Water shortage will cause greater ruin than peak oil. (Photograph: Pedro Armestre/AFP/Getty Images)
Apr 14, 2009
Almost nine out of 10 climate scientists do not believe political
efforts to restrict global warming to 2C will succeed, a Guardian poll
reveals today. An average rise of 4-5C by the end of this century is
more likely, they say, given soaring carbon emissions and political
constraints.
Such a change would disrupt food and water supplies,
exterminate thousands of species of plants and animals and trigger
massive sea level rises that would swamp the homes of hundreds of
millions of people.
The poll of those who follow global warming
most closely exposes a widening gulf between political rhetoric and
scientific opinions on climate change.
While policymakers and campaigners focus on the 2C target, 86% of the
experts told the survey they did not think it would be achieved. A
continued focus on an unrealistic 2C rise, which the EU defines as
dangerous, could even undermine essential efforts to adapt to
inevitable higher temperature rises in the coming decades, they warned.
The
survey follows a scientific conference last month in Copenhagen, where
a series of studies were presented that suggested global warming could
strike harder and faster than realised.
The Guardian contacted
all 1,756 people who registered to attend the conference and asked for
their opinions on the likely course of global warming. Of 261 experts
who responded, 200 were researchers in climate science and related
fields. The rest were drawn from industry or worked in areas such as
economics and social and political science.
The 261 respondents
represented 26 countries and included dozens of senior figures,
including laboratory directors, heads of university departments and
authors of the 2007 report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
The
poll asked the experts whether the 2C target could still be achieved,
and whether they thought that it would be met: 60% of respondents
argued that, in theory, it was still technically and economically
possible to meet the target, which represents an average global warming
of 2C since the industrial revolution. The world has already warmed by
about 0.8C since then, and another 0.5C or so is inevitable over coming
decades given past greenhouse gas emissions. But 39% said the 2C target
was impossible.
The poll comes as UN negotiations to agree a new
global treaty to regulate carbon pollution gather pace in advance of a
key meeting in Copenhagen in December. Officials will try to agree a
successor to the Kyoto protocol, the first phase of which expires in
2012. The 2C target is unlikely to feature in a new treaty, but most of
the carbon cuts proposed for rich countries are based on it. Bob
Watson, chief scientist to Defra, told the Guardian last year that the
world needed to focus on the 2C target, but should also prepare for a
possible 4C rise.
Asked what temperature rise was most likely, 84
of the 182 specialists (46%) who answered the question said it would
reach 3-4C by the end of the century; 47 (26%) suggested a rise of
2-3C, while a handful said 6C or more. While 24 experts predicted a
catastrophic rise of 4-5C, just 18 thought it would stay at 2C or under.
Some
of those surveyed who said the 2C target would be met confessed they
did so more out of hope rather than belief. "As a mother of young
children I choose to believe this, and work hard toward it," one said.
"This
optimism is not primarily due to scientific facts, but to hope," said
another. Some said they thought geoengineering measures, such as
seeding the ocean with iron to encourage plankton growth, would help
meet the target.
Many of the experts stressed that an inability
to hit the 2C target did not mean that efforts to tackle global warming
should be abandoned, but that the emphasis is now on damage limitation.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Almost nine out of 10 climate scientists do not believe political
efforts to restrict global warming to 2C will succeed, a Guardian poll
reveals today. An average rise of 4-5C by the end of this century is
more likely, they say, given soaring carbon emissions and political
constraints.
Such a change would disrupt food and water supplies,
exterminate thousands of species of plants and animals and trigger
massive sea level rises that would swamp the homes of hundreds of
millions of people.
The poll of those who follow global warming
most closely exposes a widening gulf between political rhetoric and
scientific opinions on climate change.
While policymakers and campaigners focus on the 2C target, 86% of the
experts told the survey they did not think it would be achieved. A
continued focus on an unrealistic 2C rise, which the EU defines as
dangerous, could even undermine essential efforts to adapt to
inevitable higher temperature rises in the coming decades, they warned.
The
survey follows a scientific conference last month in Copenhagen, where
a series of studies were presented that suggested global warming could
strike harder and faster than realised.
The Guardian contacted
all 1,756 people who registered to attend the conference and asked for
their opinions on the likely course of global warming. Of 261 experts
who responded, 200 were researchers in climate science and related
fields. The rest were drawn from industry or worked in areas such as
economics and social and political science.
