

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The UK government should develop a comprehensive set of standards
covering all aspects of the impact our food has on the environment and
society, according to an influential food policy adviser.
Prof
Tim Lang, who coined the term "food miles" and is an adviser to the
cabinet office, said that consumers are baffled by conflicting advice
about food. He said the government should set up an independent body of
experts to integrate information on all aspects of food's impact,
including how healthy it is, its environmental effects and the social
consequences of the way it is produced.
This could be translated
into easily accessible information on food labels for consumers such as
"food flowers" in which each petal indicates a food's impact in a
different area.
He acknowledged that this would be an extremely
complex task, but said that consumers wanted reliable information. "The
classical approach to this is to let prices and the consumer decide.
But health and environment, justice and equity are all surely
reasonable and decent aspirations," Lang told the British Association Festival of Science in Liverpool, "We need a food system to improve standards across a variety of equally important fronts."
He
hoped that his proposed "omni-standards" would help consumers to
navigate contradictory information. For example, the nutritional
evidence for eating fish is very strong and the government advocates
eating two portions of fish a week. However fish stocks are in crisis
and overfishing is having a significant ecological impact. "Which
evidence do I listen to and shape my behaviour by?" he said.
Similarly,
green beans from Kenya are good for you and if they are Fair Trade they
may help the local economy where they are grown. However, he said each
green bean stem has 4 litres of embedded water and they must be
transported thousands of miles.
Lang said that at present,
scientists and NGOs often focussed on only one part of the problem.
"Actually we are part of the problem. We've got to come together and
start piecing information together," he said.
Communicating the
information to consumers will not be easy, but he said packaging could
have basic data in the form of a graphical representation of a food's
social, health and environmental footprint. More information could be
made available via interactive screens in the supermarket or online.
Lang
acknowledged that the practicalities of putting together a panel of
experts to formulate the standards would be fraught with difficulty.
One issue would be whether NGOs should be included directly.
"If I was off the record and there weren't microphones here I would say something more interesting," he said.
"I
think there are very interesting tensions within government I will say
very tightly - very interesting nuances between the various
departmental chief scientists of their various positions."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The UK government should develop a comprehensive set of standards
covering all aspects of the impact our food has on the environment and
society, according to an influential food policy adviser.
Prof
Tim Lang, who coined the term "food miles" and is an adviser to the
cabinet office, said that consumers are baffled by conflicting advice
about food. He said the government should set up an independent body of
experts to integrate information on all aspects of food's impact,
including how healthy it is, its environmental effects and the social
consequences of the way it is produced.
This could be translated
into easily accessible information on food labels for consumers such as
"food flowers" in which each petal indicates a food's impact in a
different area.
He acknowledged that this would be an extremely
complex task, but said that consumers wanted reliable information. "The
classical approach to this is to let prices and the consumer decide.
But health and environment, justice and equity are all surely
reasonable and decent aspirations," Lang told the British Association Festival of Science in Liverpool, "We need a food system to improve standards across a variety of equally important fronts."
He
hoped that his proposed "omni-standards" would help consumers to
navigate contradictory information. For example, the nutritional
evidence for eating fish is very strong and the government advocates
eating two portions of fish a week. However fish stocks are in crisis
and overfishing is having a significant ecological impact. "Which
evidence do I listen to and shape my behaviour by?" he said.
Similarly,
green beans from Kenya are good for you and if they are Fair Trade they
may help the local economy where they are grown. However, he said each
green bean stem has 4 litres of embedded water and they must be
transported thousands of miles.
Lang said that at present,
scientists and NGOs often focussed on only one part of the problem.
"Actually we are part of the problem. We've got to come together and
start piecing information together," he said.
Communicating the
information to consumers will not be easy, but he said packaging could
have basic data in the form of a graphical representation of a food's
social, health and environmental footprint. More information could be
made available via interactive screens in the supermarket or online.
Lang
acknowledged that the practicalities of putting together a panel of
experts to formulate the standards would be fraught with difficulty.
One issue would be whether NGOs should be included directly.
"If I was off the record and there weren't microphones here I would say something more interesting," he said.
"I
think there are very interesting tensions within government I will say
very tightly - very interesting nuances between the various
departmental chief scientists of their various positions."
The UK government should develop a comprehensive set of standards
covering all aspects of the impact our food has on the environment and
society, according to an influential food policy adviser.
Prof
Tim Lang, who coined the term "food miles" and is an adviser to the
cabinet office, said that consumers are baffled by conflicting advice
about food. He said the government should set up an independent body of
experts to integrate information on all aspects of food's impact,
including how healthy it is, its environmental effects and the social
consequences of the way it is produced.
This could be translated
into easily accessible information on food labels for consumers such as
"food flowers" in which each petal indicates a food's impact in a
different area.
He acknowledged that this would be an extremely
complex task, but said that consumers wanted reliable information. "The
classical approach to this is to let prices and the consumer decide.
But health and environment, justice and equity are all surely
reasonable and decent aspirations," Lang told the British Association Festival of Science in Liverpool, "We need a food system to improve standards across a variety of equally important fronts."
He
hoped that his proposed "omni-standards" would help consumers to
navigate contradictory information. For example, the nutritional
evidence for eating fish is very strong and the government advocates
eating two portions of fish a week. However fish stocks are in crisis
and overfishing is having a significant ecological impact. "Which
evidence do I listen to and shape my behaviour by?" he said.
Similarly,
green beans from Kenya are good for you and if they are Fair Trade they
may help the local economy where they are grown. However, he said each
green bean stem has 4 litres of embedded water and they must be
transported thousands of miles.
Lang said that at present,
scientists and NGOs often focussed on only one part of the problem.
"Actually we are part of the problem. We've got to come together and
start piecing information together," he said.
Communicating the
information to consumers will not be easy, but he said packaging could
have basic data in the form of a graphical representation of a food's
social, health and environmental footprint. More information could be
made available via interactive screens in the supermarket or online.
Lang
acknowledged that the practicalities of putting together a panel of
experts to formulate the standards would be fraught with difficulty.
One issue would be whether NGOs should be included directly.
"If I was off the record and there weren't microphones here I would say something more interesting," he said.
"I
think there are very interesting tensions within government I will say
very tightly - very interesting nuances between the various
departmental chief scientists of their various positions."