices like this would truly get outlawed by the
Affordable Care Act. In actuality, insurance companies, led by
WellPoint, lobbied for changes to the restrictions on their business
and a de-fanging of the law. Much like in the current financial reform
debate, they ended up leaving a lot of the regulatory authority
open-ended and at the discretion of regulators, in this case the Health
and Human Services Secretary and the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners. Jon Walker laid out how WellPoint successfully removed independent third-party review of all rescission cases.
Reuters reports that WellPoint is under
federal investigation for singling out breast cancer patients and
dropping their coverage "based on either erroneous or flimsy
information." They also report that language in the House bill would
have protected these women, but it was removed in the Senate version of
the bill because "lobbyists for WellPoint and other top insurance
companies successfully fought proposed provisions of the legislation."Max Baucus, head of the Senate Finance Committee, credits former
WellPoint VP Liz Fowler with writing the "blueuprint" of the bill, and
her name appears as "author" on the bill PDF released by the committee
[...]As you can see, the Senate bill does not mandate either independent
third party review or the continuation of coverage while the review is
taking place. Theoretically it's possible for the Secretary of HHS to
require a similar independent third party review framework for
rescission, but unlike the House bill, the Senate bill which ultimately
passed does not require her to do so - something WellPoint actively
lobbied for.
The White House might argue that rescission is a thing of the past
because the law guarantees issue of health insurance, and with risk
adjustment insurers will have an incentive to even pick up sick
patients. However, in reality the risk adjustment mechanism is far
smaller than the liability of sick patients, and insurers will
undoubtedly work hard to avoid as many patients with pre-existing
conditions as possible.
We now have a whodunit, where we have to ask who in the Senate
pushed to eliminate the toughest regulatory restrictions from insurance
companies who obviously have no compunction against systematically
denying coverage to breast cancer patients. Obviously Liz Fowler, the
former WellPoint VP, is a good place to start. So far, nobody privy to
those discussions has been willing to say on the record that Fowler is
culpable. But the insurance industry, already hated in the country, has
now committed what even cautious groups like HCAN call murder. Covering
for the culprit here is tantamount to being an accessory to the crime.
Using some of the strongest language I've ever seen from this group,
Health Care for America Now basically charged WellPoint with murder
today, responding to the Murray Waas article
showing that the insurance giant systematically dropped breast cancer
patients from the rolls. HCAN spokesman Avram Goldstein released this
statement, intimating that criminal prosecutions should be pursued in
this case:
"WellPoint is committing murder by
spreadsheet, and it has to stop now. This is a matter of life and
death, and the executives and board members of WellPoint need to be
held to account to the fullest extent of the law."WellPoint's Blue Cross-Blue Shield companies' disregard for human
life to maximize profits is immoral and outrageous. The Reuters report
shows an unconscionable pattern of denying needed health care to line
the pockets of wealthy executives and shareholders."Today's disclosure provides more evidence of why Congress needed to
pass national health reform in the first place, and it also shows why
we need to curb the extraordinary influence of insurance companies so
they don't interfere with enforcement of the new law. We need the
forthcoming federal regulations to shine a light on the insurance
companies and hold them accountable for their bad practices."
Actually, what we needed is for groups like HCAN to ensure during
the debate that practices like this would truly get outlawed by the
Affordable Care Act. In actuality, insurance companies, led by
WellPoint, lobbied for changes to the restrictions on their business
and a de-fanging of the law. Much like in the current financial reform
debate, they ended up leaving a lot of the regulatory authority
open-ended and at the discretion of regulators, in this case the Health
and Human Services Secretary and the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners. Jon Walker laid out how WellPoint successfully removed independent third-party review of all rescission cases.
Reuters reports that WellPoint is under
federal investigation for singling out breast cancer patients and
dropping their coverage "based on either erroneous or flimsy
information." They also report that language in the House bill would
have protected these women, but it was removed in the Senate version of
the bill because "lobbyists for WellPoint and other top insurance
companies successfully fought proposed provisions of the legislation."Max Baucus, head of the Senate Finance Committee, credits former
WellPoint VP Liz Fowler with writing the "blueuprint" of the bill, and
her name appears as "author" on the bill PDF released by the committee
[...]As you can see, the Senate bill does not mandate either independent
third party review or the continuation of coverage while the review is
taking place. Theoretically it's possible for the Secretary of HHS to
require a similar independent third party review framework for
rescission, but unlike the House bill, the Senate bill which ultimately
passed does not require her to do so - something WellPoint actively
lobbied for.
The White House might argue that rescission is a thing of the past
because the law guarantees issue of health insurance, and with risk
adjustment insurers will have an incentive to even pick up sick
patients. However, in reality the risk adjustment mechanism is far
smaller than the liability of sick patients, and insurers will
undoubtedly work hard to avoid as many patients with pre-existing
conditions as possible.
We now have a whodunit, where we have to ask who in the Senate
pushed to eliminate the toughest regulatory restrictions from insurance
companies who obviously have no compunction against systematically
denying coverage to breast cancer patients. Obviously Liz Fowler, the
former WellPoint VP, is a good place to start. So far, nobody privy to
those discussions has been willing to say on the record that Fowler is
culpable. But the insurance industry, already hated in the country, has
now committed what even cautious groups like HCAN call murder. Covering
for the culprit here is tantamount to being an accessory to the crime.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.