The 261 respondents
represented 26 countries and included dozens of senior figures,
including laboratory directors, heads of university departments and
authors of the 2007 report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
The
poll asked the experts whether the 2C target could still be achieved,
and whether they thought that it would be met: 60% of respondents
argued that, in theory, it was still technically and economically
possible to meet the target, which represents an average global warming
of 2C since the industrial revolution. The world has already warmed by
about 0.8C since then, and another 0.5C or so is inevitable over coming
decades given past greenhouse gas emissions. But 39% said the 2C target
was impossible.
The poll comes as UN negotiations to agree a new
global treaty to regulate carbon pollution gather pace in advance of a
key meeting in Copenhagen in December. Officials will try to agree a
successor to the Kyoto protocol, the first phase of which expires in
2012. The 2C target is unlikely to feature in a new treaty, but most of
the carbon cuts proposed for rich countries are based on it. Bob
Watson, chief scientist to Defra, told the Guardian last year that the
world needed to focus on the 2C target, but should also prepare for a
possible 4C rise.
Asked what temperature rise was most likely, 84
of the 182 specialists (46%) who answered the question said it would
reach 3-4C by the end of the century; 47 (26%) suggested a rise of
2-3C, while a handful said 6C or more. While 24 experts predicted a
catastrophic rise of 4-5C, just 18 thought it would stay at 2C or under.
Some
of those surveyed who said the 2C target would be met confessed they
did so more out of hope rather than belief. "As a mother of young
children I choose to believe this, and work hard toward it," one said.
"This
optimism is not primarily due to scientific facts, but to hope," said
another. Some said they thought geoengineering measures, such as
seeding the ocean with iron to encourage plankton growth, would help
meet the target.
Many of the experts stressed that an inability
to hit the 2C target did not mean that efforts to tackle global warming
should be abandoned, but that the emphasis is now on damage limitation.
Almost nine out of 10 climate scientists do not believe political
efforts to restrict global warming to 2C will succeed, a Guardian poll
reveals today. An average rise of 4-5C by the end of this century is
more likely, they say, given soaring carbon emissions and political
constraints.
Such a change would disrupt food and water supplies,
exterminate thousands of species of plants and animals and trigger
massive sea level rises that would swamp the homes of hundreds of
millions of people.
The poll of those who follow global warming
most closely exposes a widening gulf between political rhetoric and
scientific opinions on climate change.
While policymakers and campaigners focus on the 2C target, 86% of the
experts told the survey they did not think it would be achieved. A
continued focus on an unrealistic 2C rise, which the EU defines as
dangerous, could even undermine essential efforts to adapt to
inevitable higher temperature rises in the coming decades, they warned.
The
survey follows a scientific conference last month in Copenhagen, where
a series of studies were presented that suggested global warming could
strike harder and faster than realised.
The Guardian contacted
all 1,756 people who registered to attend the conference and asked for
their opinions on the likely course of global warming. Of 261 experts
who responded, 200 were researchers in climate science and related
fields. The rest were drawn from industry or worked in areas such as
economics and social and political science.
The 261 respondents
represented 26 countries and included dozens of senior figures,
including laboratory directors, heads of university departments and
authors of the 2007 report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
The
poll asked the experts whether the 2C target could still be achieved,
and whether they thought that it would be met: 60% of respondents
argued that, in theory, it was still technically and economically
possible to meet the target, which represents an average global warming
of 2C since the industrial revolution. The world has already warmed by
about 0.8C since then, and another 0.5C or so is inevitable over coming
decades given past greenhouse gas emissions. But 39% said the 2C target
was impossible.
The poll comes as UN negotiations to agree a new
global treaty to regulate carbon pollution gather pace in advance of a
key meeting in Copenhagen in December. Officials will try to agree a
successor to the Kyoto protocol, the first phase of which expires in
2012. The 2C target is unlikely to feature in a new treaty, but most of
the carbon cuts proposed for rich countries are based on it. Bob
Watson, chief scientist to Defra, told the Guardian last year that the
world needed to focus on the 2C target, but should also prepare for a
possible 4C rise.
Asked what temperature rise was most likely, 84
of the 182 specialists (46%) who answered the question said it would
reach 3-4C by the end of the century; 47 (26%) suggested a rise of
2-3C, while a handful said 6C or more. While 24 experts predicted a
catastrophic rise of 4-5C, just 18 thought it would stay at 2C or under.
Some
of those surveyed who said the 2C target would be met confessed they
did so more out of hope rather than belief. "As a mother of young
children I choose to believe this, and work hard toward it," one said.
"This
optimism is not primarily due to scientific facts, but to hope," said
another. Some said they thought geoengineering measures, such as
seeding the ocean with iron to encourage plankton growth, would help
meet the target.
Many of the experts stressed that an inability
to hit the 2C target did not mean that efforts to tackle global warming
should be abandoned, but that the emphasis is now on damage limitation.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.